RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,106
Posts: 5,432,606
Members: 24,931
Currently online: 507
Newest member: emogs

TrekToday headlines

The Red Shirt Diaries #8
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

IDW Publishing January Comics
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

Retro Review: Chrysalis
By: Michelle on Oct 18

The Next Generation Season Seven Blu-ray Details
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

CBS Launches Streaming Service
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Yelchin In New Indie Thriller
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Saldana In The Book of Life
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Cracked’s New Sci-Fi Satire
By: T'Bonz on Oct 16

Beltran Introduces Shakespeare To Theater Group
By: T'Bonz on Oct 16

Burton To Be Honored at Facets Boo! Bash
By: T'Bonz on Oct 16


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Trek Literature

Trek Literature "...Good words. That's where ideas begin."

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 31 2013, 10:43 PM   #31
Therin of Andor
Admiral
 
Therin of Andor's Avatar
 
Location: New Therin Park, Andor (via Australia)
View Therin of Andor's Twitter Profile
Re: Do you prefer it when the books were numbered???

Greg Cox wrote: View Post
The books weren't serialized, so why number them as though they were?
Exactly - and the first fifteen were retro-numbered for the booklist and later reprints. Including the first three novelizations!

Now, at the time, adding those numbers to the booklist was a great marketing strategy. The numbers have psychological effects (on some collectors). I'm sure ST:TMP holds some kind of record for a novelization going into multiple reprints over many, many years. Casual browsers picked up, say, Book #19 and realized what they'd missed. Everything was still in print! They'd fill out the order form in the back - and their TrekLit adventure would step into high gear! Casual browsers picking up the numbered ST III novelization perhaps also became curious about not only TMP and ST II, but the early original novels as well.

I'm assuming Pocket may have let some of the earliest novels fall out-of-print around about the time of ST IV. That novelization was deliberately unnumbered, and the next new original MMPB novel, "Chain of Attack", had a noticeable overhaul to its cover, with the "Star Trek" banner growing much larger, and finally using the familiar and iconic TV series font on the MMPBs. "Chain of Attack" also kickstarted a new set of numbered UK releases.

Around the same time we had the arrival of the first unnumbered "giant" MMPBs and - three "giants" later - the first ST hardcover marketed to adult SF readers. ("Mission to Horatius" from Whitman had had an intended child audience.) It always amazes me that "Spock's World" (and "The Lost Years") had no "Star Trek" banner on the spine! It was marketed as a hot new science fiction hardcover, and stood proudly on "new release" shelves in bookshops with that month's other new science fiction hardcovers.

When the numbers started having negative psychological effects on collectors and casual browsers, they needed to go.
__________________
Thiptho lapth! Ian (Entire post is personal opinion)
The Andor Files @ http://andorfiles.blogspot.com/
http://therinofandor.blogspot.com/
Therin of Andor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 1 2013, 03:27 AM   #32
tomswift2002
Fleet Captain
 
Re: Do you prefer it when the books were numbered???

For the Voyager series I preferred it when the books were numbered as the had that cool band with a different color and the "digital" number. That, I found, made the Voyager books stand out when you were looking at the spine, and it gave the series a sense of uniformity.
tomswift2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 3 2013, 08:52 AM   #33
Leto_II
Commander
 
Leto_II's Avatar
 
Location: Room 303, The Heart O' The City Hotel
Re: Do you prefer it when the books were numbered???

Greg Cox wrote: View Post
The only problem I ever had with the numbering was that it could potentially create the false impression that the numbered books had to be read in some sort of sequence and took place in that order--which couldn't have been further from the truth since the books were mostly standalones back then. When I was writing, say, TNG #38, I wasn't trying to fit it in between #'s 37 and 39. Chances were, I didn't even know what 37 and 39 were about or who was writing them. I was just trying to stay more or less consistent with the TV shows!

The books weren't serialized, so why number them as though they were?
Yeah, this was simultaneously both the blessing AND the curse of the "post-memo" Pocket Books era -- neither authors nor readers had much to fear with being forced to follow a complex inter-novel continuity from book to book, but it also made the entire run far more episodic and disconnected than it could've been (which, granted, gave it the feel of its still-airing parent television show, but still).

