RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 147,564
Posts: 5,833,936
Members: 26,149
Currently online: 470
Newest member: robert0808

TrekToday headlines

Meaney In Talks For McGuinness Role
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Stewart And Son To Act Together
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Quinto: If I Wasn’t An Actor…
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Star Trek Beyond Update
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Red Shirt Diaries Returns Next Month
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

ISS Astronaut May Join Trek Fan Film
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Quinto Sports New Trek Uniform
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Star Trek: Renegades Released Early
By: T'Bonz on Aug 25

Final Trek To Boldly Go Video Honors Nimoy
By: T'Bonz on Aug 25

Star Trek Timelines Game
By: T'Bonz on Aug 24


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Trek Literature

Trek Literature "...Good words. That's where ideas begin."

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 20 2010, 04:02 AM   #1
UncleRogi
Commander
 
Location: Hanover NH, the catspaw of Atoning Unifex
Crucible:McCoy

McCoy went on with his life, but one thing bothers me: Isnt the Guardian meant to maintain the timeline?
Why was he allowed that alternate life?
We know Kirk and Spock saved the day...
One of my favorites...What if type stuff
__________________
Surprise Me, Holy Void! --Ship, departing Pandora (Frank Herbert)
UncleRogi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 20 2010, 05:09 AM   #2
David R. George III
Writer
 
David R. George III's Avatar
 
Location: California, USA
View David R. George III's Twitter Profile Send a message via AIM to David R. George III Send a message via Yahoo to David R. George III
Re: Crucible:McCoy

^ The playing out of the alternate timeline requires some perspective. In 2266, McCoy travels through the Guardian of Forever and back in time, to Earth in 1930. McCoy then prevents Edith Keeler from dying in a traffic accident that year. Time passes, Edith Keeler helps found a peace movement in the United States, which delays America's entry into World War II. The U.S. does not enter the war in 1941, but does so later. McCoy's life continues, at least for a time. Decades pass, then centuries. Eventually, in 2266, Kirk, Spock, and the rest of the landing party discover that McCoy has somehow changed history, leaving them stranded with the Guardian, evidently protected from their possible nonexistence by their proximity to the strange object.

Kirk and Spock then travel back in time, following McCoy to Earth in 1930. They stop him from saving Keeler's life. The Guardian returns them to their own present, in 2266, where they discover that time has gone forward from 1930 fundamentally just as it had before McCoy changed it.

So, regardless of the "fixing" of the timeline, or the existence of alternate universes supporting differing timelines, it is clear, by virtue of history being changed in 1930, that the altered timeline does or did exist somewhere, somehow. That changed timeline contains or contained McCoy's "alternate" life.
__________________
Regards, David

On Facebook
David R. George III is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 20 2010, 01:03 PM   #3
UncleRogi
Commander
 
Location: Hanover NH, the catspaw of Atoning Unifex
Re: Crucible:McCoy

Thank you, sir.

Somewhere, somehow, folks are happy.
I enjoyed your treatment of Kirk

I tell my friends that if Jim Kirk shows up, do what he says: he's saving the Universe!
__________________
Surprise Me, Holy Void! --Ship, departing Pandora (Frank Herbert)

Last edited by UncleRogi; March 20 2010 at 01:43 PM. Reason: stupid spelling errors
UncleRogi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21 2010, 10:35 PM   #4
Herbert
Captain
 
Herbert's Avatar
 
Re: Crucible:McCoy

^McCoy's presence did change the timeline when the homeless man found McCoy's phaser and accidently annihilated himself. Unless we are to believe that he would have died at the same time, but under different circumstances.

What was important was to restore the timeline so that the United Federation of Planets existed in 2266.

