RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,219
Posts: 5,347,111
Members: 24,607
Currently online: 731
Newest member: lueth2048

TrekToday headlines

Funko Mini Spock
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23

IDW Publishing Comic Preview
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23

A Baby For Saldana
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23

Klingon Beer Arrives In The US
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

Star Trek: Prelude To Axanar
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

Abrams Announces Star Wars: Force For Change Sweepstakes
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

New Funko Trek Figure
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

Saldana As A Role Model
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

San Diego Comic-Con Trek Fan Guide
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

Cumberbatch As Turing
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Future of Trek

Future of Trek Discussion of future Trek projects.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 7 2013, 02:44 PM   #1
Ketrick
Lieutenant Commander
 
Location: Maryland
On making references: For or Against

Would you be for or against a new Trek series that is set in the future of the Prime Timeline to make an once in a while reference to something in the novels or Star Trek Online? For example, a Captain Mackenzie Calhoun is mentioned as having been Captain of two USS Excalibur s in the 2370's or Ezri Dax is mentioned as captain of an early slipstream drive starship.
Ketrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2013, 03:10 PM   #2
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: On making references: For or Against

Nothing against references. But they need to make sense.

Let's say it's 100 years after DS9. Why should anyone really care about the name of the Captain of the earliest slipstream drive ship? Unless she did something truly spectacular, regular joe wouldn't know her. And what requires her to be mentioned by name?

But if it's done in a logical, natural fashion, they can make the references pour in all they want, as long as they want, as many as they want, as hard as they want.
__________________
lol
l
/\
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2013, 03:14 PM   #3
Sindatur
Rear Admiral
 
Sindatur's Avatar
 
Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: On making references: For or Against

I don't see a problem with Easter Eggs being thrown in, just make sure they aren't crucial enough to the plot that someone who doesn't catch them feels lost ad as JarodRussel says, it should make some kind of sense.
__________________
One Day I hope to be the Man my Cat thinks I am

Where are we going? And why are we in this Handbasket?
Sindatur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2013, 03:15 PM   #4
David.Blue
Lieutenant Commander
 
David.Blue's Avatar
 
Re: On making references: For or Against

I don't mind, were it done carefully.
__________________
David.Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2013, 04:29 PM   #5
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: On making references: For or Against

As long as it's done well, I'd love it. Good examples IMO are the last two movies, where a great many scenes, sights and comments had a deeper meaning for Trekkies, while not leaving non-die hards feeling like they're missing out of something.

I would say the worst examples of referencing would be Enterprise. Although some were subtle and well done (fleeing humans settling on Ceti Alpha V, for example), others were very, very bad - in "Dear Doctor", Archer's incredibly awkward Prime Directive speech:

ARCHER: Someday my people are going to come up with some sort of a doctrine, something that tells us what we can and can't do out here, should and shouldn't do. But until somebody tells me that they've drafted that directive I'm going to have to remind myself every day that we didn't come out here to play God.

...it treated viewers like complete idiots who needed their hands held and to be told, "Look! He's talking about the Prime Directive!"

Another cringe-worthy example was "The Augments", where Arik Soong jumps up and down waving a big sign marked "TNG REFERENCE HERE! HE'S TALKING ABOUT DATA!"

SOONG: I've been thinking. Perfecting humanity may not be possible. Cybernetics. Artificial lifeforms.

ARCHER: Good-bye, Doctor.

SOONG: I doubt I'll finish the work myself. Might take a generation or two.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2013, 04:40 PM   #6
bbjeg
Vice Admiral
 
bbjeg's Avatar
 
Location: ˙ɐlnqǝu sıɥʇ uı ʞɔnʇS
Re: On making references: For or Against

I'm all for the next series referencing to previous series.
bbjeg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2013, 04:45 PM   #7
Ketrick
Lieutenant Commander
 
