RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,138
Posts: 5,401,822
Members: 24,748
Currently online: 469
Newest member: ChrisCrash

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: Time’s Orphan
By: Michelle on Aug 30

September-October Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Lee Passes
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Trek Merchandise Sale
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek #39 Villain Revealed
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Trek Big Bang Figures
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek Seekers Cover Art
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Fan Film Axanar Kickstarter Success
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Two New Starship Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Trek Actor Wins Emmy
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Star Trek - Original Series

Star Trek - Original Series The one that started it all...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 14 2014, 07:04 AM   #46
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Kirk's First Command?

KIRK: That's enough, Doctor.
DEHNER: I don't think so. I understand you least of all. Gary told me that you've been friends since he joined the service, that you asked for him aboard your first command.

Italics mine. She says "aboard your first command" not "when you first took command." She's referencing another time and another place. That neatly affirms GR's biographical outline and his intent for Kirk's character having commanded a destroyer equivalent type vessel.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 14 2014, 07:52 AM   #47
Dukhat
Commodore
 
Dukhat's Avatar
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Kirk's First Command?

Warped9 wrote: View Post
KIRK: That's enough, Doctor.
DEHNER: I don't think so. I understand you least of all. Gary told me that you've been friends since he joined the service, that you asked for him aboard your first command.

Italics mine. She says "aboard your first command" not "when you first took command." She's referencing another time and another place. That neatly affirms GR's biographical outline and his intent for Kirk's character having commanded a destroyer equivalent type vessel.
I agree that that's an acceptable interpretation. It's also acceptable that he asked for Gary to be aboard his first command before Kirk even had that command; that is, for all we know he was waiting for a command at the time, asked that Mitchell be allowed to serve on that as-yet-unknown ship with him, and then eventually got the command of the Enterprise when Pike stepped down. After all, that is where Mitchell is serving, yes? According to your version, Mitchell served with Kirk on some other ship before serving with him again on the Enterprise. I seriously doubt Kirk had that much clout to be able to bring Gary aboard two ships in a row, or that Mitchell just happened to be randomly assigned to a ship that Kirk commanded twice in a row. Seems to me that Dehner's line works just as well, if not better, if she were referring to the Enterprise.

FWIW, I have no problem whatsoever in believing that Kirk had another command before the Enterprise. All I'm saying is that the dialogue, as presented, can go either way.
__________________
“Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.”
– Benjamin Franklin
Dukhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14 2014, 09:10 AM   #48
OpenMaw
Commander
 
OpenMaw's Avatar
 
Location: Everett, Washington
Re: Kirk's First Command?

...OR, this is being overthought, and she's merely referring to the fact that Kirk took command of the Enterprise and asked for Gary to be involved.

Given the nature of their mission in WNM, I had always assumed that is what she meant. Their first mission, or one of their first missions, was a deep range assignment to the galactic perimeter/barrier. Which explains also why the crew seems to be fairly familiar with one another right off the bat. They had six months or whatever amount of time to get to know eachother before reaching their destination.
__________________
"Paradise protests too much." SFDebris
OpenMaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14 2014, 11:47 AM   #49
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Kirk's First Command?

We can speculate that

a) Kirk got what he wished, and Gary was aboard his earlier command and is aboard now,
b) Kirk got what he wished, and Gary is aboard his first command now, or
c) Kirk's wish was not granted, and his first command came and went without Gary aboard.

Is one of these preferable to others? Well, sort of. Dehner states that Spock's inhuman attitude is all the worse because he has worked with Mitchell for "years". She should know, being an officially appointed harasser of personnel. With "years" connecting Spock and Mitchell, this pairing may hold an edge over the professional pairing of Gary and Jim, considering the overall timeline - perhaps favoring models where Gary wasn't aboard Kirk's previous command, since the Kirk/Spock pairing certainly appears brand new and thus precludes a Kirk/Spock/Mitchell menage aboard that putative earlier ship.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14 2014, 12:55 PM   #50
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Kirk's First Command?

Warped9 wrote: View Post
Unlike JJtrek where a cadet punk gets rewarded the top prize simply for being lucky.

I'll take the TOS version of events, thank you. There's more sanity there.
I like you Warped9, often times I think you bring interesting ideas to discussions you take part in. But you seem to have an unhealthy obsession with the Abrams movies. They have no place in this discussion, or most discussions about TOS, and I say that as a fan of those films.