Although Greg Cox had a different vision of the Eugenics War, Khan would already have to be living in the 1960s to lead the Eugenics War in 1996 with the other genetic supermen, or Augments, as they were subsequently called.
Herbert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21 2010, 10:40 PM   #5
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Crucible:McCoy

UncleRogi wrote: View Post
Isnt the Guardian meant to maintain the timeline?
Apparently not, since it invited the crew to make more journeys into history, despite the fact that they'd just screwed it up something awful due to a simple mistake. That's not exactly the way a guardian should behave. It doesn't seem to care what happens to the timeline as long as it's getting used. I think it's lonely. Or maybe just senile.
__________________
Written Worlds -- Christopher L. Bennett's blog and webpage
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21 2010, 10:44 PM   #6
Herbert
Captain
 
Herbert's Avatar
 
Re: Crucible:McCoy

What about the death of "Rodent"? Wasn't the timeline changed by McCoy's arrival even though Edith Keeler died?
Herbert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 22 2010, 12:03 AM   #7
Nerys Myk
Fleet Admiral
 
Nerys Myk's Avatar
 
Location: A boat on a river
Re: Crucible:McCoy

Christopher wrote: View Post
UncleRogi wrote: View Post
Isnt the Guardian meant to maintain the timeline?
Apparently not, since it invited the crew to make more journeys into history, despite the fact that they'd just screwed it up something awful due to a simple mistake. That's not exactly the way a guardian should behave. It doesn't seem to care what happens to the timeline as long as it's getting used. I think it's lonely. Or maybe just senile.
Its more of a Crossing Guard of Forever/
Nerys Myk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 22 2010, 01:56 PM   #8
Therin of Andor
Admiral
 
Therin of Andor's Avatar
 
Location: New Therin Park, Andor (via Australia)
View Therin of Andor's Twitter Profile
Re: Crucible:McCoy

Christopher wrote: View Post
I think it's lonely. Or maybe just senile.
I agree. It also permitted Gray and Aleek-Om to play recent Vulcan history while Spock was in Orion's distant past.
__________________
Thiptho lapth! Ian (Entire post is personal opinion)
The Andor Files @ http://andorfiles.blogspot.com/
http://therinofandor.blogspot.com/
Therin of Andor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 22 2010, 05:54 PM   #9
Herbert
Captain
 
Herbert's Avatar
 
Re: Crucible:McCoy

The "Guardian of Forever" sounds much more important than "Time Vortex of the Ancients"

"Since before you sun burned hot, I have been trying to think of a cool name for myself."

In the first draft of the screenplay, the Guardians of Forever were the nine-foot tall guardians of the Time Vortex of the Ancients. In the second draft, the guardians are gone and the vortex is renamed Guardian of Forever. Although the name sounds cooler, the time vortex doesn't seem to be guarding anything.

In Ellison's first draft, the Guardians mention that death will disrupt the proper flow of time.

I also find it interesting that Bob Justman made the comment that making Edith Keeler an anti-war pacificist was directed at the then anti-Vietnam war movement. Did the writing staff believe in the "Domino Theory" and that the anti-Vietnam war movement would lead to pacificism by the United States and the triumph of communism?

Last edited by Herbert; March 22 2010 at 06:14 PM.
Herbert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 22 2010, 06:19 PM   #10
ronny
Fleet Captain
 
ronny's Avatar
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
View ronny's Twitter Profile
Re: Crucible:McCoy

Herbert wrote: View Post
What about the death of "Rodent"? Wasn't the timeline changed by McCoy's arrival even though Edith Keeler died?
Edith Keeler was an important person in history, Rodent wasn't. The time line was probably altered but in such a trivial way no one noticed.

It's been years since I've read Harlan Ellison's original screen play but if I remember correctly one of the differences was Kirk saw Rodent die, in fact he died saving Kirks life, and in the end is left to wonder why Edith Keeler had to die but Rodent didn't matter.
__________________
If you want people to respect your ideas, get better ideas. - John Scalzi

My Star Trek readathon.
ronny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 22 2010, 06:34 PM   #11
Herbert
Captain
 
Herbert's Avatar
 
Re: Crucible:McCoy

ronny wrote: View Post
Herbert wrote: View Post
What about the death of "Rodent"? Wasn't the timeline changed by McCoy's arrival even though Edith Keeler died?
Edith Keeler was an important person in history, Rodent wasn't. The time line was probably altered but in such a trivial way no one noticed.

It's been years since I've read Harlan Ellison's original screen play but if I remember correctly one of the differences was Kirk saw Rodent die, in fact he died saving Kirks life, and in the end is left to wonder why Edith Keeler had to die but Rodent didn't matter.
I see.
Herbert is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.