RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,797
Posts: 5,471,360
Members: 25,037
Currently online: 576
Newest member: Skelch

TrekToday headlines

Shatner Book Kickstarter
By: T'Bonz on Nov 20

Trek Original Series Slippers
By: T'Bonz on Nov 19

Hemsworth Is Sexiest Man Alive
By: T'Bonz on Nov 19

Trek Business Card Cases
By: T'Bonz on Nov 17

February IDW Publishing Trek Comics
By: T'Bonz on Nov 17

Retro Review: The Siege of AR-558
By: Michelle on Nov 15

Trevco Full Bleed Uniform T-Shirts
By: T'Bonz on Nov 14

Wheaton Buys Wesley Crusher Hoodie
By: T'Bonz on Nov 14

People’s Choice Award Nominations
By: T'Bonz on Nov 14

Quinto: Not Internally Homophobic
By: T'Bonz on Nov 14


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 26 2014, 10:06 PM   #1
USSPhilippi
Lieutenant Commander
 
Location: West Virginia
View USSPhilippi's Twitter Profile
"Into Darkness" Nominated for 5 Saturn Awards

Full list of nominees here:

http://www.saturnawards.org/

"Into Darkness" is nominated for Best Science Fiction Film, Abrams for Best Director, Cumberbatch for Best Supporting Actor.
Technical category nominations are for Costume Design and Special/Visual Effects.

Personally, I think STID has *no* chance at winning Best Sci-Fi Film. That will most likely go to "Gravity", though "Hunger Games: Catching Fire" is a possibility. I do think that Cumberbatch has a decent shot at the Supporting Actor trophy.

Comments?
__________________
Edward

For Thou lovest all things that are, and hatest none of the things which Thou hast made: for Thou didst not appoint, or make any thing hating it. Wisdom 11:25, Douay-Rheims Bible
USSPhilippi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26 2014, 10:53 PM   #2
BigJake
Rear Admiral
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Location: No matter where you go, there you are.
Re: "Into Darkness" Nominated for 5 Saturn Awards

If Gravity doesn't sweep the Best SF Film, Best Director, Best Actress and Best Supporting Actor categories it will have been robbed; it's just straight up in a different league from its competition. Cumberbatch could have challenged for Best Supporting Actor, he has the ability and the presence, but I think his turn as Khan involved too much scenery-chewing for it to be a serious possibility.
__________________
Weasels rip BigJake's flesh!
"I wanna read more" - Dennis "I . . . agree with everything you said" - SPCTRE "I blame Cracked" - J. Allen "Take me off" - The Stig
BigJake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26 2014, 11:09 PM   #3
CorporalCaptain
Admiral
 
CorporalCaptain's Avatar
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: "Into Darkness" Nominated for 5 Saturn Awards

BigJake wrote: View Post
If Gravity doesn't sweep the Best SF Film, Best Director, Best Actress and Best Supporting Actor categories it will have been robbed; it's just straight up in a different league from its competition. Cumberbatch could have challenged for Best Supporting Actor, he has the ability and the presence, but I think his turn as Khan involved too much scenery-chewing for it to be a serious possibility.
I agree, with the possible exception of Best Supporting Actor. Kingsley was good in IM3, I thought, but it's been almost a year since I've seen that film (and I only saw it once), so I don't have as clear a memory of his performance as Clooney's, but I remember laughing my ass off. Clooney's was excellent, though.

To be honest, I'm surprised that Clooney is counted as a supporting actor. That doesn't seem fair to roles that are really only more supporting, such as Kingsley's.
__________________
John
CorporalCaptain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 10 2014, 06:07 AM   #4
Shaka Zulu
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Bulawayo Military Krral
Re: "Into Darkness" Nominated for 5 Saturn Awards

Considering that Gravity isn't truly 'original' itself (it's a new version of two movies dealing with failed space missions) and that it already has won Oscars in a few categories, letting Star Trek Into Darkness be nominated for Saturn Awards isn't a crime against cinema or science fiction. Don't you think that it's time to give up this childish hatred of the Abramsverse?
Shaka Zulu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 10 2014, 06:24 AM   #5
M'Sharak
Definitely Herbert. Maybe.
 
