RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,196
Posts: 5,345,749
Members: 24,603
Currently online: 791
Newest member: localyokel

TrekToday headlines

Funko Mini Spock
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23

IDW Publishing Comic Preview
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23

A Baby For Saldana
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23

Klingon Beer Arrives In The US
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

Star Trek: Prelude To Axanar
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

Abrams Announces Star Wars: Force For Change Sweepstakes
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

New Funko Trek Figure
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

Saldana As A Role Model
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

San Diego Comic-Con Trek Fan Guide
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

Cumberbatch As Turing
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

View Poll Results: Grade the movie...
A+ 141 19.11%
A 160 21.68%
A- 99 13.41%
B+ 82 11.11%
B 58 7.86%
B- 27 3.66%
C+ 40 5.42%
C 38 5.15%
C- 24 3.25%
D+ 11 1.49%
D 13 1.76%
D- 10 1.36%
F 35 4.74%
Voters: 738. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 21 2013, 06:39 AM   #4906
MakeshiftPython
Captain
 
MakeshiftPython's Avatar
 
Location: Ladies love Riker's beard.
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

She basically teases Spock by singing about him, pointing out his resemblance to the Satan, which was something the writers like to make fun of in the show ("The Apple" ends with a similar bit with Bones and Spock pointing out that if anyone resembles the Devil, it's Spock). Right after she sings that bit in the rec room she then immediately sings to Charlie to tease him as well.
MakeshiftPython is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 21 2013, 10:48 AM   #4907
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Rayna wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
Shazam! wrote: View Post

It's amazing how many people have claimed this post-Abrams' Trek.
It's amazing how many people didn't pick up on it prior to the 2009 film as it was pretty obvious in the early-1st season episodes.
Isn't there a very early episode where Uhura literally sings about her feelings for Spock in the rec room?
Charlie X
__________________
"I had no idea you were so... formidable. " - Anan 7 to James T. Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 21 2013, 01:43 PM   #4908
Malaika
Lieutenant Commander
 
Malaika's Avatar
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

MakeshiftPython wrote: View Post
Other than the scene where Uhura was teasing Spock in "The Man Trap", what else was it that made it "obvious" that there was a Spock/Uhura thing going on? It sounds more like a case of fans reading too much into something to validate the pairing in the 2009 film.

Either way, I don't care and neither did the writers of TOS seemed to think much of it.
MakeshiftPython wrote: View Post

That's it? Now I'm convinced fans are seeing things that aren't there, unless you have info on the writers actually acknowledging that they meant for a Spock/Uhura in TOS. With that, I would concede.
*cough*

...
"I decided then from the character that I read [Spock] that I wanted to be very much like that character but in a feminine way. And Gene said, and I was sharing this with George [Takei] the other day, when I told him that I thought of Spock as my mentor. Because if you remember Uhura was the only one he was able to teach the Vulcan lyre to(*) and he sang and spooffed on Spock. Now, you could have never had a love scene in 63 between Uhura and Spock but there were several hints and [back to Roddenberry] Gene was one in the kind of beginning to follow that and he wanted to do episodes if we had gone past the third year" - Nichelle Nichols TrekFest 09 in Riverside, Iowa

(*)
Deleted scene from “Elaan of Troyius
http://www.startrekhistory.com/DS1.html


UHURA
Mr. Spock, that music really gets to you.
SPOCK
Yes, I find it relaxing.
UHURA
Relaxing? It's... I don't know what to call it -- but
relaxing's not the word.
SPOCK
Most interesting. I suppose it works differently on
non-Vulcan nervous systems.
UHURA
I'd certainly like to learn how to play that.
SPOCK
I'd be glad to give you the theory. The mathematics are somewhat
complex. To my knowledge, no non-Vulcan has eve mastered the skill.
You see, we Vulcans have natural rhythm.
UHURA
Uhura looks impressed.

adding to the scenes already listed here, one that is often underrated is the one from the episode “Is There in Truth No Beauty?”. Kollos addresses Kirk, McCoy and Uhura as Spock knows them:
Spock: This is delightful! I know you! All of you!
James Kirk, captain and friend for many years.
And Leonard McCoy also of long acquaintance.
And Uhura, whose name means “freedom.” She walks in beauty like the night.

