At War With The Romulan Empire?

Discussion in 'General Trek Discussion' started by Portal, Jun 28, 2013.

  1. Portal

    Portal Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    May 10, 2013
    According to the TNG episode "The Defector", the Norkan Outposts were destroyed in a massacre by the Romulans.

    Now I admit to knowing very little about stardates and the entire TOS series timelines, but my questions are these:

    Did the Norkan Outposts belong to the Federation?

    And if so...

    When was the Federation formally at war with the Romulan Star Empire?

    Please forgive my ignorance on this matter.
     
  2. -Brett-

    -Brett- Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2001
    Been a long time since I've seen the episode, so I can't comment in too much detail.

    I will say that the Federation doens't necessarily respond to military provokation (even incidents that can be called massacres) with declarations of war.
     
  3. Portal

    Portal Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    May 10, 2013
    Also in "The Defector", the Romulan Admiral Jarok mentions something to the effect that starting a new war would be too costly for the Empire. So I assume there was a war at some point in the past.
     
  4. Portal

    Portal Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    May 10, 2013
    ^He also mentions the "humiliating defeat at the Battle of Cheron has not been forgotten."
     
  5. Phily B

    Phily B Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2001
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    There are lots of neat references through out the show to battles and incidents we don't see, its why the Trek universe seems to full and big. Just leaves us to imagine these battles incidents etc
     
  6. C.E. Evans

    C.E. Evans Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2001
    Location:
    Ferguson, Missouri, USA
    Yep.
    Technically, the Federation has been in a cold war (with periodic bursts of actual hostilities) with the Romulans since its inception, but in TOS' "Balance of Terror," it established that Earth and Romulus went to war during the 22nd-Century (presumably a few years prior to the Federation's formation).

    The Norkan Outposts were Federation outposts destroyed by the Romulans during a series of border skirmishes along the Neutral Zone possibly in the early 24th-Century and prior to the Romulans entering their period of isolationism, IMO.
     
  7. Praetorian

    Praetorian Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2002
    It's possible, and in my oppinion, more likely, that the Norkan Outpots belonged to some smaller race that bordered the Romulan Star Empire.
     
  8. C.E. Evans

    C.E. Evans Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2001
    Location:
    Ferguson, Missouri, USA
    Or that they were a series of Federation outposts located in the Norkan System (or the Norkan Sector) along the Neutral Zone.
     
  9. Portal

    Portal Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    May 10, 2013
    Alright, so what do we know about this war. I'm very interested to learn about it. I'll try to get ahold of the "Balance of Terror" episode and watch it carefully.
     
  10. Nerys Myk

    Nerys Myk A Spock and a smile Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2001
    Location:
    AI Generated Madness
    In a nutshell

     
  11. Praetorian

    Praetorian Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2002
    Yes, my post was meant as an alternative to yours, should have made it clear.

    I do find it unlikely that a "massacre" wouldn't have resulted in war between the Federation and the Romulans. The Federation might be pacifist, but never had problems enganging in wars, like with the Cardassians, Talarians and the Tzenkethi. Such war would have been mentioned other times, I'd wager.

    Also, such war/massacre would have had to happen before the Tomed Incident, some 50 years before the episode, implying that Alidar Jarok was quite old. Not impossible though, considering Vulcan longevity, which, I suppose, Romulans also have.

    However, nothing precludes your scenario, the info we have is simply not enough.
     
  12. Portal

    Portal Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    May 10, 2013
    That's great. Thank you Nerys Myk.
     
  13. C.E. Evans

    C.E. Evans Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2001
    Location:
    Ferguson, Missouri, USA
    Had ENT continued for a couple more seasons, it probably would have shown the event(s) that caused the war.
     
  14. Praetorian

    Praetorian Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2002
    It would have been interesting to see how Enterprise would have dealt with the limitations imposed by Balance of Terror, specially considering their previous track record (Romulans already having fully funcional cloaks in the 22nd century...hell, Suliban already having fully funcional cloaks in the 22nd century).
     
  15. C.E. Evans

    C.E. Evans Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2001
    Location:
    Ferguson, Missouri, USA
    It could have easily been a case that military action was taken by the Federation that resolved the situation without the need for a full-out war. Romulan forces may have been driven out of the Norkan System and the Romulans acquiesced.
     
  16. Portal

    Portal Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    May 10, 2013
    Well, we'll just have to wait for the next series.

    Oh how I can't wait to see it! :rommie:
     
  17. Praetorian

    Praetorian Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2002

    That is true!
     
  18. SchwEnt

    SchwEnt Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2005
    Didn't they mention a 53 year absence in "The Neutral Zone"? If that's so, when could the Norcan campaigns occur?
     
  19. C.E. Evans

    C.E. Evans Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2001
    Location:
    Ferguson, Missouri, USA
    A couple of years before they go into isolationism, IMO. The Norkan Campaign could even have been a precursor to the Tomed Incident.
     
  20. SchwEnt

    SchwEnt Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2005
    I thought so as well. It just seems odd because Picard and Jarok spoke of it as if it happened in their lifetimes, something they recalled personally. But they would have been children or still unborn.

    Maybe it's just my take on their conversation.