RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,578
Posts: 5,403,097
Members: 24,865
Currently online: 494
Newest member: shyrim

TrekToday headlines

October-November 2014 Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Sep 30

Cho Selfie TV Alert
By: T'Bonz on Sep 30

TPTB To Shatner: Shhh!
By: T'Bonz on Sep 30

Mystery Mini Vinyl Figure Display Box
By: T'Bonz on Sep 29

The Red Shirt Diaries Episode Five
By: T'Bonz on Sep 29

Shatner In Trek 3? Well Maybe
By: T'Bonz on Sep 28

Retro Review: Shadows and Symbols
By: Michelle on Sep 27

Meyer: Revitalizing Star Trek
By: T'Bonz on Sep 26

Trek Costumes To Be Auctioned
By: T'Bonz on Sep 25

Hulu Snaps up Abrams-Produced Drama
By: T'Bonz on Sep 25


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Enterprise

Enterprise The final frontier has a new beginning in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 6 2014, 12:50 AM   #1
Viva Sativa
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Location: Sacramento, California
Watching ENT despite the continuity flaws.

I watched the series despite its plethora of issues because I love Star Trek. Am I the only one that tolerated captain Archer and his shipmates? Am I the only one who feels that Star Trek Enterprise was just another chance for Hollywood to revamp the series with new special effects and makeup without stressing whether the plot would correlate with the previous series.
Viva Sativa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 6 2014, 01:03 AM   #2
Hober Mallow
Commodore
 
Location: The planet Terminus, site of the Encyclopedia Foundation on the periphery of the galaxy
Re: Watching ENT despite the continuity flaws.

Viva Sativa wrote: View Post
I watched the series despite its plethora of issues because I love Star Trek. Am I the only one that tolerated captain Archer and his shipmates? Am I the only one who feels that Star Trek Enterprise was just another chance for Hollywood to revamp the series with new special effects and makeup without stressing whether the plot would correlate with the previous series.
I love Trek also, and I never cared about the ENT continuity issues... but I still didn't like the show.
__________________
"Beep... beep!" --Captain Pike
Hober Mallow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 6 2014, 01:14 AM   #3
F. King Daniel
Admiral
 
F. King Daniel's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: Watching ENT despite the continuity flaws.

Watch the Youtube videos in my signature. Enterprise certainly hasn't got the monopoly on continuity errors. The entire Trek saga is packed with HUGE universe-breakers (like the difference in warp speeds between TOS and Voyager)

IMO, if the errors (most of which were deliberate changes) ruin it for you, you're watching Trek wrong. Because you're not gonna have any fun!
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
F. King Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 6 2014, 01:48 AM   #4
theenglish
Rear Admiral
 
theenglish's Avatar
 
Location: Suriname
Re: Watching ENT despite the continuity flaws.

Thanks for pointing out the videos!
theenglish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 6 2014, 01:51 AM   #5
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Watching ENT despite the continuity flaws.

All Trek has continuity problems, as King Daniel points out. Enterprise's are no worse than those of any prior series or movie. It's just that it covers a period that we had decades to build up assumptions and expectations about. Most of the things that people saw as "continuity errors" in ENT were really contradictions of their preconceptions and beliefs about the 22nd century, rather than any actual canonical information.

Really, it would've been a total waste if all ENT had done was confirm our existing assumptions about the era. That would've been boring and pointless. It's good to be surprised.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 6 2014, 01:55 AM   #6
Hober Mallow
Commodore
 
Location: The planet Terminus, site of the Encyclopedia Foundation on the periphery of the galaxy
Re: Watching ENT despite the continuity flaws.

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
Watch the Youtube videos in my signature.
I like the turbo-lift stuff.
__________________
"Beep... beep!" --Captain Pike
Hober Mallow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 6 2014, 02:07 AM   #7
USS Triumphant
Rear Admiral
 
USS Triumphant's Avatar
 
Location: Go ahead, caller. I'm listening...
Re: Watching ENT despite the continuity flaws.

I don't have any serious problems with Enterprise, but it's because I assume the series is the result of changes starting with Cochrane, Sloan, and the Vulcans in ST:FC (or perhaps even earlier from some part of the Temporal Cold War) and leading to NuTrek, not to the Prime. In the Prime, I assume that Archer and company and their ship were somewhat different (and more in line with TOS, TNG, DS9, and VOY).
__________________
As the brilliant philosopher once said... Everybody, have fun tonight. Everybody, Wang Chung tonight.
USS Triumphant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 6 2014, 03:41 AM   #8
Viva Sativa
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Location: Sacramento, California
Re: Watching ENT despite the continuity flaws.

