RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,063
Posts: 5,397,682
Members: 24,735
Currently online: 414
Newest member: phurren

TrekToday headlines

Two New Starship Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Trek Actor Wins Emmy
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Trek Retro Watches
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

New DS9 eBook To Debut
By: T'Bonz on Aug 25

Trek Ice Cube Maker and Shot Glasses
By: T'Bonz on Aug 25

City on the Edge of Forever #3 Preview
By: T'Bonz on Aug 25

TV Alert: Shatner TNG Documentary
By: T'Bonz on Aug 25

Forbes Cast In Powers
By: T'Bonz on Aug 22

Dorn To Voice Firefly Character
By: T'Bonz on Aug 22

No ALS Ice Bucket For Saldana
By: T'Bonz on Aug 22


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old March 8 2010, 12:54 AM   #61
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Why doesn't Spock Prime go back in time to save Vulcan?

Therin of Andor wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
you have to work from the assumption that the older Spock as depicted in this film isn't from the Prime timeline and is from a timeline where him and Jim Kirk didn't flaunt the timeline at will. It just doesn't make sense any other way. The man let his Mother die decades earlier why precisely?
In "Yesteryear" (TAS), Spock attempts to reset a timeline and save himself and his mother, but permits a new timeline - where his pet sehlat died decades earlier than it should have - to continue. So where do you draw the line? Go back again and try to save the pet, and risk changing something else? Go back and save the mother and risk losing the father this time?

Have you ever seen "The Butterfly Effect" with Ashton Kutcher?
Think you made my point. We already have precedent for Spock Prime going back in time to fix things of a personal nature.
__________________
"I tell you what you all need, you need to take a thirteenth step, down off your high horse." - Hank Hill, King of the Hill
BillJ is offline  
Old March 8 2010, 01:28 AM   #62
USS Intrepid
Commodore
 
USS Intrepid's Avatar
 
Location: Dundee, Scotland, UK
Re: Why doesn't Spock Prime go back in time to save Vulcan?

It's all fiction. And regardless of what "current scientific theory" may be, the simple fact is nobody really knows how time travel works. So honestly, all the arguing is really rather pointless.

I'll live with the explanation for the events of JJ Trek, because it's really all we've got. I will not be retconning the last forty odd years of Trek stories to to fit Orci and Kurtzman's thinking because, as others have said, it draws all the drama out of some really great stories.

As for linear timeline versus multiple worlds, there's no reason why both can't exist side by side in a fictional work.
__________________
Star Trek: Intrepid
USS Intrepid is offline  
Old March 8 2010, 01:46 AM   #63
Jeyl
Commodore
 
Jeyl's Avatar
 
Location: Asheville, NC
Re: Why doesn't Spock Prime go back in time to save Vulcan?

EJA wrote:
Why doesn't Spock Prime go back in time to save Vulcan?
Because it's not Earth, and anything not Earth in Star Trek isn't worth saving.
Jeyl is offline  
Old March 8 2010, 01:54 AM   #64
Nerys Myk
Fleet Admiral
 
Nerys Myk's Avatar
 
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
Re: Why doesn't Spock Prime go back in time to save Vulcan?

Earthicans rule!!!!!
Nerys Myk is offline  
Old March 8 2010, 11:23 AM   #65
Therin of Andor
Admiral
 
Therin of Andor's Avatar
 
Location: New Therin Park, Andor (via Australia)
View Therin of Andor's Twitter Profile
Re: Why doesn't Spock Prime go back in time to save Vulcan?

BillJ wrote: View Post
Think you made my point. We already have precedent for Spock Prime going back in time to fix things of a personal nature.
My point is, he doesn't go back and fix the pet problem, despite realising that time is still not properly reset - although he acknowledges that such a (minor?) change would matter more to some than others.

So you want Spock Prime to go back in time again and save only another timeline's version of Vulcan, or the deceased crewmembers from the USS Kelvin, or everyone who dies between those two events? Some people were born who shouldn't have been, and others died who should hae lived. Isn't this the same conundrum that Sisko faced in "Children of Time"? That resetting the timeline to satisfy themselves (and restore Kira to life) and be able to reunite with their loved ones back on DS9, destroys the lives of their new offspring, in the new timeline, on the planet upon which Sisko, Odo, Dax, Worf and O'Brien were marooned upon?
__________________
Thiptho lapth! Ian (Entire post is personal opinion)
The Andor Files @ http://andorfiles.blogspot.com/
http://therinofandor.blogspot.com/
Therin of Andor is offline  
Old March 8 2010, 01:04 PM   #66
Pauln6
Rear Admiral
 
Pauln6's Avatar
 
Location: Bristol, United Kingdom
Re: Why doesn't Spock Prime go back in time to save Vulcan?

