RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,324
Posts: 5,352,870
Members: 24,617
Currently online: 772
Newest member: CaptXeno

TrekToday headlines

Drexler TV Alert
By: T'Bonz on Jul 26

Retro Review: His Way
By: Michelle on Jul 26

MicroWarriors Releases Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Ships Of The Line Design Contest
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Next Weekend: Shore Leave 36!
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

True Trek History To Be Penned
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Insight Editions Announces Three Trek Books For 2015
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

To Be Takei Review by Spencer Blohm
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Mulgrew: Playing Red
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Hallmark 2015 Trek Ornaments
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > The Next Generation

The Next Generation All Good Things come to an end...but not here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 13 2013, 11:36 AM   #1
Noddy
Captain
 
Patrick Stewart interview

I remember seeing a link to an interview with Patrick Stewart once, many years ago now, where he expressed some doubt as to the viability of human space travel. I think it might have been on the old Trek BBC site. Has anyone seen this? What were his reasons? In all honesty, I think Stewart was very brave in voicing such an opinion.
Noddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 13 2013, 11:44 AM   #2
Infern0
Captain
 
Infern0's Avatar
 
Re: Patrick Stewart interview

Google turned up this in about 5 seconds

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3455463.stm
Infern0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 13 2013, 11:48 AM   #3
Noddy
Captain
 
Re: Patrick Stewart interview

I have to be honest here, I think he kind of has a point.
Noddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 13 2013, 12:04 PM   #4
Infern0
Captain
 
Infern0's Avatar
 
Re: Patrick Stewart interview

Yes, I agree with him right now it's not justifiable to fund hugely extravagant space travel, sadly.

Hopefully one day humanity gets itself in order and we will set off for the stars

The US Military spent 40 times more than Nasas budget for the financial year 2012

In ONE YEAR, they spent FOURTY years worth of Nasas budget, in two and a half years they would spend ONE HUNDRED YEARS WORTH

If anyone wants to know why we are not on mars yet, it's because we are spending atrocious amounts of money on killing each other
Infern0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 13 2013, 05:47 PM   #5
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: Patrick Stewart interview

Yeah... Defense isn't important at all. It's not like there's groups of people all over the world who want to blow us up or anything.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 13 2013, 06:02 PM   #6
JirinPanthosa
Commodore
 
Re: Patrick Stewart interview

Wow. It's kind of hilarious that Patrick Stewart thinks humans shouldn't be allowed to explore space because they are a 'Dangerously savage child race'. I want so bad now to hear a rebuttal from John DeLancie.

An explorer who is assigned to a position where he is humanity's representative to new worlds you can argue has the right to make sweeping statements about the virtue of the race, but playing such an explorer on television does not qualify you to make the same sweeping statements. I may agree that the resources necessary to go to other planets at the moment are better spent on the ridiculous about of conflict and income disparity we have now. So phrase it as a 'Best use of resources' argument, don't phrase it in such an obnoxiously snobbish and judgmental way.

'Not having perfected the race' is no excuse not to explore outward.
JirinPanthosa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 13 2013, 06:16 PM   #7
Melakon
Vice Admiral
 
Melakon's Avatar
 
Location: Unmarked grave, Ekos
Re: Patrick Stewart interview

JirinPanthosa wrote: View Post
. . .phrase it as a 'Best use of resources' argument, don't phrase it in such an obnoxiously snobbish and judgmental way.
Aren't the British natural experts at that though?
__________________
Curly: Moe, Larry, the cheese! Moe, Larry, the cheese! (Horses Collars, 1935)
Melakon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 13 2013, 06:55 PM   #8
PhoenixClass
Lieutenant Commander
 
Re: Patrick Stewart interview

JirinPanthosa wrote: View Post
Wow. It's kind of hilarious that Patrick Stewart thinks humans shouldn't be allowed to explore space because they are a 'Dangerously savage child race'. I want so bad now to hear a rebuttal from John DeLancie.

An explorer who is assigned to a position where he is humanity's representative to new worlds you can argue has the right to make sweeping statements about the virtue of the race, but playing such an explorer on television does not qualify you to make the same sweeping statements. I may agree that the resources necessary to go to other planets at the moment are better spent on the ridiculous about of conflict and income disparity we have now. So phrase it as a 'Best use of resources' argument, don't phrase it in such an obnoxiously snobbish and judgmental way.

'Not having perfected the race' is no excuse not to explore outward.
He didn't say that we shouldn't be "allowed" to explore space, not did he say that humanity would have to be perfect before heading into space. You are mis-characterizing his statement. A better paraphrase would be that we are not ready to go into space.

One would hope that devoting more resources to science and expanding our knowledge would act as a unifying force, however slowly. And I am in favor of diverting most of the US military budget into science and social development. At this point, however, we would carry all our political divisions with us into space. Proxy wars are fought on earth, and under current conditions, would be extended into space.
PhoenixClass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 14 2013, 12:48 AM   #9
Noddy
Captain
 
Re: Patrick Stewart interview

PhoenixClass wrote: View Post
JirinPanthosa wrote: View Post
Wow. It's kind of hilarious that Patrick Stewart thinks humans shouldn't be allowed to explore space because they are a 'Dangerously savage child race'. I want so bad now to hear a rebuttal from John DeLancie.

