RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,229
Posts: 5,438,262
Members: 24,957
Currently online: 607
Newest member: zanejc

TrekToday headlines

Cumberbatch In Wax
By: T'Bonz on Oct 24

Trek Screenwriter Washington D.C. Appearance
By: T'Bonz on Oct 23

Two Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Oct 22

Pine In New Skit
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

Stewart In Holiday Film
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

The Red Shirt Diaries #8
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

IDW Publishing January Comics
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

Retro Review: Chrysalis
By: Michelle on Oct 18

The Next Generation Season Seven Blu-ray Details
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

CBS Launches Streaming Service
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Sports and Fitness

Sports and Fitness It's football, not soccer.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old December 4 2013, 03:51 PM   #136
Timby
GIVE ME YOUR FACE
 
Timby's Avatar
 
Re: MLB Offseason 2013-2014

Yanks wrote: View Post
Ellsbury brings a higher on base percentage, less strike-outs, more stolen bases and you don't loose much pop.
Fun fact: If Ellsbury had hit one fewer home run this past season, his 2011 season would comprise exactly half of his career total. Remove 2011 from the equation (because he's never going to repeat that), and he averages about eight dingers a season. Ellsbury has very little pop; he's basically Carl Crawford 2.0 (except he's somehow getting paid more). Ellsbury is not elite talent, and there's no reason to pay him like he is.

The other interesting factor in play here is that the Yankees are still desperately trying to get under the luxury tax threshold and reports say they haven't given up on Cano, which would suggest they're expecting a Christmas present in the form of a lengthy Alex Rodriguez suspension.
Timby is offline  
Old December 4 2013, 04:02 PM   #137
Yanks
Fleet Captain
 
Yanks's Avatar
 
Location: NX01 Bridge
Re: MLB Offseason 2013-2014

Timby wrote: View Post
Yanks wrote: View Post
Ellsbury brings a higher on base percentage, less strike-outs, more stolen bases and you don't loose much pop.
Fun fact: If Ellsbury had hit one fewer home run this past season, his 2011 season would comprise exactly half of his career total. Remove 2011 from the equation (because he's never going to repeat that), and he averages about eight dingers a season. Ellsbury has very little pop; he's basically Carl Crawford 2.0 (except he's somehow getting paid more). Ellsbury is not elite talent, and there's no reason to pay him like he is.

The other interesting factor in play here is that the Yankees are still desperately trying to get under the luxury tax threshold and reports say they haven't given up on Cano, which would suggest they're expecting a Christmas present in the form of a lengthy Alex Rodriguez suspension.
I'm not so sure about the "trying to stay under $189". I know they've stated that, but it sure doesn't seem like that's really a factor.

Not sure I agree about Ellsbury either. I think he is a top tear player. Just look at what he brought to the Red Sox last year.

I DEEPLY hope that the Yankees know something we don't about the Choke-Rod debacle. Nothing would make my day more than to never see this guy play another game (at least never again in pin-stripes)

I also read that they Yanks won't go over $175 for Cano....

We'll see I guess, it's kind of suprising to me that Seattle all of a sudden "might" be willing to pay Cano $200. I'm taking that with a grain of salt.
__________________
We have to learn again that science without contact with experiments is an enterprise which is likely to go completely astray into imaginary conjecture.”
- Evolution of the Solar System, NASA 1976, H. Alfvén & G, Arrhenius, p. 257.
Yanks is offline  
Old December 4 2013, 04:37 PM   #138
Scout101
Admiral
 
Scout101's Avatar
 
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Re: MLB Offseason 2013-2014

Well, they were rumored to be in on Ells, so now that that money is available again, it's not that far fetched. They've got some pitching, need some bats.

And for all the people the Yanks are bringing in, pitching remains their biggest problem, and they've done nothing about that. good luck there...
__________________
Perhaps, if I am very lucky, the feeble efforts of my lifetime will someday be noticed and maybe, in some small way, they will be acknowledged as the greatest works of genius ever created by man. ~Jack Handey
STO: @JScout33
Scout101 is offline  
Old December 4 2013, 04:55 PM   #139
Yanks
Fleet Captain
 
Yanks's Avatar
 
Location: NX01 Bridge
Re: MLB Offseason 2013-2014

Scout101 wrote: View Post
Well, they were rumored to be in on Ells, so now that that money is available again, it's not that far fetched. They've got some pitching, need some bats.

And for all the people the Yanks are bringing in, pitching remains their biggest problem, and they've done nothing about that. good luck there...
I think they are going to bring in Jap sensation Tanaka.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/ja...d=tanaka003mas

Fingers crossed on getting Kuroda to sign one more...

