STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Discussion in 'Star Trek Movies: Kelvin Universe' started by Agent Richard07, Apr 18, 2013.

?

Grade the movie...

  1. A+

    18.8%
  2. A

    20.6%
  3. A-

    13.2%
  4. B+

    11.1%
  5. B

    7.9%
  6. B-

    4.1%
  7. C+

    5.7%
  8. C

    5.0%
  9. C-

    3.5%
  10. D+

    1.5%
  11. D

    1.6%
  12. D-

    1.3%
  13. F

    5.7%
  1. teacake

    teacake Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Location:
    inside teacake
    I expect a very public disbanding may a part of Section 31's plans. Marcus is far too easy with throwing around Section 31's name, even if he did think those he told were never coming back. How does he know they didn't send off an email about it prior to their planned deaths?

    But if it disbands there will be speeches full of Roddenberry ideals about not losing what makes us human as we try and preserve humanity blah blah and everyone will pat themselves on the back and Section 31 will continue, more covert than ever.
     
  2. Phily B

    Phily B Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2001
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    they operate outside of federation/starfleet jurisdiction and recruit/influence people like marcus.
     
  3. indianatrekker26

    indianatrekker26 Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2006
    i saw it again tonight, with a packed sold out theater. Something didn't even hit me before. I now know how Spock Prime told NuSpock how they beat Khan. Once again, Khan is taken out by a torpedo. Of all the Trek II references, that one went completely over my head the first time.
     
  4. Brent

    Brent Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Location:
    TARDIS
    Seen the movie twice now, A+

    It is better than the first one, the issues I had with the first one are mostly gone, still some slight issues with the bud wiser plant stuff, but much improved over the first one. That's my only complaint really. I felt this movie had more substance, and a better story. I also enjoyed the myriad of filming locations and scenes this time. I really liked the parts off the ship, on Earth, very nicely done. I enjoyed making the Enterprise a star of the show, like it is an actual character to the show. I enjoyed all the homages of course.

    Yep, much better than the first one, I'll be seeing it a couple more times at least, plan to go see it with my sister and a friend tomorrow, can't wait to see their reactions.
     
  5. DaveyNY

    DaveyNY Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Location:
    DaveyNY from Skin-Neck-Ta-Dee (Schenectady)
    It seemed to me that Marcus himself, started Section-31, after he found Khan in this Trek Universe.

    Up to the point that the Narada showed up, it didn't seem likely that Section-31 would have been needed, again, in the JJ-universe.
     
  6. Brent

    Brent Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Location:
    TARDIS
    I think it existed before, he just took over it now, i.e. the man in charge right now. It sounded like to me it was there before him from this movie.
     
  7. Ovation

    Ovation Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Location:
    La Belle Province
    Nah. 31 is around in Enterprise. They get their hooks into Reed.
     
  8. Count Zero

    Count Zero No nation but procrastination Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2005
    Location:
    European Union
    Well, since Enterprise is the only series still existing in this universe I would go with what was established on that show about Section 31 unless it was directly contradicted on screen. Section 31 actually predates the Federation.

    ETA: Damn, you're all too fast for me.
     
  9. teacake

    teacake Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Location:
    inside teacake
    Section 31 is around right now.
     
  10. Ovation

    Ovation Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Location:
    La Belle Province
    Shh!!! You'll blow our cov…oops. I've said too much already. :shifty: :lol:
     
  11. HaventGotALife

    HaventGotALife Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2011
  12. mattman8907

    mattman8907 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2013
    Location:
    California
    did anyone find it a little ironic that when Kirk's five year mission ends it will be around the same time in the "Prime" reality, Kirk started his?
     
  13. Amaris

    Amaris Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Location:
    United States
    Ironic? No. It wouldn't be irony. It is a nice little tidbit of trivia, though.
     
  14. mattman8907

    mattman8907 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2013
    Location:
    California
    yeah it just kinda came to me.
     
  15. Lord Garth

    Lord Garth Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    Location:
    In a spoof of '50s sci-fi movies
    I saw Star Trek Into Darkness. I thought the 2009 film was better.
     
  16. mattman8907

    mattman8907 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2013
    Location:
    California
  17. Finn

    Finn Bad Batch of TrekBBS Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Just saw the movie. I had the impression that a scene or two was deleted from early in the movie.
     
  18. Tai

    Tai Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    May 19, 2001
    Location:
    Washington, D.C
    ^This is brilliant.

    To layer the conspiracy even further one could picture a Section 31 that saw Marcus getting a little too power hungry and decided to cut Khan loose to expose him and have the problem take care of itself.

    If a war with the Klingons ensued as a result of the chaos, then that's what they wanted all along anyway.
     
  19. mattman8907

    mattman8907 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2013
    Location:
    California
    im going to snatch the novel on tuesday. see what was missing from the movie.
     
  20. Tai

    Tai Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    May 19, 2001
    Location:
    Washington, D.C
    I'm wondering about the motives of Section 31 and how it relates to the third film. On reflection it seems that the Klingons would be the obvious choice of villians in the next film. They have every justification to declare war on the Federation given that Starfleet agents violated their space, landed on their homeworld, murdered dozens of their men and destroyed 3 ships.

    Could you imagine if a Klingon raiding party just beamed down to Australia and killed a bunch of people in retaliation and just left?

    Kirk's actions in this movie alone seems like provocation enough for the Klingons.