RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,903
Posts: 5,477,272
Members: 25,051
Currently online: 668
Newest member: GrammaticalFict

TrekToday headlines

New Star Trek Funko Pop! Vinyl Figures
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

QMx Mini Phaser Ornament
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Stewart as Neo-Nazi Skinhead
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Klingon Bloodwine To Debut
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Trek Actors In War Of The Worlds Fundraiser
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Star Trek: The Next Generation Gag Reel Tease
By: T'Bonz on Nov 24

Shatner In Haven
By: T'Bonz on Nov 24

Retro Review: Covenant
By: Michelle on Nov 22

Two Official Starships Collection Previews
By: T'Bonz on Nov 21

Saldana: Women Issues In Hollywood
By: T'Bonz on Nov 21


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Lounges & General Chat > Miscellaneous

Miscellaneous Discussion of non-Trek topics.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 11 2013, 08:34 PM   #16
Locutus of Bored
Full Metal Bat'leth
 
Locutus of Bored's Avatar
 
Location: Huntington Beach, California
Re: Wood Burning = Illegal

Kestrel wrote: View Post
Move somewhere less crowded if wood fires ETA: whenever you feel like it are that important to you.
No, because...

Locutus of Bored is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 11 2013, 08:41 PM   #17
doubleohfive
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: Wood Burning = Illegal

Well, that would just make too much sense.
doubleohfive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 11 2013, 08:48 PM   #18
J.T.B.
Commodore
 
J.T.B.'s Avatar
 
Re: Wood Burning = Illegal

Flux Capacitor wrote: View Post
The real question is...how do they even plan to enforce this? The cops don't want anything to do with it, so I don't see how some air protection district is going to have any authority to start fining people.
Where I live wood burning restrictions have been the rule for years. The Department of Environmental Quality has enforcement people who look for smoking chimneys and give warnings or citations. A home is exempt if wood fire is the sole heat source, but that is rare.

Nevertheless, the air can be downright dangerous to some people in winter inversions, and rates of chronic respiratory conditions are significantly higher than national averages. Rates of people freezing to death remain very low.
J.T.B. is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 11 2013, 09:02 PM   #19
sojourner
Admiral
 
sojourner's Avatar
 
Location: I'm at WKRP
Re: Wood Burning = Illegal

I don't live there, but in parts of Colorado I think all new construction is limited to installing gas fireplaces. Wood burning is not allowed. Think it's in the ski areas.
__________________
Baby, you and me were never meant to be, just maybe think of me once in a while...
sojourner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 11 2013, 09:05 PM   #20
Kestra
Vice Admiral
 
Kestra's Avatar
 
Re: Wood Burning = Illegal

I'm always grateful for limitations on burning because it definitely aggravates my respiratory system, even if I'm just in my car driving by.
Kestra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 11 2013, 09:07 PM   #21
Robert Maxwell
beep
 
Location: boop
View Robert Maxwell's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to Robert Maxwell Send a message via AIM to Robert Maxwell Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Robert Maxwell Send a message via Yahoo to Robert Maxwell
Re: Wood Burning = Illegal

Flux Capacitor wrote: View Post
Once again, you people seem to think I'm making a huge deal out of something when all I'm doing is bringing it up for discussion. I myself don't even have a fireplace in my apartment. I just general question things being banned that people typically can do in their own homes. Just because I bring something up does not equal me complaining. It's called starting a discussion.
Let's look at your original post, shall we?

Flux Capacitor wrote: View Post
Well, in the San Francisco Bay Area it is, anyway...

For the fourth time this week, a Spare the Air alert has been issued for Saturday by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District.
According to the district, a high pressure weather system along with colder temperatures have lingered in the Bay Area all week, causing pollution to become trapped and rise to unhealthy levels. When an alert has been issued, it is illegal residents to burn wood, manufactured fire logs or any other solid fuels indoors or outside.
Full Story

So...during one of the coldest winters we've experienced in years, this BAAQMD wants to make a cheap and easy way to stay warm illegal. Apparently, if your home is without a permanent heating system you're exempt (apparently the wood being burned in those homes doesn't affect the air) but otherwise, if you're caught burning wood, you're subject to a fine...although, at least in my city, the police department has refused to assist in enforcing this ban. Something about having real criminals to worry about.

I get that we all want to have clean, breathable air...but burning wood? Something people have been doing since we discovered what fire is? The smell of someone having a fire in their fireplace has always been a pleasant smell for me, sort of one of those smells that lets you know it's time for the holidays.

I could see maybe suggesting people find another means of heating their homes if possible, but a ban? Seems like a pretty big overstep.

<img id="ums_img_tooltip" class="UMSRatingIcon">
(Emphasis mine.)

I mean, you basically said, "I get wanting to be able to breathe, but what about freedom?" Did you really expect no one to find that a bit absurd?
__________________
I has a blag.
Robert Maxwell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 11 2013, 09:17 PM   #22
Locutus of Bored
Full Metal Bat'leth
 
Locutus of Bored's Avatar
 
Location: Huntington Beach, California
Re: Wood Burning = Illegal

Fear not. I have it on good authority that wood burning will still be permitted in San Francisco in the distant future of ten years from now.