Peneda should be healthy for the first time in Pinstripes...

I don't think Robertson is the answer to replace Mo. He's too good and too valuable to bring in in the 7th and 8th.

Lots of work to do...
__________________
We have to learn again that science without contact with experiments is an enterprise which is likely to go completely astray into imaginary conjecture.”
- Evolution of the Solar System, NASA 1976, H. Alfvén & G, Arrhenius, p. 257.

Last edited by Yanks; December 4 2013 at 07:58 PM.
Yanks is offline  
Old December 4 2013, 06:09 PM   #140
Tom Servo
Commodore
 
Tom Servo's Avatar
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Re: MLB Offseason 2013-2014

If the Yankees somehow get out of that contract, I'll be livid. They shouldn't be rewarded because A-Rod acted stupid. They signed him, they should have to live with it, not receive a get of jail free card.

Hell, there is a way from suspected PED guys from getting raises like Peralta did from the Cardinals. If you're caught with PEDs to the point of a major suspension like A-Rod, the team should still have to eat that contract money. That'll cause teams to think twice about signing guys who seem to pose that PED use.

As for Ellsbury...it sucks its NY, but I'm glad the Sox aren't paying him that kind of money. Granted, this is really the only way they can reload because their farm system is the Mojave at the moment. Meanwhile the Sox have young guys coming up that they can start using to fill these holes, and using the draft picks from these FA to draft more.
__________________
"I like this ship! It's exciting!"-Scotty "Star Trek"

Member of Red Sox Nation
Tom Servo is offline  
Old December 4 2013, 06:20 PM   #141
Timby
GIVE ME YOUR FACE
 
Timby's Avatar
 
Re: MLB Offseason 2013-2014

Yanks wrote: View Post
Timby wrote: View Post
Yanks wrote: View Post
Ellsbury brings a higher on base percentage, less strike-outs, more stolen bases and you don't loose much pop.
Fun fact: If Ellsbury had hit one fewer home run this past season, his 2011 season would comprise exactly half of his career total. Remove 2011 from the equation (because he's never going to repeat that), and he averages about eight dingers a season. Ellsbury has very little pop; he's basically Carl Crawford 2.0 (except he's somehow getting paid more). Ellsbury is not elite talent, and there's no reason to pay him like he is.

The other interesting factor in play here is that the Yankees are still desperately trying to get under the luxury tax threshold and reports say they haven't given up on Cano, which would suggest they're expecting a Christmas present in the form of a lengthy Alex Rodriguez suspension.
I'm not so sure about the "trying to stay under $189". I know they've stated that, but it sure doesn't seem like that's really a factor.
Every move they've made over the past two years has been about getting under 189. That's why they trotted out an outfield of Gardner and the corpses of Vernon Wells and Ichiro last year.

Not sure I agree about Ellsbury either. I think he is a top tear player. Just look at what he brought to the Red Sox last year.
Player A: 2228 PA, 23 HR, 161 SB, 38 CS, .268/.352/.381

Player B: 2472 PA, 33 HR, 202 SB, 31 CS, .289/.341/.405

Guess who?

We'll see I guess, it's kind of suprising to me that Seattle all of a sudden "might" be willing to pay Cano $200. I'm taking that with a grain of salt.
Hint: The Mariners are major players for Cano in the same way the Mets are, which is to say about 24 hours ago the Yankees drew another line in the sand.
Timby is offline  
Old December 4 2013, 07:55 PM   #142
Yanks
Fleet Captain
 
Yanks's Avatar
 
Location: NX01 Bridge
Re: MLB Offseason 2013-2014

Timby wrote: View Post
Player A: 2228 PA, 23 HR, 161 SB, 38 CS, .268/.352/.381

Player B: 2472 PA, 33 HR, 202 SB, 31 CS, .289/.341/.405

Guess who?
OK, I give...

...but numbers don't signify what he meant to the Red Sox line up.

Don't forget, the bigget part of that deal is that he is no longer in the Sox line-up. Double whammy is that he'll be patrolling center for the Yanks.

