RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,901
Posts: 5,387,488
Members: 24,717
Currently online: 604
Newest member: teriankhoka

TrekToday headlines

IDW Publishing November Trek Comic
By: T'Bonz on Aug 20

Pegg/Wright Trilogy In The Works
By: T'Bonz on Aug 20

Star Trek: The Compendium Rebate Details
By: T'Bonz on Aug 20

Gold Key Archives Volume 2
By: T'Bonz on Aug 19

Takei Documentary Wins Award
By: T'Bonz on Aug 19

Cumberbatch To Voice Khan
By: T'Bonz on Aug 19

Shaun And Ed On Phineas and Ferb
By: T'Bonz on Aug 18

New Ships Coming From Official Starships Collection
By: T'Bonz on Aug 18

Trek Stars Take On Ice Bucket Challenge
By: T'Bonz on Aug 18

Retro Review: Profit and Lace
By: Michelle on Aug 16


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Fandom > Fan Productions

Fan Productions Creating our own Trek canon!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 27 2014, 02:34 AM   #286
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Star Trek Continues: Episode 2 "Lolani"...

doubleohfive wrote: View Post
Everyone else: Please note: That's not me trolling Warped9
Actually this is exactly what you're doing.

Any remarks I've made in terms of technobabble, call outs or connect-the-dots (continuity porn) to other productions have been in context of those things not being present in TOS. And if STC is trying to be a direct TOS followup then those things mentioned above shouldn't be in it, in my opinion. I have kept my remarks in that context. If you take those as stealth digs then it's your issue in trying to insinuate I'm indulging in drive-by swipes.

I shouldn't have to tip-toe in my viewpoint or apologize for my preferences in entertainment. I've done nothing inflammatory and I don't care for your insinuating otherwise.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 27 2014, 02:53 AM   #287
doubleohfive
Fleet Admiral
 
Location: Hollywood, CA
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to doubleohfive
Re: Star Trek Continues: Episode 2 "Lolani"...

Warped9 wrote: View Post
doubleohfive wrote: View Post
Everyone else: Please note: That's not me trolling Warped9
Actually this is exactly what you're doing.

Any remarks I've made in terms of technobabble, call outs or connect-the-dots (continuity porn) to other productions have been in context of those things not being present in TOS. And if STC is trying to be a direct TOS followup then those things mentioned above shouldn't be in it, in my opinion. I have kept my remarks in that context. If you take those as stealth digs then it's your issue in trying to insinuate I'm indulging in drive-by swipes.

I shouldn't have to tip-toe in my viewpoint or apologize for my preferences in entertainment. I've done nothing inflammatory and I don't care for your insinuating otherwise.
Let's go back to talking about Star Trek Continues, shall we?
__________________
"You are the product. You feeling something. That's what sells. Not them. Not sex. They can't do what we do and they hate us for it."
--Don Draper
doubleohfive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 27 2014, 07:22 AM   #288
J. Allen
Dancing on Rainbows
 
J. Allen's Avatar
 
Location: United States
Send a message via ICQ to J. Allen Send a message via AIM to J. Allen Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to J. Allen Send a message via Yahoo to J. Allen
Re: Star Trek Continues: Episode 2 "Lolani"...

Maurice wrote: View Post
Writing in the vernacular of a bygone era is tricky. A friend of mine wrote a screenplay set in 1954 and had one character describe another as "awesome" and I went, "ummmm...." And he was alive in 1954!

You don't realize how much language changes in subtle ways. A great example is that Mad Men, which is fairly pedantic on such things, still slips and has characters using words and phrases uncommon in its time period, like "leveraged" and characters saying "you need to" when in 1960s they'd more likely have said "you ought to".

Also, there's a modern American trend where many younger women talk higher and go up on the last syllables of words (a la Valley Speak) which isn't how women spoke in the 60s.
It really is one of those things that can take one out of a show, even if one knows it's unintentional. I try not to be harsh, because words do change gradually, though I have no tolerance for period pieces set hundreds of years in the past and use words that are more modern slang.

Well, let me add that I have no tolerance if the slang isn't part of the piece. If it's a classic work with a modern twist, I get that, but modern sensibilities soaking into a work that's trying to stay true to the original environment in which it was written, that is annoying.
__________________
Visit us at Brony Kingdom!
You will never find a more precious hive of love and humility.
---------
"Anger is an acid that can do more harm to the vessel in which it is stored than to anything on which it is poured." - Mark Twain
J. Allen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 27 2014, 07:40 AM   #289
Barbreader
Fleet Captain
 
Location: New York, New York
View Barbreader's Twitter Profile
Re: Star Trek Continues: Episode 2 "Lolani"...

