RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 149,588
Posts: 5,947,873
Members: 26,487
Currently online: 451
Newest member: jerrypcampe

Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.

Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Trek Literature

Trek Literature "...Good words. That's where ideas begin."

Thread Tools
Old May 18 2014, 04:24 PM   #16
Fer's Avatar
Location: Pittsburgh PA area
Re: The Guardian's Damien Walter on the franchise novel

David Mack wrote: View Post
It's a good article, if a bit narrow in its examination of the field.

Sadly, the reader comments that follow the article are the usual disappointing melange — complaints of "franchise novels" just being printed television, or repeating the ignorant belief that one must have seen every episode and have read every previous novel in order to enjoy the newest ones, or that franchise novels "bring nothing new or original" to the page.

I give the article's author a polite hat-tip for trying to give media tie-in novels a fair shake, but I want to kick the shit out of some of his dumbfuck readers.
Never read the comments!
Fer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2014, 05:38 PM   #17
Vice Admiral
Stevil2001's Avatar
Location: 2010
Re: The Guardian's Damien Walter on the franchise novel

Deranged Nasat wrote: View Post
Stevil2001 wrote: View Post
It just seems odd to me, I guess. I wouldn't expect anyone to like all "classic literature"-- but then, who likes all kinds of science fiction? But it just seems unlikely that there'd be no "classic literature" someone might respond to emotionally.
Well, I do have a tendency (one I'm not exactly apologetic for, but which I acknowledge can be troublesome) to be rather pronounced - very likely far too much so in most peoples' perspectives - in my desire to distance myself from what I perceive as a collective series of cultural assumptions. It can cause me to be a little frustrating at times, I imagine.
Is that what makes sf appealing to you? Is that what you're saying? (N.B. Just interested and trying to clarify your position.)

Also, my post up there was poorly phrased and not at all thought out, as evidenced by the fact that I had to then try to clarify myself over several other posts, so, really, my foul.
No problem-- I probably came off stronger than I should have, too. As someone who works in both literary studies and tie-in fiction, I can get defensive on both ends: academics who sneer at sf* and sf fans who sneer at "literature" both set me off!

* Thankfully, I see a lot less of this in the current generation of rising academics than in older members of the academy. I can't move six feet in grad school without hitting a Doctor Who fan these days.
"I don't like adventure. I'm a stay-at-home-and-read kind of guy."
Science's Less Accurate Grandmother
Stevil2001 is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.