|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Captain
Location: USS Lollipop
|
It's Bravo, not Baker!
(Brothers) Riker: I've got a clear path to panel J14 baker. (The Next Phase) Ro: I'm at section twenty-three baker, near Sickbay. (Disaster) Riker: Thirteen sixty-five baker. That should put us right behind shuttlebay two. (TOS: The Naked Time) Spock: Go to Alert Baker two. Seal off main sections. (DS9: In the Pale Moonlight) Worf: Sections fifty-two Baker through sixty-two Baker have been secured. (TOS: The Menagerie) Spock: Go to tape Abel Seven Baker. Execute instructions. (Ent: Harbinger) Reed: We're coming up on access tube seventeen baker. (Ent: Affliction) Reed: Computer, establish an encrypted comm.-link. Starfleet frequency seven nine baker. (DS9: Defiant) Tamal: Squadron Baker has arrived at their checkpoint. (TNG: Rightful Heir) Riker: Security team, meet me on deck seven, section twenty-five baker. Does this annoy anyone besides me?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Definitely Herbert. Maybe.
Location: Terra Inlandia
|
Re: It's Bravo, not Baker!
__________________
I have long felt that any reviewer who expresses rage and loathing for a novel or a play or a poem is preposterous. He or she is like a person who has put on full armor and attacked a hot fudge sundae or a banana split. — Kurt Vonnegut |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: It's Bravo, not Baker!
__________________
Star Trek: 1987-Present |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: It's Bravo, not Baker!
What I do have a problem with is that they use Alpha in connection with Baker; it probably should be either Alpha/Bravo/Charlie/Delta or Able/Baker/Charlie/Dog, not a mixture of both. However, phonetic alphabet has been constantly changing, and justly so. It relies on the fact that while letters may be confused with one another over noisy connections, the initial letters of recognizable words are not. So one needs recognizable words. And it's quite possible that 24th century people would no longer recognize, say "Jig" (which stood for J before NATO came along), or "Quebec", or "Zulu", or "Tare", or "Tango"... Thus, we could have a phonetic alphabet that reads more like Alpha, Baker, Cochrane, Delta, Frammistat, Graviton, Holodeck... Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Captain
Location: USS Lollipop
|
Re: It's Bravo, not Baker!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Between the candle and the star
|
Re: It's Bravo, not Baker!
__________________
"I hate purity, I hate goodness! I don't want any virtue to exist anywhere. I want everyone to be corrupt to the bones." - Winston Smith |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: It's Bravo, not Baker!
Perhaps Bravo is too easily confused with Dravo (a prominent shipyards since the 22nd century) or Wravo (an important Earth colony founded mainly by Polish technocrats), so Baker is the better bet? Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Captain
Location: New Zealand
|
Re: It's Bravo, not Baker!
It's the perfectionist in me, perhaps. It's a worldwide standard for military, police, aviation and many other professions. Why it would be un/re-written by the 23rd century is a mystery to me. I blame the writers (who - it has been said - had no practical experience of things military etc.). The TOS writers would never have made that mistake (EDIT: Sorry, yes, I see they did - thanks for raining on my parade, Timo). Assuming, of course, that the NATO phonetic alphabet - or more correctly, the international radiotelephony spelling alphabet - had been in common usage by them during the war (which it wasn't). This alphabet was formally adopted in 1956 although many still clung to several of the older names (for example, S for Sugar and M for Mother) for some years. And, yes, it also bugs me when 'sixties British dramas use "sugar" and "mother" in call signs... |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Captain
|
Re: It's Bravo, not Baker!
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: It's Bravo, not Baker!
Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Commodore
Location: Geosyncrhonous orbit over NJ
|
Re: It's Bravo, not Baker!
(The Naked Time) Uhura: All decks, alert system B-2. Repeat: go to Alert condition Baker 2. Never bothered me. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Commodore
Location: Portland, OR (Kaziarl)
|
Re: It's Bravo, not Baker!
What throws me off in real life, since I was in the military, is when other people use different words. I'm used to Alpha Bravo Charlie Delta Echo Foxtrot Golf Hotel etc etc etc... Not Apple Boy Cat Dog Exit Frank Grape Hospital etc etc etc... Not a big issue, but it does throw me off from time to time.
__________________
Guardian Force Updated with new content |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Captain
|
Re: It's Bravo, not Baker!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Who is John Galt?
|
Re: It's Bravo, not Baker!
![]() This thread reminds me of Hot Shots (From Wiki): In the 1991 film Hot Shots! , the alphabet is parodied in such phrases as "Yankee Doodle Floppy Disk, this is Foxtrot Zulu Milkshake," "Alpha Velveeta Knuckle Underwear, you are cleared for take-off," and "Sphincter Mucus Layer Ringworm, roger." And yes, to answer the OP's question, it bothered me. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: It's Bravo, not Baker!
__________________
http://drunkmonkeys.onimpression.com/ www.mpjournal.com Tumblr: http://barnaclelapse.tumblr.com Word Press: http://gabrielricard.wordpress.com |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:12 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.




