Then again, going in the exact opposite direction with the product line has since brought the other problems to light -- greater reader reticence to pick up one volume of an interconnected series (for fear of becoming lost), bookstore buyer confusion regarding purchases, etc. However, in my opinion, the creative benefits that have since been reaped far outweigh any of these issues.
Leto_II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 3 2013, 05:20 PM   #34
jayceee
Commander
 
Re: Do you prefer it when the books were numbered???

Therin of Andor wrote: View Post
As for myself, I once made a firm promise to stop buying "Fantastic Four" comics when the Thing returned from "Secret Wars", and when She-Hulk stepped down for him as his replacement, but ten or so issues later and there was still no sign of an official handover issue. Five members in some issues, all members wearing "4" logos. I'm still buying FF, even when I haven't been enjoying it.
I know the feeling.

Back in the day in late-1984, I kept telling myself that I would stop collecting comics with:

- Iron Man #200
- The Uncanny X-Men #200

But then comes along "Secret Wars II", which made my "psychological" point somewhat easier. It prolonged my collecting slightly longer to sometime in early-1986, where I picked up all the "Secret Wars II" crossover issues. I more or less stopped collecting after all the crossover issues were finished.


Going on a further tangent.

In more recent times, I was playing rpg games again like Dungeons & Dragons, where in 2008 I started to collect the then-new 4th edition supplement books. (I use to play D&D a lot when I was a kid, but later stopped playing for decades). So over the next two years from 2008 to 2010, I was buying the new monthly supplement books every month.

Then they "revised" the D&D rules slightly in mid-2010, and released a set of "4.5" edition core books, which I was somewhat hesitant to buy at first. At the time, I thought it would be a good point to stop buying D&D books. But I ended up playing in a D&D game which used these revised 4.5 books, and hence I ended up buying these core 4.5 rulebooks.

After buying these 4.5 core D&D rulebooks, in early-2011 I told myself (again) that I would stop buying any new D&D supplement books. But a year later in January 2012, they formally announced that a new 5th edition of D&D was going to be produced, which effectively ended the 4/4.5 edition D&D product line.

http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2012/01...s-and-dragons/

So I ended up buying the rest of the 4.5 edition D&D supplement books published in 2011 and 2012, largely to "complete" my collection of 4/4.5 edition D&D books. (There were around a dozen or so 4.5 edition supplement books). The final official 4.5 edition book published, was like a "the rest of 4th and 4.5 edition" hodge podge collection of written rules and advice.

At this point in time, I keep telling myself that I will not buy any 5th edition D&D books.

Somewhat surprising that an edition of D&D only lasted for four years. Previous editions of D&D, lasted for as long as a decade.

Last edited by jayceee; September 4 2013 at 09:47 AM. Reason: typos
jayceee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 3 2013, 10:27 PM   #35
Stevil2001
Rear Admiral
 
Stevil2001's Avatar
 
Location: 2010
Re: Do you prefer it when the books were numbered???

Wait, there's a fifth edition coming!?
__________________
"I don't like adventure. I'm a stay-at-home-and-read kind of guy."
Science's Less Accurate Grandmother
Stevil2001 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 4 2013, 12:00 AM   #36
jayceee
Commander
 
Re: Do you prefer it when the books were numbered???

Steve Mollmann wrote: View Post
Wait, there's a fifth edition coming!?
They've been doing public playtests of potential 5E D&D rulesets, over the last year and a half or so. (They've been semi-officially calling it "D&D Next").

https://www.wizards.com/dnd/dndnext.aspx

So far they have not stated a release date yet for the 5E player's handbook.
jayceee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 4 2013, 12:56 AM   #37
DorkBoy [TM]
Captain
 
Re: Do you prefer it when the books were numbered???

The best thing about the "numbers" is that it makes it really easy to put your shelf in release order and see where the gaps in your collection are. That was really helpful back in the day.

Especially when I was catching up and buying older books piecemeal from used book stores, etc.