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
Watch the Youtube videos in my signature. Enterprise certainly hasn't got the monopoly on continuity errors. The entire Trek saga is packed with HUGE universe-breakers (like the difference in warp speeds between TOS and Voyager)

IMO, if the errors (most of which were deliberate changes) ruin it for you, you're watching Trek wrong. Because you're not gonna have any fun!
As far as warp factors go there is no controversy. In "Journey to Babel" that Orion ship was going warp 10. It was speculated that other than life support, since they would not be returning home they could attain such velocity by using all energy reserves. 24th century warp theory said that warp 10 is infinite velocity because the rapid folding of space would give the ship an inertia at such a high magnitude that there wouldn't be enough stopping power to exit warp 10. That theory was broken several times in TOS, TNG and VOY. The theory however had not been theorized yet during TOS. Theories are plausible and when outside intelligence is involved it's all possible because their technological advances were not documented by the federation e.g. The Kelvans, kalandans, and NOMAD. That's just in TOS canon. TNG had the traveler and Voyager had the Nacene among others. It's the unknown clause/ loophole and that is not comparable to ENT's continuity flaws.

I suggest you read Star Trek: Memory Prime(No.42). There is a point where Scotty is giving a tour of the engine room to Nobel and Zee-Magnees prize nominees. Someone argues that science may one day create trilythium and he counters by pointing out that they still haven't created DiSodium. Then gives a thorough lecture on accelerator fields and warp factors. Give it a read and correct thine error.
Viva Sativa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 6 2014, 03:42 AM   #9
Geoff Peterson
Fleet Admiral
 
Geoff Peterson's Avatar
 
Location: 20 feet from an outlet
Re: Watching ENT despite the continuity flaws.

USS Triumphant wrote: View Post
I don't have any serious problems with Enterprise, but it's because I assume the series is the result of changes starting with Cochrane, Sloan, and the Vulcans in ST:FC (or perhaps even earlier from some part of the Temporal Cold War) and leading to NuTrek, not to the Prime. In the Prime, I assume that Archer and company and their ship were somewhat different (and more in line with TOS, TNG, DS9, and VOY).
That would seem to be contradicted by In A Mirror Darkly and These Are the Voyages.
__________________
Nerys Myk
Geoff Peterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 6 2014, 04:01 AM   #10
Viva Sativa
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Location: Sacramento, California
Re: Watching ENT despite the continuity flaws.

Nerys Myk wrote: View Post
USS Triumphant wrote: View Post
I don't have any serious problems with Enterprise, but it's because I assume the series is the result of changes starting with Cochrane, Sloan, and the Vulcans in ST:FC (or perhaps even earlier from some part of the Temporal Cold War) and leading to NuTrek, not to the Prime. In the Prime, I assume that Archer and company and their ship were somewhat different (and more in line with TOS, TNG, DS9, and VOY).
That would seem to be contradicted by In A Mirror Darkly and These Are the Voyages.
Thank you.
Viva Sativa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 6 2014, 04:11 AM   #11
USS Triumphant
Rear Admiral
 
USS Triumphant's Avatar
 
Location: Go ahead, caller. I'm listening...
Re: Watching ENT despite the continuity flaws.

Nerys Myk wrote: View Post
That would seem to be contradicted by In A Mirror Darkly and These Are the Voyages.
In A Mirror Darkly isn't necessarily inconsistent, because there's nothing saying that the U.S.S. Defiant from the Prime Timeline wasn't shunted to the past of the NuMirror Universe.

(This also presumes, which I do, that the Nu Timeline has it's own NuMirror Universe that is approximately the same "distance" across the quantum realities from the Nu Universe as the original Mirror Universe was from the Prime Universe.)

As to These Are The Voyages, that episode isn't part of my personal canon (as someone else cleverly put it here recently, Deanna Troi's holodeck fanfic isn't canon ), and Berman and Braga can eat a big bag of {censored}.
__________________
As the brilliant philosopher once said... Everybody, have fun tonight. Everybody, Wang Chung tonight.
USS Triumphant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 6 2014, 04:27 AM   #12
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Watching ENT despite the continuity flaws.

