A Niner Watches Babylon 5 (NO spoilers, please)

Discussion in 'Science Fiction & Fantasy' started by TheGodBen, Jan 24, 2010.

  1. Booji

    Booji Commodore Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2004
    Location:
    Illadelph
    hehe... I just finished watching TOS all the way through for the first time, and it's so nice to finally get many of the jokes that are thrown around here.

    and Ivanova was dreadful in season 1. at least she becomes bearable in s2
     
  2. TheGodBen

    TheGodBen Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2008
    Location:
    Ireland
    But the problem is that the exact opposite is happening, Sinclair is coming across as a Kirk-like hero of unquestionable integrity because most of the antagonists he faces are 1 dimensional and clearly in the wrong. It's similar to the problem on Voyager where the writers feared that they'd make Janeway look weak if any of her crew challenged her decisions, so characters like Chakotay were emasculated. The opposite happened, by never being properly challenged Janeway appeared weaker than she was.

    Sinclair's track record...
    The Gathering: G'Kar was the ultimate villain at the end of the episode, this revelation was played as comedy.
    Midnight on the Firing Line: A MacGuffin.
    Soul Hunter: A man considered insane even by Soul Hunter standards.
    Infection: A b-movie monster.
    Mind War: Bester seems like he could be multi-dimensional in the future, it is hard to judge him on this episode alone.
    The War Prayer: A racist.
    And the Sky Full of Stars: A ham whose motivation isn't explained, at least not in this episode.
    Deathwalker: A genocidal witch.
    By Any Means Necessary: A prig.
    Eyes: An unstable, covetous rival.

    Sinclair's best moment so far was the section in Believers where he had to weigh up whether to save that boy or not, other than that I'm not finding him all that interesting as a man. He's more a mystery than a character in his own right. In fairness, Sisko was like that too for the first two years of DS9, he was good in Emissary but it wasn't until Past Tense that he really started to come together as a character. The problem with Sinclair is that he can't be afforded the luxury of time like Sisko was because I know he will be replaced by Sheridan in season 2. I don't know, maybe he sticks around as a recurring character and I'll get to see him prove himself against compelling antagonists, but right now I feel that they're wasting him by putting him up against people like Ben Zayn.
     
  3. stonester1

    stonester1 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2004
    Patience...just take it all in...
     
    Seven of Five likes this.
  4. Kegg

    Kegg Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2009
    Location:
    Ireland.
    The real clincher for "Legacies" is Delenn being the perp, I'd agree. It's definitely a good example of the relative uptick in quality as season one enters its final lap.

    Oh come now, she was more developed than that.

    Uh.

    She was also Jewish. There, see?

    Exactly. It's lazy, conveinent writing, especially in something like "Eyes." Star Trek can be guilty of it at times, but really, its best and most probing episodes morally are the ones where there is another side to the argument - consider "The Measure of a Man", which is a goddamned powerhouse of Picard's intellectual and moral integrity, but that doesn't mean Riker or even his old flame - or even Maddox - come off as one-note villains. They all have perfectly rational reasons for either what they want to do or argue to be the case.
     
  5. stonester1

    stonester1 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2004
    I swear, some of the B5 bashers, with their quick Trek comparisons, come across as...catty/bitchy. Yes, Kegg, I would be talking about you.
     
  6. Kegg

    Kegg Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2009
    Location:
    Ireland.
    I'm a B5 basher now? This comes as a surprise to me. I do energetically enjoy taking the show down a few pegs or nine, but I also do like it very, very much. That's less contradictory than it sounds: There's things I really like about B5, and then there's all this other stuff I'm not keen on.

    Anyway, with more than a few other posts being to the effect of 'now the show gets incredibly amazing', well, I like to counterpoint. Did I mention "Counterpoint" is my favourite episode of Star Trek: Voyager? I'm like the guy in that episode: Love Mahler, allegedly sympathetic guy, but I have it in for the telepaths. :devil:

    I think the metaphors were too mixed there.
     
  7. stonester1

    stonester1 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2004
    Or at least attempting, my question would be why.

    It's the latter that, for whatever reason, you seem singularly focused on.


    I don't know how much of a counterpoint it is. You act like it's some kind of revelation that the show isn't always perfect, especially in it's first season. For some reason, you like to FOCUS on that.

    I don't get that.

    But yes, you do come across as a basher at times. Like when B5 was the shiney new scifi kid and you were a Trek fan who resented it at the time, and still do to an extent.

    Me, I'm one of the happy Trek fans who WELCOMED the new kid and was glad to see this one wanting to defy previously established genre tropes and expectations, and throw a little something extra in the mix.

    That TV science fiction didn't have to be Star Trek.

    Star Trek did itself favors when it came to that realization itself, and shot itself in the foot when it retreated from that with a vengeance.

    Voyager would a a classic case in point of that retreat. There was a chance to truly break the mold with that unique situation, crew and location created. But no.

    Mind you, there was lots of promise. Some good characters well cast, some good stories told in the mix, and I'm a Voyager fan now (for many years was not), but largely, it was an opportunity wasted.

