Which 12 Constitution class starships in "Tomorrow is Yesterday"?

So in the episode "Tomorrow is Yesterday", regarding his ship, Kirk tells Christopher that "there are only twelve like it in the United Earth Space Probe Agency". Now we have to take Kirk's comments with a grain of salt since he's trying to deal with a 20th century human, but if he means Federation Constitution class starships, which would they be? Here are the ones shown in TOS and TOS remastered:

1. U.S.S. Enterprise (NCC-1701) ("The Cage" et al.)
2. U.S.S. Constellation (NCC-1017) ("The Doomsday Machine")
3. U.S.S. Intrepid (NCC-1631) ("The Immunity Syndrome")
4. U.S.S. Potemkin (NCC-1657) ("The Ultimate Computer")
5. U.S.S. Excalibur (NCC-1664) ("The Ultimate Computer")
6. U.S.S. Exeter (NCC-1672) ("The Omega Glory")
7. U.S.S. Hood (NCC-1703) ("The Ultimate Computer")
8. U.S.S. Lexington (NCC-1709) ("The Ultimate Computer")
9. U.S.S. Defiant (NCC-1764) ("The Tholian Web")
10.
11.
12.
So which other 3 Constitution class starships do we pick from non-canon works to fill in the gap?

 

List of Federation Ships Mentioned in the Memos of D.C. Fontana and Robert H. Justman and Quoted in The Making of Star Trek by Stephen Whitfield:

CONSTELLATION
CONSTITUTION
ENTERPRISE
EXCALIBUR
EXETER
FARRAGUT
HOOD
INTREPID
KONGO
LEXINGTON
POTEMKIN
REPUBLIC
VALIANT
YORKTOWN

List of Additional Federation Ships Mentioned in the Memos of D.C. Fontana and Robert H. Justman:

ARI
BONHOMME RICHARD
EAGLE
EL DORADO
ENDEAVOR
ESSEX
EXCELSIOR
HORNET
KRIEGER
LAFAYETTE
MERRIMAC [sic]
MONITOR
SARATOGA
TORI
WASP

 

You don't have to pick anything from non-canon. The three other ships are Constitution, Farragut and Yorktown.

Constitution: existence proven by the term "Constitution class"

Farragut and Yorktown: mentioned in "Obsession"

 

There's also the Republic too. The Constitution is a given, but the problem with the other three ships however, is that they were not seen on screen or referred to in dialogue as Constitution class, so we don't really know what they are.

*EDIT* Avro Arrow beat me to the punch. I will say, however, that a Farragut was seen in the 2009 movie (and the ships in that fleet were implied to have been built before the timeline change), which would seem to confirm that it wasn't a Constitution class ship if one so chooses to believe that.

 

How very true, my thinking exactly! The same applies to the Intrepid, BTW

 

Well, with TOS-R, that's subject to interpretation. While we don't see the ship in "The Immunity Syndrome," we do see a Constitution class ship in TOS-R's "Court Martial," the dialogue of which seems to imply that this ship is the Intrepid:

http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080310013612/memoryalpha/en/images/2/2a/USS_Intrepid%2C_Court_martial.jpg

We don't get a good look at the name or registry of the CGI model however, so again YMMV. Of note, the crew count for the ship in "The Immunity Syndrome" is 430, the exact same count as the Enterprise.

As an aside, it would have been nice to see all ten ships in orbit, in various stages of repair, but my fear would have been that they would have made them all Connies to go along with Greg Jein's T-Negative list and the conjecture of the ST Encyclopedia.

 

KIRK: Spock?
MCCOY: What is it, Spock? Are you in pain?
SPOCK: Captain, the Intrepid. It just died. And the four hundred Vulcans aboard, all dead.

To me this crew count of 400 is an indication, that the Intrepid was NOT of the same class as the Enterprise.

Mario

 

How so? The crew count of a Constitution appears highly variable, as it was around 210 back in "The Cage". And most of Kirk's crew appeared to be passengers anyway, with titles like Archaeology and Anthropology Officer and job descriptions of waiting and painting and daydreaming. Probably the crew count of the Enterprise under Kirk would also have varied a lot if not for his five-year assignment that often took the ship far away from support assets.

That's not a quote from the episode, though. What is said in the episode is that there are only twelve ships like Kirk's, and that Kirk operates for the UESPA. These are two separate claims. It doesn't necessarily follow that all of those other ships would also operate for the UESPA, or for Starfleet, or whatever.

If Kirk means there are twelve ships that are like his in both design and assignment, then most of the names dropped here might be for starships that aren't like Kirk's at all. The Excalibur might never have done a single star-hour for UESPA, say.

Timo Saloniemi

 

I stand corrected. However, there's a difference between someone saying "four hundred" and saying, say, "two hundred fifty seven." A total of four hundred at least implies a ship as large as the Enterprise, if not the same class. Granted, Spock isn't the type of person to round off numbers; if the crew of the Intrepid numbered 430, then he probably would have said 430. But at the same time it's highly unlikely that the ship had exactly 400 crewmembers either. Perhaps without sufficient information Spock was indeed rounding off.