Of course, these days I just buy almost all the novels as they come out, anyhow. So its really kind of moot.

When they started doing the crazy crossover series the numbering system really started to break down. When TOS 70, TNG 30, DS9 15, VOY 10 are book 1-4 of a series, it quickly becomes confusing. (And, which way do I shelve my collection - do I keep the numbers in order or keep the crossover series together? Its enough to make the OCD part of my brain explode!)

Anyhow I think we're better off without them. And the recent novels have hardly been as ordinary and "by the numbers" as the numbered era books were.
__________________
Homer: The information superhighway showed the average person what some nerd thinks about Star Trek.
DorkBoy [TM] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 4 2013, 06:06 AM   #38
Markonian
Captain
 
Markonian's Avatar
 
Location: Leipzig, Saxony
Re: Do you prefer it when the books were numbered???

DorkBoy [TM] wrote: View Post
And, which way do I shelve my collection - do I keep the numbers in order or keep the crossover series together? Its enough to make the OCD part of my brain explode!
Easy solution: by all of the crossover books twice and do both.

I'm okay with books not being numbered anymore, although I appreciate it in the case of CoE, which makes it easier to get the books in publication order. And the numbering scheme of the German editions prevented me from picking VGD 2 instead of 1.
__________________
1.000 years: University Leipzig, 1409-2409
Gorn to be wild!
Markonian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 4 2013, 09:05 AM   #39
Jar Jar Binks
Admiral
 
Jar Jar Binks's Avatar
 
Location: Skywalker
Re: Do you prefer it when the books were numbered???

jayceee wrote: View Post
Somewhat surprising that an edition of D&D only lasted for four years. Previous editions of D&D, lasted for as long as a decade.
Sorry to continue on the tangent, but I think the primary impetus for D&D Next was because of the relative failure that was 4E. Wizards of the Coast botched the release of 4E bigtime and never really recovered, and because of some changes they made to the gameplay, they've lost a huge portion of their audience to rival Pathfinder, which uses a refined and improved 3E/3.5 ruleset (which was made possible by the Open Game License published by WotC back during the 3E era).

To get back on topic, I didn't follow Trek lit back during the numbered era, so I find the whole concept a little awkward. I definitely prefer things the way they are now. Numbering the books would make me feel like I have to buy them all in order to complete the set. I'm sure Pocket would prefer I did that, but I'd rather not.
Jar Jar Binks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 4 2013, 01:32 PM   #40
jayceee
Commander
 
Re: Do you prefer it when the books were numbered???

Therin of Andor wrote: View Post
Yep. Their interest was waning, but they hated the idea of just... stopping.

Yep. I know several people who did continue to keep collecting ST novels. Complaining all the way.
On another tangent.

More generally, this type of behavior sounds very similar to that of a hardcore alcoholic, drug addict, degenerate gambler, etc ...

With that being said, as I've gotten older I've had to train myself to avoid jumping onto compulsive collecting type "treadmills". (Especially ones which are long term running or recurring, with frequent releases). Though sometimes I am not successful.

In recent times, some of the treadmills I jumped onto were:

- 4/4.5 edition Dungeons & Dragons rpg supplement books
- dvds/blurays of 1980's and early-1990's action movies
- television show season sets on dvd (or bluray)
- Star Trek novels (mostly older numbered novels)
- various graphic novels of recent limited series comic book titles
- etc ...

Over the last year or two, I've found various "psychological" tricks to jump off these various treadmills, such as:

- a series is complete (ie. older tv shows, limited series comic books, D&D books, older movies, etc ...)
- heavily restricting my choices to buy (ie. current tv shows, newer movies, Star Trek novels, etc ...).


For current tv shows released on dvd or bluray, I have largely restricted myself to tv shows released on bluray, where I have not previously watched through most or all of the episodes in a season. (Since very few tv shows are released on bluray, this severely restricts my selection of possible new tv show season sets to buy). Also if I have watched through all the episodes of a particular season of a current or recent tv show, there's no point anymore in buying that season on dvd/bluray.

