RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,410
Posts: 5,359,775
Members: 24,630
Currently online: 546
Newest member: DasGeneral


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > The Next Generation

The Next Generation All Good Things come to an end...but not here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 7 2013, 11:29 PM   #121
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Blu Rays Aspect Ratio Question

Mr. Adventure wrote: View Post

Speaking of not getting comments, I don't understand why people say this when there's what one cable channel that shows B&W films? Other than TCM, maybe you might possibly see a B&W movie on AMC if you happen to catch the right day. Where are all these people watching old B&W movies?
You have MeTV, Turner Classic Movies and I Love Lucy on the Hallmark Channel. Outside of those places, I hardly ever see any black & white material in the 500-channel universe.
__________________
"I had no idea you were so... formidable. " - Anan 7 to James T. Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2013, 12:49 AM   #122
DonIago
Rear Admiral
 
Location: Burlington, VT, USA
View DonIago's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to DonIago Send a message via AIM to DonIago Send a message via Yahoo to DonIago
Re: Blu Rays Aspect Ratio Question

Why on Earth would I choose to watch a movie on cable in this day and age? Because I want a cut-down version with commercials inserted?

Speaking of ways movies weren't meant to be watched...
__________________
--DonIago
It was the best of Trek, it was the worst of Trek...
"If I lean over, I leave myself open to wedgies, wet willies, or even the dreaded Rear Admiral!"
DonIago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2013, 01:04 AM   #123
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Blu Rays Aspect Ratio Question

DonIago wrote: View Post
Why on Earth would I choose to watch a movie on cable in this day and age? Because I want a cut-down version with commercials inserted?

Speaking of ways movies weren't meant to be watched...
Ideally, I'd own every movie ever. That way I could watch them the way they were intended. Since that's not really practical, I watch some things on cable.

Plus, original aspect ratio isn't that important to probably 90% of the population. That's why I think it would have been great to offer audiences and content providers a 16:9 option.
__________________
"I had no idea you were so... formidable. " - Anan 7 to James T. Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2013, 01:24 AM   #124
DonIago
Rear Admiral
 
Location: Burlington, VT, USA
View DonIago's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to DonIago Send a message via AIM to DonIago Send a message via Yahoo to DonIago
Re: Blu Rays Aspect Ratio Question

Well, exactly...the way you're watching movies isn't the way you'd choose to watch them, but the way your circumstances limit you to watching them.

I suspect OAR has become more important to the general public over time, but I admittedly don't have any evidence to support that (beyond the death of DVDs that had non-OAR versions of movies).
__________________
--DonIago
It was the best of Trek, it was the worst of Trek...
"If I lean over, I leave myself open to wedgies, wet willies, or even the dreaded Rear Admiral!"
DonIago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2013, 01:30 AM   #125
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Re: Blu Rays Aspect Ratio Question

DonIago wrote: View Post
I suspect OAR has become more important to the general public over time, but I admittedly don't have any evidence to support that (beyond the death of DVDs that had non-OAR versions of movies).
I wonder what those people that own hundreds of useless fullscreen dvds of widescreen movies are doing with them these days? Do they regret not buying OAR?
__________________
=)
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2013, 01:36 AM   #126
DonIago
Rear Admiral
 
Location: Burlington, VT, USA
View DonIago's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to DonIago Send a message via AIM to DonIago Send a message via Yahoo to DonIago
Re: Blu Rays Aspect Ratio Question

I presume they've held onto their 4:3 TVs so that they can continue to watch an image that fills the screen.
__________________
--DonIago
It was the best of Trek, it was the worst of Trek...
"If I lean over, I leave myself open to wedgies, wet willies, or even the dreaded Rear Admiral!"
DonIago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2013, 01:45 AM   #127
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Re: Blu Rays Aspect Ratio Question

DonIago wrote: View Post
I presume they've held onto their 4:3 TVs so that they can continue to watch an image that fills the screen.
I don't own a single movie in fullscreen dvd. The only fullscreen dvds that I own are shows that were originally shown that way. In early 2000 even I realized all 4:3 tvs were eventually going to all be replace by widescreen in the very near future!
__________________
=)
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2013, 01:48 AM   #128
DonIago
Rear Admiral
 
Location: Burlington, VT, USA
View DonIago's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to DonIago Send a message via AIM to DonIago Send a message via Yahoo to DonIago
Re: Blu Rays Aspect Ratio Question

Hell, I've been buying OAR since the late '90s. Deliberately went for VHS tapes in letterbox when I could find them.
__________________
--DonIago
It was the best of Trek, it was the worst of Trek...
"If I lean over, I leave myself open to wedgies, wet willies, or even the dreaded Rear Admiral!"
DonIago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2013, 01:57 AM   #129
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Re: Blu Rays Aspect Ratio Question

I admit that the movies I have on VHS are in fullscreen, but I didn't know any better and the studios didn't offer the customers any real choice. I got smarter after seeing Star Wars in widescreen VHS and learned about OAR, and have bought OAR ever since. It is impossible for me to rewatch a Star Wars movie in fullscreen nowadays knowing how much of the picture I'm not seeing.

