STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Discussion in 'Star Trek Movies: Kelvin Universe' started by Agent Richard07, Apr 18, 2013.

?

Grade the movie...

  1. A+

    18.8%
  2. A

    20.6%
  3. A-

    13.2%
  4. B+

    11.1%
  5. B

    7.9%
  6. B-

    4.1%
  7. C+

    5.7%
  8. C

    5.0%
  9. C-

    3.5%
  10. D+

    1.5%
  11. D

    1.6%
  12. D-

    1.3%
  13. F

    5.7%
  1. CorporalClegg

    CorporalClegg Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2001
    He crushed a guy's skull with his bare hands.
     
  2. Belz...

    Belz... Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 19, 2013
    Location:
    In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
    I was simply stating facts, not commenting on them. I like the new look of engineering.
     
  3. teacake

    teacake Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Location:
    inside teacake
    I have to know the answer!!

    What did they mean by they stunned their ride in the beginning of the movie, were they actually going to RIDE ON that creature?

    Do you think it was domesticated by the natives?
     
  4. Belz...

    Belz... Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 19, 2013
    Location:
    In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
    That was my understanding.
     
  5. teacake

    teacake Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Location:
    inside teacake
    Was it tethered? It must have been tethered. And big enough for two.They must have already tested it out to know it would let them ride it. Since they would smell totally different than anything the animal had smellled before.
     
  6. Belz...

    Belz... Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 19, 2013
    Location:
    In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
    Not tested much. Look at its reaction to Kirk. :D
     
  7. teacake

    teacake Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Location:
    inside teacake
    Maybe they just startle easily..
     
  8. Cryogenic

    Cryogenic Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2008
    With Evil Villain Rage or just some good ol' superhuman adrenaline. Neither makes Khan particularly menacing, in my view.

    In fact, at the moment of crushing Admiral Robocop's skull, Khan revealed himself to be a petty emo kid, and rendered himself momentarily vulnerable to attack. His urge for simplistic recrimination saps the scene of intrigue and power. It's more like Ru'afo killing Admiral Dougherty in ST:Insurrection.

    This same kind of vengeful killing method was done far better, in my opinion, in Ridley Scott's "Blade Runner" (a stunning sci-fi tone poem of a film, it must be noted, that predates STID by three decades). There, Roy Batty was truly menacing, with his slow-burn intimidation of Tyrell, and both the lighting and the music conveyed a feeling of raw horror utterly absent from STID's boorish, run-and-gun histrionics.
     
    Last edited: May 29, 2013
  9. teacake

    teacake Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Location:
    inside teacake
    Didn't Roy Batty also crush someone's skull? Or.. something?
     
  10. Mad Jack Wolfe

    Mad Jack Wolfe Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Their Tauntaun was in the shop. The Nibiru critter was a rental.
     
  11. teacake

    teacake Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Location:
    inside teacake
    :) :) :)

    I like it when people talk about tauntauns.
     
  12. Zeppster

    Zeppster Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    I didn't really like Cumberbatch as Khan. I think he was a much better villain than in the last one. So was Adm Marcus.

    The last 30-40 minutes which became a reverse TWOK was much weaker than the first 2 hours which set up a good story between the crew vs Adm Marcus. That was a much more dramatic, and much better story. When Khan killed Adm Marcus he turned from an interesting character to a cartoon villain. And the story kinda fell apart from there. Not saying it was bad. I quite like the movie. But you had more cartoon elements than you did actual elements that were built over the film.

    Cumberbatch was a good augment. I think if they just went with him as a counterpart to Khan this story works better because Cumberbatch just didn't have the presence t hat role deserves. He was really good and gave some solid moments though and was a far better villain than in ST09 and probably overall one of the best villains in Star Trek movie history. The only reason that they made his character Khan in this film was to have the scene where Spock yells his name to re-enact TWOK. But even that was flat compared to this one because of how much drama was built into that moment in TWOK.

    The stuff between the Enterprise Crew and Adm. Marcus was much more interesting overall. It was all set up over the course of the movie. It was much better framed. The last 30-40 minutes Khan pretty much became a cartoon villain and little more. You didn't see any real motives for doing what he was doing for the most part. Which is pretty much all you got in TWOK.
     
  13. Admiral Buzzkill

    Admiral Buzzkill Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2001
    I found the "war-crazed admiral" storyline by itself silly and cliche.
     
  14. Belz...

    Belz... Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 19, 2013
    Location:
    In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
    Yeah I'm sure that's the reason. They made that whole scripe just for that one word. :lol:

    Yes, but well done, imo.
     
  15. siskokid888

    siskokid888 Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Location:
    Either Quark's, or a bar on St. Mark's Place
    Cryogenic, reference your critique, there is some I agree with, and much I don't, but I won't go point by point. The one thing I will take issue with is your doubt in the ability for Kirk to directly contact Scott. I have a phone in my pocket right now which I could use to call an individual in Shanghi, China, (or send him a text message) if I so desire. I'm sure by the 23rd century, such communications technology will have advanced to cover even greater distances person to person.
     
  16. Belz...

    Belz... Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 19, 2013
    Location:
    In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
    Well it wasn't comm-to-comm call. Kirk's communicator used the ship's system which in turn used subspace relays and such.
     
  17. Zeppster

    Zeppster Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Seems like the communicators also used text messaging. Pike was called to the meeting reading something. They are more or less cell phones at this point. But then again the cell phone was inspired by the communicators from TOS.
     
  18. Rhaven

    Rhaven Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2012
    Location:
    Rhaven in Boston
    I've waited to comment on the movie. I've read the various threads on here as well as other sites. I just can't get that worked up over some of the things others have. That's not to say valid points haven't been high-lighted.
    I went into the movie expecting to be entertained and I was. I enjoyed the nods to past Trek canon, as well as the way the actors have taken to their respective roles. All in all, I thought the latest Trek movie was an A effort.
     
  19. Belz...

    Belz... Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 19, 2013
    Location:
    In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
    And yet greatly superior. Rewatch The Cage and check out how the camera focuses on Pike's communicator at the beginning like it's some amazing piece of tech. Kinda funny now.
     
  20. Franklin

    Franklin Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Location:
    In the bleachers
    At least Marcus wasn't going around saying Klingons were trying to pollute our precious bodily fluids.

    I didn't have a problem with Marcus, either, even though he was over the top, son. In reality, Marcus struck me as grossly exaggerated and totally amoral versions of Curtis LeMay and Douglas MacArthur who somehow avoided any checks on his power or ambitions.

    After all:
    -- LeMay told anyone who would listen (even in public) that nuclear war with the Soviet Union was inevitable and major U.S. cities would be wiped out. In 1961 he told JFK he had a plan for a surprise attack on the USSR to beat them while the U.S. still held the nuclear advantage. Kennedy didn't even listen to the plan.
    -- In October 1962, when Kennedy said no to LeMay's plan to bomb the missile sites in Cuba and went with a blockade instead, Ted Sorenson said LeMay likened that to Chamberlain at Munich and said the American people would never go for it.
    --Think of how badly MacArthur wanted to escalate the Korean War to use it as an excuse to invade China.

    So, is it that much of a stretch to create a grossly audacious character with an itch for war with the Klingons that has to be scratched?