For newer movies, I've been restricting myself to only buying ones which are released on bluray and that I think I will watch numerous times. Over that last year or so, I've only had one bluray title which I have watched numerous times: the 2009 Star Trek movie.

I have too many tv show dvd season sets and movies, which I have not finished watching or haven't watched at all.


To go back on topic in regard to Star Trek novels, I've largely restricted myself to buying second handed ST novels at book fairs, thrift stores, etc ..., where most of the time I can find older Star Trek books for 50 cents each or less.
jayceee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 4 2013, 02:13 PM   #41
Therin of Andor
Admiral
 
Therin of Andor's Avatar
 
Location: New Therin Park, Andor (via Australia)
View Therin of Andor's Twitter Profile
Re: Do you prefer it when the books were numbered???

jayceee wrote: View Post
To go back on topic in regard to Star Trek novels, I've largely restricted myself to buying second handed ST novels at book fairs, thrift stores, etc ..., where most of the time I can find older Star Trek books for 50 cents each or less.
Sure, and the thrill of the hunt, throughout the early 80s, searching for Bantam and Ballantine Trek materials, involved some memories I still hold in fond regard. But I'm also happy to send my ongoing contributions to current and future author royalties with the new books.
__________________
Thiptho lapth! Ian (Entire post is personal opinion)
The Andor Files @ http://andorfiles.blogspot.com/
http://therinofandor.blogspot.com/
Therin of Andor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 4 2013, 04:21 PM   #42
jpv2000
Captain
 
jpv2000's Avatar
 
Location: Georgia, United States
Re: Do you prefer it when the books were numbered???

Therin of Andor wrote: View Post
jayceee wrote: View Post
To go back on topic in regard to Star Trek novels, I've largely restricted myself to buying second handed ST novels at book fairs, thrift stores, etc ..., where most of the time I can find older Star Trek books for 50 cents each or less.
Sure, and the thrill of the hunt, throughout the early 80s, searching for Bantam and Ballantine Trek materials, involved some memories I still hold in fond regard. But I'm also happy to send my ongoing contributions to current and future author royalties with the new books.
Same with me. Fond memories indeed. But, I get most of my books new these days.
jpv2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 4 2013, 11:00 PM   #43
Garrovick
Commander
 
Garrovick's Avatar
 
Location: wallowing in a pool of emotion
Re: Do you prefer it when the books were numbered???

I do miss the days of numbered Trek books, more for nostalgia than anything else, really. But, I think given the way that Treklit has evolved over about the past 10 to 12 years or so, I am glad they did away with the numbering. It would be rather confusing for new readers, I believe.

I do still wish they published the list of previously-published novels in the books, though. Even though it would take up more pages than it's probably worth.
__________________
"A mind needs books the way a sword needs a whetstone." - Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones
Garrovick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 5 2013, 12:18 AM   #44
RandyS
Vice Admiral
 
RandyS's Avatar
 
Location: Randyland
View RandyS's Twitter Profile
Re: Do you prefer it when the books were numbered???

Garrovick wrote: View Post
I do miss the days of numbered Trek books, more for nostalgia than anything else, really. But, I think given the way that Treklit has evolved over about the past 10 to 12 years or so, I am glad they did away with the numbering. It would be rather confusing for new readers, I believe.

I do still wish they published the list of previously-published novels in the books, though. Even though it would take up more pages than it's probably worth.
This is what I miss also but, the easy solution there is you can probably find that list online someplace. I haven't looked, but I'm sure it's out there somewhere.

As for the numbering of the books, I too miss it for nostalgic reasons (I will go to my grave believing that there is no good reason for any kind of change for ANYTHING), but i can see the arguments behind getting rid of it, and , as long as there's a list of the books, I guess we can do without it.
RandyS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 5 2013, 12:20 AM   #45
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Do you prefer it when the books were numbered???

RandyS wrote: View Post
(I will go to my grave believing that there is no good reason for any kind of change for ANYTHING)
If that includes such things as your clothes, your toothbrush, your tires, and your brake pads, then expect to go to your grave sooner rather than later...
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.