 

Since the Enterprise obviouisly underwent a refit of some sort between "The Cage" and the series proper, it´s not out of the question that it was also rebuilt / re-structured internally to allow more room for crew quarters. Or it was decided that a crew 204 was simply too small for a five-year-mission so it was increased.

IIRC, every time the crew count of "Kirk´s" Enterprise was given it was exactly 430 - quite a coincidence, if there is indeed such a fluctuation and variation of crew strength and composition as you suggest.

Sorry, but a Spock that gives time counts exact to the fraction of a second ("11.337 hours" in That Which Survives) will definitely NOT be rounding off any numbers. And why is it "highly unlikely" that the Intrepid had a crew of exactly 400? 400 is just as likely as 402 or 397 - it´s just the human tendency to round off that makes round numbers seem more unlikely.

That being said, I´m not insisting that the crew count of 400 is proof that the Intrepid belongs to a class different to the Enterpise´s, I´m just saying it´s an indication - it´s still anyone´s choice to follow that indication or not

Mario

 

The difference is that Spock had that time information readily available. He may not have had the crew count of the Intrepid readily available, so he may have just made an educated guess.

I'd say that it's highly improbable that with constant crew rotations, promotions, reassignments, etc., that a ship would have an exact round number of crew at any time.

 

It may be a deleted scene and an alternate reality, but my vote for one of those slots goes to the USS BIDDEFORD NCC-0718
[YT]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnVWUce3FHQ[/YT]

 

There'd be a 1/10 chance, surely! Not exactly bad odds.

 

Thank you !!

 

The commissioning plaque on the TOS bridge says Starship Class.

Does anybody know where the term "Constitution Class" first appeared? I remember Picard said it aloud in "Relics" when he entered Scotty's simulation of the bridge, but that can't be the first usage.

 

I still don't follow why having a crew of 400 Vulcans is an indication that it is not in the same class as the Enterprise. If we take the numbers Kirk spits out as gospel and that 428 (as per Charlie X where he was bring 'exact") is the standard (requiring replacements of the dead), The Enterprise had a crew of only about 30 more than the Intrepid. Are 30 people really all that much more on a ship that size? Also, Vulcans are smarter than Humans. No doubt there could be job consolidation.

Besides, 428 could just be the count on the Enterprise. Kirk sometimes rounds down to 400 anyway.

Just one example is The Ultimate Computer: "Four starships, sixteen hundred men and women!"

No, since the writers and producers make it a point to tell us a starship crew numbers around 400 repeatedly, using the number for the Intrepid is an indication that it is in the same class as the Enterprise.

Also, as Zap pointed out, the Enterprise was listed on the plaque as being in "starship" class. This was before the 70's reference materials and later spin off series began giving sub classes to starships. Every reference in the series is to "starships," not "Constitution class" or anything else. The Enterprise is one of 12 starships in the fleet and every time we saw a starship, it was of the same design. The Constellation was "by configuration a starship." Yes, there could be many different configurations and Spock would know this, but there's no indication of it. I have to go with what we're given on screen. The four starships in The Ultimate Computer were also the same design. It doesn't matter if the budget wouldn't allow a new design of ships. it's on screen so that's what it is.

Now back to The Immunity Syndrome -

MCCOY: Not even a Vulcan could feel a starship die.

I think I've used up my allowance of the use of the term "starship" in this one post alone...

Going by what we were told and led to believe on the original series, The Intrepid is of the same class as the Enterprise.

 

In theory, the term is part of the graphics seen in ST:TMP monitors (as we know those graphics in detail, thanks to them coming from the Star Fleet Technical Manual), but in practice it cannot be spotted there; it's not visible in the up-close view of such a graphic in ST3:TSfS, either. Early TNG has no references to the class name, so it falls upon ST6:TUC to show a graphic with that name (although it refers to the refitted design). That and "Relics" really are the first canon usages AFAIK.

The designation was apparently invented early on, as it was used in a TOS graphic (that never was visible enough to the audience), but it was not mentioned in any dialogue and wasn't even particularly tightly associated with Kirk's ship.

That's a 1/100 chance, actually, since what we're talking about here are the odds of 400 (two zeroes) triumphing over 430 (one zero).

Timo Saloniemi

Edit: Actually, TNG "The Naked Now" has Picard say out loud "The Constitution class Enterprise, Captain James T. Kirk commanding" when reading the computer entry pertaining to the "The Naked Time" adventure. Yet the episode features a graphic of the refitted ship there, allowing us to interpret the Constitution class as referring solely to the refit (as it does refer to the refit in ST6) - it's only in TNG-R that a different graphic, closer to the TOS appearance of the ship, is shown there. So nitpickers might say that TNG-R "The Naked Now" came after "Relics" and ST6.

In any case, my mistake.

 

There might have been more, but only 12 remaining after some 20 years of service. Who knows, probably Constitution herself already was lost/decommissioned at that time.