Also, we shouldn't pretend that TOS didn't stretch credibility from time to time to tell the story they wanted to tell. In "The Galileo Seven", we're suppose to believe that Spock had risen to the first officer of a starship yet had never had any missions he was in command of prior to the mission to explore the Murasaki Quasar?

As far as Kirk's first command goes? We simply don't have enough on screen evidence to know one way or the other.
__________________
"I tell you what you all need, you need to take a thirteenth step, down off your high horse." - Hank Hill, King of the Hill
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14 2014, 01:08 PM   #51
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Kirk's First Command?

^^ None of which invalidates the point I'm making.

And I sleep quite well at night and have a healthy appetite, thank you.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 14 2014, 01:15 PM   #52
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Kirk's First Command?

Warped9 wrote: View Post
^^ None of which invalidates the point I'm making.
Sure it does. You blast the Abrams movies for taking what you perceive to be shortcuts to tell the stories they want to tell but seem to not hold TOS to that same standard. It really does taint your posts.

That's why when you take a detour to blast the Abrams films, people either roll their eyes at you or call you out on the non-sense.
__________________
"I tell you what you all need, you need to take a thirteenth step, down off your high horse." - Hank Hill, King of the Hill
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14 2014, 01:29 PM   #53
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Kirk's First Command?

BillJ wrote: View Post
Warped9 wrote: View Post
^^ None of which invalidates the point I'm making.
Sure it does. You blast the Abrams movies for taking what you perceive to be shortcuts to tell the stories they want to tell but seem to not hold TOS to that same standard. It really does taint your posts.

That's why when you take a detour to blast the Abrams films, people either roll their eyes at you or call you out on the non-sense.
No.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 14 2014, 03:22 PM   #54
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Kirk's First Command?

Well, yes.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14 2014, 03:30 PM   #55
J.T.B.
Commodore
 
J.T.B.'s Avatar
 
Re: Kirk's First Command?

BillJ wrote: View Post
Also, we shouldn't pretend that TOS didn't stretch credibility from time to time to tell the story they wanted to tell. In "The Galileo Seven", we're suppose to believe that Spock had risen to the first officer of a starship yet had never had any missions he was in command of prior to the mission to explore the Murasaki Quasar?
I'm not sure that's the only interpretation. McCoy's comments about Spock's "chance" for command did not come until the shuttlecraft had been forced to land and they had lost contact with Enterprise. McCoy could have been referring to Spock's first command that was completely independent of a superior's orders, which, considereing Starfleet communication capabilities, could have been a rare occasion even for officers detailed to commanding landing parties, surveys and so on.

Whatever the interpretation, it was clear that Spock was an officer of considerable experience, so I don't personally think it's comparable to someone skipping all the grades and experience between cadet and cruiser captain.
J.T.B. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14 2014, 03:34 PM   #56
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Kirk's First Command?

Let's also remember Commodore Stocker and the established path to flag rank without stops at vessel command in between. Spock could have been kept clear of vessel command as well: Abrams paints him as a devoted instructor who may or may not have vessel commands under his belt when Pike makes him his XO, and Roddenberry Trek would be compatible with that part of Spock's character arc.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14 2014, 04:35 PM   #57
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: Kirk's First Command?

Warped9 wrote: View Post
TOS had a sense of credibility to its universe and world building rather than the arbitrariness of something like JJtrek. In the TOS universe you have to train, gain experience through various postings and earn your stripes to rise in rank. This is backed up by how things are generally portrayed in the series and the biography of Kirk (taken from the Writer's Guide) seen in The Making Of Star Trek. So it makes perfect sense that Kirk had to prove himself before being posted to command one of Starfleet's best ships.

Unlike JJtrek where a cadet punk gets rewarded the top prize simply for being lucky.

I'll take the TOS version of events, thank you. There's more sanity there.
Is there really? Taking away the writer's guide conjecture, I think it's a lot of assumption on your part. Marla McGuyvers, for example, appeared to be assigned to the Enterprise based upon having collected enough cereal box tokens. We see endless unprofessional behaviour from the crew ("The Apple", "Lights of Zetar" etc.) ...
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14 2014, 04:41 PM   #58
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Kirk's First Command?