An explorer who is assigned to a position where he is humanity's representative to new worlds you can argue has the right to make sweeping statements about the virtue of the race, but playing such an explorer on television does not qualify you to make the same sweeping statements. I may agree that the resources necessary to go to other planets at the moment are better spent on the ridiculous about of conflict and income disparity we have now. So phrase it as a 'Best use of resources' argument, don't phrase it in such an obnoxiously snobbish and judgmental way.

'Not having perfected the race' is no excuse not to explore outward.
He didn't say that we shouldn't be "allowed" to explore space, not did he say that humanity would have to be perfect before heading into space. You are mis-characterizing his statement. A better paraphrase would be that we are not ready to go into space.

One would hope that devoting more resources to science and expanding our knowledge would act as a unifying force, however slowly. And I am in favor of diverting most of the US military budget into science and social development. At this point, however, we would carry all our political divisions with us into space. Proxy wars are fought on earth, and under current conditions, would be extended into space.
Exactly. Stewart is just saying that we shouldn't try to run when we've only really begun to learn to walk.
Noddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 14 2013, 11:52 AM   #10
starburst
Fleet Captain
 
starburst's Avatar
 
Re: Patrick Stewart interview

He does have a point, by the time of the earliest Trek stories the people of Earth had gotten past their differences... right now we cant get those who supposedly believe in the same ideology to get along without trying to kill each other.

If we were delivered a fully functioning starship today which was ready to go explore U would be the first to volunteer to go but also be one to ask should we risk spreading our nonsense to other planets just yet, some of us are just too quick to take offense to a difference of opinion to risk first contact with life from another planet!
starburst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 14 2013, 12:08 PM   #11
Timewalker
Cat-lovin', Star Trekkin' Time Lady
 
Timewalker's Avatar
 
Location: In many different universes, simultaneously.
Re: Patrick Stewart interview

If we wait until humans are "fully enlightened," we'll never get off this planet. Humans aren't perfect and never will be.

Apparently Patrick Stewart is unaware that astronauts are subect to rigorous psychological testing as well as physical and scientific training. Anyone who gets chosen to go to the Moon or Mars (or anywhere else in the immediate decades to come) would also be subject to psychological testing and assessed for compatibility.
__________________
"Let's give it to Riker. He'll eat anything!"

For some great Original Series fanfic, check out the Valjiir Continuum!
Timewalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 14 2013, 01:18 PM   #12
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Patrick Stewart interview

I'm absolutely with Stewart on the matter. Space travel is pure luxury. There is NOTHING to be gained from space travel other than perhaps tourism and scientific exploration. Forget everything you have heard about mining resources for Earth. It's bullshit. It doesn't pay off. It costs more than it gains.

And to waste money on space travel while people here are still suffering is crazy.

Where's the other thread where someone brought up that the US spent 40 years of NASA budget on ONE year's worth of military budget?

Stop having wars, then we can think about space travel. But first use that money for education, food, water, etc... for every spaceship that goes to Mars you could probably built desalination plants all over the world to handle fresh water shortages, for example. And when those problems are solved, THEN we can build our spaceships.
__________________
lol
l
/\
JarodRussell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 14 2013, 01:59 PM   #13
Makarov
Commander
 
Re: Patrick Stewart interview

Here I'd have to disagree with him. I'm strongly against this idea that we shouldn't be spending money until we fix all our problems. It's the same argument against any expensive research. Humans will never stop having wars or things of that nature. Are we going to stop all advancement until then?

Imagine what technology might developed in the process that could then benefit our everyday lives.
Makarov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 14 2013, 02:03 PM   #14
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Patrick Stewart interview

Makarov wrote: View Post
Humans will never stop having wars or things of that nature.
I see you have already given up.
__________________
lol
l
/\
JarodRussell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 14 2013, 09:11 PM   #15
Timewalker
Cat-lovin', Star Trekkin' Time Lady
 
Timewalker's Avatar
 
Location: In many different universes, simultaneously.
Re: Patrick Stewart interview

JarodRussell wrote: View Post
I'm absolutely with Stewart on the matter. Space travel is pure luxury. There is NOTHING to be gained from space travel other than perhaps tourism and scientific exploration. Forget everything you have heard about mining resources for Earth. It's bullshit. It doesn't pay off. It costs more than it gains.

And to waste money on space travel while people here are still suffering is crazy.

Where's the other thread where someone brought up that the US spent 40 years of NASA budget on ONE year's worth of military budget?

Stop having wars, then we can think about space travel. But first use that money for education, food, water, etc... for every spaceship that goes to Mars you could probably built desalination plants all over the world to handle fresh water shortages, for example. And when those problems are solved, THEN we can build our spaceships.
And you know that space mining costs too much because you've actually done it yourself and have the ledgers to prove it, right? I mean, with all that certain knowledge, you must be from the future, and have come back to enlighten us.

As for wasting money, everyone has their own ideas of what is a waste of money. I happen to think that if we stopped wasting money trying to kill people, we could fund both fresh-water projects, educate people, and do further research into clean energy AND go to space.

JarodRussell wrote: View Post
Makarov wrote: View Post
Humans will never stop having wars or things of that nature.
I see you have already given up.
I see that Makarov is simply being realistic about human nature.
__________________
"Let's give it to Riker. He'll eat anything!"

For some great Original Series fanfic, check out the Valjiir Continuum!
Timewalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.