RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 137,835
Posts: 5,327,229
Members: 24,551
Currently online: 569
Newest member: Mycroft

TrekToday headlines

Latest Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Jul 10

Seven of Nine Bobble Head
By: T'Bonz on Jul 9

Pegg The Prankster
By: T'Bonz on Jul 9

More Trek Stars Join Unbelievable!!!!!
By: T'Bonz on Jul 8

Star Trek #35 Preview
By: T'Bonz on Jul 8

New ThinkGeek Trek Apparel
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7

Star Trek Movie Prop Auction
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7

Drexler: NX Engineering Room Construction
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7

New Trek Home Fashions
By: T'Bonz on Jul 4

Star Trek Pop-Ups Book Preview
By: T'Bonz on Jul 3


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Fandom > Fan Art

Fan Art Post your Trek fan art here, including hobby models and collectibles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 22 2013, 02:58 AM   #121
Praetor
Vice Admiral
 
Praetor's Avatar
 
Location: The fine line between continuity and fanwank.
Re: Pre TOS star cruiser....

Agreed with the 1940s comment... she's looking really great.
__________________
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross; but it's not for the timid." - Q
Praetor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 23 2013, 11:29 AM   #122
Nightfall to-Ennien
Lieutenant Commander
 
Nightfall to-Ennien's Avatar
 
Location: The Everfree Forest
Re: Pre TOS star cruiser....

I concur that the design evokes the Art Moderne movement, and I love it. The simple, streamlined shapes contrast nicely with the blockier detailing of the "greasy bits" to give a good sense of verisimilitude, and along with the squat nature of the design, feel more primitive than TOS without being clunky.
__________________
On the Starship Enterprise, no one is alone. No one.
Nightfall to-Ennien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 23 2013, 04:07 PM   #123
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Pre TOS star cruiser....

I've taken physical detailing about as far as I'm comfortable with except for just a little bit of something I want to add to the well around the upper saucer dome. Then it's on to running lights, windows and signage as well as a bit of creating the look of some panels with slightly different tones (something I've actually already started as I went). Like the clipper I want to exercise restraint in terms of the number of windows used.



Shadowbolt wrote: View Post
I concur that the design evokes the Art Moderne movement, and I love it. The simple, streamlined shapes contrast nicely with the blockier detailing of the "greasy bits" to give a good sense of verisimilitude, and along with the squat nature of the design, feel more primitive than TOS without being clunky.
The use of horizontal lines does break up the overall chunky or weighty look of the design as well as suggesting speed and motion. The detailing on the secondary hull, particularly at the front, suggests something 1920-'30s rocketship or locomotive to me. The whole idea was to use shapes and lines to suggest bulkier systems and technology without having a design that looks awkward and ungainly. Note that in my pre TOS designs I also eschew the use of elaborate lighting effects (like lighted nacelle inserts) and excessive surface detailing seen in other versions of Trek. This is to try for something that could conceivably fit within the TOS universe, something the designs of ENT fail with in my view.

On this point I particularly like how my clipper design came out. The saucer alone ties it to the Trek universe, but the rest creates a sense of a construct from about a century pre TOS yet without looking overly derivative or ungainly.


I'm already beginning to consider my next project. I'm thinking of shifting gears and coming back to the pre TOS era later. Next I'm thinking of tackling what I call the TOS era Masao-class destroyer. Masao made some detail changes to FJ's destroyer/scout design and I'm thinking of fleshing it out further. The major departures from FJ are incorporating the nav deflector into the dorsal, adding a connecting structure between the dorsal and the warp nacelle and (my idea) incorporating some form of small hangar facility aft of the B/C deck superstructure. While the saucer is essentially a Connie hull I would alter the arrangement of some of the windows.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?

Last edited by Warped9; October 23 2013 at 04:32 PM.
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2013, 02:44 AM   #124
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Pre TOS star cruiser....

I mentioned my next project will be more TOS era. Here is Masao's version of the FJ destroyer/scout. It's from this that I'm thinking of fleshing this out with a few tweaks of my own.

__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 26 2013, 10:20 PM   #125
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Pre TOS star cruiser....

When I move on to my TOS era Masao-class starship this is the general outline I'm thinking of. I will enlargen the nav-deflector pod a bit as well as move the nacelle downward a little (but not further aft). The hangar area I'm envisioning will not be a cut-and-paste of the existing Connie style hangar area but rather a wholly new design to integrate better with the shape of the B/C deck superstructure. I will also think about redesigning the reactor loop and inboard (now underside) nacelle trench since I think it looks odd oriented downward as is.

__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 27 2013, 09:36 PM   #126
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Pre TOS star cruiser....

Looks kinda funky in x-ray view. I just finished adding the running lights. Next up is signage and windows.

__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 28 2013, 04:06 AM   #127
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Pre TOS star cruiser....

Starting to get in some signage. Since this is a UESPA vessel I'm using the same pennant design as that on my star clipper Swiftsure.

__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 28 2013, 03:38 PM   #128
Praetor
Vice Admiral
 
Praetor's Avatar
 
Location: The fine line between continuity and fanwank.
Re: Pre TOS star cruiser....

