RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,314
Posts: 5,352,316
Members: 24,620
Currently online: 648
Newest member: MAC5494

TrekToday headlines

Drexler TV Alert
By: T'Bonz on Jul 26

Retro Review: His Way
By: Michelle on Jul 26

MicroWarriors Releases Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Ships Of The Line Design Contest
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Next Weekend: Shore Leave 36!
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

True Trek History To Be Penned
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Insight Editions Announces Three Trek Books For 2015
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

To Be Takei Review by Spencer Blohm
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Mulgrew: Playing Red
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Hallmark 2015 Trek Ornaments
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 30 2013, 04:17 AM   #1
The Overlord
Captain
 
The Beta Quadrant

We don't seem know much about the Beta Quadrant compared to the other Quadrants. In TOS it was suggested that the Klingon and Romulan Empires were in the Beta Quadrant, but by DS9 they both seem to be in the Alpha Quadrant. Plus if both those empires were in the Beta Quadrant, how would they be so close to the Federation to the Alpha Quadrant, to the point that Federation Starships can easily travel to both the Klingon and Romulan home worlds.

So what exactly is in the Beta Quadrant?
The Overlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30 2013, 04:22 AM   #2
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: The Beta Quadrant

The common explanation in the novels and fan maps is that Earth is right at the border of the Alpha/Beta Quadrants and the Romulans/Klingons are mostly in the Beta with Cardassia being on the opposite side of the Federation in the Alpha Quadrant. Though this gets problematic when you analyze just how the Klingons were able to invade or the Romulans were able to open their own second front against Cardassia.

Really, it's not the first inconsistency in Trek and hardly one of the big ones. I just roll with it usually.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30 2013, 05:32 AM   #3
Nerys Myk
Fleet Admiral
 
Nerys Myk's Avatar
 
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
Re: The Beta Quadrant

The Overlord wrote: View Post
We don't seem know much about the Beta Quadrant compared to the other Quadrants. In TOS it was suggested that the Klingon and Romulan Empires were in the Beta Quadrant, but by DS9 they both seem to be in the Alpha Quadrant. Plus if both those empires were in the Beta Quadrant, how would they be so close to the Federation to the Alpha Quadrant, to the point that Federation Starships can easily travel to both the Klingon and Romulan home worlds.

So what exactly is in the Beta Quadrant?
I don't think TOS ever mention the Quadrants. Thats something that came into being with the films and TNG.

Since the Quadrants would be next to each other its possible for a starship to travel to the capital worlds with a certain amount of ease. I can travel from the capital of California to the capital of Nevada in a few hours.
__________________
The boring one, the one with Khan, the one where Spock returns, the one with whales, the dumb one, the last one, the one with Kirk, the one with the Borg, the stupid one, the bad one, the new one, the other one with Khan.
Nerys Myk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30 2013, 05:37 AM   #4
TheSubCommander
Captain
 
TheSubCommander's Avatar
 
Re: The Beta Quadrant

R. Star wrote: View Post
The common explanation in the novels and fan maps is that Earth is right at the border of the Alpha/Beta Quadrants and the Romulans/Klingons are mostly in the Beta with Cardassia being on the opposite side of the Federation in the Alpha Quadrant. Though this gets problematic when you analyze just how the Klingons were able to invade or the Romulans were able to open their own second front against Cardassia.

Really, it's not the first inconsistency in Trek and hardly one of the big ones. I just roll with it usually.
You are so two-dimensional

Who is to say the Klingons had to traverse federation space to get there?
TheSubCommander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30 2013, 06:24 AM   #5
Bry_Sinclair
Commodore
 
Bry_Sinclair's Avatar
 
Location: Along the border of Talarian space
Re: The Beta Quadrant

As I understand it the concept of what a quadrant is wasn't established until the beginning of TNG, in TOS it was used rather loosely as a means of describing a location. It was only in TUC that the TOS crew used the new format (Sulu and the Excelsior were in the Alpha Quadrant when the Enterprise-A was in the Beta).
__________________
Avatar: Captain Susanna Leijten, U.S.S. Silverfin NCC-4470, Border Service Third Cutter Squadron
Manip by: FltCpt. Bossco (STPMA)
Bry_Sinclair is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 30 2013, 07:09 AM   #6
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: The Beta Quadrant

TheSubCommander wrote: View Post
R. Star wrote: View Post
The common explanation in the novels and fan maps is that Earth is right at the border of the Alpha/Beta Quadrants and the Romulans/Klingons are mostly in the Beta with Cardassia being on the opposite side of the Federation in the Alpha Quadrant. Though this gets problematic when you analyze just how the Klingons were able to invade or the Romulans were able to open their own second front against Cardassia.