McCoy: [to Kirk] That’s not Spock!
Spock: Are you surprised to find that I’ve read Byron, doctor?
McCoy: [to Kirk] That’s Spock!

what is interesting about this is that unless you think that Kollos could be so familiar with ancient earth poetry and he could know that "Uhura" comes from the Swahili (ancient earth language) word uhuru that means "freedom", you now know that Spock looked for the meaning of her name and he reads poetry in regards to her. (and after all Kirk and McCoy are really his friends too, no?)


I don't think people are saying there was a Spock/Uhura thing in tos and they don't need to prove anything here to validate the romance being canon in the reboot that is an alternate reality

I think that people are simply saying that the idea of them together isn't so "crazy" and non canon because there were hints even in the old trek that:
a- they were attracted to each other
b- it could have been an idea that the tos writers had too but due to the time being too racist and bigot they gave up.
So it isn't so far fetched to put them in an actual relationship in an alternate reality where they met each other under different circumstances, sooner and younger than in the prime timeline.
You know that thing called "what if?" This is what alternate realities should be for.
__________________
Kirk: So her first name's Nyota?
Spock: I have no comment on the matter.
Malaika is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 21 2013, 02:34 PM   #4909
starburst
Fleet Captain
 
starburst's Avatar
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

nevy wrote: View Post
Uhara I don't know what she is meant to be but all she does is whine at Spock until the end when she is beamed down for 2 seconds and shoots Khan. It is just so lame.
So I take it you missed the whole sequence when she stood alone and confronted a number of Klingons, the whole reason she was there was that she could speak Klingon something the original version (at least in STVI) wasnt able to.

nevy wrote: View Post
The other things that bugged me were, why are people still using laptops and mobile phones 300 years in the future.
It wouldnt be Star Trek without communicators (and the fact they now receive text messages is a nice touch) and how do you think tablets and other computers will evolve over the next 200 years? They will become more advanced but should still look similar if not just smaller.

nevy wrote: View Post
Why is there always a magic button in the midst of everything going to shit that if pressed saves everyone (this happened twice). If the core was out of alignment, why wasn't there some machine that could align it inside the core, without Kirk having to go in and kick it.
Ok that bit was a bit dumb, you would think they would build a system to allow them the option to align the core but then that would involve a magic "turn it off and back on again wait for it to align" button.

nevy wrote: View Post
And the dumbest part, the 911 reference at the end.
nevy wrote: View Post
worst star trek movie ever!
Hardly, The Motion Picture is worse as are TFF, Insurrection and Nemesis and I dont mind any of those films.

nevy wrote: View Post
edit: and the whole kirk and spock thing was somewhat homeoerotic.
Care to explain how its any different to how their friendship has been shown in the past? "Captain, please, not infront of the Klingons" springs to mind.

Last edited by starburst; October 21 2013 at 03:15 PM.
starburst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 21 2013, 05:07 PM   #4910
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Malaika wrote: View Post

*cough*

...
"I decided then from the character that I read [Spock] that I wanted to be very much like that character but in a feminine way. And Gene said, and I was sharing this with George [Takei] the other day, when I told him that I thought of Spock as my mentor. Because if you remember Uhura was the only one he was able to teach the Vulcan lyre to(*) and he sang and spooffed on Spock. Now, you could have never had a love scene in 63 between Uhura and Spock but there were several hints and [back to Roddenberry] Gene was one in the kind of beginning to follow that and he wanted to do episodes if we had gone past the third year" - Nichelle Nichols TrekFest 09 in Riverside, Iowa

(*)
Deleted scene from “Elaan of Troyius
http://www.startrekhistory.com/DS1.html


UHURA
Mr. Spock, that music really gets to you.
SPOCK
Yes, I find it relaxing.
UHURA
Relaxing? It's... I don't know what to call it -- but
relaxing's not the word.
SPOCK
Most interesting. I suppose it works differently on
non-Vulcan nervous systems.
UHURA
I'd certainly like to learn how to play that.
SPOCK
I'd be glad to give you the theory. The mathematics are somewhat
complex. To my knowledge, no non-Vulcan has eve mastered the skill.
You see, we Vulcans have natural rhythm.
UHURA
Uhura looks impressed.