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
Warped9 wrote: View Post
TOS had a sense of credibility to its universe and world building rather than the arbitrariness of something like JJtrek. In the TOS universe you have to train, gain experience through various postings and earn your stripes to rise in rank. This is backed up by how things are generally portrayed in the series and the biography of Kirk (taken from the Writer's Guide) seen in The Making Of Star Trek. So it makes perfect sense that Kirk had to prove himself before being posted to command one of Starfleet's best ships.

Unlike JJtrek where a cadet punk gets rewarded the top prize simply for being lucky.

I'll take the TOS version of events, thank you. There's more sanity there.
Is there really? Taking away the writer's guide conjecture, I think it's a lot of assumption on your part. Marla McGuyvers, for example, appeared to be assigned to the Enterprise based upon having collected enough cereal box tokens. We see endless unprofessional behaviour from the crew ("The Apple", "Lights of Zetar" etc.) ...
I've made my points with evidence. The Writer's Guide that GR wrote is not conjecture (it's what he intended) and it's backed up by evidence right in WNMHGB. I don't need to bother repeating it over and over just because some want to cover their ears and yell, "Nah, nah, nah, nah, nah..."
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 14 2014, 04:56 PM   #59
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Kirk's First Command?

J.T.B. wrote: View Post

I'm not sure that's the only interpretation. McCoy's comments about Spock's "chance" for command did not come until the shuttlecraft had been forced to land and they had lost contact with Enterprise. McCoy could have been referring to Spock's first command that was completely independent of a superior's orders, which, considereing Starfleet communication capabilities, could have been a rare occasion even for officers detailed to commanding landing parties, surveys and so on.
It's more than just the dialogue though. Spock acts like a novice who has never worked with or been in command of humans before throughout the episode.

Warped9 wrote: View Post

I've made my points with evidence. The Writer's Guide that GR wrote is not conjecture (it's what he intended) and it's backed up by evidence right in WNMHGB. I don't need to bother repeating it over and over just because some want to cover their ears and yell, "Nah, nah, nah, nah, nah..."
I still don't see your evidence being anything more than your interpretation of dialogue and behind-the-scenes memo's that were obviously ignored.

The officers serving under Kirk weren't always the most professional, security was often incredibly lax aboard the Enterprise and Kirk was constantly tiptoeing the line of insubordination and breaking regulations without ever having to answer for his actions. Not exactly representative of real world military practices...

Kirk is a cowboy and we like that he's a cowboy. But he would likely be drummed out of the real world military before the end of boot camp. He's about as realistic military officer as Maverick from Top Gun.
__________________
"I tell you what you all need, you need to take a thirteenth step, down off your high horse." - Hank Hill, King of the Hill
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14 2014, 04:56 PM   #60
Nerys Myk
Fleet Admiral
 
Nerys Myk's Avatar
 
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
Re: Kirk's First Command?

Warped9 wrote: View Post
King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
Warped9 wrote: View Post
TOS had a sense of credibility to its universe and world building rather than the arbitrariness of something like JJtrek. In the TOS universe you have to train, gain experience through various postings and earn your stripes to rise in rank. This is backed up by how things are generally portrayed in the series and the biography of Kirk (taken from the Writer's Guide) seen in The Making Of Star Trek. So it makes perfect sense that Kirk had to prove himself before being posted to command one of Starfleet's best ships.

Unlike JJtrek where a cadet punk gets rewarded the top prize simply for being lucky.

I'll take the TOS version of events, thank you. There's more sanity there.
Is there really? Taking away the writer's guide conjecture, I think it's a lot of assumption on your part. Marla McGuyvers, for example, appeared to be assigned to the Enterprise based upon having collected enough cereal box tokens. We see endless unprofessional behaviour from the crew ("The Apple", "Lights of Zetar" etc.) ...
I've made my points with evidence. The Writer's Guide that GR wrote is not conjecture (it's what he intended) and it's backed up by evidence right in WNMHGB. I don't need to bother repeating it over and over just because some want to cover their ears and yell, "Nah, nah, nah, nah, nah..."
But a writers guide is just that, a guide. Things can and will change as a show progresses and as stories develop. Both Spock and Kirk evolved beyond what the writers guide originally said and the pilots and first episodes established. New and at times contradictory, information can and were introduced on an episode by episode basis. Sometimes the "need of the plot" will supersede continuity, reality and guidelines.
__________________
The boring one, the one with Khan, the one where Spock returns, the one with whales, the dumb one, the last one, the one with Kirk, the one with the Borg, the stupid one, the bad one, the new one, the other one with Khan.
Nerys Myk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.