He'll wait to see how bad a job nuKirk does before deciding to go back and try and erase his exsitence!
Pauln6 is offline  
Old March 8 2010, 02:57 PM   #67
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Why doesn't Spock Prime go back in time to save Vulcan?

Therin of Andor wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
Think you made my point. We already have precedent for Spock Prime going back in time to fix things of a personal nature.
My point is, he doesn't go back and fix the pet problem, despite realising that time is still not properly reset - although he acknowledges that such a (minor?) change would matter more to some than others.

So you want Spock Prime to go back in time again and save only another timeline's version of Vulcan, or the deceased crewmembers from the USS Kelvin, or everyone who dies between those two events? Some people were born who shouldn't have been, and others died who should hae lived. Isn't this the same conundrum that Sisko faced in "Children of Time"? That resetting the timeline to satisfy themselves (and restore Kira to life) and be able to reunite with their loved ones back on DS9, destroys the lives of their new offspring, in the new timeline, on the planet upon which Sisko, Odo, Dax, Worf and O'Brien were marooned upon?
You're talking about a pet. I'm talking about six billion people. I think the stakes are a touch different, don't you?
__________________
"I tell you what you all need, you need to take a thirteenth step, down off your high horse." - Hank Hill, King of the Hill
BillJ is offline  
Old March 8 2010, 04:07 PM   #68
Agenda
Fleet Captain
 
Re: Why doesn't Spock Prime go back in time to save Vulcan?

Simple explanation that someone has probably already mentioned? Because it would just create another alternate reality - Vulcan would still be destroyed in this universe.
Agenda is offline  
Old March 8 2010, 04:25 PM   #69
I-Am-Zim
Captain
 
Location: North Carolina, USA
Re: Why doesn't Spock Prime go back in time to save Vulcan?

EJA wrote: View Post
Spock Prime doubtless knows of a number of ways to travel back in time and prevent Nero from embarking on his rampage resulting in the destruction of Vulcan (e.g. slingshot around a star, Guardian of Forever, etc). So why doesn't he do this?
Because then we would not have the Abramsprise, the iBridge, or the Titanic Boiler Room/Budweiser Brewery/Water Treatment Plant Engineering, Vulcan would still exist, Kirk's father wouldn't be killed which would allow JTK to develop into the fine captain we all know instead of "Kirk the Jerk". We'd never know about the ludricoulsy stupid "transwarp beaming" nonsense. Etc. Etc. Yadda yadda. And so forth and so on. Oh, worst of all, we wouldn't have Keesner!

In essence, if OldSpock had gone back and corrected the timeline, JJA and his crack team of so-called Trekkie writers and set designers may have actually had to make the end of the movie actually look like something out of Star Trek. That would have been horrible.
I-Am-Zim is offline  
Old March 8 2010, 04:26 PM   #70
EJA
Fleet Captain
 
Location: United Kingdom
Re: Why doesn't Spock Prime go back in time to save Vulcan?

Assuming for now that the original timeline has survived, I wonder if people like Daniels and the temporal police of the 31st century are aware of this freak divergent reality? Coming from the distant future of the Trekverse, Spock Prime's disappearance in 2387 would be a documented historical fact to them.
EJA is offline  
Old March 8 2010, 04:39 PM   #71
Jeyl
Commodore
 
Jeyl's Avatar
 
Location: Asheville, NC
Re: Why doesn't Spock Prime go back in time to save Vulcan?

Beyond Antares wrote: View Post
Simple explanation that someone has probably already mentioned? Because it would just create another alternate reality - Vulcan would still be destroyed in this universe.
That method of time travel is not absolute. There are instances in Trek where time travel has changed events in the character's time line.
Jeyl is offline  
Old March 8 2010, 05:21 PM   #72
Pauln6
Rear Admiral
 
Pauln6's Avatar
 
Location: Bristol, United Kingdom
Re: Why doesn't Spock Prime go back in time to save Vulcan?