adding to the scenes already listed here, one that is often underrated is the one from the episode “Is There in Truth No Beauty?”. Kollos addresses Kirk, McCoy and Uhura as Spock knows them:
Spock: This is delightful! I know you! All of you!
James Kirk, captain and friend for many years.
And Leonard McCoy also of long acquaintance.
And Uhura, whose name means “freedom.” She walks in beauty like the night.

McCoy: [to Kirk] That’s not Spock!
Spock: Are you surprised to find that I’ve read Byron, doctor?
McCoy: [to Kirk] That’s Spock!

what is interesting about this is that unless you think that Kollos could be so familiar with ancient earth poetry and he could know that "Uhura" comes from the Swahili (ancient earth language) word uhuru that means "freedom", you now know that Spock looked for the meaning of her name and he reads poetry in regards to her. (and after all Kirk and McCoy are really his friends too, no?)


I don't think people are saying there was a Spock/Uhura thing in tos and they don't need to prove anything here to validate the romance being canon in the reboot that is an alternate reality

I think that people are simply saying that the idea of them together isn't so "crazy" and non canon because there were hints even in the old trek that:
a- they were attracted to each other
b- it could have been an idea that the tos writers had too but due to the time being too racist and bigot they gave up.
So it isn't so far fetched to put them in an actual relationship in an alternate reality where they met each other under different circumstances, sooner and younger than in the prime timeline.
You know that thing called "what if?" This is what alternate realities should be for.
Awesome post worthy of being quoted in its entirety.

Seems like Orci and Kurtzman did some research that went far beyond just rewatching the episodes.
__________________
"I had no idea you were so... formidable. " - Anan 7 to James T. Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 21 2013, 05:40 PM   #4911
MakeshiftPython
Captain
 
MakeshiftPython's Avatar
 
Location: Ladies love Riker's beard.
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Malaika wrote: View Post
MakeshiftPython wrote: View Post
Other than the scene where Uhura was teasing Spock in "The Man Trap", what else was it that made it "obvious" that there was a Spock/Uhura thing going on? It sounds more like a case of fans reading too much into something to validate the pairing in the 2009 film.

Either way, I don't care and neither did the writers of TOS seemed to think much of it.
MakeshiftPython wrote: View Post

That's it? Now I'm convinced fans are seeing things that aren't there, unless you have info on the writers actually acknowledging that they meant for a Spock/Uhura in TOS. With that, I would concede.
*cough*

...
"I decided then from the character that I read [Spock] that I wanted to be very much like that character but in a feminine way. And Gene said, and I was sharing this with George [Takei] the other day, when I told him that I thought of Spock as my mentor. Because if you remember Uhura was the only one he was able to teach the Vulcan lyre to(*) and he sang and spooffed on Spock. Now, you could have never had a love scene in 63 between Uhura and Spock but there were several hints and [back to Roddenberry] Gene was one in the kind of beginning to follow that and he wanted to do episodes if we had gone past the third year" - Nichelle Nichols TrekFest 09 in Riverside, Iowa

(*)
Deleted scene from “Elaan of Troyius
http://www.startrekhistory.com/DS1.html


UHURA
Mr. Spock, that music really gets to you.
SPOCK
Yes, I find it relaxing.
UHURA
Relaxing? It's... I don't know what to call it -- but
relaxing's not the word.
SPOCK
Most interesting. I suppose it works differently on
non-Vulcan nervous systems.
UHURA
I'd certainly like to learn how to play that.
SPOCK
I'd be glad to give you the theory. The mathematics are somewhat
complex. To my knowledge, no non-Vulcan has eve mastered the skill.
You see, we Vulcans have natural rhythm.
UHURA
Uhura looks impressed.

adding to the scenes already listed here, one that is often underrated is the one from the episode “Is There in Truth No Beauty?”. Kollos addresses Kirk, McCoy and Uhura as Spock knows them:
Spock: This is delightful! I know you! All of you!
James Kirk, captain and friend for many years.
And Leonard McCoy also of long acquaintance.
And Uhura, whose name means “freedom.” She walks in beauty like the night.