We'll see I guess, it's kind of suprising to me that Seattle all of a sudden "might" be willing to pay Cano $200. I'm taking that with a grain of salt.
Hint: The Mariners are major players for Cano in the same way the Mets are, which is to say about 24 hours ago the Yankees drew another line in the sand.
Agree.
__________________
We have to learn again that science without contact with experiments is an enterprise which is likely to go completely astray into imaginary conjecture.”
- Evolution of the Solar System, NASA 1976, H. Alfvén & G, Arrhenius, p. 257.
Yanks is offline  
Old December 4 2013, 07:57 PM   #143
Kirby
Rear Admiral
 
Kirby's Avatar
 
Location: Alt: 5280
View Kirby's Twitter Profile
Re: MLB Offseason 2013-2014

The Rockies traded the streaky Dexter Fowler to the Astros for Brandon Barnes (meh), and Jordan Lyles with his magnificant 5.59 era. Way to go Rockies. WTF?
__________________
Give each other $10, put it on Underhill.
Kirby is offline  
Old December 4 2013, 08:20 PM   #144
George Steinbrenner
Fleet Admiral
 
George Steinbrenner's Avatar
 
Location: Mr. Laser Beam is in the visitor's bullpen
View George Steinbrenner's Twitter Profile
Re: MLB Offseason 2013-2014

Wonder how Salty feels about going from a team that just won the World Series to...the Marlins.
__________________
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.
George Steinbrenner is offline  
Old December 4 2013, 08:34 PM   #145
Scout101
Admiral
 
Scout101's Avatar
 
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Re: MLB Offseason 2013-2014

About 21 Million dollars richer, I'd imagine. And playing in nice weather near his house.

Probably not terrible

Like a lot of people in a lot of sports, it's the drive to get the championship/ring. Once you've gotten that, it's nice to have more, but it's also ok to chase the money a bit and get yourself set up. Same thing Ellsbury just did: get your rings, then sign a bloated contract to a washed-up team to cash in
__________________
Perhaps, if I am very lucky, the feeble efforts of my lifetime will someday be noticed and maybe, in some small way, they will be acknowledged as the greatest works of genius ever created by man. ~Jack Handey
STO: @JScout33
Scout101 is offline  
Old December 4 2013, 09:02 PM   #146
Ar-Pharazon
Rear Admiral
 
Ar-Pharazon's Avatar
 
Re: MLB Offseason 2013-2014

Ríu ríu, chíu wrote: View Post
Wonder how Salty feels about going from a team that just won the World Series to...the Marlins.
It's just like getting sent to the minors I would guess.
__________________
Rimmer, on what period of history to live in-
“Well, It’d be the 19th century for me, one of Napoleon’s marshals.
The chance to march across Europe with the greatest general of all time and kill Belgians” - (White Hole).
Ar-Pharazon is offline  
Old December 4 2013, 09:24 PM   #147
Kirby
Rear Admiral
 
Kirby's Avatar
 
Location: Alt: 5280
View Kirby's Twitter Profile
Re: MLB Offseason 2013-2014

^^ A LOSING minor league team at that. Enjoy your cash and good coffee Salty.
__________________
Give each other $10, put it on Underhill.
Kirby is offline  
Old December 4 2013, 09:26 PM   #148
Yanks
Fleet Captain
 
Yanks's Avatar
 
Location: NX01 Bridge
Re: MLB Offseason 2013-2014

The Sox had no desire nor need to keep him...
__________________
We have to learn again that science without contact with experiments is an enterprise which is likely to go completely astray into imaginary conjecture.”
- Evolution of the Solar System, NASA 1976, H. Alfvén & G, Arrhenius, p. 257.
Yanks is offline  
Old December 4 2013, 10:57 PM   #149
George Steinbrenner
Fleet Admiral
 
George Steinbrenner's Avatar
 
Location: Mr. Laser Beam is in the visitor's bullpen
View George Steinbrenner's Twitter Profile
Re: MLB Offseason 2013-2014

They got rid of Salty, but signed the washed up AJ Pierzynski?
__________________
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.
George Steinbrenner is offline  
Old December 4 2013, 11:13 PM   #150
Timby
GIVE ME YOUR FACE
 
Timby's Avatar
 
Re: MLB Offseason 2013-2014

Yanks wrote: View Post
Timby wrote: View Post
Player A: 2228 PA, 23 HR, 161 SB, 38 CS, .268/.352/.381

Player B: 2472 PA, 33 HR, 202 SB, 31 CS, .289/.341/.405

Guess who?
OK, I give...

...but numbers don't signify what he meant to the Red Sox line up.
It's baseball. Numbers are everything. And to that note, Player A is Brett Gardner. Player B is Ellsbury with his monster 2011 removed, since nothing before or since says he'll repeat it. The point is that they are extremely comparable players, which is to say "good," but not elite and far from top-tier.

Don't forget, the bigget part of that deal is that he is no longer in the Sox line-up. Double whammy is that he'll be patrolling center for the Yanks.
You seem to be overlooking the fact that Ellsbury was not a significant piece of their lineup. Sure, he was a good player for them. But he's pretty easily replaceable: Very little power but runs really fast, and speed is the trait that degrades most quickly in players. As I said, he's Carl Crawford 2.0.
Timby is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.