RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,562
Posts: 5,514,121
Members: 25,147
Currently online: 449
Newest member: Wolfspaw

TrekToday headlines

Two New Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Dec 26

Captain Kirk’s Boldest Missions
By: T'Bonz on Dec 25

Trek Paper Clips
By: T'Bonz on Dec 24

Sargent Passes
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

QMx Trek Insignia Badges
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

And The New Director Of Star Trek 3 Is…
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

TV Alert: Pine On Tonight Show
By: T'Bonz on Dec 22

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Trek Tech

Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 8 2013, 08:41 PM   #16
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Anyone else hate the "New" Deep Space 9 design?

Hate? No. Dislike? Yeah.

But the beauty of novels is I can imagine it however I want.
__________________
"...the most elementary and valuable statement in science, the beginning of wisdom, is I do not know." - Lt. Commander Data, "Where Silence Has Lease"
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 9 2013, 06:44 AM   #17
lonewriter
Lieutenant Commander
 
lonewriter's Avatar
 
Location: Texas
Re: Anyone else hate the "New" Deep Space 9 design?

I hate it but will still read the books, I think this fan built station would have been perfect for the new DS9
Alternate design
__________________
Lonewriter

Last edited by Unwrapped; August 10 2013 at 01:48 AM.
lonewriter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 9 2013, 05:02 PM   #18
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Anyone else hate the "New" Deep Space 9 design?

It's just a book cover. Where's your imagination?
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 9 2013, 05:29 PM   #19
Crazy Eddie
Rear Admiral
 
Crazy Eddie's Avatar
 
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
Re: Anyone else hate the "New" Deep Space 9 design?

^ Well, the link that was posted upthread contains some beauty shots (if you could call it that) of the new station design.

Having said that, I haven't really enjoyed the DS9 books all that much and I only really read them out of some sense of loyalty to the show itself and wanting to know what happens next. Since it turns out the original DS9 is basically being scrapped anyway, I no longer have a reason to keep on reading.
__________________
The Complete Illustrated Guide to Starfleet - Online Now!
Crazy Eddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 9 2013, 06:17 PM   #20
ComicGuy89
Lieutenant Commander
 
Re: Anyone else hate the "New" Deep Space 9 design?

Not a fan but I don't hate it. There was a certain character to the old DS9 that I feel a Federation redesign would be unable to capture. Then again, the Galaxy class is not the Constitution class.
ComicGuy89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 10 2013, 12:36 AM   #21
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Anyone else hate the "New" Deep Space 9 design?

Crazy Eddie wrote: View Post
^ Well, the link that was posted upthread contains some beauty shots (if you could call it that) of the new station design.

Having said that, I haven't really enjoyed the DS9 books all that much and I only really read them out of some sense of loyalty to the show itself and wanting to know what happens next. Since it turns out the original DS9 is basically being scrapped anyway, I no longer have a reason to keep on reading.
But that's my point. What difference does it make in a book? Just imagine it looks like it always did.
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 10 2013, 01:47 AM   #22
Unwrapped
Continuity Spackle
 
Unwrapped's Avatar
 
Location: The mockingjay soars (Unicron)
Send a message via ICQ to Unwrapped
Re: Anyone else hate the "New" Deep Space 9 design?

lonewriter wrote: View Post
I hate it but will still read the books, I think this fan built station would have been perfect for the new DS9
Alternate design
I rather like that one actually. Nice use of the spacedock and drydock elements. However, I changed the image to a link because you should only link to images on your own host.
__________________

"If you think you're brave enough to walk the path of honor, then follow me into the dragon's den."


Knight Exemplar
Unwrapped is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 10 2013, 08:06 AM   #23
Bry_Sinclair
Commodore
 
Bry_Sinclair's Avatar
 
Location: Tactical withdrawl along the Klingon border
Re: Anyone else hate the "New" Deep Space 9 design?

Why destroy the station in the first place? Besides didn't they tow Empok Nor into the Bajor System (it was a DS9/SCE crossover)? Couldn't they have just activated it and had it become Deep Space 9-A?
__________________
Avatar: Captain Naya, U.S.S. Renown NCC-1415 [Star Trek: Four Years War]
Manip by: JM1776 (STPMA.net)
Bry_Sinclair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 10 2013, 07:49 PM   #24
C.E. Evans
Vice Admiral
 
C.E. Evans's Avatar
 
Location: Ferguson, Missouri, USA
Re: Anyone else hate the "New" Deep Space 9 design?