    Same thing happened to Enterprise.

    Anyway, the point is, Babylon 5 wished to retreat from all that. And most of the time, it did a damn good job. And helped create a new paradigm that allowed subsequent creators to be more daring.

    We as science fiction fans, as STAR TREK FANS, are better off as a result.
     
  8. Kegg

    Kegg Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2009
    Location:
    Ireland.
    To quote myself:
    That was the post just prior to the one that preceeded this disgression. It's not glowing praise, but I don't think it'd be altogether true I'm singularly focused on criticizing the show.

    Because TheGodBen is currently watching the first sseason. I'll get to the others soon enough, no? Come "The Coming of the Shadows" and "The Long Twilight Struggle" expect me to be whistling a fairly different tune.

    Also I just plain love the death of Refa to gospel music. That's dramatically satisfying and hilariously ironic all at the same time. Now that's something Star Trek could have used more of.
     
  9. stonester1

    stonester1 Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2004
    Such damning with faint praise, especially when stacked with just plain damning, makes it pretty clear where your biases lie. At least to me.




    Oh, I suspect you'll get in your digs where you can.

    One of the best eps of the series.
     
  10. Kegg

    Kegg Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2009
    Location:
    Ireland.
    I didn't say I was fair, I said I wasn't singular. My verdict is definitely largely against the first season, as I've already rambled about.

    Absolutely.
     
  11. Canadave

    Canadave Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Location:
    Saint Catharines, ON
    SPOILERS! :mad:
     
  12. Lindley

    Lindley Moderator with a Soul Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2001
    Location:
    Bonney Lake, WA
    Yeah, damn that past tense! Now he'll realize she's going to become a Buddist Mormon!
     
  13. Canadave

    Canadave Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Location:
    Saint Catharines, ON
    ^ Not to mention the fact that Crusade is all about her crusade (hence the name) to convert the galaxy.
     
  14. Reverend

    Reverend Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Location:
    UK
    Man I hate those guys! Always coming to your door, asking if you think the next incarnation is in a terrible state and going on about how true enlightenment can only be found sitting under trees, shouting at passers by...

    If memory serves, a lot of the season one episodes got their order scrambled by the network, so we get a bunch of shows with similar threads right on top of each other when they were supposed to be a lot more spaced out. Plus most of the naff ones all got lumped together so it makes for a rather uneven overall viewing experience at times.

    Case in point, I'm pretty sure the "Voice in the Wilderness" two parter was meant to be smack in the middle of the season, but instead it got pushed back to just a few episodes shy of the finale.

    Fear not though, with one or two exceptions the rest of the show was broadcast in more or less the proper order, so from season 2 on out, any rough patches are entierly intentional. ;)

    As for Neroon (no, not you!) yes he will continue to be an interesting character. Just remember that what G'Kar said near the end of 'Mind War' holds true to most of the supporting cast too. "No one here is exactly what he appears."
     
  15. DWF

    DWF Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 19, 2001
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio
    B5 was a syndicated series not a network one and the eps. weren't scrambled at least not here in the States.
     
  16. David cgc

    David cgc Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2002
    Location:
    Florida
    Sure they were. One of the biggest continuity flubs I can remember off-hand is that Legacies comes before Babylon Squared, but B2 introduced a prop seen at one point in Legacies.
     
  17. Neroon

    Neroon Mod of Balance Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2000
    Location:
    On my ship the Rocinante
  18. CorporalClegg

    CorporalClegg Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2001
    I think the part you're forgetting is this is first and foremost a Star Trek message board. The Trek comparisons offer a common point of relative interest.
     
  19. Neroon

    Neroon Mod of Balance Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2000
    Location:
    On my ship the Rocinante
    If there is one, single quote that is emblematic of the entire series... this is that quote
     
  20. Ryan Thomas Riddle

    Ryan Thomas Riddle Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2003
    Babylon 5 was part of a syndicated network called the Prime Time Entertainment Network, which was Warner Bros.'s first attempt at creating the much-desired fifth network of the early 90s.

    Shows were given in two-hour block packages to syndicators to be aired on specific days. For example, Babylon 5 usually aired on Thursday nights in most cities, followed by another PTEN show, Kung Fu: The Legend Continues. PTEN would air its shows about twice a week, and it was hoped that eventually it'd have five nights of programing.

    When UPN gained ground and the WB was created, PTEN switched to primarily syndicating its remaining show, Babylon 5. This event was one of the reasons for the five-year arc being truncated in the fourth year and only the eleventh hour deal with TNT allowed for a fifth and final season.

    So, yes it was syndicated but it was also part of a network, and, iirc (help Jan!), PTEN screwed with B5 in terms of notes and airing orders.

    One thing that the network did was to hold off the final four episodes of the season and air them right before the next season's premier in the fall. Reason: to give the season a jump start. Consequence: the previous season ended on a flat note and not an exciting cliffhanger.
     
    Last edited: Feb 21, 2010