McCoy: [to Kirk] That’s not Spock!
Spock: Are you surprised to find that I’ve read Byron, doctor?
McCoy: [to Kirk] That’s Spock!

what is interesting about this is that unless you think that Kollos could be so familiar with ancient earth poetry and he could know that "Uhura" comes from the Swahili (ancient earth language) word uhuru that means "freedom", you now know that Spock looked for the meaning of her name and he reads poetry in regards to her. (and after all Kirk and McCoy are really his friends too, no?)


I don't think people are saying there was a Spock/Uhura thing in tos and they don't need to prove anything here to validate the romance being canon in the reboot that is an alternate reality

I think that people are simply saying that the idea of them together isn't so "crazy" and non canon because there were hints even in the old trek that:
a- they were attracted to each other
b- it could have been an idea that the tos writers had too but due to the time being too racist and bigot they gave up.
So it isn't so far fetched to put them in an actual relationship in an alternate reality where they met each other under different circumstances, sooner and younger than in the prime timeline.
You know that thing called "what if?" This is what alternate realities should be for.

Thanks for sharing that. It is an interesting "what if", given the timing of TOS and such. I'm not sure I would have been crazy about it if they had actually gone that route. As far as romance goes with Spock, I still prefer that one sided deal with Chapel pining for him, but Spock not feeling anything back for her. When it comes to Spock having feelings for someone, I prefer the standalone story "This Side of Paradise".
MakeshiftPython is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 23 2013, 06:40 PM   #4912
kirk55555
Fleet Captain
 
kirk55555's Avatar
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

I just saw the movie. Is's another horrible JJ Trek film. First, I'll name the few good things in this movie. Simon Pegg, Karl Urban, Lenonard Nimoy and Benedict Cumberbatch are good actors, and did well with what they had. Cumberbatch was cast horribly as Khan, but he's a good actor and did as well as he could with the role. As for scenes I liked, it was hilarious when Kirk was trying to beat up Khan, and Khan weasn't effected at all.

Now that the positive is out of the way, I'll talk about the negative. This isn't all the negative stuff, and I'm not going through the whole story, but these are just things that come to mind. The overall story was fairly stupid. Kirk being relieved of command was fairly pointless, and (just as a relevant tech thing) a ship as big as the JJ Prise is not going to be traveling in gravity, much less act as a submarine.

There were a few scenes where I think the bad tech officially went from "only fans will get angry" to "makes no sense regardless of wether you care about it or not". The klingon neutral zone is far away from Starfleet, yet you can not only teleport there with a small module made of bullshit. It was stupid when it happened in the first movie, at this point, scotty's "formula" has basically made transporting over almost unlimited distance possible, although to be fair the Klingon homeworld, as shown in the movie, is apparently only a 5 minute warp trip away. So, I guess iuts not that far to transport If the klingon neutrtal zone/homeworld were that close, the klingons would have invaded long ago. Its practically on the federation's doorstep. Based on how long it took the Enterprise to get from their to earth its actually probably closer to Earth than Vulcan was in the first JJ Trek movie. Also, warp is not like going down a river, and you cannot be knocked out of some stupid "warp stream" like what the dreadnought did to the JJprise.

When it comes to the villains, the klingons looked horrible. They've never looked that bad before, this is easily the worst make up job they ever had. Khan was acted as well as he could, and he was slightly interesting, but he wasn't very similar to the actual Khan. He was just a smart villain with the same name.The dreadnought was a weird idea, and there is no way in hell it could be flown by one guy. Admiral Marcus's plan was stupid, and he was a moron. Starting a war with klingon's because...it was going to happen eventually anyway? In Star Trek VI, similar thinking made sense in the context of the movie. In this case, he was obviously crazy, and I have no idea how he could build a huge Starship in the solar system with no info being leaked at all.