Those arguing about wanting TNG in widescreen are the exact same as those people that had 4:3 tvs demanding fullscreen dvds of widescreen movies, just so it can fill the screen.
__________________
=)
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2013, 01:58 AM   #130
trevanian
Rear Admiral
 
trevanian's Avatar
 
Re: Blu Rays Aspect Ratio Question

Shoot, the main reason I went so heavy into laserdisc for the whole stretch of the 90s was for OAR (though having nearly twice the resolution was awfully nice too ... looking at 2001 or BLADE RUNNER in LD after VHS was a wonderful reminder of the theatrical experience, though we're kind of spoiled now that we can see movies looking about as good at home as in the cinema.)

I remember trying to watch 2001 on its first (only?) network run, probably 1976 or 1980, and having to switch off, because it was incomprehensible visually with so much image missing. Worse than watching a cropped version of a threeway spaghetti western gunfight, about on par with RIVER KWAI, which had a seen on the cropped version that was about 2 minutes of the middle of a table, and you'd occasionally see either Obi Wan or Sessue's hand come into frame. Ridiculous.

I think being able to see stuff, especially older stuff, in OAR is going to be a big benefit on films in the next decade with newer filmmakers who I hope won't feel compelled to continue with the ADD cutting that has gone from bad to preposterous in the last couple decades. Frame a shot properly to tell the story and you don't have to gimmick stuff up with ten cuts in twelve seconds, because what you've got up there is a strong enough visually you don't need those kinds of crutches.
trevanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2013, 02:24 AM   #131
Mr. Adventure
Admiral
 
Mr. Adventure's Avatar
 
Location: Mr. Adventure
Re: Blu Rays Aspect Ratio Question

Dream wrote: View Post
DonIago wrote: View Post
I suspect OAR has become more important to the general public over time, but I admittedly don't have any evidence to support that (beyond the death of DVDs that had non-OAR versions of movies).
I wonder what those people that own hundreds of useless fullscreen dvds of widescreen movies are doing with them these days? Do they regret not buying OAR?
I was thinking about that the other day, I remember being in a Best Buy when some old man was telling another he was buying the wrong DVD because if it didn't say "Full Screen" he'd have black bars. Of course, he might've died before regretting his folly.
Mr. Adventure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2013, 04:04 AM   #132
Lance
Fleet Captain
 
Lance's Avatar
 
Location: The Enterprise's Restroom
Re: Blu Rays Aspect Ratio Question

In Australia they usually never bothered authoring multiple versions of most 'standard' issue movies on DVD. They only released the widescreen versions. I can only recall a few exceptions where two versions were released (for example the first Harry Potter movie was definitely released in both fullscreen and widescreen versions back in the day). But for the most part, the studios seemed to decide that the Australian buying public would simply accept the black bars as "preserving the original aspect ratio".

Or maybe they just figured it was cheaper than having to press two different versions of the same product?
Lance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2013, 04:47 AM   #133
Mr. Adventure
Admiral
 
Mr. Adventure's Avatar
 
Location: Mr. Adventure
Re: Blu Rays Aspect Ratio Question

^^ I believe the US was slower adopting widescreen than other countries which may have been a factor. I'm going off memory and hearsay but I believe Europe had widescreen CRTs before HD but in the US widescreen only came with HDTV.
Mr. Adventure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2013, 05:38 AM   #134
GameOn
Lieutenant Commander
 
GameOn's Avatar
 
Location: UK
Re: Blu Rays Aspect Ratio Question

Lance wrote: View Post
In Australia they usually never bothered authoring multiple versions of most 'standard' issue movies on DVD. They only released the widescreen versions.
It was the same in the UK even though almost everything on VHS had been 4:3 pan & scan. I had a couple of older DVD releases that were double sided and contained both the widescreen and 4:3 versions of the movie but they were pretty rare.
GameOn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 8 2013, 07:38 AM   #135
Mr. Adventure
Admiral
 
Mr. Adventure's Avatar
 
Location: Mr. Adventure
Re: Blu Rays Aspect Ratio Question

Here in the US, Wal-Mart is a big player and they were also really into the full screen thing, and kept it alive long after it had died a natural death most everywhere else (in the US). There was a period of time though where one had to be careful they were renting/buying the right version. I only messed up once and bought a full screen (what a misnomer) version of Dogma. I have to laugh when the disclaimer says "This movie has been formatted to fit this screen.", not my screen buddy.
Mr. Adventure is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.