M'Sharak's Avatar
 
Location: Terra Inlandia
Re: "Into Darkness" Nominated for 5 Saturn Awards

Shaka Zulu wrote: View Post
... Don't you think that it's time to give up this childish hatred of the Abramsverse?
It's not clear who's being addressed here (was your post even pertinent to anything in this thread?) but don't do that. Just... don't.
__________________
The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but
that the lightning ain't distributed right.
— Mark Twain
M'Sharak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 10 2014, 09:41 AM   #6
BigJake
Rear Admiral
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Location: No matter where you go, there you are.
Re: "Into Darkness" Nominated for 5 Saturn Awards

Shaka Zulu [When the Walls Fell ]:

Shaka Zulu wrote:
Considering that Gravity isn't truly 'original' itself . . . letting Star Trek Into Darkness be nominated for Saturn Awards isn't a crime against cinema or science fiction.
Just aside from the piece of gratuitous aggressiveness already noted above, you seem to routinely come onto threads loudly "refuting" things nobody has said, just like that there. Maybe if you feel someone is trying to imply something with a remark, you could try asking them what they mean first? Just for a bit of variety?
__________________
Weasels rip BigJake's flesh!
"I wanna read more" - Dennis "I . . . agree with everything you said" - SPCTRE "I blame Cracked" - J. Allen "Take me off" - The Stig

Last edited by BigJake; March 10 2014 at 09:58 AM.
BigJake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 10 2014, 10:28 AM   #7
UUS Contrarian
Lieutenant
 
Re: "Into Darkness" Nominated for 5 Saturn Awards

Neat.
UUS Contrarian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 10 2014, 04:09 PM   #8
Jeyl
Commodore
 
Jeyl's Avatar
 
Location: Asheville, NC
Re: "Into Darkness" Nominated for 5 Saturn Awards

So when do we find out who won?
Jeyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 10 2014, 04:14 PM   #9
Jeyl
Commodore
 
Jeyl's Avatar
 
Location: Asheville, NC
Re: "Into Darkness" Nominated for 5 Saturn Awards

Shaka Zulu wrote: View Post
Considering that Gravity isn't truly 'original' itself (it's a new version of two movies dealing with failed space missions) and that it already has won Oscars in a few categories, letting Star Trek Into Darkness be nominated for Saturn Awards isn't a crime against cinema or science fiction.
If originality is the name of the game, what the heck does Star Trek Into Darkness have going for it? If it's not being a complete rehash of the last film, it's directly lifting material word for word from previous Star Trek works.

I think Gravity has the upper hand against Star Trek Into Darkness when it comes to originality.
Jeyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 10 2014, 10:50 PM   #10
M'Sharak
Definitely Herbert. Maybe.
 
M'Sharak's Avatar
 
Location: Terra Inlandia
Re: "Into Darkness" Nominated for 5 Saturn Awards

Jeyl wrote: View Post
So when do we find out who won?
The 40th Saturn Awards, honoring the best in science fiction, fantasy and horror film and television in 2013, will be held June 2014 in Burbank, California.
__________________
The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but
that the lightning ain't distributed right.
— Mark Twain
M'Sharak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 11 2014, 01:00 AM   #11
Shaka Zulu
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Bulawayo Military Krral
Re: "Into Darkness" Nominated for 5 Saturn Awards

Jeyl wrote: View Post
If originality is the name of the game, what the heck does Star Trek Into Darkness have going for it? If it's not being a complete rehash of the last film, it's directly lifting material word for word from previous Star Trek works.

I think Gravity has the upper hand against Star Trek Into Darkness when it comes to originality.
As I said, Gravity has pretty much won its awards; I personally don't think that the academy behind the Saturns is going to give it more awards after Oscar rewarded it, but give it to something else just as prominent. That STID isn't as prominent as you'd like doesn't mean that the movie's not so for others.
Shaka Zulu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 11 2014, 03:59 AM   #12
BigJake
Rear Admiral
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Location: No matter where you go, there you are.
Re: "Into Darkness" Nominated for 5 Saturn Awards

