RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,168
Posts: 5,435,128
Members: 24,937
Currently online: 499
Newest member: bryanb2014

TrekToday headlines

Two Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Oct 22

Pine In New Skit
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

Stewart In Holiday Film
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

The Red Shirt Diaries #8
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

IDW Publishing January Comics
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

Retro Review: Chrysalis
By: Michelle on Oct 18

The Next Generation Season Seven Blu-ray Details
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

CBS Launches Streaming Service
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Yelchin In New Indie Thriller
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Saldana In The Book of Life
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > TV & Media

TV & Media Non-Trek television, movies, books, music, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 29 2009, 04:22 AM   #1
BoxWhatBox
Commander
 
Angels and Demons [MAJOR SPOILER]

After watching the reading the novel and watching the movie, am I the only who thought it would have been better to deviate from the novels and allowed the villain not only to live but to achieve his objectives? He would have made an excellent enemy for Langdon to have in future installments of either the film series or novels. What do you think?
__________________
"A powerful weapon? %&#!#? This is a pen!"
BoxWhatBox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29 2009, 09:23 AM   #2
Asbo Zaprudder
Rear Admiral
 
Asbo Zaprudder's Avatar
 
Location: Sand in the Vaseline
Re: Angels and Demons [MAJOR SPOILER]

Dan Brown is a terrible writer, and the novels and films are a waste of cellulose and celluloid respectively. That's what I think. Here's another viewpoint:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/b...sentences.html

ETA: Dan Brown's research isn't as thorough as he claims.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/b...al-errors.html
__________________
"After a time, you may find that having is not so pleasing a thing, after all, as wanting. It is not logical, but it is often true." -- Spock -- Flip flap!

Last edited by Asbo Zaprudder; November 29 2009 at 09:50 AM. Reason: ETA
Asbo Zaprudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29 2009, 03:39 PM   #3
ThunderAeroI
Rear Admiral
 
ThunderAeroI's Avatar
 
Location: Perpetually being chased by airplanes
Re: Angels and Demons [MAJOR SPOILER]

Great Mambo Chicken wrote: View Post
Dan Brown is a terrible writer, and the novels and films are a waste of cellulose and celluloid respectively. That's what I think. Here's another viewpoint:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/b...sentences.html

ETA: Dan Brown's research isn't as thorough as he claims.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/b...al-errors.html

THis is solved by taking ones brain and turning it off. There is not much thought placed into them.

As for A&D, it is probably th better of the three RL books.
__________________
No Where to be found, but everywhere you are - I'll be there looking for ways to save your life.
ThunderAeroI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.