RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 135,692
Posts: 5,213,354
Members: 24,207
Currently online: 735
Newest member: Stevie Trek


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Trek Tech

Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 28 2011, 09:53 AM   #1
glock27
Ensign
 
Defiant Deck Plans?

I am desperate for some images of the deck-by-deck blueprints for a Defiant-class starship. I've heard that there were some pretty nice sheets on the strategicpubdesigns.com website, but that site seems to be offline, indefinitely. Can anybody maybe post some designs, please? I would really be incredibly grateful.
glock27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 28 2011, 10:41 AM   #2
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: Defiant Deck Plans?

The official deck plans are in the Deep Space Nine technical manual. You can probably get a copy from Amazon or eBay for barely more than the cost of shipping nowadays.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 28 2011, 10:53 AM   #3
LCARS 24
Commodore
 
Re: Defiant Deck Plans?

What you want is David's Schmidt's deck plans, which are no longer available.

I've got a somewhat rough set of deck plans, which I will be doing up in the style of my other LCARS schematics to include in my LCARS software package, at which point I'll put them on my Web site for anyone to view and copy, as well as at Cygnus. But I haven't put the set together yet.

You can see the style here (the deck plans will have more colors:
http://lcars24.com/schem3.html

They will be set in this outline and labeled in LCARS fonts like my other schematics. I'll probably post them here in TrekTech one deck at a time to get feedback on details.


LCARS 24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 28 2011, 05:08 PM   #4
SonicRanger
Rear Admiral
 
SonicRanger's Avatar
 
Location: Sheffield, England
Re: Defiant Deck Plans?

It'd be helpful, of course, if we knew the size of the Defiant... or how many decks she actually had.
__________________
"STAR TREK is... Action - Adventure - Science Fiction."
-- Gene Roddenberry, 1964, top of the first page of his original pitch and outline for Star Trek
SonicRanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 28 2011, 05:22 PM   #5
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Defiant Deck Plans?

The size is vague, but the deck count is canonically established as 6 turbolift-accessible decks by a more or less readable turbolift Okudagram, or at the very least as 5 decks mentioned in dialogue.

How we choose to insert these decks to the spaceframe is up to us, of course. Perhaps Deck 3 is slightly above Deck 2, and Decks 5 and 6 are at the same level but one is in the portside ventral keel while the other is in the starboard one. FWIW, the turbolift chart assigns standing-height facilities to each deck, unless we assume that the brig on Deck 6 is a lie-down space only...

The presence of a standing-height Deck 5 is well established in at least two episodes, already invalidating the four-deck MSD that we see up close on screen. But the Defiant has plenty of other invalid Okudagrams about - perhaps as the result of her being a hastily cobbled-together prototype that was perhaps torn down and rebuilt to a different shape more than once. Not to mention that she's a top secret weapon yet often hosts assorted alien dignitaries; perhaps bridge displays are deliberately perverted to preserve Starfleet secrets?

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 28 2011, 08:48 PM   #6
Crazy Eddie
Rear Admiral
 
Crazy Eddie's Avatar
 
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
Re: Defiant Deck Plans?

^ I've seen an 8-deck cross section of Defiant that seemed surprisingly reasonable to me. Can't find it now, though.
__________________
The Complete Illustrated Guide to Starfleet - Online Now!
Crazy Eddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 29 2011, 12:40 AM   #7
DEWLine
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Send a message via AIM to DEWLine Send a message via Yahoo to DEWLine
Re: Defiant Deck Plans?

I bought a copy of those Defiant plans before Strategic Design Publications shut down for however long they're going to be off-line. Got what I paid for, too. Consider me a Satisfied Customer, and I hope they get back in the game again soon.
__________________
Yours,

Dwight Williams
Illustrator/Writer
DEWLine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 29 2011, 05:14 AM   #8
SicOne
Commodore
 
Location: Omaha, NE
Re: Defiant Deck Plans?

As far as I can recall the discussions, the 120-meter length of the Defiant was preferred over the 174-meter length. A perusal of past Trek Tech threads will find where that particular war was fought in the forum, with many arguments pro and con.
SicOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 29 2011, 06:46 AM   #9
LCARS 24
Commodore
 
Re: Defiant Deck Plans?

Here's one of the items from the Christie's auction. I notice dual hardare in each nacelle. The Freedom class has the equivalent of two nacelles in one wide nacelle housing, achieving line-of-sight codependence within that space. The figure below seems to show the same sort of setup, countering the argument that the Defiant class violates the light-of-sight rule, giving the Defiant the equivalent of four warp nacelles. None of the deck plans I've seen show this. Either way, I wonder if their not being parallel to direction of flight is an issue. I don't have the DS9 tech manual.

When Jadzia said, "deck five", what she should have said was "deck two, section five," which is what the Jem'Hader elder said to the turbolift computer when taking Captain Sisko to the engine room in DS9: One Little Ship and exactly where Jadzia went after mistakenly saying, "deck five," like "That's one small step for [missing word] man, one giant leap for mankind." Audio glitch or human/Trill error.

If I do deck plans, I don't want to get into more than four decks, other than the walkway in the lowest part of each nacelle that is actually a little below the level of deck four. And I like to stick to overall length of 120 meters, unless you're talking about Empress Sato's Defiant.

LCARS 24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 29 2011, 07:21 AM   #10
glock27
Ensign
 
Re: Defiant Deck Plans?

You're doing some great work there with the schematics, LCARS 24. You da man! Yes, I was talking about the DS9 Defiant, and I, too, subscribe to the '4-deck / 120m' baseline with the subdecks acting like expanded Jefferies' tubes. I eagerly await the prints you come up with! Thanks to all of you guys for your answers!
glock27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 29 2011, 08:00 AM   #11
billcosby
Commodore
 
billcosby's Avatar
 
Location: billcosby
Re: Defiant Deck Plans?

