RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,162
Posts: 5,402,541
Members: 24,751
Currently online: 577
Newest member: kaklina

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: Time’s Orphan
By: Michelle on Aug 30

September-October Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Lee Passes
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Trek Merchandise Sale
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek #39 Villain Revealed
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Trek Big Bang Figures
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek Seekers Cover Art
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Fan Film Axanar Kickstarter Success
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Two New Starship Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Trek Actor Wins Emmy
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Trek Tech

Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 13 2014, 02:37 AM   #1
SicOne
Commodore
 
Location: Omaha, NE
Enterprise-E size difference between "Insurrection" and "Nemesis"?

Five questions, folks.

(1) I am of the understanding that the nacelles were repositioned on E-E between these two movies, but wasn't sure if they were moved forwards, or backwards, or just further out to the sides. Can anyone clarify?

(2) Was there any kind of in-universe explanation as to why they were moved, i.e. to improve warp efficiency or some such technobabble?

(3) Also, I am of the understanding that the reference in dialogue to "Deck 29" isn't necessarily accurate, but were additional decks indeed added to the engineering hull to change it from 24 decks to another number?

(4) If the original "First Contact" and "Insurrection" Enterprise-E was 685.7 meters long x 282.0 meters wide x 75.0 meters tall, what are the stats for the "Nemesis" E-E?

(5) Finally, although this question might be better answered in Trek Lit, have the more recent novels mentioned new or more elongated nacelles for the Sovereign-class in connection with being able to utilize slipstream drive?

Thanks in advance, folks.
SicOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2014, 02:58 AM   #2
DonIago
Rear Admiral
 
Location: Burlington, VT, USA
View DonIago's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to DonIago Send a message via AIM to DonIago Send a message via Yahoo to DonIago
Re: Enterprise-E size difference between "Insurrection" and "Nemesis"?

Most of these questions are too tech-oriented for me, but if by in-universe you mean canonically so, then I'm reasonably sure no explanations are provided. Regarding your last question, it's my understanding that the E-E doesn't do slipstream.
__________________
--DonIago
It was the best of Trek, it was the worst of Trek...
"If I lean over, I leave myself open to wedgies, wet willies, or even the dreaded Rear Admiral!"
DonIago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2014, 10:08 AM   #3
Nob Akimoto
Captain
 
Location: The People's Republic of Austin
View Nob Akimoto's Twitter Profile
Re: Enterprise-E size difference between "Insurrection" and "Nemesis"?

http://www.trekbbs.com/showthread.php?t=227680 A general discussion on the size of the Sovereign

More generally...
Ex-Astris Scientia has a good article on the Nemesis changes. http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/ar.../sovereign.htm

The model doesn't actually feature any new decks and the pylon changes weren't actually given an in-universe explanation.

And the Enterprise as of the end of Peaceable Kingdoms doesn't have Slipstream capability, yet, but might for the upgrades mentioned before her next mission. Also, nacelles don't really impact slipstream.
Nob Akimoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13 2014, 12:23 PM   #4
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: Enterprise-E size difference between "Insurrection" and "Nemesis"?

I'm of the opinion that the changes between Insurrection and Nemesis are a retcon, not an in-universe change. The reasons they exist is because it was a very minor change which made the ship look better, and that when laying out the space battles they realized the ship had a poor field of fire.

There's no difference at all to the ship's length, the nacelles were just raised a bit. Lots of pics of the Nemesis CG model here: http://www.modelermagic.com/?p=2890
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 14 2014, 09:45 PM   #5
Boris Skrbic
Commander
 
Re: Enterprise-E size difference between "Insurrection" and "Nemesis"?

This blog post by John Eaves covers the evolution in quite some detail. No decks were intentionally added and the conceptual size changed only from 2248 to 2250 feet over the years.

If someone could create an overlay of the various schematics, including the Fact Files orthos and the freely available Nemesis CG views, it should be easy to see how the proportions changed over time. In order to develop accurate deck plans, it would be necessary to decide which of the versions is 2248 feet long and how many of them can be rationalized as in-universe modifications.

Last edited by Boris Skrbic; January 14 2014 at 10:08 PM.
Boris Skrbic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.