Really, it's not the first inconsistency in Trek and hardly one of the big ones. I just roll with it usually.
You are so two-dimensional

Who is to say the Klingons had to traverse federation space to get there?
You're right, the Klingon's strike me as being excellent at logistics being able to keep supply lines open through, over, under or around Federation space. They're a diverse people. Like that lawyer and those spies.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30 2013, 07:12 AM   #7
C.E. Evans
Vice Admiral
 
C.E. Evans's Avatar
 
Location: Saint Louis (aka Defiance)
Re: The Beta Quadrant

TOS used the terms "quadrant" and "sector" interchangeably, but one could argue--as proposed by some--that space was so much bigger in Kirk's day that sectors were divided into quadrants. By the time of the Khitomer Conference, however, this practice of having "sector quadrants" had likely ended.
TheSubCommander wrote:
You are so two-dimensional

Who is to say the Klingons had to traverse federation space to get there?
That's a valid point. Lose the idea that each galactic government exists in a perfect sphere, it's easy for them to have territories that wrap around one another.

There is enough onscreen material to piece together an idea that the Federation and some of the other local galactic governments in the Trek Universe all occupy a region that spans the line where the Alpha and Beta Quadrants meet, with parts of their borders fairly close to one another. Having so many interstellar powers in close proximity to one another along the Alpha-Beta Quadrant border would explain some of the conflicts the Federation gets into.

We could still have it be a case that the Klingons are mostly in the Beta Quadrant but have some territory or colonies in the Alpha Quadrant as well. There could also be regions of non-aligned space that anyone can cross through (a Neutral Zone could just be an agreement prohibiting Federation ships from crossing into Klingon territory or Romulan ships from entering Federation territory, but doesn't prevent any of them from crossing the Alpha-Beta Quadrant border through unincorporated territory).
__________________
"Everybody wants to rule the world..."
C.E. Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30 2013, 11:38 AM   #8
ZapBrannigan
Fleet Captain
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Location: New York State
Re: The Beta Quadrant

In TOS, I think a quadrant was supposed to be just some marked-off region on a star map, and the Federation contained many quadrants. TNG-era terminology re-defined a Quadrant, capitalized, as one-quarter of the whole galaxy.

I suspect that a lot of Star Trek fans, and some of the writers, had no understanding of how big our galaxy is.

- Our galaxy appears to contain up to 400 billion stars. That's a lot.

- Even if you could travel at 1000 times the speed of light, it would still take decades to get from the heart of one TNG-era Quadrant to the heart of another [or to get from Earth to the center of the galaxy, as they did in ST-5; the spinoff TV series had much better science advisors than Shatner did for his film].

So the galaxy is an absurdly large territory and far bigger than the whole Star Trek franchise would ever need to tell all its stories, as long as its size is understood.

The Borg were placed in the Delta Quadrant and the Dominion in the Gamma Quadrant, both vastly far away, in order to explain how we had been isolated from them for so long. Things like Q's magic, trans-warp drive, or a wormhole are needed to cross the distance.

As for the Klingons and Romulans, the only possible way they're in the Beta Quadrant is if the Federation is right near the Beta border, and these two alien empires are right near the Alpha border, like R. Star said.
ZapBrannigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30 2013, 02:47 PM   #9
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: The Beta Quadrant

TOS used the terms "quadrant" and "sector" interchangeably
...But ST2:TWoK specified that a quadrant was a subsection of a sector. Which can be retroactively applied to all the TOS references without a problem. It can also be applied to early TNG references to quadrants, such as the Morgana Quadrant: there simply are two types of quadrant, the local and the galactic, and TOS never concerned itself with the latter because there were no wormholes and the nearest thing to Q only ever flung Kirk's ship a thousand lightyears.

We could still have it be a case that the Klingons are mostly in the Beta Quadrant but have some territory or colonies in the Alpha Quadrant as well.
And this would be enough to set up the situation where, late in DS9, Klingons are considered an "Alpha Quadrant species".

That is, if Klingons were mostly in Beta, they'd originally certainly be known as a Beta species, the way Russkies were the Eastern foe. Indeed the whole Alpha/Beta division might have been devised to separate "us" from "them" in a putatively astronomical but essentially political way. But once they became solid allies in the war against the Dominion, they'd be "upgraded" into an Alpha culture, the double excuse being that they operate in Alpha for shared Alpha goals, and a corner of their territory also extends to Alpha. Basically, Russia counts as the West in certain contexts already...

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30 2013, 03:15 PM   #10
Bad Thoughts
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Disguised as Reb Bad Thoughts
Re: The Beta Quadrant

We are talking about cartographical conviences used to express varied political relationships, not real galactic structures, no? A quadrant is just a section of a larger territory that has been divided in four; any such division could be described as a quadrant. Moreover, the quadrants could be redefined in order to be useful to the context under discussion.

Could the four-part division of the Milky Way have been reconsidered at some point? Why not? Before WWI, the West consisted of nations and territories west of the Rhine River. During the Cold War, the West stopped where the Soviet Bloc nations began. Now, the notion of Central Europe is gradually replacing the East/West divide, with nations like Poland and Czech Republic being considered geo-politically alongside Germany and Austria. We have broad categories, like the Middle East, which at its largest consists of territories that are more west than Western Europe (Morocco).