Some of the changes are regional. Language has become much less regional over the last 100 years. I'm not sure that even in the 1950s in New York City people would say, "you ought to." Just as some places say, when you wait at a bank you are "in line" and other locations say you are "on line." (In New York you get "on line" and it's not the internet.) On the other hand, I agree that the word "leveraged" has come into common usage more recently. A friend who is working on a novel set in 1972 uses only dictionaries published around then or somewhat earlier to check his word usage.
Barbreader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 27 2014, 07:47 AM   #290
J. Allen
Dancing on Rainbows
 
J. Allen's Avatar
 
Location: United States
Send a message via ICQ to J. Allen Send a message via AIM to J. Allen Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to J. Allen Send a message via Yahoo to J. Allen
Re: Star Trek Continues: Episode 2 "Lolani"...

Barbreader wrote: View Post
Some of the changes are regional. Language has become much less regional over the last 100 years. I'm not sure that even in the 1950s in New York City people would say, "you ought to." Just as some places say, when you wait at a bank you are "in line" and other locations say you are "on line." (In New York you get "on line" and it's not the internet.) On the other hand, I agree that the word "leveraged" has come into common usage more recently. A friend who is working on a novel set in 1972 uses only dictionaries published around then or somewhat earlier to check his word usage.
I do the same when I write stories set in past decades. I have a number of dictionaries for that purpose. I have a neat little dictionary from the late 1800s, so that should I write a western space fiction, it will be authentic!
__________________
Visit us at Brony Kingdom!
You will never find a more precious hive of love and humility.
---------
"Anger is an acid that can do more harm to the vessel in which it is stored than to anything on which it is poured." - Mark Twain
J. Allen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 27 2014, 09:15 AM   #291
Maurice
Vice Admiral
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
Re: Star Trek Continues: Episode 2 "Lolani"...

They'd have said "you oughta" in NYC.
__________________
* * *
"If you wanted to get a good meeting... just go in and
say 'darker, grittier, sexier' and whatever."
—Glen Larson, 2010
Maurice is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 27 2014, 01:36 PM   #292
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Star Trek Continues: Episode 2 "Lolani"...

Maurice wrote: View Post
Writing in the vernacular of a bygone era is tricky. A friend of mine wrote a screenplay set in 1954 and had one character describe another as "awesome" and I went, "ummmm...." And he was alive in 1954!

You don't realize how much language changes in subtle ways. A great example is that Mad Men, which is fairly pedantic on such things, still slips and has characters using words and phrases uncommon in its time period, like "leveraged" and characters saying "you need to" when in 1960s they'd more likely have said "you ought to".

Also, there's a modern American trend where many younger women talk higher and go up on the last syllables of words (a la Valley Speak) which isn't how women spoke in the 60s.
Well said. And it would be a very challenging thing to guard against.


On their FB page one continues to see lots of wishful suggestions:
- revisit the Mirror Universe.
- bring back Harry Mudd.
- revisit the planet of the Providers.
- Tribbles.
- bring back Kor, Kang and/or Koloth.
- revisit the Iotian planet

...etc, etc, etc,

All I can think is "no." Just, please, no.

One poster stated while he enjoyed the Apollo revisit he'd rather see new things and new characters he'd never seen before.

Yes.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 27 2014, 03:13 PM   #293
J. Allen
Dancing on Rainbows
 
J. Allen's Avatar
 
Location: United States
Send a message via ICQ to J. Allen Send a message via AIM to J. Allen Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to J. Allen Send a message via Yahoo to J. Allen
Re: Star Trek Continues: Episode 2 "Lolani"...

Maurice wrote: View Post
They'd have said "you oughta" in NYC.
Also, "you'se guys."

Er, probably. I don't know, I live in Ohio.
__________________
Visit us at Brony Kingdom!
You will never find a more precious hive of love and humility.
---------
"Anger is an acid that can do more harm to the vessel in which it is stored than to anything on which it is poured." - Mark Twain
J. Allen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 27 2014, 04:01 PM   #294
Barbreader
Fleet Captain
 
Location: New York, New York
View Barbreader's Twitter Profile
Re: Star Trek Continues: Episode 2 "Lolani"...

My family has lived in New York City since it became Greater New York. Before that, we lived in the City of Brooklyn. I'm going to be 59 this year. So, I'll say this will no concern that you'll disagree, because... if you do, you are wrong. There are multiple accents here, divided by class and ethnic group, and each speaks somewhat differently. Wall Streeters speak differently than Cabbies. There is a distinctive (and IMHO, very lovely) New York African-American accent. It's a mixture of New York and Black and It's one of the nicest in the City. I'm not sure I've ever heard it on TV, though, except in local news coverage. I hear it a lot as I shop in Harlem and it is also spoken in parts of Brooklyn. The old Tirdy-tird accent... I don't hear that nowadays, except in the old movies and on some West-coast based TV shows. I don't recall hearing it in my youth, either. As a child I asked my parents why on TV New Yorkers talked so funny, and they said people did speak that way in the late 1920s and early 1930s. Of course, you'll say my parents were wrong, and my childhood ear, growing up in the 1950s, was wrong. It could be that in those days it still existed around the dockworkers, but it was no longer common in the ordinary blue-collar neighborhood of my early years. There is still a blue-collar accent, but it's slightly different.

Graffitti likewise was washed from NYC subway cars by 1980, but continued to appear on them on TV for decades after that.

