RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,352
Posts: 5,502,893
Members: 25,121
Currently online: 606
Newest member: MsMarrielle

TrekToday headlines

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13

Sindicate Lager To Debut In The US Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

Rumor Mill: Saldana Gives Birth
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

New Line of Anovos Enterprise Uniforms
By: T'Bonz on Dec 11

Frakes: Sign Me Up!
By: T'Bonz on Dec 11


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 16 2014, 03:47 AM   #1
Gerbil13
Ensign
 
star trek vs star wars in five minutes question

Constructive critisms please and feedback on your thoughts about this.
Being science Fiction the who would win would be determined by the story ,directors and writers regardless of any technology.
For things like Tech Manuels giving scientific numbers like power outputs these are irrelevant when comparing different TV shows as the science are different even if using the same unit of measurement.
For instance if you think of two hovercars from each sci fi franchise both can reach 100mph however star trek says it takes 100bhp and star wars says it takes 200bhp to go that fast then when you compare the two you would assume the star wars car can travel twice as fast as the star trek car because it has twice the power. Dispite the numbers being official they should only be used to compare vehicles from there own universes.
Point2
The empire would clearly win as it has massive military and is a huge threat to the UFP,but thats why its will also lose. Star trek films are made for the enterprise to go against overwhelming odds like saving earth by going back in time without a time machine to bring back extinct whales. If the protagonist is starfleet then the empire will lose again by inferior forces because star trek is about hope and optimism.
Gerbil13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2014, 04:15 AM   #2
1001001
Let the Good Times Roll!!
 
1001001's Avatar
 
Location: People's Gaypublic of Drugafornia
Re: star trek vs star wars in five minutes question

Welcome to the board.

Since this topic covers more than Star Trek, it's really more appropriate for the SFF Forum.
__________________
“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States...The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge'.” - Isaac Asimov
1001001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2014, 04:19 AM   #3
Merry Christmas
Vice Admiral
 
Merry Christmas's Avatar
 
Location: tantalizing t'girl's techno temenos
Re: star trek vs star wars in five minutes question

Of course to beat the empire it not actually necessary to defeat the empire's military. It's a dictatorship with a single individual at the top. Kill or capture the federation's president and the federation goes on quite nicely, not a hiccup. Do the same to the empire and the whole thing comes to a halt. The republic is re-established and there is peace with the federation.

The federation would be assisted by the rebellion and whatever Jedi are alive at that time period.

The empire would not dare to throw it's entire military might against the federation because it has to maintain control over it's own people.

The federation has experience fighting clones during the dominion war and let's face it, compared to the jem'hadar the imperial storm troopers are pathetic.

Visual evidence suggest that imperial ftl travel is blind, starfleet would have the advantage of being able to attack in that realm without any counterattack. Even taking into account the imperial vessel obvious superior speed, starfleet comes out ahead.

Starfleet vessel's shields can not be penetrated with laser energy.

Merry Christmas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2014, 04:28 AM   #4
Robbiesan
Lieutenant Commander
 
Re: star trek vs star wars in five minutes question

There actually is a mod for GalCiv2 Twilight of the Arnor which is called Star Trek vs, Star Wars. Within that strategy game mod, you play as any number of races within the Star Trek universe, or you can choose to play factions within the Star Wars universe. It features tech for both universes as well as ships.
http://forums.galciv2.com/448534

If you're looking for a serious question about this, I don't think you've framed the question properly yet.

From a cinematic perspective, George Lucas probably never intended for that kind of question when he began the franchise. Star Wars is based upon Japanese chambara films (samurai films) of the 1940s-1970s, and that's why Darth Vader has armor of a futuristic samurai style. The Force is nothing more that Ki, a Japanese name for the original Chinese concept of Chi.
http://www.aikidofaq.com/philosophy/

In essence Star Wars IV is The Hidden Fortess by Akira Kurosawa.





The ships are derived from WW1 planes and their movements within an atmoshere. The overall genre based upon serialized films of the 1930s and beyond.