The intent was always that ENT would lead into the Trek universe we knew. But since it's fiction, it reinterpreted a few things, just like TOS itself was constantly reinterpreting and revising its ideas as it gradually built the universe (Spock was originally a Vulcanian, the Enterprise was originally an Earth ship, Kirk originally had little interest in women, etc.). Every canon rewrites itself over time.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 6 2014, 04:37 AM   #13
Geoff Peterson
Fleet Admiral
 
Geoff Peterson's Avatar
 
Location: 20 feet from an outlet
Re: Watching ENT despite the continuity flaws.

USS Triumphant wrote: View Post
Nerys Myk wrote: View Post
That would seem to be contradicted by In A Mirror Darkly and These Are the Voyages.
In A Mirror Darkly isn't necessarily inconsistent, because there's nothing saying that the U.S.S. Defiant from the Prime Timeline wasn't shunted to the past of the NuMirror Universe.

(This also presumes, which I do, that the Nu Timeline has it's own NuMirror Universe that is approximately the same "distance" across the quantum realities from the Nu Universe as the original Mirror Universe was from the Prime Universe.)

As to These Are The Voyages, that episode isn't part of my personal canon (as someone else cleverly put it here recently, Deanna Troi's holodeck fanfic isn't canon ), and Berman and Braga can eat a big bag of {censored}.
The Defiant has data in its memory banks that indicates Enterprise, as we've seen it, is part of the history of the Prime Universe.

I'm no fan of TATV either. ( Worst. Episode. Evah.) If I was inclined to have a "personal canon", Enterprise would end with "Terra Prime", but creator intent trumps personal canon, so I have to accept TATV as canonical.
__________________
Nerys Myk
Geoff Peterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 6 2014, 05:07 AM   #14
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Watching ENT despite the continuity flaws.

Nerys Myk wrote: View Post
I'm no fan of TATV either. ( Worst. Episode. Evah.) If I was inclined to have a "personal canon", Enterprise would end with "Terra Prime", but creator intent trumps personal canon, so I have to accept TATV as canonical.
But canons often disregard individual parts of themselves. "The Alternative Factor" treated antimatter and dilithium in a way that contradicted what prior episodes had established, and it was ignored by all subsequent episodes. The Final Frontier's quick jaunt to the center of the galaxy was ignored by TNG, DS9, and VGR, which all assumed it would take decades to cover such distances via warp drive. "Threshold" was explicitly renounced and decanonized by its own writer.

Canon is fiction, not fact. It's the pretense of a consistent reality, but since it's still a story being told, it's flexible. It can make mistakes and it can correct or ignore those mistakes later on.

So canon does not require you to accept every last episode, every last line, as indisputable fact. No canon does that with itself, so there's no reason why we should have to. A canon is a story that people are telling you, and it's a story you tell yourself. On both levels, there is choice involved. You choose, just as they do, how to fit the disparate and conflicting details into an overall narrative, and sometimes that means just ignoring some of the details. And that is creator intent, because it's the intent of just about any creator to keep tweaking and refining a creation as long as possible.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 6 2014, 08:50 AM   #15
Dukhat
Commodore
 
Dukhat's Avatar
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Watching ENT despite the continuity flaws.

Christopher wrote: View Post
All Trek has continuity problems, as King Daniel points out. Enterprise's are no worse than those of any prior series or movie. It's just that it covers a period that we had decades to build up assumptions and expectations about. Most of the things that people saw as "continuity errors" in ENT were really contradictions of their preconceptions and beliefs about the 22nd century, rather than any actual canonical information.

Really, it would've been a total waste if all ENT had done was confirm our existing assumptions about the era. That would've been boring and pointless. It's good to be surprised.
But that was the problem. ENT, stylistically, structurally, and writing-wise, really wasn't all that different from Voyager which came before it.

I have no problems with changing preconceptions, but for the first two years the show was simply about a crew on a ship visiting planets/aliens-of-the-week. They even had a Seven-of-Nine clone. Every script for the first two seasons could have easily been written for Voyager.

It wasn't that my preconceptions of the 22nd century had changed, it was that I was basically being shown that Star Trek's past wasn't all that different from Star Trek's future. Stylistically and structurally, Forbidden Planet was a better Star Trek prequel than ENT was.
__________________
“Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.”
– Benjamin Franklin
Dukhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
continuity, controversy, ent

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.