RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,140
Posts: 5,433,877
Members: 24,935
Currently online: 495
Newest member: Uhura's legs

TrekToday headlines

Pine In New Skit
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

Stewart In Holiday Film
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

The Red Shirt Diaries #8
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

IDW Publishing January Comics
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

Retro Review: Chrysalis
By: Michelle on Oct 18

The Next Generation Season Seven Blu-ray Details
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

CBS Launches Streaming Service
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Yelchin In New Indie Thriller
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Saldana In The Book of Life
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Cracked’s New Sci-Fi Satire
By: T'Bonz on Oct 16


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Star Trek - Original Series

Star Trek - Original Series The one that started it all...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 22 2013, 01:21 PM   #31
Forbin
Admiral
 
Forbin's Avatar
 
Location: I said out, dammit!
Re: Lit nacelle trenches?

^Well THAT's no fun for a modeler.
Forbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2013, 05:29 AM   #32
Maurice
Vice Admiral
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
View Maurice's Twitter Profile
Re: Lit nacelle trenches?

It also wouldn't look right because the image would be "flat" against the inside surface of the dome and would have to dimension or shirt from different viewing angles.
__________________
* * *
"The road to hell is paved with works-in-progress."
—Philip Roth
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2013, 12:59 PM   #33
Forbin
Admiral
 
Forbin's Avatar
 
Location: I said out, dammit!
Re: Lit nacelle trenches?

I had to dimension a shirt once, when I designed a T-shirt for an event at work. Not sure how that relates to bussard domes, though.

Forbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 25 2013, 05:38 AM   #34
Mark 2000
Commander
 
Mark 2000's Avatar
 
Location: San Francisco
Send a message via AIM to Mark 2000
Re: Lit nacelle trenches?

publiusr wrote: View Post
The trenches should be an easier lighting job than the naclle domes. In not too many years curved displays will be the rage, and it might be easier to do a computer graphic skin on a dome shaped screen showing the TOS effect rather than having an actual electromechanical system.
I think one of the joys of this kit is that the mechanism is nearly identical to the actual shooting model down to led covers being shaped like Christmas lights. The only problem I can see is the noise of the motors.
__________________
Creator of Klingon Propaganda. Artist and writer for Star Trek: The Webcomic.
Mark 2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 25 2013, 03:29 PM   #35
Forbin
Admiral
 
Forbin's Avatar
 
Location: I said out, dammit!
Re: Lit nacelle trenches?

They're not that loud, IMHO. Might get annoying if you leave them running for, say an entire evening during a get-together. The model might melt at that point too.

Here's how they sound on mine:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Cglu9L_JrI
Forbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 4 2013, 07:11 AM   #36
Mark 2000
Commander
 
Mark 2000's Avatar
 
Location: San Francisco
Send a message via AIM to Mark 2000
Re: Lit nacelle trenches?

For anyone who was actually interested in this besides me, after looking around hobbytalk.com some more I found a quote of the memo but not the exact source. Gary Kerr wrote that he read this in a price quote for work on the model:



This was included in a estimate from the Howard A. Anderson Company, dated April 6, 1966, to convert the 2nd Pilot model into the Production version. The exact quote is:

"13. Light source on inside area of both pods. $ 300.00"

The deal breaker was the fact that the existing nacelles, then referred to as "Pods", could not accommodate the planned lighting:

"Items 13 & 14 - in the event that opening up the sheet metal pods for this work, the metal goes out of shape to render further work on existing pods useless - new pods will have to be made."

The exact nature of the desired lighting effect isn't known, but if I were to add lighting behind the inboard screens I'd probably go with some shade of blue or purple to be consistent with subsequent starships.

Gary
__________________
Creator of Klingon Propaganda. Artist and writer for Star Trek: The Webcomic.
Mark 2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.