RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 143,278
Posts: 5,603,964
Members: 25,412
Currently online: 482
Newest member: bumpey65

TrekToday headlines

Quinto To Guest Star On Crime Show
By: T'Bonz on Mar 5

Star Trek/Doctor Who Parody Comic
By: T'Bonz on Mar 4

Nimoy Commemorative Magazine
By: T'Bonz on Mar 4

Saturday Night Live Trek Skit
By: T'Bonz on Mar 3

Two IDW Publishing Trek Comics Previews
By: T'Bonz on Mar 3

Shatner: Celebrate Life
By: T'Bonz on Mar 3

March-April 2015 Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Mar 2

Shatner Shares Nimoy Memories
By: T'Bonz on Mar 2

Retro Review: When It Rains…
By: Michelle on Feb 27

Nimoy Dead At Eighty-Three
By: T'Bonz on Feb 27


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 16 2010, 09:05 PM   #1
John200
Lieutenant Commander
 
John200's Avatar
 
Location: New Brunswick Canada
Whose morals seemed more natural?

As an example I think the Original Series crew came off as moral people who where not ashamed of making mistakes.

But in some cases the Next Generation crew sometimes came off like they were reading from a Politically Correct handbook.
John200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 16 2010, 09:39 PM   #2
Anwar
Vice Admiral
 
Anwar's Avatar
 
Location: Regina, SK, Canada
Re: Whose morals seemed more natural?

I never really saw a difference between the two, really. Maybe it was because in TOS it was all focused mainly on the trinity and they were more archetypes than real characters, while in TNG we saw the whole crew more.
Anwar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 16 2010, 10:04 PM   #3
The Borgified Corpse
Admiral
 
The Borgified Corpse's Avatar
 
Location: Ouch! Forgotten already? You were just down there 20 minutes ago.
Re: Whose morals seemed more natural?

I would say that the Original cast, particularly Captain Kirk, seemed a lot more confident. Even when faced with very difficult decisions, they at least seemed to take solace in the fact that they were always trying their best. I suppose, if you always give your best effort, you needn't fear failure because any failure will only result from things you were never able to control in the first place.

OTOH, the Next Generation crew seemed more self-conscious, more afraid of making mistakes. Perhaps it's because the stakes for them often felt more removed. Without the constant spectre of Cold War with the Klingons, it rarely felt like anything the crew did or didn't do would really affect anyone that we cared about. Even the ship & crew rarely seemed to be in any real danger because it felt less like a functional military vessel and more like an omnipotent space hotel.
__________________
Kegg: "You're a Trekkie. The capacity to quibble over the minutiae of space opera films is your birthright."
The Borgified Corpse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 17 2010, 12:13 AM   #4
TheQman
Commander
 
TheQman's Avatar
 
Location: Rura Penthe
Re: Whose morals seemed more natural?

TOS was definately more natural and this is comming from a TNG fan.

By TNG they really were probably writing more PC scripts.
__________________
As Uhura once said "the things gotta have a tail pipe!"
TheQman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 18 2010, 06:52 AM   #5
FormerLurker
Fleet Captain
 
Re: Whose morals seemed more natural?

Oh, the TNG scripts were far more PC. Commentary from the characters about sexism, racism, and the like that ostensibly would no longer be of concern. Even the TNG movies got into the act, if but for one of the better jokes in Insurrection.
FormerLurker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 18 2010, 04:22 PM   #6
Admiral Shran
Admiral
 
Location: In the Before Time - the Long, Long Ago
Re: Whose morals seemed more natural?

As someone who prefers TNG over TOS, I have to say that TOS did seem more natural. And, TNG was at times so PC that it was rather off-putting.
__________________
Vote Obomney 2012!
"All governments suffer a recurring problem: power attracts pathological personalities. It's not that power corrupts but that it's magnetic to the corruptible." - Frank Herbert, Dune
Admiral Shran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 20 2010, 09:37 AM   #7
Arpy
Rear Admiral
 
Re: Whose morals seemed more natural?

The world changed - not just Star Trek.

We made a lot of mistakes, recognized them, and now tread more carefully. I think that's a good thing. I think that if we treaded even more so, we wouldn't have gone into Iraq, or let Afghanistan or our economy deteriorate so.

I agree the political correctness could at times be off-putting, but I think that's because they were new at it and weren't sure how to portray it naturally.
Arpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.