Fortunately, NY has adopted a pro-film pro-TV policy and most shows set here are now shot here, so that type of error is less common.

In fact, Marvel/Disney has just announced some web series that will be shot here.

I suspect in 1964 NYC, an ad man would not have said, "you oughta" that's very blue collar. He probably would have said, "you should."
Barbreader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 27 2014, 04:11 PM   #295
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Star Trek Continues: Episode 2 "Lolani"...

I think we can also get somewhat deaf to certain things we get accustomed to. My parents have a distinct French Canadian accent yet I don't notice it like I do in some of my other relations. Funny, but my older brother, myself and my two younger sisters don't have a French Canadian accent probably given because we were born and raised in Ontario and English became largely our first language. When I do speak French I don't think I have an English accent, but maybe I do. Then again I grew up in a home and listened to relations where I could easily pickup the French Canadian pronunciations.

And if you really listen you can detect all sorts of subtle accents in people, not surprising with how much people have been moving around this past century.

Five years ago I moved away from the greater Toronto area to Brockville, Ontario, a much smaller community. It's only a four hour drive west from Toronto on highway 401. But right off I started to pick up certain small differences in how many local people spoke. It isn't a huge difference, but it's there.

I, too, can really notice the different patterns of speech in older films. That was one of the things that sometimes throws me when watching a show like Mad Men. They make an effort (not always successful) to make the characters speak befitting the 1960's era. Knowing it's a modern production it can sometimes be odd because usually period films or series don't make that effort and we're used to hearing mostly contemporary speech patterns. It's even more amusing how we adapt to changing times because we don't really notice much how our own speech patterns have changed. Back in the '60s and '70s everyone spoke the same (to us) and yet now revisiting it we see it was different than how we speak now.

Fascinating really.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 27 2014, 04:23 PM   #296
MikeH92467
Vice Admiral
 
MikeH92467's Avatar
 
Location: Boise, ID
View MikeH92467's Twitter Profile
Re: Star Trek Continues: Episode 2 "Lolani"...

Well, if they ever do a show set in Mississippi, I hope whoever does it will note that the pronunciation is Be-LUX-ee, not Be-LOX-ee. All you have to do is say Be-LOX to anyone from the deep south to immediately tag yourself as a Yankee. I even heard the guy who announces Professional Bull Riding for CBS Sports say Be-LOX-ee when he was promoting an upcoming event.

Ooops, I just realized I went completely off topic with that rant. Would somebody be kind enough to get us back on topic before Greg notices?
MikeH92467 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 27 2014, 04:40 PM   #297
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Star Trek Continues: Episode 2 "Lolani"...

For some TOS can seem more sexist than it did back in the day. One thing a production like STC can do is temper that element. They've already taken the first step by introducing a woman Starfleet Commodore.

Next up, at some point lets see a female starship Captain.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 27 2014, 05:23 PM   #298
JJohnson
Captain
 
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Re: Star Trek Continues: Episode 2 "Lolani"...

Mr_Homn wrote: View Post
Random thoughts:

I re-watched this episode again, and I want to say again how awesome Lou Ferrigno was. An inspired choice for the role.

Also, I am sold on Vic as Kirk, and I'm sure he will get even better as more episodes are released.

The guy playing spock needs a lot of work but he's growing on me. Spock is probably the hardest character to play, though. Nimoy is just one of a kind.

Chris Doohan is perfect.

Most of the actresses in the show give off way too many "modern" vibes for me, if that makes sense. Too many 90s/00s/10s inflections and mannerisms. But it's a minor annoyance and maybe they are doing it intentionally.

I don't mind the Mckennah character that much but I agree with the camp that says she steps out of line too much with her Captain. Only Bones is really allowed to do that. If this continues I hope Kirk addresses the issue with some disciplinary action. Captain Kirk does not get P-whipped.
I agree here with respect to Chris Doohan. He does a great Scotty. And there are times I'm forgetting I'm not looking at James Doohan playing the character.

Ferrigno was also a great choice. I'm looking forward to episode 3.
JJohnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 1 2014, 09:17 PM   #299
Maurice
Vice Admiral
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
Re: Star Trek Continues: Episode 2 "Lolani"...

There's no denying there are regional accents and dialects and even sayings, but to nitpick the examples I gave re Mad Men is missing the forest for the trees, as the point is still valid that it's easy to get the vernacular wrong since it's constantly evolving.

Heck, I've asked people from other countries and a regions to go over dialogue I've written for contemporary characters just to make sure I'm not betraying said characters by making them speak incorrectly.

Back to the topic, though, all TOS fanfilms fall into this trap.
__________________
* * *
"If you wanted to get a good meeting... just go in and
say 'darker, grittier, sexier' and whatever."
—Glen Larson, 2010
Maurice is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 2 2014, 05:17 AM   #300
Barbreader
Fleet Captain
 
Location: New York, New York
View Barbreader's Twitter Profile
Re: Star Trek Continues: Episode 2 "Lolani"...

And my point is that it's not easy to do, and that even the professionals often get it wrong.
Barbreader is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.