Just for the record, The Wrath of Khan is my favorite movie of all time. so, ripping off its ending really pissed me off more than most. That said, I don't think I've read many review, even positive ones, were anyone thought that rip off (with Spock's "KHAAAAAAAAAN" scream) was a good idea. The magic blood was a complete cop out, and really stupid. I really wish they had just killed Pine off. that would have been awesome.

Now, for characters I haven't mentioned. Pine, Quinto and Saldanna were, once again, the unholy trinity of horrible actors. They don't have any ability to act at all and that, combined with being badly written characters, was a terrible combination. Spock/Uhura's little lover's spat was particularly annoying. Spock was also super emotional for what felt like half the movie. I wish old Spock had been on the ship to slap his whiny other universe self. I also have no idea how the Kelvin exploding made Carol Marcus not only like Star Fleet but be an officer, but besides that she was fairly bland and I didn't care about her one way or another.

Overall, while this was horrible, it was slightly better than the first one. Partially because I had no expectations for it being good, and partly because a few slightly interesting things did happen. The special effects were decent, and even if the warp core looked like a bunch of car engines stuck together atleast it looked like an actual room instead of a pipe maze sometimes.

I gave the movie an F in the poll, and if I were to give it a numbered grade, it would be a 2/10 (which is better than ST09's 0/10).
kirk55555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 23 2013, 06:58 PM   #4913
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

kirk55555 wrote: View Post
Also, warp is not like going down a river, and you cannot be knocked out of some stupid "warp stream" like what the dreadnought did to the JJprise.
Since it isn't real, I like that they took and made it different. It now seems like a powerful and dangerous process.

The rest of your complaints have been discussed. Not everyone is going to like every single iteration of the franchise. For the record, I gave the film an 'A-'. Another solid outing.

...and even if the warp core looked like a bunch of car engines stuck together...
Real facility...

http://penderspen.wordpress.com/2013...hat-warp-core/

The laboratory houses “the world’s largest and highest energy laser system”, delivering 2m joules of ultraviolet laser energy in pulses of a billionth of a second. Experiments provide data about nuclear reactions for use in weapons, energy generation and analysis of the reactions taking place within stars.
__________________
"I had no idea you were so... formidable. " - Anan 7 to James T. Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 23 2013, 08:51 PM   #4914
MakeshiftPython
Captain
 
MakeshiftPython's Avatar
 
Location: Ladies love Riker's beard.
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Gotta disagree with the "bad acting". Pine, Quinto and Saldana are just fine, the only issue is the work they're given which makes their characters unlikable. I cite the moment Spock praises Kirk for his decision not to use the torpedoes as a great example of what they two actors could pull off if they were given writing that more or less aligned better with what we had in TOS. It's the same characters, but Pine and Quinto make it their own and I'm able to buy them as the characters. Hopefully this is the kind of portrayal we'll get more of in future films.

And yeah, the Klingon Empire does seem ridiculously close. The most curious thing however is that the neutral zone seems to be WITHIN Kronos' system. While the Enterprise is sitting in the neutral zone, you can see Kronos from a distance. If that's how far the Klingon Empire expands, then I can't understand what makes them a great threat. Heck, they don't even intercept the stolen ship that Kirk drives until it's in their own atmosphere! Talk about poor planetary defense.
MakeshiftPython is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2013, 12:11 AM   #4915
Cara007
Lieutenant
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

kirk55555 wrote: View Post

Now, for characters I haven't mentioned. Pine, Quinto and Saldanna were, once again, the unholy trinity of horrible actors. They don't have any ability to act at all and that, combined with being badly written characters, was a terrible combination. Spock/Uhura's little lover's spat was particularly annoying. Spock was also super emotional for what felt like half the movie. I wish old Spock had been on the ship to slap his whiny other universe self. I also have no idea how the Kelvin exploding made Carol Marcus not only like Star Fleet but be an officer, but besides that she was fairly bland and I didn't care about her one way or another.

Overall, while this was horrible, it was slightly better than the first one. Partially because I had no expectations for it being good, and partly because a few slightly interesting things did happen. The special effects were decent, and even if the warp core looked like a bunch of car engines stuck together atleast it looked like an actual room instead of a pipe maze sometimes.