Jeyl wrote: View Post
Beyond Antares wrote: View Post
Simple explanation that someone has probably already mentioned? Because it would just create another alternate reality - Vulcan would still be destroyed in this universe.
That method of time travel is not absolute. There are instances in Trek where time travel has changed events in the character's time line.
That's a red herring. They ended up in an alternate reality every time without realising it, just an alternate reality very similar to the original one.

Time's Arrow appeared like a time loop so I think that one is an exception.
Pauln6 is offline  
Old March 8 2010, 06:01 PM   #73
OneBuckFilms
Fleet Captain
 
OneBuckFilms's Avatar
 
Re: Why doesn't Spock Prime go back in time to save Vulcan?

Pauln6 wrote: View Post
Jeyl wrote: View Post
Beyond Antares wrote: View Post
Simple explanation that someone has probably already mentioned? Because it would just create another alternate reality - Vulcan would still be destroyed in this universe.
That method of time travel is not absolute. There are instances in Trek where time travel has changed events in the character's time line.
That's a red herring. They ended up in an alternate reality every time without realising it, just an alternate reality very similar to the original one.

Time's Arrow appeared like a time loop so I think that one is an exception.
BINGO !!!!
OneBuckFilms is offline  
Old March 9 2010, 06:26 AM   #74
Therin of Andor
Admiral
 
Therin of Andor's Avatar
 
Location: New Therin Park, Andor (via Australia)
View Therin of Andor's Twitter Profile
Re: Why doesn't Spock Prime go back in time to save Vulcan?

BillJ wrote: View Post
You're talking about a pet. I'm talking about six billion people. I think the stakes are a touch different, don't you?
And that was the precise point of the closing lines in "Yesteryear". To some people, the death of one domesticated animal is as horrifying as a planet of billions of sentient humanoids.

You really wanted people screaming "RESET BUTTON!!!!" in the cinemas during the closing credits of the 2009 film?

So why didn't Spock Prime (in TOS) also take a starship around a sun and restore the planets destroyed by "The Doomsday Machine"? The Starfleet starships destroyed by "The Ultimate Computer"?

Maybe it's just too risky, and they were incredible lucky in ST IV? Meddling in time is probably rarely work the trouble, as the bad guy learned in VOY's "Year of Hell".
__________________
Thiptho lapth! Ian (Entire post is personal opinion)
The Andor Files @ http://andorfiles.blogspot.com/
http://therinofandor.blogspot.com/
Therin of Andor is offline  
Old March 9 2010, 04:34 PM   #75
lawman
Commander
 
Re: Why doesn't Spock Prime go back in time to save Vulcan?

Therin of Andor wrote: View Post
So why didn't Spock Prime (in TOS) also take a starship around a sun and restore the planets destroyed by "The Doomsday Machine"? The Starfleet starships destroyed by "The Ultimate Computer"?
Are you asking this seriously? I'd have thought the answer here was self-evident.

To wit: those disasters were not the result of time manipulations in the first place. The ethos we've seen consistently throughout the history of Trek is that time travel intended specifically to alter the past is bad (even for desirable ends), but that time travel intended to correct or minimize alterations of the past is a worthwhile endeavor.

It's a matter of being sensitive to context. By way of analogy, we all understand why it's considered wrong to initiate violence against someone, but it's permissible to engage in violence if it's a defense against a threat to self or others.

(Philosophically speaking, the underlying view would seem to be that at any given moment in time, the future remains to be shaped, but the past is a known quantity that should be left alone. Presumably the idea is that the unintended consequences of trying to change time can dwarf any positive change one might hypothetically achieve.)

I can only think of two clear counter-examples, or perhaps I should say "violations," of this ethos. One was STIV:TVH; the trip back to retrieve the whales was technically intended only to bring something forward that could preserve the future, and the stakes were certainly high, but it's undeniable that while in 1986 the Enterprise crew didn't take the kind of pains they should've to avoid creating paradoxes and/or unpredictable side-effects. The other was the finale of Voyager, which was IMHO a far more serious breach of "protocol" inasmuch as Janeway's actions knowingly and deliberately wiped out sixteen years of Federation history just to get her ship and crew home sooner, without any apparent concern for what the indirect consequences might be.

---
(BTW, just as an aside... those here who keep insisting that the Many Worlds Interpretation is the only "scientific" approach to understanding time travel, and who are anxious to reinterpret and retcon the entire history of Trek in light of same, really ought to take a step back and read up on the Novikov Self-Consistency Principle. Google is your friend.)
__________________
Blogging on pop culture and politics at SmartRemarks
lawman is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.