RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,658
Posts: 5,428,950
Members: 24,813
Currently online: 419
Newest member: SB118_Pavlova


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science and Technology

Science and Technology "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known." - Carl Sagan.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 24 2011, 08:29 PM   #1
brian577
Captain
 
brian577's Avatar
 
Location: United States of Equestria
Progress supply ship crash

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...nch/50123004/1

We grounded the shuttles for this?
brian577 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 24 2011, 08:33 PM   #2
Robert Maxwell
Not Your Toy
 
Robert Maxwell's Avatar
 
Location: A broken roof
View Robert Maxwell's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to Robert Maxwell Send a message via AIM to Robert Maxwell Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Robert Maxwell Send a message via Yahoo to Robert Maxwell
Re: Progress supply ship crash

Some commentary would be nice in an opening post.
__________________
It's all false love and affection
I has a blag.
Robert Maxwell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 24 2011, 10:04 PM   #3
Marc
Fleet Admiral
 
Location: An Aussie in Canukistan
Send a message via ICQ to Marc
Re: Progress supply ship crash

brian577 wrote: View Post
No that shuttles were grounded because of their age and the cost of maintaining them.

In on another board, some-one made the comment about the russians having four failures in 9 months.

Now when was the last time the U.S was able to attempt four launches in 9 months?
__________________
Gentlemen you can't fight in here - this is the war room.

Pres. Merkin P. Muffly
Marc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 25 2011, 06:49 PM   #4
Wanderlust
Captain
 
Wanderlust's Avatar
 
Location: A Checklist
View Wanderlust's Twitter Profile
Re: Progress supply ship crash

Yea, a progress craft. You cant be perfect. This is the first progress failure since they have been flying to the ISS.

Russian space program has been very good to us, remember we are in a team here.
__________________
Gradatim Ferociter
Wanderlust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 25 2011, 07:25 PM   #5
Dukhat
Commodore
 
Dukhat's Avatar
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Progress supply ship crash

ExplorerAtHeart wrote: View Post
Yea, a progress craft. You cant be perfect. This is the first progress failure since they have been flying to the ISS.
And considering there hasn't been a manned Soyuz fatality in exactly 40 years (and the only two fatalities had nothing to do with the launch vehicle), I'd say the Russians' record is damn near perfect.

Russian space program has been very good to us, remember we are in a team here.
Yep. For the next two years at least. Das Vidaniya!
__________________
“Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.”
– Benjamin Franklin
Dukhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 25 2011, 07:42 PM   #6
YellowSubmarine
Rear Admiral
 
YellowSubmarine's Avatar
 
Re: Progress supply ship crash

Awesome! Another step forward for the Dragon!

Seriously though, even with the failure I wouldn't say anything against Soyuz or Progress. They are still cheaper and more efficient than the shuttle, they are definitely the better choice. Their failure rates are comparable, both have had two fatal manned missions IIRC, and this is the first failed launch of a Progress spacecraft. Nothing to worry about – this just shows that space flight is still a difficult endeavour.

Edit: And as Dukhat pointed out, these two Soyuz fatal failures were decades ago, recent Soyuz fatality rate is practically zero, and “failure to reach” orbit would have been non-fatal if this was a manned mission. This makes Soyuz safer than the shuttle.
YellowSubmarine is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.