There is precious little science within the Star Wars universe, and so it's hard to have a framework in which to discuss such things in any logical discussion, much less a debate.
Robbiesan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2014, 04:35 AM   #5
BigKrampus
Rear Admiral
 
BigKrampus's Avatar
 
Location: No matter where you go, there's BigJake.
Re: star trek vs star wars in five minutes question

Robbiesan wrote: View Post
There is precious little science within the Star Wars universe, and so it's hard to have a framework in which to discuss such things in any logical discussion, much less a debate.
To be fair, you could probably manage it with NuTrek, which deliberately imitates the scientific literacy levels of the 1930s serials.

On the one hand this should be a no-contest, because between "red matter," "transwarp beaming" and Khan's blood, the NuTrek Federation has planet-smashing technology, the ability to instantly teleport across the galaxy, and functional immortality. OTOH its penchant for totally illogical behavior would make the contest a lot closer than it ought to be.
__________________
Weasels rip BigJake's flesh!
"I wanna read more" - Dennis "I . . . agree with everything you said" - SPCTRE "I blame Cracked" - J. Allen "Take me off" - The Stig
BigKrampus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2014, 04:37 AM   #6
Robbiesan
Lieutenant Commander
 
Re: star trek vs star wars in five minutes question

BigJake wrote: View Post
Robbiesan wrote: View Post
There is precious little science within the Star Wars universe, and so it's hard to have a framework in which to discuss such things in any logical discussion, much less a debate.
To be fair, you could probably manage it with NuTrek, which deliberately imitates the scientific literacy levels of the 1930s serials.

On the one hand this should be a no-contest, because between "red matter," "transwarp beaming" and Khan's blood, the NuTrek Federation has planet-smashing technology, the ability to instantly teleport across the galaxy, and functional immortality. OTOH its penchant for totally illogical behavior would make the contest a lot closer than it ought to be.
Wow, what a witty slam!
Robbiesan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2014, 04:47 AM   #7
BigKrampus
Rear Admiral
 
BigKrampus's Avatar
 
Location: No matter where you go, there's BigJake.
Re: star trek vs star wars in five minutes question

Robbiesan wrote: View Post
BigJake wrote: View Post
Robbiesan wrote: View Post
There is precious little science within the Star Wars universe, and so it's hard to have a framework in which to discuss such things in any logical discussion, much less a debate.
To be fair, you could probably manage it with NuTrek, which deliberately imitates the scientific literacy levels of the 1930s serials.

On the one hand this should be a no-contest, because between "red matter," "transwarp beaming" and Khan's blood, the NuTrek Federation has planet-smashing technology, the ability to instantly teleport across the galaxy, and functional immortality. OTOH its penchant for totally illogical behavior would make the contest a lot closer than it ought to be.
Wow, what a witty slam!
Actually I was being totally in earnest. This is a witty slam:



__________________
Weasels rip BigJake's flesh!
"I wanna read more" - Dennis "I . . . agree with everything you said" - SPCTRE "I blame Cracked" - J. Allen "Take me off" - The Stig
BigKrampus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2014, 04:53 AM   #8
Yuletide Caroler
Rear Admiral
 
Yuletide Caroler's Avatar
 
Location: A ship of Ancient Mariner's festive imagination.
View Yuletide Caroler's Twitter Profile
Re: star trek vs star wars in five minutes question

BigJake wrote: View Post
On the one hand this should be a no-contest, because ... NuTrek Federation has planet-smashing technology
Don't be too proud of this technological terror [they've] constructed. The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of The Force.

(Somebody had to say it. )



ETA:
Wait, unless you're saying Khan's blood is special because it contains ... midichlorians ...
__________________
Yuletide Caroler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2014, 04:56 AM   #9
Merry Christmas
Vice Admiral
 
Merry Christmas's Avatar
 
Location: tantalizing t'girl's techno temenos
Re: star trek vs star wars in five minutes question

Ancient Mariner wrote: View Post
The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of The Force.
The power of the force is nothing next to being dropped into a deep pit.

Remember how Riker killed the Reman Viceroy?

