RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,147
Posts: 5,343,580
Members: 24,592
Currently online: 517
Newest member: LaVelle

TrekToday headlines

New Funko Trek Figure
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

Saldana As A Role Model
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

San Diego Comic-Con Trek Fan Guide
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

Cumberbatch As Turing
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

Retro Review: In the Pale Moonlight
By: Michelle on Jul 19

Trek Beach Towel
By: T'Bonz on Jul 18

Two New Starships Collection Releases
By: T'Bonz on Jul 17

Giacchino Tour Arrives In North America
By: T'Bonz on Jul 17

IDW Publishing October Star Trek Comics
By: T'Bonz on Jul 16

Cho As Romantic Lead
By: T'Bonz on Jul 16


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 17 2013, 11:26 AM   #1
ZapBrannigan
Captain
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Location: New York State
Transporter beams itself?

Could the ship's transporter be locked onto itself and dematerialize all its own machinery? If it did, there would be no "pattern buffer" (a storage device) to hold the reassembly instructions, and no machinery to perform the reassembly of the machine. It sounds absurd. At best, a matter stream would fly off into space never to be seen again.

And yet that's what Mr. Data's personal transporter does in Nemesis. For me, that was over the line. Advanced technology is one thing, but the idea that all the transporter machinery gets dematerialized with you, and yet it continues to function, is insane.
ZapBrannigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 17 2013, 11:35 AM   #2
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: Transporter beams itself?

IIRC, Data's mini transporter was one use only, and so presumably left some tiny components behind. I'm not sure the writers gave it that much thought, but it's my explanation and I'm sticking with it!
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 17 2013, 12:55 PM   #3
Tosk
Rear Admiral
 
Tosk's Avatar
 
Location: On the run.
Re: Transporter beams itself?

Even though the film doesn't support this, I prefer to think of it as a compact version of the pattern enhancers that we saw on TNG. And that Data tied it in to one of the shuttle transporters.
Tosk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 17 2013, 04:31 PM   #4
T'Girl
Vice Admiral
 
T'Girl's Avatar
 
Re: Transporter beams itself?

^ It being something like a targetting beacon would seem to make more sense, the Enterprise's transporters weren't completely disabled, just the part that locks on to the transportee.


T'Girl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 17 2013, 05:36 PM   #5
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Transporter beams itself?

That's always been my interpretation, that the "personal transporter" was just some sort of remote control or beacon for the ship's machinery.

It should be noted that the concept of a personal transporter was introduced quite a few years earlier in Voyager's "Non Sequitur," though there it was a rather larger device than the one in NEM. There as well, I choose to interpret it as a device that connects to an existing transporter system and takes control of it, rather than one that actually somehow teleports itself.

Hmm... I suppose a self-beaming transporter could work if it had two redundant transporter mechanisms -- transporter A would beam transporter B to the destination, then transporter B would beam transporter A there. But it's hard to believe that even one transporter could be miniaturized to the size of that tiny device in Data's arm, let alone two.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 17 2013, 05:51 PM   #6
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: Transporter beams itself?

I thought the pip-sized transporter was pretty cool. We so rarely saw any technological advancement in the Trekverse's 200+ years, that and Voyager's warp 9+ shuttles were a nice sign that things were moving forward.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 17 2013, 07:19 PM   #7
Bad Thoughts
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Disguised as Reb Bad Thoughts
Re: Transporter beams itself?

Oh, I wished from the title that this was a series of Yakov Smirnoff-style jokes about the ST future: "In Socialist Federation, transporter beams itself!"
Bad Thoughts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 18 2013, 04:54 AM   #8
JirinPanthosa
Commodore
 
Re: Transporter beams itself?

In America, winner of election is candidate who gets most votes.

In Democratic Russia, winner of election is Putin!

I feel like Data's personal transporter was a contrivance to make it so he couldn't get both of them back and would be forced to sacrifice himself.
JirinPanthosa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 19 2013, 04:23 AM   #9
Pavonis
Commodore
 
Re: Transporter beams itself?

