RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,920
Posts: 5,478,390
Members: 25,052
Currently online: 607
Newest member: johnclever25

TrekToday headlines

Trek Shirt And Hoodie
By: T'Bonz on Nov 27

A Klingon Christmas Carol’s Last Season
By: T'Bonz on Nov 27

Attack Wing Wave 10 Expansion Pack
By: T'Bonz on Nov 27

New Star Trek Funko Pop! Vinyl Figures
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

QMx Mini Phaser Ornament
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Stewart as Neo-Nazi Skinhead
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Klingon Bloodwine To Debut
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Trek Actors In War Of The Worlds Fundraiser
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Star Trek: The Next Generation Gag Reel Tease
By: T'Bonz on Nov 24

Shatner In Haven
By: T'Bonz on Nov 24


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Trek Tech

Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 10 2013, 09:19 AM   #46
RapidNadion
Commander
 
RapidNadion's Avatar
 
Re: NuTrek's Starfleet

Following this work with interest. Really enjoying this dangerous alternate history. Thanks for this!
RapidNadion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 10 2013, 11:06 PM   #47
Mountie1988
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Re: NuTrek's Starfleet

Those poor people on U.S.S. Sutherland...

so what tactical system of the Constitution represents the blue ball torpedoes from star trek 2009?

will we see the d4 and warbirds as well?
Mountie1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 12 2013, 09:29 AM   #48
CaptainDonovin
Fleet Captain
 
CaptainDonovin's Avatar
 
Location: Labrador City. woof
View CaptainDonovin's Twitter Profile
Re: NuTrek's Starfleet

I never post in this section but wow these are great. I love that someone is giving some needed attention to the AR/JJverse, especially with something that reminds me of a hybrid of the Ships of the Starfleet & a chronology type reference book.
__________________
Long live DS9!
CaptainDonovin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 12 2013, 04:25 PM   #49
Crazy Eddie
Rear Admiral
 
Crazy Eddie's Avatar
 
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
Re: NuTrek's Starfleet

Mountie1988 wrote: View Post
so what tactical system of the Constitution represents the blue ball torpedoes from star trek 2009?
I'd actually prefer to leave that open to interpretation since in-film they represent nothing more specific than "the weapons." My personal feeling, for a variety of reasons, is that it's probably the ship's main phaser cannon.

will we see the d4 and warbirds as well?
I hadn't really thought about doing the Klingon ships yet and I'm not sure that I could until more information actually comes out about them.
__________________
The Complete Illustrated Guide to Starfleet - Online Now!
Crazy Eddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 12 2013, 05:07 PM   #50
DEWLine
Commodore
 
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Send a message via AIM to DEWLine Send a message via Yahoo to DEWLine
Re: NuTrek's Starfleet

Understandable, given the lack of information on offer thus far.
__________________
Yours,

Dwight Williams
Illustrator/Writer
DEWLine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 12 2013, 05:39 PM   #51
Crazy Eddie
Rear Admiral
 
Crazy Eddie's Avatar
 
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
Re: NuTrek's Starfleet

Two more ship sheets before I start doing weapons and sensors. May add more ships later if I need to, but nothing comes to mind right this second.







__________________
The Complete Illustrated Guide to Starfleet - Online Now!
Crazy Eddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 12 2013, 05:52 PM   #52
DEWLine
Commodore
 
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Send a message via AIM to DEWLine Send a message via Yahoo to DEWLine
Re: NuTrek's Starfleet

"Second Romulan War"?

What of the assumption that the divergence began with the Kelvin Incident?

Also: I like the idea of Academy Annexes elsewhere in UFP space, which I think at least one TNG episode hinted at via several Okudagrams.
__________________
Yours,

Dwight Williams
Illustrator/Writer
DEWLine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 12 2013, 06:56 PM   #53
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: NuTrek's Starfleet

Just plain excellent work, Crazy Eddie.
__________________
"If I hadn't tried, the cost would have been my soul." - Admiral James T. Kirk, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 12 2013, 09:10 PM   #54
Crazy Eddie
Rear Admiral
 
Crazy Eddie's Avatar
 
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
Re: NuTrek's Starfleet

DEWLine wrote: View Post
"Second Romulan War"?
The first one was so tasty, they came back for seconds.

In all seriousness, it's sort of a reference to Alan Dean Fosters' "Balance of Terror" novelization; that's the phrase he uses to refer to the Romulan incursion and Enterprise's interception. I include it here because (aside from the fact that I think it sounds cool) there are multiple descriptions of the Earth-Romulan War -- from the ENT/Novelverse, from TNG, from the TOS description, from other novels before ENT came out -- and they largely contradict each other. I realized that it can be explained nicely if Spock was actually referring to the Earth-Romulan Wars, as a series of conflicts of various size and intensity that began a century ago and never completely ended. Only the first was even a declared war, the others are "wars" that involved different Romulan sub-nations/colonies fighting with different Federation members/colonies at different times using different weapons and technology. This way you wouldn't have to reconcile contradictory depictions of the Romulan War; they're ALL accurate, they just don't always refer to the same event.