Merry Christmas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2014, 04:58 AM   #10
BigKrampus
Rear Admiral
 
BigKrampus's Avatar
 
Location: No matter where you go, there's BigJake.
Re: star trek vs star wars in five minutes question

Ancient Mariner wrote: View Post
Wait, unless you're saying Khan's blood is special because it contains ... midichlorians ...
Darth Khan... now there's a thought!
__________________
Weasels rip BigJake's flesh!
"I wanna read more" - Dennis "I . . . agree with everything you said" - SPCTRE "I blame Cracked" - J. Allen "Take me off" - The Stig
BigKrampus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2014, 05:18 AM   #11
Hound of UIster
Rear Admiral
 
Re: star trek vs star wars in five minutes question

The Empire at its height had several times the resources and territory of the Federation. Just for the UFP to get to these place would be a problem never mind conquering and occupying them.
Hound of UIster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2014, 03:20 PM   #12
DarthTom
Fleet Admiral
 
DarthTom's Avatar
 
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Re: star trek vs star wars in five minutes question

Gerbil13 wrote: View Post
The empire would clearly win as it has massive military and is a huge threat to the UFP,but thats why its will also lose. Star trek films are made for the enterprise to go against overwhelming odds like saving earth by going back in time without a time machine to bring back extinct whales. If the protagonist is starfleet then the empire will lose again by inferior forces because star trek is about hope and optimism.

The Empire would win because they would be willing to use end-game tactics and the Federation people are pussies in comparison.

The Empire would park either a Superdestoryer or the DeathStar itself next the moon - threaten to destory it - do so anyway as a show of force - demanding that the UFP immediately surrender. And then they would.

Despite any technological differences between the two universes - that the Empire is willing to take any measures to win, means they would whereas the Federation would be hampered by its morality.

A real world comparison would be if the United States threatened to nuke any state that killed even one of our soliders and followed through on that threat would mean we'd win.
DarthTom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 18 2014, 08:05 PM   #13
Merry Christmas
Vice Admiral
 
Merry Christmas's Avatar
 
Location: tantalizing t'girl's techno temenos
Re: star trek vs star wars in five minutes question

DarthTom wrote: View Post
A real world comparison would be if the United States threatened to nuke any state that killed even one of our soliders and followed through on that threat would mean we'd win.
Given that we're currently fight folks who willingly and routinely kill themselves in their attack upon both us and their own countrymen ... what are you talking about?

Merry Christmas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 18 2014, 08:42 PM   #14
The Festivus Awakens
Airing Grievouses
 
The Festivus Awakens's Avatar
 
Location: Performing Festivus Miracles
Re: star trek vs star wars in five minutes question

Ancient Mariner wrote: View Post
BigJake wrote: View Post
On the one hand this should be a no-contest, because ... NuTrek Federation has planet-smashing technology
Don't be too proud of this technological terror [they've] constructed. The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of The Force.
Yeah, those Jedi and Sith guys were always playing up what badasses they are (midichlorians also give one the power of shameless self-promotion), but you get them into the middle of an arena surrounded by armed roaches and stupid robots and they die just as easy as anyone else.
__________________
Locutus of Bored
The Festivus Awakens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 18 2014, 09:02 PM   #15
SantaEddie74
Fleet Admiral
 
SantaEddie74's Avatar
 
Location: The North Pole of the Warped Sector of the Demented Quadrant
View SantaEddie74's Twitter Profile
Re: star trek vs star wars in five minutes question

When Jar Jar Binks can take down as many Battle Droids with crude aquatic weaponry and his own inherent clumsiness as a fully trained Jedi Knight armed with the best weapon his or her Order has to offer it does kinda make one wonder just how much of the Jedi mythos built up over the centuries was just pretty damn good P.R., much like how J. Edgar Hoover portrayed the FBI as almost indestructible warriors for law and justice while whitewashing the weaknesses and failings.

Of course it didn't help that the Jedi tended to fall hook, line and sinker for their own publicity.
__________________
Remember what cooleddie74 says, kids:

"Don't forget to have a Patrick Swayze Christmas!"
SantaEddie74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.