Locutus of Bored is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 11 2013, 09:18 PM   #23
Kestra
Vice Admiral
 
Kestra's Avatar
 
Re: Wood Burning = Illegal

What is that, Doctor Who or something?
Kestra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 11 2013, 09:26 PM   #24
J. Allen
[Snuggling Intensifies]
 
J. Allen's Avatar
 
Location: The Countryside
Send a message via ICQ to J. Allen Send a message via AIM to J. Allen Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to J. Allen Send a message via Yahoo to J. Allen
Re: Wood Burning = Illegal

HoHoHocutus wrote: View Post
Fear not. I have it on good authority that wood burning will still be permitted in San Francisco in the distant future of ten years from now.


Wow. That is a seriously large, unauthorized conflagration. If you're not careful, the EPA will see it, and when they do, they're going to be pi-



Fuck Fuck Fuck! Everybody Run!
__________________
-----------------------
💗 Visit Brony Kingdom 💗
-----------------------
J. Allen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 11 2013, 09:31 PM   #25
Mr Awe
Rear Admiral
 
Re: Wood Burning = Illegal

Flux Capacitor wrote: View Post
Well, in the San Francisco Bay Area it is, anyway...

For the fourth time this week, a Spare the Air alert has been issued for Saturday by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District.
According to the district, a high pressure weather system along with colder temperatures have lingered in the Bay Area all week, causing pollution to become trapped and rise to unhealthy levels. When an alert has been issued, it is illegal residents to burn wood, manufactured fire logs or any other solid fuels indoors or outside.
Full Story

So...during one of the coldest winters we've experienced in years, this BAAQMD wants to make a cheap and easy way to stay warm illegal.
It may be cheap for the person burning the wood but it has external costs to others. Namely the frigging disgusting pollution that no doubt causes all sorts of health problems.

So, look at it another way. Why should someone be allowed to use a method of heating that produces excessive pollution and health problems for others?

Is the wood burner going to compensate the health problems of others? No. And, that's why it superficially appears to cheap but in reality it's not cheap.

Mr Awe
Mr Awe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 11 2013, 09:37 PM   #26
doubleohfive
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: Wood Burning = Illegal

Solstice wrote: View Post
Flux Capacitor wrote: View Post
Once again, you people seem to think I'm making a huge deal out of something when all I'm doing is bringing it up for discussion. I myself don't even have a fireplace in my apartment. I just general question things being banned that people typically can do in their own homes. Just because I bring something up does not equal me complaining. It's called starting a discussion.
Let's look at your original post, shall we?

Flux Capacitor wrote: View Post
Well, in the San Francisco Bay Area it is, anyway...

For the fourth time this week, a Spare the Air alert has been issued for Saturday by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District.
According to the district, a high pressure weather system along with colder temperatures have lingered in the Bay Area all week, causing pollution to become trapped and rise to unhealthy levels. When an alert has been issued, it is illegal residents to burn wood, manufactured fire logs or any other solid fuels indoors or outside.
Full Story

So...during one of the coldest winters we've experienced in years, this BAAQMD wants to make a cheap and easy way to stay warm illegal. Apparently, if your home is without a permanent heating system you're exempt (apparently the wood being burned in those homes doesn't affect the air) but otherwise, if you're caught burning wood, you're subject to a fine...although, at least in my city, the police department has refused to assist in enforcing this ban. Something about having real criminals to worry about.

I get that we all want to have clean, breathable air...but burning wood? Something people have been doing since we discovered what fire is? The smell of someone having a fire in their fireplace has always been a pleasant smell for me, sort of one of those smells that lets you know it's time for the holidays.

I could see maybe suggesting people find another means of heating their homes if possible, but a ban? Seems like a pretty big overstep.

<img id="ums_img_tooltip" class="UMSRatingIcon">
(Emphasis mine.)

I mean, you basically said, "I get wanting to be able to breathe, but what about freedom?" Did you really expect no one to find that a bit absurd?

(See what I did there?)
doubleohfive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 11 2013, 09:41 PM   #27
sojourner
Admiral
 
sojourner's Avatar
 
Location: I'm at WKRP
Re: Wood Burning = Illegal

Lot of image linking fail in this thread.
__________________
Baby, you and me were never meant to be, just maybe think of me once in a while...
sojourner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 11 2013, 09:42 PM   #28
doubleohfive
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: Wood Burning = Illegal

Fixed it. (sorry.)
doubleohfive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 11 2013, 09:47 PM   #29
Trekker4747
Trekker4747
 
Trekker4747's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
Re: Wood Burning = Illegal

You live in one of the more Liberal states/cities in the country. This seems on par with that. Perhaps you'll be happier living somewhere else? Texas? South Carolina? Anywhere in the South?
__________________
Just because it's futuristic doesn't mean it's practical.
Trekker4747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 11 2013, 09:52 PM   #30
Locutus of Bored
Full Metal Bat'leth
 
Locutus of Bored's Avatar
 
Location: Huntington Beach, California
Re: Wood Burning = Illegal

Kestra wrote: View Post
What is that, Doctor Who or something?


sojourner wrote: View Post
Lot of image linking fail in this thread.
doubleohfive wrote: View Post
Fixed it. (sorry.)
I don't think it's you. There seems to be something going on board wide with images taking a longer than normal time to load or not loading at all for some people. There was a similar issue in the Thread Bomb topic and a couple other places.

Last edited by Locutus of Bored; December 11 2013 at 10:03 PM.
Locutus of Bored is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.