Galaxy Class Starships 20 years later, What changes Occur ?

Discussion in 'Star Trek: The Next Generation' started by DumbDumb2007, Jan 17, 2008.

  1. Mister_Atoz

    Mister_Atoz Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Re: Galaxy Class Starships 20 years later. What changes Occu

    looks like something from the SFB universe where your ship can't be badass without at least five nacelles
     
  2. FordSVT

    FordSVT Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2001
    Location:
    Atlantic Canada
    Re: Galaxy Class Starships 20 years later. What changes Occu

    Not bad, but I think the saucer impulse engines could be toned and slimmed down a bit. One port per instead of two, that design is a bit of overkill. The nacelles and surface details look good though.

    I'd say the bridge(s), warp and impulse drives and reactors, deflectors, weapons, computer cores and sensor systems would be very likely to get an overhaul every decade or so. The ship is very much a modular design, so there isn't much limit to what you could do with the ship in a refit.
     
  3. T'Cal

    T'Cal Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Location:
    Chicago
    New bridge module with a small transporter in the aft section.
    A saucer-mounted pod (similar to Reliant & Southerland) with a weapons array and a pair of warp engines
     
  4. Ryan Thomas Riddle

    Ryan Thomas Riddle Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2003
    Any changes to the Galaxy-Class, I feel, would be internal rather than external. IIRC, the Tech Manual states that the class's interior is interchangeable and can be outfitted for a number of mission profiles.
     
  5. Blueicus

    Blueicus Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2005
    Location:
    Torontoish, Canada
    I personally feel that the Galaxy class has a certain majesty (No offense, but I feel that the design that melds with the E-E to be pretty hideous) that no refit has ever improved upon.
     
  6. James Wright

    James Wright Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2005
    Location:
    Church Hill, Tennessee
    Re: Galaxy Class Starships 20 years later. What changes Occu

    The Galaxy class may look the same as it did in TNG with improvements made to ship systems, these ships were meant to serve for a long time before any major refit.
    Why change a design that works!?

    JDW
     
  7. PhotoM

    PhotoM Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Location:
    Kentucky
    Like others had said "Warp!" for the Saucer. The whole concept for the Separation was not for battle but for civilian safety. Well that does a hell of alot of good if the battle session flies off and gets defeated and leaves the saucer at impulse. To be picked off later. Even if its a small drive that only makes warp 5.

    Also landing and take off again for the saucer would be great. Some torpedos would be pretty easy to install.

    Beyond that I'm sure system upgrades like Quantum torpedo and faster computers would be a give in.

    Oh yea something that stops those nasty occasional exploding consoles that injures and kills so many a year;) Maybe surge protectors. I think Walmart The Next Generation has them.
     
  8. James Wright

    James Wright Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2005
    Location:
    Church Hill, Tennessee
    There are torpedoes and the launcher to fire them already in the saucer section, just look at the blueprints of the Enterprise-D.

    JDW
     
  9. Philo

    Philo Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2005
    Location:
    Montréal
    Indeed.

    Yeah, some landing legs might be advantageous. ;)
     
  10. hellsgate

    hellsgate Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2002
    Location:
    Surrey (Vancouver) B.C. Canada
    I prefer the Frontier-Class & its' internet varients of the Galaxy-Class.

    [​IMG]
     
  11. Rat Boy

    Rat Boy Vice Admiral Admiral

    Here's a rather nice attempt.