RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 143,898
Posts: 5,639,885
Members: 25,496
Currently online: 598
Newest member: danielbaln

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: The Dogs of War
By: Michelle on Mar 28

Takei Calls For Boycott
By: T'Bonz on Mar 27

April-May 2015 Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Mar 27

Quinto TV Alert
By: T'Bonz on Mar 26

Shatner Remembers Nimoy
By: T'Bonz on Mar 26

Star Trek Delta Coin Pouches
By: T'Bonz on Mar 25

Takei Museum Fundraiser In Progress
By: T'Bonz on Mar 25

Star Trek 3 Villain?
By: T'Bonz on Mar 25

Montgomery Comic Book Signing
By: T'Bonz on Mar 24

Mulgrew To Receive Award
By: T'Bonz on Mar 24


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

View Poll Results: What did Picard mean by 150+
150+ planets total 6 12.00%
150+ Federation members 29 58.00%
150+ Species homeworlds 12 24.00%
Something else 3 6.00%
Voters: 50. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 4 2014, 01:07 PM   #46
grendelsbayne
Commander
 
grendelsbayne's Avatar
 
Location: Netherlands
Re: What Did Picard Mean?

T'Girl wrote: View Post
grendelsbayne wrote: View Post
First of all, the klingon and Romulan empires are considerably older than the Federation, and obviously expansionistic.
I would describe the Federation also as "obviously expansionistic."

I would describe Humans as obviously expansionistic, and as the main driving force behind federation expansion. I'm not so convinced about the rest of the Federation, especially if there are only 150 member worlds despite us having seen so many species. And the point still remains that both Empires have existed much longer, and therefore had much more opportunity to expand.
grendelsbayne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 4 2014, 09:28 PM   #47
T'Girl
Vice Admiral
 
T'Girl's Avatar
 
Re: What Did Picard Mean?

Masao Okazaki's The Starfleet Museum postulated a Federation history where the Human race reproduces so fast and founds so many colonies, that it begin to cause problems with other Federation members.

Especially given that Humans in that history basically dominates Starfleet and we use it to assist our colonial expansion.

T'Girl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 8 2014, 01:29 AM   #48
Annorax849
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Location: Connecticut
Re: What Did Picard Mean?

I do think a high human population would explain why they have so many more colonies than the other races. Maybe most races in the UFP are in the low billions or less than a billion, while humans are a few dozen billion?

Still less than the Husnock were.
Annorax849 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.