RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,704
Posts: 5,431,720
Members: 24,834
Currently online: 438
Newest member: kamkaran


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 14 2014, 09:43 PM   #1
Noddy
Captain
 
Ion drive in the early 21st century

Propulsion tech sure is advanced by the early 2030s, judging by the line in VOY "One Small Step" about the stranded crew of Ares IV only having to wait two weeks for a rescue ship to get from Earth to Mars.
Noddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 14 2014, 10:29 PM   #2
PicardSpeedo
Lieutenant Commander
 
PicardSpeedo's Avatar
 
Re: Ion drive in the early 21st century

Noddy wrote: View Post
Propulsion tech sure is advanced by the early 2030s, judging by the line in VOY "One Small Step" about the stranded crew of Ares IV only having to wait two weeks for a rescue ship to get from Earth to Mars.
Word.
PicardSpeedo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 14 2014, 10:33 PM   #3
T'Girl
Vice Admiral
 
T'Girl's Avatar
 
Re: Ion drive in the early 21st century

Unless the "rescue ship" was simply the next scheduled ship that was going to arrive in two weeks anyway, repurpose as a rescue mission.

__________________
.
It's easy to support someones beliefs if they are identical to your own.
Tolerating beliefs that you don't personal embrace, or even fully understand, is harder.
T'Girl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 14 2014, 10:33 PM   #4
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: Ion drive in the early 21st century

They had artificial gravity in 1996. Why didn't the Aries IV have it?
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 14 2014, 11:06 PM   #5
Noddy
Captain
 
Re: Ion drive in the early 21st century

T'Girl wrote: View Post
Unless the "rescue ship" was simply the next scheduled ship that was going to arrive in two weeks anyway, repurpose as a rescue mission.

Ares V?
Noddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 14 2014, 11:19 PM   #6
Robert Comsol
Commodore
 
Robert Comsol's Avatar
 
Location: USS Berlin
Re: Ion drive in the early 21st century

Maybe the Botany Bay just had an oddly shaped centrifuge interior and artificial gravity was created the old fashioned 2001 or B5 style?

SCOTT: Well, it looks like that ship was expecting us. We read heat coming on, complete oxygen atmosphere.


Considering how the TOS producers emphasized the vital role of artificial gravity in the Writer's Guide and especially its limited availability while on battery power only ("In case of total failure of all engine power sources, the vessel's gravitational and life support systems can be switched to battery power, with a full-load capacity of about one week."), add to this that the Botany Bay apparently only had nuclear power (the equivalent of a 23rd starship battery?), it looks like it had to rely on centrifugal AG.

Bob
__________________
"The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth" Jean-Luc Picard
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
Robert Comsol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 15 2014, 11:33 PM   #7
T'Girl
Vice Admiral
 
T'Girl's Avatar
 
Re: Ion drive in the early 21st century

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
They had artificial gravity in 1996. Why didn't the Aries IV have it?
Budget cuts, artificial gravity equipment is expensive to manufacture and something had to go.


__________________
.
It's easy to support someones beliefs if they are identical to your own.
Tolerating beliefs that you don't personal embrace, or even fully understand, is harder.
T'Girl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.