RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,750
Posts: 5,433,419
Members: 24,836
Currently online: 487
Newest member: Mei'konda

TrekToday headlines

Episode Four of The Red Shirt Diaries
By: T'Bonz on Sep 22

Star Trek: The Compendium Review
By: T'Bonz on Sep 22

Orci Drops Rangers Project
By: T'Bonz on Sep 22

Retro Review: Image in the Sand
By: Michelle on Sep 20

Star Trek: Shadows Of Tyranny Casting Call
By: T'Bonz on Sep 19

USS Vengeance And More Starship Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Sep 19

Trek 3 To Being Shooting Next Year
By: T'Bonz on Sep 19

Trek Messenger Bag
By: T'Bonz on Sep 18

Star Trek Live In Concert In Australia
By: T'Bonz on Sep 18

IDW Publishing December Trek Comics
By: T'Bonz on Sep 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies I-X

Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 10 2014, 11:24 AM   #16
Robert Comsol
Commodore
 
Robert Comsol's Avatar
 
Location: USS Berlin
Re: Reason for Reliant's number?

Mario de Monti wrote: View Post
Timo wrote: View Post
Interestingly, TOS "Court Martial" already featured registries this high.
I guess you mean the second number from the top, which is supposed to read "1831"? I´m not so sure about that. If you look at the screencap there are two definite 8s: the third from the bottom reads "1718" and the one below is "1685". If you compare these 8s (which clearly differ from the 6s) to the number in question, it doesn´t look like "1831" but rather "1631". So I´d say all the numbers on the list are either 16XX or 17XX.
No offense, but you should really read these numbers while the scene is playing, freeze-framing individual screencaps sometimes suggest an "18" or the actual "16" (took the Blu-ray to a friend's 4K front projector and the unbiased opinion of the other two "witnesses" was "1684" and not "1864").

It most definitely is "1831" and not "1631" (as Greg Jein erroneously assumed for the Intrepid).

Since I believe in the essential Jeffries Nomenclature (first two digits indicate starship design series) the "1831" indicates a Miranda Class starship.

I also did suggest in an earlier thread, that the last two digits might just be a contact code (NCC = Naval Contact Code) which can be inherited from a destroyed or missing ship.

Excalibur (NCC-1664) was destroyed in "The Ultimate Computer", last two digits passed on to Defiant (NCC-1764) that was presumed destroyed (vanished in interphase in "The Tholian web"). The "64" contact code was inherited next by the Reliant (18th starship design, contact code "64"). YMMV.

Bob
__________________
"The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth" Jean-Luc Picard
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
Robert Comsol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 11 2014, 07:27 AM   #17
Mario de Monti
Captain
 
Mario de Monti's Avatar
 
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Re: Reason for Reliant's number?

Robert Comsol wrote: View Post
Mario de Monti wrote: View Post
Timo wrote: View Post
Interestingly, TOS "Court Martial" already featured registries this high.
I guess you mean the second number from the top, which is supposed to read "1831"? I´m not so sure about that. If you look at the screencap there are two definite 8s: the third from the bottom reads "1718" and the one below is "1685". If you compare these 8s (which clearly differ from the 6s) to the number in question, it doesn´t look like "1831" but rather "1631". So I´d say all the numbers on the list are either 16XX or 17XX.
No offense, but you should really read these numbers while the scene is playing, freeze-framing individual screencaps sometimes suggest an "18" or the actual "16" (took the Blu-ray to a friend's 4K front projector and the unbiased opinion of the other two "witnesses" was "1684" and not "1864").
None taken And I bow to whatever the superior resolution reveals. Could you post those ten numbers (I assume you analyzed them all)?
__________________
"Do you give me attitude, Spock?" - "I´m expressing multiple attitudes simultaneously, Sir. To which are you referring?"
Mario de Monti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 11 2014, 11:06 AM   #18
Robert Comsol
Commodore
 
Robert Comsol's Avatar
 
Location: USS Berlin
Re: Reason for Reliant's number?

NCC registries from top to bottom (not from bottom to top ): 1709, 1831, 1703, 1672, 1664 (appearance in 4K resolution), 1697 (appearance in 4K resolution), 1701, 1718, 1685 and 1700.

Bob
__________________
"The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth" Jean-Luc Picard
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
Robert Comsol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 11 2014, 12:23 PM   #19
Mario de Monti
Captain
 
Mario de Monti's Avatar
 
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Re: Reason for Reliant's number?

Thanks, so I just missed the 1831.
__________________
"Do you give me attitude, Spock?" - "I´m expressing multiple attitudes simultaneously, Sir. To which are you referring?"
Mario de Monti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 14 2014, 01:46 PM   #20
austen_pierce
Captain
 
austen_pierce's Avatar
 
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Re: Reason for Reliant's number?

I always thought it was civil war, but never knew an exact reference point or could site a source.
__________________
"I'm not the commander" - Tim Allen
austen_pierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 14 2014, 02:56 PM   #21
Ar-Pharazon
Rear Admiral
 
Ar-Pharazon's Avatar
 
Re: Reason for Reliant's number?

But the NCC 1941 of the Bozeman is an homage to the movie 1941, right?
__________________
Rimmer, on what period of history to live in-
“Well, It’d be the 19th century for me, one of Napoleon’s marshals.
The chance to march across Europe with the greatest general of all time and kill Belgians” - (White Hole).
Ar-Pharazon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 14 2014, 07:34 PM   #22
Mario de Monti
Captain
 
Mario de Monti's Avatar
 
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Re: Reason for Reliant's number?

Supposedly, yes. Because someone working on TNG at the time was working on 1941 earlier. And the name Bozeman came from the hometown of Brannon Braga, IIRC.
__________________
"Do you give me attitude, Spock?" - "I´m expressing multiple attitudes simultaneously, Sir. To which are you referring?"
Mario de Monti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 11 2014, 04:07 AM   #23
Anji
Rear Admiral
 
Anji's Avatar
 
Location: Assisting in the birth of baby Horta on Janus VI
View Anji's Twitter Profile
Re: Reason for Reliant's number?

Read Nick Meyer's book: Reliant's registry number was Harvey Bennett's apartment number.
__________________
"You may be wrong, but you may be right." - Billy Joel
Anji is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.