Location: Maryland
Re: On making references: For or Against

Well, since it seems we're generally agreed that references would be ok as long as they make sense and don't require knowing anything about where they came from for the plot or subplot to work, I'll ask this related question in addition to the opening question: So, what references to the novels, comics, or STO would y'all like to see in such a new series and what references or type of references would y'all never want to see?
Ketrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2013, 04:49 PM   #8
bbjeg
Vice Admiral
 
bbjeg's Avatar
 
Location: ˙ɐlnqǝu sıɥʇ uı ʞɔnʇS
Re: On making references: For or Against

^Ferengi laser whips.
bbjeg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2013, 05:02 PM   #9
Kelthaz
Rear Admiral
 
Kelthaz's Avatar
 
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Re: On making references: For or Against

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
As long as it's done well, I'd love it. Good examples IMO are the last two movies, where a great many scenes, sights and comments had a deeper meaning for Trekkies, while not leaving non-die hards feeling like they're missing out of something.
Yeah, Into Darkness did a great job with references to the shows. Everything from Section 31 to Khan travelling to Martok's home province on Qo'nos was perfectly done. They held significance for hardcore fans without alienating casual viewers.
__________________
"Who are you?! And how did you get in here?!"

"I'm the locksmith. And... I'm the locksmith."
Kelthaz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2013, 05:08 PM   #10
Melakon
Vice Admiral
 
Melakon's Avatar
 
Location: Unmarked grave, Ekos
Re: On making references: For or Against

Blowing up Vulcan held significance for hardcore fans without alienating casual viewers too.
__________________
Curly: Moe, Larry, the cheese! Moe, Larry, the cheese! (Horses Collars, 1935)
Melakon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2013, 07:59 PM   #11
dub
Captain
 
dub's Avatar
 
Location: Location? What is this?
Re: On making references: For or Against

At least with novels there's no on-screen comparison. And re-using or re-introducing general ideas, aliens, conflicts, relationships, all of that is fine. But re-using or re-purposing specific lines or scenes from previous on-screen Trek is risky. To me it's okay when it's done in a moment (a brief moment) that's meant to be fun and not at a crucial time in the film or series. Quark quoting Picard's "this far, no farther" line comes to mind. That was meant to be a parody. As Ron Moore said about that line: "I take great glee at mocking my own work." On the other hand -- if it's overdone or placed in the show or film at the wrong time (a serious or crucial scene or scenes), quoting previous on-srceen Trek can become a parody for some viewers even if that is not the intent. And because of that, it can potentially ruin a show or film for some people. That's the risk.
dub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2013, 08:13 PM   #12
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: On making references: For or Against

Jeri Taylor referenced her own novels in Voyager. I have nothing against it, as long as it's done carefully and for a reason. If Shatner's novels get referenced I'll probably facepalm.

Though it's safe to say any series set post Nemesis is probably gonna screw over a lot of novels.

STO? It's a game loosely based on the novels and I don't even see it being relevant to comment on.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2013, 08:13 PM   #13
C.E. Evans
Vice Admiral
 
C.E. Evans's Avatar
 
Location: Saint Louis (aka Defiance)
Re: On making references: For or Against

I think a general rule of thumb for any continuity reference is that it should be done sparingly, briefly, and only if there's some actual relevance to whatever is going on in the story. Namedropping just for the sake of namedropping (with no relevance to anything), really is more of a distraction to the story, IMO.
__________________
"Everybody wants to rule the world..."
C.E. Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2013, 08:55 PM   #14
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: On making references: For or Against

Try to watch films keeping an eye and ear out for every reference to a character's past. You will find plenty, even in totally original standalone films. Because that's what you do, you give a character a backstory that took place well before the events of the film.

There is no difference to the audience between a reference to a completely imaginary event, and a reference to a previously filmed event in a TV episode. Also no difference to a real event. When someone references the Lincoln assassination, there will of course be people who don't know who Lincoln was. Should that be a reason to not make a reference when the story requires it?
__________________
lol
l
/\
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 8 2013, 12:40 AM   #15
C.E. Evans
Vice Admiral
 
C.E. Evans's Avatar
 
Location: Saint Louis (aka Defiance)
Re: On making references: For or Against

It really is detrimental to a story to have too many references to past events. It truly should be handled with a less is more approach. TNG, DS9, and VOY generally handled references pretty well, I think.
__________________
"Everybody wants to rule the world..."
C.E. Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.