Presumably the people running the Saturns will reward what they think the best movie is in each category. I very much doubt they're weighing their moral duties to other "prominent films" in the wake of the Oscars.
__________________
Weasels rip BigJake's flesh!
"I wanna read more" - Dennis "I . . . agree with everything you said" - SPCTRE "I blame Cracked" - J. Allen "Take me off" - The Stig
BigJake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 11 2014, 02:16 PM   #13
Jeyl
Commodore
 
Jeyl's Avatar
 
Location: Asheville, NC
Re: "Into Darkness" Nominated for 5 Saturn Awards

Shaka Zulu wrote: View Post
As I said, Gravity has pretty much won its awards; I personally don't think that the academy behind the Saturns is going to give it more awards after Oscar rewarded it, but give it to something else just as prominent. That STID isn't as prominent as you'd like doesn't mean that the movie's not so for others.
Giving awards to a film simply because the "other" film won awards from different organizations is not a credible way of recognizing good work. It'd be like if the Academy Awards decided not to give the Best Song to "Let It Go" because song itself had won almost every other major award up to that point. That song didn't win because it won the other awards, it won because it deserved to win. What is it about Star Trek Into Darkness that makes it a more deserving film to win the Saturn awards over Gravity outside of the latter winning many awards already?
Jeyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 12 2014, 04:59 AM   #14
Shaka Zulu
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Bulawayo Military Krral
Re: "Into Darkness" Nominated for 5 Saturn Awards

Jeyl wrote: View Post
Shaka Zulu wrote: View Post
As I said, Gravity has pretty much won its awards; I personally don't think that the academy behind the Saturns is going to give it more awards after Oscar rewarded it, but give it to something else just as prominent. That STID isn't as prominent as you'd like doesn't mean that the movie's not so for others.
Giving awards to a film simply because the "other" film won awards from different organizations is not a credible way of recognizing good work. It'd be like if the Academy Awards decided not to give the Best Song to "Let It Go" because song itself had won almost every other major award up to that point. That song didn't win because it won the other awards, it won because it deserved to win. What is it about Star Trek Into Darkness that makes it a more deserving film to win the Saturn awards over Gravity outside of the latter winning many awards already?
STID addressed a ton of recent concerns terrorism, revenge and blowback (in a blockbuster movie, no less!) and did it well enough to earn critical praise and a substantial amount of box office profits worldwide. I (and everybody else that's not a Trekfan trapped in Trekfan dogma about Gene Roddenberry's 'vision' of what Star Trek's supposed to be) would think that it has enough merit to win awards for script, direction, cinematography, and acting as much as the supposedly original Gravity merits them.
Shaka Zulu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 12 2014, 10:40 PM   #15
BigJake
Rear Admiral
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Location: No matter where you go, there you are.
Re: "Into Darkness" Nominated for 5 Saturn Awards

Shaka Zulu wrote: View Post
(and everybody else that's not a Trekfan trapped in Trekfan dogma about Gene Roddenberry's 'vision' of what Star Trek's supposed to be)
You're doing it again.

I . . . would think that it has enough merit to win awards for script, direction, cinematography, and acting as much as the supposedly original Gravity merits them.
The trouble is that it's not really just about what you think, nor about how shrill and needlessly defensive you are about what other people think. What award shows are weighing have nothing to do with how many "topicality" boxes you can tick off in STiD's script, nor with your private uni-directional feud with imaginary hordes of evil persecuting Trekfans. Their business is assessing the actual quality of the movies involved, period.

The fact of the matter is that Gravity won almost universal critical acclaim and did better box than STiD -- and excelled most other films among its fellow nominees in these regards as well -- for very good reasons. Its odds in award shows are better for the same reasons. I for one am not saying this just to slam Abrams: if Gravity were competing against a movie of the quality of The Wrath of Khan I would still like its chances better. (As things are, I also like its chances better than several other films in the categories it's nominated in that I also quite like, such as Pacific Rim and The Hunger Games: Catching Fire.) It's just a really really good movie, it costs me nothing to recognize that.
__________________
Weasels rip BigJake's flesh!
"I wanna read more" - Dennis "I . . . agree with everything you said" - SPCTRE "I blame Cracked" - J. Allen "Take me off" - The Stig

Last edited by BigJake; March 12 2014 at 10:58 PM.
BigJake is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
abrams, awards, cumberbatch, stid

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.