Good grief, what a pretty girl she's shaped up to be.
__________________
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross; but it's not for the timid." - Q
Praetor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 28 2013, 09:30 PM   #129
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Pre TOS star cruiser....

A different kind of update here. What's notable isn't the model, but the background.

Up to this point I would render my models and then Photoshop them onto a starfield or spacescape of some sort. It works, but it's basically a messy cut-and-paste method that doesn't always get the best results.

But over the past few days I've been learning how to do it more effectively. Essentially I create my starscapes in Photoshop and save them as HDR images as a .exr file. I can then load those right into my rendering program (Maxwell Render) and have my 3D model right in the scene. The end result is being able to render the model already set in the scene it's meant to be in eventually. This saves a lot of time and avoids the messiness of cut-and-pasting the rendered model's image onto another image.

I'm reasonably sure I'll get more proficient at it as I go forward, but posted here is my first effort at generating a space environment with the (unfinished) model already in it.

__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 29 2013, 11:56 PM   #130
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Pre TOS star cruiser....

This one is a model update: signage on the nacelles.



A note on the scene, though, because it's nice to be able to render the ship already in the scene. I could also add objects like other ships or planets and moons (assuming I have the models) and the light and shadow effects would all be consistent. Using an HDR image also makes for a background scene that seems to have more depth. And so along with making new models I'll also have to start making new scenes to put them in.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 30 2013, 01:04 AM   #131
Praetor
Vice Admiral
 
Praetor's Avatar
 
Location: The fine line between continuity and fanwank.
Re: Pre TOS star cruiser....

Awesome. I like what you've done with the starscape. SR = Starship Registry?
__________________
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross; but it's not for the timid." - Q
Praetor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 30 2013, 02:51 AM   #132
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Pre TOS star cruiser....

Praetor wrote: View Post
SR = Starship Registry?
Close. Spaceship Registry...and I like the sound of it.

The background HDR image is 300 dpi yet it's only 3000 x 1500 pixels. I rendered it as four main separate separate layers: black background, small distant stars, nebula and larger nearer stars. I also made a layer of some star clusters and dark clouds. All the stars I generated from scratch in Photoshop but the nebula is from a Hubble image I tweaked for my own use. What Maxwell does is allow you to project this image as a circular screen background that surrounds your model. As such you can rotate your background as well as your model to get different views. You can also project your background image as a dome, but I think you have to create the original image differently. I'm not sure yet.

Eventually I'll learn how to do planets where you model a sphere or half sphere and map a surface texture onto it. I understand you can do that in layers as well in terms of land masses, oceans and clouds. That's got to be a challenge.

Presently I'm planning to do these scenes with my own model designs, but one day I want to build my own 3D TOS Enterprise and other ship for never seen TOS era scenes.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 30 2013, 11:53 AM   #133
Starship
Commander
 
Starship's Avatar
 
Location: São Paulo, Brasil
Re: Pre TOS star cruiser....

Looks wonderfull!
If you allow me, after you finish her, I would like to try a conversion for 3ds max.
Starship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 31 2013, 01:57 AM   #134
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Pre TOS star cruiser....

The main hull signage. I like the shadowing in this---makes it look rather moody.




I'm currently working on something within my modelling program that---if I can get it to work--- will conveniently give me the volume of the model. And if I scale the model to exact measurements (easy enough) then it will give me my volume in cubic metres (or whatever units I wish) and from that I can get approximate tonnage.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?

Last edited by Warped9; October 31 2013 at 07:21 AM.
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 31 2013, 07:52 AM   #135
DaveyNY
Commodore
 
DaveyNY's Avatar
 
Location: DaveyNY
Send a message via AIM to DaveyNY Send a message via Yahoo to DaveyNY
Re: Pre TOS star cruiser....

These are gorgeous...
I've always loved the TOS design ethic.

I have one personal nit though...

One of the basic tenets of MJ's ships, was that the nacelles were purposely placed a good distance away from the actual living areas of the ship, due to the energy radiation if you will, given off by the WARP effect.

As such, your designs would be truer to form if the front ends of the nacelles were either a bit farther back, and/or out, from the primary hull.

Getting just the right balance with the tighter (smaller) size of the ship would probably take a bit of nuancing, as in either moving the connection point of the pylon to the nacelle or perhaps lengthening the pylon to push the nacelles out (or both).
But finding that balance, is one of the most important facets in Trek type ships.

As I said, it's just a nit of mine and I don't mean to downplay your wonderful effort in any manner.
But it was an important design element that was incorporated pretty much throughout all of the Trek incarnations.

The one major exception is of course the DS-9 Defiant, but I believe that even in the DS-9 Tech Manual, it is mentioned that there is new and very heavy shielding between the nacelles and the interior of the ship.

Since earlier era ships didn't have that particular tech, the 'distance' design, was their way of protecting the crew.
__________________
I must go out in2 space again for the call of adventure cries. With a steady hand & robust crew I'll take her forth with pride. I must go out in2 space again to a vagabond Captains life. Where comets play & galaxies sway like whirlwinds in the night.

Last edited by DaveyNY; October 31 2013 at 08:15 AM.
DaveyNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.