I gave the movie an F in the poll, and if I were to give it a numbered grade, it would be a 2/10 (which is better than ST09's 0/10).

I will give you the Khan scream and rip off scene of Kirk's death as been far from great but saying Pine, Saldana and Zachary are horrible actors is not criticism. It is not even bad criticism. it is hate speech.

If there is anything both JJ Trek's film has been praised for is how the acting is always excellent and how the ensemble cast are all brilliant and work together well.

You are so talking out of spite and hate.
Cara007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2013, 01:15 AM   #4916
M'Sharak
Definitely Herbert. Maybe.
 
M'Sharak's Avatar
 
Location: Terra Inlandia
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Cara007 wrote: View Post
kirk55555 wrote: View Post

Now, for characters I haven't mentioned. Pine, Quinto and Saldanna were, once again, the unholy trinity of horrible actors. They don't have any ability to act at all and that, combined with being badly written characters, was a terrible combination. Spock/Uhura's little lover's spat was particularly annoying. Spock was also super emotional for what felt like half the movie. I wish old Spock had been on the ship to slap his whiny other universe self. I also have no idea how the Kelvin exploding made Carol Marcus not only like Star Fleet but be an officer, but besides that she was fairly bland and I didn't care about her one way or another.

Overall, while this was horrible, it was slightly better than the first one. Partially because I had no expectations for it being good, and partly because a few slightly interesting things did happen. The special effects were decent, and even if the warp core looked like a bunch of car engines stuck together atleast it looked like an actual room instead of a pipe maze sometimes.

I gave the movie an F in the poll, and if I were to give it a numbered grade, it would be a 2/10 (which is better than ST09's 0/10).

I will give you the Khan scream and rip off scene of Kirk's death as been far from great but saying Pine, Saldana and Zachary are horrible actors is not criticism. It is not even bad criticism. it is hate speech.

If there is anything both JJ Trek's film has been praised for is how the acting is always excellent and how the ensemble cast are all brilliant and work together well.

You are so talking out of spite and hate.
It's his opinion, and this is the place for him to have posted it. Now that he's watched the movie at last, it's reassuring to know that kirk555555's review is consistent with the grade he voted in the poll many months ago.

No one is obligated to agree with everything or anything expressed therein. However, it's also best to confine criticism of any poster's review to its content and to leave any criticism of the reviewer unspoken.
__________________
Dinosaurs are just really, really big chickens.
M'Sharak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2013, 03:09 AM   #4917
CorporalCaptain
Vice Admiral
 
CorporalCaptain's Avatar
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Malaika wrote: View Post
adding to the scenes already listed here, one that is often underrated is the one from the episode “Is There in Truth No Beauty?”. Kollos addresses Kirk, McCoy and Uhura as Spock knows them:
Spock: This is delightful! I know you! All of you!
James Kirk, captain and friend for many years.
And Leonard McCoy also of long acquaintance.
And Uhura, whose name means “freedom.” She walks in beauty like the night.

McCoy: [to Kirk] That’s not Spock!
Spock: Are you surprised to find that I’ve read Byron, doctor?
McCoy: [to Kirk] That’s Spock!

what is interesting about this is that unless you think that Kollos could be so familiar with ancient earth poetry and he could know that "Uhura" comes from the Swahili (ancient earth language) word uhuru that means "freedom", you now know that Spock looked for the meaning of her name and he reads poetry in regards to her. (and after all Kirk and McCoy are really his friends too, no?)


I don't think people are saying there was a Spock/Uhura thing in tos and they don't need to prove anything here to validate the romance being canon in the reboot that is an alternate reality

I think that people are simply saying that the idea of them together isn't so "crazy" and non canon because there were hints even in the old trek that:
a- they were attracted to each other
b- it could have been an idea that the tos writers had too but due to the time being too racist and bigot they gave up.
So it isn't so far fetched to put them in an actual relationship in an alternate reality where they met each other under different circumstances, sooner and younger than in the prime timeline.
You know that thing called "what if?" This is what alternate realities should be for.
This exactly expresses my position, too.