Perhaps the alliance with the Klingons forced a reconsideration of the greater geo-political structure of the area round the Federation. Rather than Earth dividing Alpha from Beta, political planners decided that Alpha was a better description for an area under the influence of the Federation, Klingon Empire, and Romulan Empire. There's no need for these cartographical conveniences to be set in stone.
Bad Thoughts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30 2013, 04:03 PM   #11
Nine of Four
Commander
 
Nine of Four's Avatar
 
Location: On a Borg Cube in the Delta Quadrant
Re: The Beta Quadrant

Nerys Myk wrote: View Post
The Overlord wrote: View Post
We don't seem know much about the Beta Quadrant compared to the other Quadrants. In TOS it was suggested that the Klingon and Romulan Empires were in the Beta Quadrant, but by DS9 they both seem to be in the Alpha Quadrant. Plus if both those empires were in the Beta Quadrant, how would they be so close to the Federation to the Alpha Quadrant, to the point that Federation Starships can easily travel to both the Klingon and Romulan home worlds.

So what exactly is in the Beta Quadrant?
I don't think TOS ever mention the Quadrants. Thats something that came into being with the films and TNG.
When TOS refers to "quadrants", they are definitely not referring to the quadrants of TNG, DS9, and VOY. In TOS, quadrants are much smaller sectors of space.
__________________
- Nine of Four
Nine of Four is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30 2013, 08:45 PM   #12
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: The Beta Quadrant

We are talking about cartographical conviences used to express varied political relationships, not real galactic structures, no?
Absolutely - and we may even conclude that these are conveniences specific to individual cultures. Klingons may not believe in Alpha and Beta Quadrants: it's just the Universal Translator giving us the impression that they do, much like it fools us into thinking they believe in "hours" and sometimes also "meters".

Perhaps the alliance with the Klingons forced a reconsideration of the greater geo-political structure of the area round the Federation. Rather than Earth dividing Alpha from Beta, political planners decided that Alpha was a better description for an area under the influence of the Federation, Klingon Empire, and Romulan Empire. There's no need for these cartographical conveniences to be set in stone.
If this happened between TNG "The Price" and VOY "False Profits", it explains a thing or two... Moving the A/B border would necessarily also move the G/D border, thus allowing for a wormhole end that in "The Price" was at the very most 200 ly into Delta to now be several thousand lightyears into Delta and thus on the route of the Voyager!

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30 2013, 09:35 PM   #13
Nerys Myk
Fleet Admiral
 
Nerys Myk's Avatar
 
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
Re: The Beta Quadrant

Why divide an object into quadrants if its not going to be four equal parts? These aren't hard borders, there are probably space faring cultures who's territories are in two, three or even four of the quadrants, just as there are countries who borders are in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres.
__________________
The boring one, the one with Khan, the one where Spock returns, the one with whales, the dumb one, the last one, the one with Kirk, the one with the Borg, the stupid one, the bad one, the new one, the other one with Khan.
Nerys Myk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30 2013, 09:38 PM   #14
MacLeod
Admiral
 
Location: Great Britain
Re: The Beta Quadrant

Bad thoughts wrote: View Post
We are talking about cartographical conviences used to express varied political relationships, not real galactic structures, no? A quadrant is just a section of a larger territory that has been divided in four; any such division could be described as a quadrant. Moreover, the quadrants could be redefined in order to be useful to the context under discussion.

Could the four-part division of the Milky Way have been reconsidered at some point? Why not? Before WWI, the West consisted of nations and territories west of the Rhine River. During the Cold War, the West stopped where the Soviet Bloc nations began. Now, the notion of Central Europe is gradually replacing the East/West divide, with nations like Poland and Czech Republic being considered geo-politically alongside Germany and Austria. We have broad categories, like the Middle East, which at its largest consists of territories that are more west than Western Europe (Morocco).

Perhaps the alliance with the Klingons forced a reconsideration of the greater geo-political structure of the area round the Federation. Rather than Earth dividing Alpha from Beta, political planners decided that Alpha was a better description for an area under the influence of the Federation, Klingon Empire, and Romulan Empire. There's no need for these cartographical conveniences to be set in stone.
Perhaps, but in terms of Europe or at least the EU, countries like Poland and the Czech Republic are classed as Eastern European. So sometimes is a matter of perspective of where you are looking from and from what you are measuring. i.e Geographically, politically etc..
__________________
On the continent of wild endeavour in the mountains of solace and solitude there stood the citadel of the time lords, the oldest and most mighty race in the universe looking down on the galaxies below sworn never to interfere only to watch.
MacLeod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30 2013, 10:11 PM   #15
Bad Thoughts
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Disguised as Reb Bad Thoughts
Re: The Beta Quadrant

MacLeod wrote: View Post
Perhaps, but in terms of Europe or at least the EU, countries like Poland and the Czech Republic are classed as Eastern European. So sometimes is a matter of perspective of where you are looking from and from what you are measuring. i.e Geographically, politically etc..
Increasingly, it's East-Central Europe, distancing those nations from Russia.
Bad Thoughts is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.