So when Spock refers to the "primitive atomic weapons and in primitive space vessels" of the era, he's mainly referring to the colonial militias and the Earth Cargo Service who wound up fighting the bulk of the Romulan force while Starfleet had its hands full defending Sol. That early debacle, more than anything else, explains Starfleet's longstanding policy of isolation against the Romulans: they've been known to come busting out from time to time and you never know when they're going to make trouble again.

What of the assumption that the divergence began with the Kelvin Incident?
It most likely did, but I make no assumptions. On the one hand, the current movie produces have ALOT of room to maneuver and could play that any way they like, even ways that will make most of us angry and confused. My goal in writing this was to leave "wiggle room" where new information could fit without too much editing.
__________________
The Complete Illustrated Guide to Starfleet - Online Now!

Last edited by Crazy Eddie; December 12 2013 at 09:20 PM.
Crazy Eddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 12 2013, 11:14 PM   #55
DEWLine
Commodore
 
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Send a message via AIM to DEWLine Send a message via Yahoo to DEWLine
Re: NuTrek's Starfleet

Hmmm. Interesting point there. And we certainly have recent incidents of mutually conflicting accounts, as you say, re: the novels and the material published by 47North...
__________________
Yours,

Dwight Williams
Illustrator/Writer
DEWLine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 12 2013, 11:30 PM   #56
Nightowl1701
Captain
 
Location: Orlando, FL
Re: NuTrek's Starfleet

I think you meant "James Blish's 'Balance of Terror' novelization" there.
Nightowl1701 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 13 2013, 06:08 AM   #57
Kruezerman
Fleet Captain
 
Kruezerman's Avatar
 
Location: The corner of San Antonio and a bottle of Fireball
Re: NuTrek's Starfleet

Yorktown and Lexington share a registry number. Is that intentional?
__________________
I'm not saying it's cold, but I just keyed two cars with my nipples.
Kruezerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 13 2013, 08:11 AM   #58
Nob Akimoto
Captain
 
Location: The People's Republic of Austin
View Nob Akimoto's Twitter Profile
Re: NuTrek's Starfleet

Is there a particular reason the ship names seem to be drawn from a very narrow pool of possible names? They mostly seem primarily drawn from London Treaty power navies.
Nob Akimoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 13 2013, 05:47 PM   #59
Crazy Eddie
Rear Admiral
 
Crazy Eddie's Avatar
 
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
Re: NuTrek's Starfleet

Nightowl1701 wrote: View Post
I think you meant "James Blish's 'Balance of Terror' novelization" there.
Probably. It's been years since I read it.

Kruezerman wrote: View Post
Yorktown and Lexington share a registry number. Is that intentional?
USS Yorktown was originally just an engineering test article and refitted for fleet service when Lexington and Hornet were shot by the Romulans. I had been debating with myself whether or not to make the first ship in that series NX- or NCC and change the numbers accordingly. Come to think of it, I forgot to make a final decision on that.

Nob Akimoto wrote: View Post
Is there a particular reason the ship names seem to be drawn from a very narrow pool of possible names? They mostly seem primarily drawn from London Treaty power navies.
Most of the Yorktowns built during the Romulan Wars were named after famous warships. These were followed by a "restart" of the production line which were named after famous generals or military leaders. Dallas, Chicago and Houston were built after the war's end.

The Poseidons were named after figures from greek mythology, which -- not entirely coincidentally -- also happen to be the names of asteroids and moons in the Sol system.

The first run of Proximas were named after major stars in the Earth astronomical catalog. The next five were named after famous warships.

The Eagle class ships were named after famous exploration vessels, except for Defiant and Farragut which are named after the first two manned spacecraft to explore the outer solar system.

The Solomon and Newton classes are named after well-known starships from the previous century, while the Constitution class are named after aircraft carriers.
__________________
The Complete Illustrated Guide to Starfleet - Online Now!
Crazy Eddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 14 2013, 02:39 AM   #60
The_Beef
Lieutenant Commander
 
Re: NuTrek's Starfleet

I'm really enjoying this. It's a big twist on the traditional way of looking at Starfleet, and I really like the vibe that the fleet is doing its best to apply cutting-edge technology to both exploration and defense, rather than the way most timelines just portray earlier ships as more primitive versions of the Enterprise.

I just want to clarify: so the original, classic Constitution design would definitely have been non-transwarp capable, right? It would have been just a bigger and better version of the Bonaventure, filling the same role of exploring the vast stretches of nearby but uncharted space? So under this, in the classic TOS era there would have been transwarp-capable flagships, but due to their horrendous cost and defense priorities they weren't being used for exploration. Excelsior was supposed to be the game changer in that it was a smaller and presumably cheaper transwarp ship, and whether it succeeded or failed, by the time of TNG transwarp on smaller ships is commonplace (I assume, based on the Defiant and Voyager. The Ent-D certainly would have been big enough to support transwarp even in this time period). Does that sound about right?
The_Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
alternate timeline, into darkness, nutrek, starfleet

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.