And, thanks for the observation about Is There In Truth No Beauty? Your point about that episode is something that's absolutely clear in hindsight, but which I had failed to notice.

kirk55555 wrote: View Post
I also have no idea how the Kelvin exploding made Carol Marcus not only like Star Fleet but be an officer
Perhaps the Kelvin incident changed her father, and thereby the relationship he had with her, which in turn altered the course of her life.
__________________
John
CorporalCaptain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2013, 04:33 AM   #4918
Set Harth
Rear Admiral
 
Set Harth's Avatar
 
Location: Gallifrey Falls
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

kirk55555 wrote:
The dreadnought was a weird idea, and there is no way in hell it could be flown by one guy.
Really?

There's no way in hell one guy could fly a spaceship?

Ever hear of computers? Automation? Bueller?



kirk55555 wrote:
Also, warp is not like going down a river
Though some of that could be attributed to artistic license, this version of warp may be somewhat different from what we were used to in the old timeline.

kirk55555 wrote:
and you cannot be knocked out of some stupid "warp stream" like what the dreadnought did to the JJprise.
Warp strafing goes back to TOS, it's just that TNG effectively decanonized it.
__________________
"In the future... do I make it?"
"No."
Set Harth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2013, 05:04 AM   #4919
SeerSGB
Admiral
 
SeerSGB's Avatar
 
Location: Tennessee
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Closed Caption wrote: View Post
Malaika wrote: View Post
adding to the scenes already listed here, one that is often underrated is the one from the episode “Is There in Truth No Beauty?”. Kollos addresses Kirk, McCoy and Uhura as Spock knows them:
Spock: This is delightful! I know you! All of you!
James Kirk, captain and friend for many years.
And Leonard McCoy also of long acquaintance.
And Uhura, whose name means “freedom.” She walks in beauty like the night.

McCoy: [to Kirk] That’s not Spock!
Spock: Are you surprised to find that I’ve read Byron, doctor?
McCoy: [to Kirk] That’s Spock!

what is interesting about this is that unless you think that Kollos could be so familiar with ancient earth poetry and he could know that "Uhura" comes from the Swahili (ancient earth language) word uhuru that means "freedom", you now know that Spock looked for the meaning of her name and he reads poetry in regards to her. (and after all Kirk and McCoy are really his friends too, no?)


I don't think people are saying there was a Spock/Uhura thing in tos and they don't need to prove anything here to validate the romance being canon in the reboot that is an alternate reality

I think that people are simply saying that the idea of them together isn't so "crazy" and non canon because there were hints even in the old trek that:
a- they were attracted to each other
b- it could have been an idea that the tos writers had too but due to the time being too racist and bigot they gave up.
So it isn't so far fetched to put them in an actual relationship in an alternate reality where they met each other under different circumstances, sooner and younger than in the prime timeline.
You know that thing called "what if?" This is what alternate realities should be for.
This exactly expresses my position, too.

And, thanks for the observation about Is There In Truth No Beauty? Your point about that episode is something that's absolutely clear in hindsight, but which I had failed to notice.

kirk55555 wrote: View Post
I also have no idea how the Kelvin exploding made Carol Marcus not only like Star Fleet but be an officer
Perhaps the Kelvin incident changed her father, and thereby the relationship he had with her, which in turn altered the course of her life.
And Carol in Starfleet is nothing new. A lot of STID and ST09 makes me wonder how extensive of use the writers made of sites like Memory Alpha and Memory Beta on top of the books they used.
__________________
- SeerSGB -
Good men don't need rules, The Doctor (A Good Man Goes To War)
SeerSGB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2013, 03:40 PM   #4920
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Set Harth wrote: View Post
kirk55555 wrote:
Also, warp is not like going down a river
Though some of that could be attributed to artistic license, this version of warp may be somewhat different from what we were used to in the old timeline.
Try TOS, where moving at warp looked exactly the same as moving at impulse.

Besides, it looked to me as if the Enterprise was knocked out of it's own warp field (blue stuff = visible warp field) to me.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
benedict cumberbatch, grading & discussion, jj abrams

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.