RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 145,424
Posts: 5,726,515
Members: 25,779
Currently online: 467
Newest member: DataFanGirl

TrekToday headlines

Starship Collection Ships Arriving In August
By: T'Bonz on May 28

Farrell: Berman Was Inflexible
By: T'Bonz on May 28

Pine In Wonder Woman Talks
By: T'Bonz on May 28

Admiral – There Be Whales Here!
By: T'Bonz on May 27

Shatner To Guest On Canadian Mystery Show
By: T'Bonz on May 27

Pegg: Shatner In Star Trek 3?
By: T'Bonz on May 27

Star Trek Uniform Laptop Bag And Fanny Pack
By: T'Bonz on May 26

Star Trek: The Fifty Year Mission
By: T'Bonz on May 26

Where No Garden Gnome Has Gone Before
By: T'Bonz on May 22

Scotland Yard Trekkie Fear
By: T'Bonz on May 22


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Lounges & General Chat > Miscellaneous

Miscellaneous Discussion of non-Trek topics.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 7 2013, 09:56 PM   #16
publiusr
Rear Admiral
 
Re: WWII Japanese carrier/sub located

Well the links are to show a bit of frustration I have with those who think the battleship dead. The concept of arsenal ship may make the carrier obsolete in turn. Too often we have a fighter jock mentality--and my links just go to show that things can come back around...
publiusr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 8 2013, 08:06 PM   #17
J.T.B.
Commodore
 
J.T.B.'s Avatar
 
Re: WWII Japanese carrier/sub located

Ar-Pharazon wrote: View Post
This is one of those military machines, that if the Axis had many more of them, we might be speaking German and/or Japanese right now.
Japan had many war aims that can be fairly seen as irrational, but they were never so delusional as to think their island nation of 70 million could take over a huge country of 130 million on the other side of the world. While at the same time controlling China, which was the Imperial Japanese Army's overriding goal in life.

As to the vessels themselves, like all the big WW1-WW2 submarine cruiser ideas, they were dead-end experiments. Too slow to run, too big to dive quickly, too un-maneuverable to evade, too vulnerable to fight on the surface, they would be a destroyer skipper's dream target.

publiusr wrote: View Post
Well the links are to show a bit of frustration I have with those who think the battleship dead. The concept of arsenal ship may make the carrier obsolete in turn. Too often we have a fighter jock mentality--and my links just go to show that things can come back around...
The battleship was a weapon system optimized to fight fleet battles with other battleships a hundred years ago. That world is long gone.
J.T.B. is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.