Bry_Sinclair wrote: View Post
Why destroy the station in the first place?
For the same reasons the original Enterprise and the Enterprise-D were destroyed--to do something shocking that forever changes the status quo.
Besides didn't they tow Empok Nor into the Bajor System (it was a DS9/SCE crossover)? Couldn't they have just activated it and had it become Deep Space 9-A?
I think in-universe, Starfleet may have decided to build a new state-of-the-art starbase that met Federation specifications and requirements rather than try to repurpose another abandoned Cardassian ore facility.
__________________
"Don't sweat the small stuff--it makes you small-minded..."
C.E. Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 12 2013, 03:10 AM   #25
Storyteller
Ensign
 
Re: Anyone else hate the "New" Deep Space 9 design?

Somehow, the new design doesn't bug me much. That window probably isn't glass; does anybody remember that scene in "First Contact" where Picard demonstrates a force field window to Lily? On a slightly (un)related note, I wonder if this picture rings a bell with anybody?

__________________
Happy freelancer and Mars One candidate. I blog if anybody is interested.
Storyteller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 12 2013, 04:44 AM   #26
137th Gebirg
Rear Admiral
 
137th Gebirg's Avatar
 
Location: Who is John Galt?
Re: Anyone else hate the "New" Deep Space 9 design?

Was that one of the conceptual space station desgns from "Beyond the Farthest Star"?
__________________
Gebirgswick - Ind, Tra, Sec & Env.
137th Gebirg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 12 2013, 06:12 AM   #27
Rķu rķu, chķu
Fleet Admiral
 
Rķu rķu, chķu's Avatar
 
Location: Mr. Laser Beam is in the visitor's bullpen
View Rķu rķu, chķu's Twitter Profile
Re: Anyone else hate the "New" Deep Space 9 design?

Bry_Sinclair wrote: View Post
Why destroy the station in the first place? Besides didn't they tow Empok Nor into the Bajor System (it was a DS9/SCE crossover)? Couldn't they have just activated it and had it become Deep Space 9-A?

IIRC, Empok Nor wasn't repairable as a whole, it was just useful for spare parts.

What I want to know about the pylons on the new DS9 is, what exactly are they for? When the pylons on the old station didn't connect at the top, it's obvious what they were for - starship docking. Do the pylons on the new station stand for anything except decoration? They don't connect to anything, do they?
__________________
"A hot dog at the ballpark is better than a steak at the Ritz." - Humphrey Bogart
Rķu rķu, chķu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 12 2013, 06:58 AM   #28
Infern0
Captain
 
Infern0's Avatar
 
Re: Anyone else hate the "New" Deep Space 9 design?

Bry_Sinclair wrote: View Post
Why destroy the station in the first place? Besides didn't they tow Empok Nor into the Bajor System (it was a DS9/SCE crossover)? Couldn't they have just activated it and had it become Deep Space 9-A?
Those Nor class space stations were old and decrepit rust buckets

I'm not surprised they would opt for a modern replacement
Infern0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 12 2013, 11:33 AM   #29
Mage
Commodore
 
Mage's Avatar
 
Re: Anyone else hate the "New" Deep Space 9 design?

Bry_Sinclair wrote: View Post
Why destroy the station in the first place? Besides didn't they tow Empok Nor into the Bajor System (it was a DS9/SCE crossover)? Couldn't they have just activated it and had it become Deep Space 9-A?
They ripped out the old fusion cores for DS9, since those were ejected when they overloaded thanks to sabotage early in the Relaunch. Cardassia couldn't supply new cores since their entire industrial infrastructure was messed up after the war.

As for a new station being build, if you read the books, it was made clear it was as much a symbol as a necesity. To show the Typhon Pact that the Federation won't be bullied down, and that they will rebuild. I think you could almost compare it to what the new Tower being build in New York. To rebuild exactly what was, can open up old wounds for some. But to build something new, something out of the ashes so to speak, is a powerfull symbol for some.
__________________
Niner. Lurker. Browncoat.
Mage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 12 2013, 12:00 PM   #30
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Anyone else hate the "New" Deep Space 9 design?

Mage wrote: View Post
Bry_Sinclair wrote: View Post
Why destroy the station in the first place? Besides didn't they tow Empok Nor into the Bajor System (it was a DS9/SCE crossover)? Couldn't they have just activated it and had it become Deep Space 9-A?
They ripped out the old fusion cores for DS9, since those were ejected when they overloaded thanks to sabotage early in the Relaunch. Cardassia couldn't supply new cores since their entire industrial infrastructure was messed up after the war.

As for a new station being build, if you read the books, it was made clear it was as much a symbol as a necesity. To show the Typhon Pact that the Federation won't be bullied down, and that they will rebuild. I think you could almost compare it to what the new Tower being build in New York. To rebuild exactly what was, can open up old wounds for some. But to build something new, something out of the ashes so to speak, is a powerfull symbol for some.
And they still should have build two towers, not only one.
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.