Star Trek :Into Darkness Trailer has been Rated.

Underwater?!? Bahahaha!

This is going to be glorious!

 

Stay tuned for Enterprise bath toys!

 

Floating water or vapors in space isnt stuff of science fiction anymore and am glad that Star Trek will now incorporate some fun and amazing stuff that we now know about the mysteries of outer space.

 

It's bad enough that Abrams has raped my childhood, now he's doing it under water.





Seriously though, the Delta Flyer did go under water too.

 

... and so it begins ...

 

Let's see.... we've seen Trek ships go underwater before. The animated episode "The Ambergris Element" (as mentioned above) had the Aquashuttle, Voyager's "Thirty Days" had the Delta Flyer modified to go underwater and Enterprise's "Azati Prime" (and I think an episode or two before) had Xindi Aquatic and Insectoid ships go from space to underwater (where they were building their WMD) with no trouble whatsoever, and Enterprise modified a shuttlepod for the task too but IIRC never used it.

Although dramatically.... Iron Man 3's trailer was "Oooh, Iron Man's underwater!" and now Trek's doing the same thing (albeit with a 725m long, 500,000 ton starship)

 

I'd think pressurization would be major problem taking a half-mile long spacecraft underwater. But they'll probably doubletalk some explanation about the structural integrity field. Isn't helium sometimes used for atmosphere in submersibles? They might all start talking like the Munchkins.

 

Fuckit the ocean is now apparently the last frontier.

 

Does anyone know about Pine, Abrams, Cumberbatch and Bryan Burk in Tokyo with trailer?


Star Trek:Into Darkness, will be in cinemas on September 2013 Japan, reveals a special footage presentation on 4th December from 9:50 at 109Cinemas Kiba, cinema2(IMAX), Paramount Pictures Japan announced. Director J.J Abrams, Chris Pine, Benedict Cumberbatch and Producer Bryan Burk will come to Tokyo to attend.

source: rengo-tsushin

 

I also recall voyager entering fluidic space

 

Why do you think they would want to back away from the PG-13 of the first film? Is there a specific reason why you think they are going for a PG rating this time?

I think PG-13 is fitting for the type of movie Star Trek wants to be/needs to be.

 

If the Enterprise does go underwater, I hope they put a bit more thought into it than they did with that Xindi ship in Enterprise's Azati Prime. Seriously, the dialogue there is basically "this thing is designed to fly through a gas giant. It's only water, take a dive." At least with the Delta Flyer they mentioned having to do modifications.

 

Will it be their choice though?
Maybe they will crash and go under.

 

Which would be acceptable. Just as long as it's not something like.

Kirk: "Take us underwater, Mr Sulu."
Sulu: "Underwater, sir? You want to take this ship underwater?"
Kirk: "Why the hell not, we've flown through gas giants and nebulas. It's only water, take a dive."

 

"Starfish Trek"

 

"Starfish Trek Into Darkness"

 

"Who flew The Enterprise under the sea?

J. J. A-Bhrams!"

 

If it's true that the Enterprise goes underwater in STID, I wouldn't be surprised if it's to hide the Enterprise for whatever reason like the Falcon hiding inside the asteroid in The Empire Strikes Back.

 

The Enterprise underwater?

[Sulu]Oh my...[/Sulu]