You should feel that way. That's what it was.
Pavonis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 19 2013, 09:49 AM   #10
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: Transporter beams itself?

Add in the transwarp beaming mod and you have a pip-sized transporter that can send you anywhere.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 19 2013, 01:51 PM   #11
PicardSpeedo
Lieutenant Commander
 
PicardSpeedo's Avatar
 
Re: Transporter beams itself?

Pavonis wrote: View Post
You should feel that way. That's what it was.
As was the entire movie.
PicardSpeedo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 20 2013, 11:34 PM   #12
Dick_Valentine
Commander
 
Location: Birmingham, UK (Not Alabama)
View Dick_Valentine's Twitter Profile
Re: Transporter beams itself?

That was a whole new level of confusion for me when I think about the transporter.

I still have a hard enough time getting my head round the idea you need a transporter pad to disassemble you but you can seemingly be reassembled in the middle of a barren alien planet with no receiving equipment......

If I was going to have my insides scrambled and reassembled I think I'd want the equipment working on BOTH ends, thank you very much!

(Also depending on plot it either needs the transporter pad at one end or they can sometimes go site to site and have the ship teleport them around the planet without a need for a pad on either end.....WHATTTTTT? )
__________________
I don't care what anyone thinks, when I hit the iceberg the iceberg sinks!
Dick_Valentine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 20 2013, 11:42 PM   #13
Robert Comsol
Commodore
 
Robert Comsol's Avatar
 
Location: shore leave in La Baule, France
Re: Transporter beams itself?

Dick_Valentine wrote: View Post
If I was going to have my insides scrambled and reassembled I think I'd want the equipment working on BOTH ends, thank you very much!
I wouldn't recommend that. As we clearly saw in TMP, having a transmitting transporter and a receiving one is not without risk.

Bob
__________________
"The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth" Jean-Luc Picard
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
Robert Comsol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 28 2013, 02:15 AM   #14
Phanton
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Phanton's Avatar
 
Location: Andromeda
Re: Transporter beams itself?

I posted similar question without seeing this one sorry; I think multiple transporters each locking on to itself within the matter stream?

Barclay in I think ‘Realm of Fear’ TNG seemed to grab others within the matter stream which suggests things continue to work (in a way) while in the matter stream.

What is the matter stream? Is it sub-space? Does it have dimension or time?
__________________
Make it so.
Trek Trance
Phanton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 28 2013, 02:55 AM   #15
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Transporter beams itself?

The absurdities of "Realm of Fear" notwithstanding, the matter stream is supposed to be the stream of particles that make up the subject, being transmitted through the transporter beam to the destination coordinates. It's literally a stream of matter -- your atoms are disassembled, turned into a stream which travels through subspace to the destination, and then reassembled into their original configuration. It's kind of like sending something through a very tiny wormhole only wide enough to fit individual subatomic particles rather than an intact person.

Essentially there are two key components transmitted through the beam. One is the matter stream, the actual raw material, and the other is the transporter pattern, the information describing how the particles go together to make a person or object, which is recorded when the transporter scans you. Now, in quantum physics terms, particles of the same type are identical and interchangeable; the thing that makes them individual is their particular state. So the information that defines you essentially is you in quantum terms. So in a sense, the real you is converted into the transporter pattern, an energy matrix in the beam which encodes that information. That would have to be the part that retains consciousness while the body is disassembled. After all, consciousness is information as well, so the mind could be active within the beam just as it would if it were uploaded into a computer. That's my take on what Barclay experienced in "Realm" -- that his mind perceived himself as still having a body because he was experiencing things from within the pattern that encoded all information about his body and mind simultaneously, so subjectively it felt to him as if he still had physical form. And when he sensed the others in the beam, his mind interpreted the sensation through sensory hallucinations.

It's still a dumb episode, but that's how I rationalize it.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
beaming, matter stream, nemesis, technology, transporter

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.