The DS9 Tech Manual plans are beautiful, if you can get a copy of the book you'll be satisfied with them.
__________________
My 1st Edition TrekCCG virtual expansion: http://billcosbytrekccg.blogspot.com/

billcosby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 29 2011, 10:46 AM   #12
Boris Skrbic
Commander
 
Re: Defiant Deck Plans?

Timo wrote: View Post
The size is vague, but the deck count is canonically established as 6 turbolift-accessible decks by a more or less readable turbolift Okudagram, or at the very least as 5 decks mentioned in dialogue.
According to Doug Drexler, in order to avoid the size issue, he had designed the schematic without clear labels or text, which were later added by the "Captain's Chair" people. I'm not sure if the schematic appeared onscreen in modified form, but even if it did, the MSD would have to take precedence because of its sheer number of onscreen appearances: behind Sisko on the bridge, in the engine room, in closeups, and even indirectly in the form of Doug Drexler's DS9TM blueprints. This is especially obvious if we rewatch seasons 3-7 straight through on DVD.

By extension, the size would have to be roughly 120 meters, because the MSD also trumps the few inconsistent occasions where we could measure the Defiant next to other ships of known size.

Timo wrote: View Post
How we choose to insert these decks to the spaceframe is up to us, of course. Perhaps Deck 3 is slightly above Deck 2, and Decks 5 and 6 are at the same level but one is in the portside ventral keel while the other is in the starboard one. FWIW, the turbolift chart assigns standing-height facilities to each deck, unless we assume that the brig on Deck 6 is a lie-down space only...
It's up to Doug Drexler's MSD, mainly in order to avoid contradicting frequent onscreen evidence. The only real question is how Deck 5 fits into the layout; it would be better if it were a standing-height portion of the horizontally broken-up fourth level rather than a crawlspace below, just in case someone were to make further errors.
Boris Skrbic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 29 2011, 11:01 AM   #13
LCARS 24
Commodore
 
Re: Defiant Deck Plans?

The only real deck 5 is about half a deck lower than deck 4, and there is no deck floor above it, because it's located in the lowest portion of each nacelle. It's like being in a slightly lower level in a different building and hardling worth referring to as deck 5. It consists of just one walkway within each nacelle and is used for maintenance purposes. And when someone mentioned deck 5 in dialog, that's not even what they were talking about. Those rare mentions of deck 5 were just errors.

But again, what about the nonparallel orientation of the nacelles? Is that okay?

Last edited by LCARS 24; January 29 2011 at 11:11 AM.
LCARS 24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 29 2011, 12:08 PM   #14
Saquist
Commodore
 
Location: Starbase Houston
Re: Defiant Deck Plans?

SonicRanger wrote: View Post
It'd be helpful, of course, if we knew the size of the Defiant... or how many decks she actually had.

I drew a simple AUTOCAD scalings of the Galaxy, DS9 and Defiant. This is what I found.

a. It's impossible to fit all three vessels at their proper scale as seen on screen.

b. Galaxy would never fit properly in the upper pylons as we frequently see. It would be an extremely tight fit.

c. Defiant is never shown less than 1/10 the station's diameter. It's always around 200 meters.

d. In order for Defiant to fit between those docking latches it has to be larger than 170 meters.


The Variable that really keeps changing is the station's size. Defiant aswell is scaled up to as large as a Miranda class and as small as 100 meter or less like in First Contact.

Okuda's Deck plan is decidedly wrong. In order for the windows on the lower deck and on the deflector housing to be proper the ship must have 6 plus decks. There are also no turbo lifts on his plan.

If his deck plan was to be believed in the LCARS then shuttle is too large to fit through the modified opening where the tractor beam was. The torpedo tubes forward are barely big enough to to a huge size object

If you go by the DS9 Tech Manual the shuttle deck is somewhere in the Nacelles aswell as the aft torpedo launchers aswell not the bottom of the main hull. Nor would 3 people fit to those escape pods.

Clearly a new Deck plan has to be made that actually fits the external layout which is the only consistent feature of the ship.

Last edited by Saquist; January 29 2011 at 01:23 PM.
Saquist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 29 2011, 12:22 PM   #15
Boris Skrbic
Commander
 
Re: Defiant Deck Plans?

No law of physics prevents Deck 5 from being on the same level as Deck 4. The level isn't continuous anyway because of the large open space in the middle. Perhaps the nose section is labeled Deck 5, the port section - Deck 4, the starboard section - Deck 6. Such irregular labeling would also explain how Deck 2 could've been sealed off in "Starship Down" while everyone kept going in the engine room.

The rows of lights near the shuttlepod bays need not be windows, since they haven't been shown as such in the canon. Also, some of the details on Doug Drexler's (not Mike Okuda's) schematic might have to be rethought in light of the remaining canon, but not the core layout. The turbolifts need not have been indicated. We're not clear about the size of the Chaffee (Doug Drexler says 26 feet according to his copy of the LightWave model), but even so, it's only one CG shot. The escape pods might be bigger than indicated on the diagram. The point is to devise a best fit scenario for all the inconsistencies, as opposed to coming up with a six- or eight-level layout which wouldn't stand up to scrutiny even by casual viewers.

I mean, if we were to see a sequel to DS9 (not that the likelihood of that is anywhere above 0.1%), should the Defiant suddenly appear with a six-deck MSD out of nowhere, after four years of a prominent four-deck schematic? It is important to remain consistent with highly-visible evidence, and rethink only the details which appeared on a limited number of occasions.

Last edited by Boris Skrbic; January 29 2011 at 01:14 PM.
Boris Skrbic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.