RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,273
Posts: 5,349,932
Members: 24,610
Currently online: 780
Newest member: VST

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: His Way
By: Michelle on Jul 26

MicroWarriors Releases Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Ships Of The Line Design Contest
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Next Weekend: Shore Leave 36!
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

True Trek History To Be Penned
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Insight Editions Announces Three Trek Books For 2015
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

To Be Takei Review by Spencer Blohm
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Mulgrew: Playing Red
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Hallmark 2015 Trek Ornaments
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Funko Mini Spock
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Star Trek - Original Series

Star Trek - Original Series The one that started it all...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 23 2013, 12:58 PM   #46
CommishSleer
Fleet Captain
 
CommishSleer's Avatar
 
Location: Way back of nowhere
View CommishSleer's Twitter Profile
Re: Original or remastered effects?

I have owned every format of TOS from some very low quality VHS tapes in the 80s to the DVD, HD, and blu-rays.

I can take or leave the new FX. Overall I believe the new FX are better than the old. Sometimes the obviously CGI ship fly-bys look cartoonsish but they're better than nothing. And TOS was written and directed knowing it had limited costly special effects so you can understand the story with bad (in today's standards) and sometime totally absent special effects shot.

I'm old school so I personally would pick the original shots if allowed only one but since I have the blurays and can look at the old effects whenever I want I always watch the episodes with the new effects.

The best thing about the remastering IMO was getting rid of the spots and film blemishes. That makes getting any remastered version worthwhile
CommishSleer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 23 2013, 01:53 PM   #47
CaptainDave1701
Lieutenant Commander
 
Re: Original or remastered effects?

I am in the process of building the Round 2 AMT K-7 Space Station and this really has come into play in reference to the build. Yes the kit does bring back a lot of childhood memories but the one that is missing is how it was originally intended to look.

When doing searches online so that I may determine as to how I am going to paint the model I am finding many pictures from the remastered episode to include the DS9 episode but original stills are few and far between. This gives me cause for concern as I would wonder if what was originally done in the 60's in reference to effects could soon be forgotten.

As far as the research on the model though I wonder why they chose to put a big K7 right over a bunch of windows anyway since the original model onscreen had no markings at all. At least none that could be seen on screen anyway.
CaptainDave1701 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 23 2013, 02:47 PM   #48
ssosmcin
Rear Admiral
 
ssosmcin's Avatar
 
Location: ssosmcin
Re: Original or remastered effects?

Just a note: if you don't have a high definition TV, don't bother with Blu-Ray. This is especially true if you want to watch Star Trek or other "full screen" TV series. The picture will not fill the screen and be quite smaller, because the format is made to fit the 16:9 widescreen aspect ratio. Widescreen movies will always have the black bars and the top and bottom, which probably won't be an issue, but Star Trek is in 4:3 and it will have the black bars on the top and bottom as well as the side. It's in the same space as a widescreen movie, but inhabits only the center of the screen. This makes the picture a good 30% smaller, I would guess. Also, the picture quality of DVD is still excellent in standard def, so there's no reason to convert if the equipment you have is working fine. If your set breaks, there are plenty of working models at thrift stores, Goodwill, Craig's List and garage sales for very little money.

My HDTV crapped out last year and I haven't been able to replace it yet (the cheapest is still more than I can spend before fixing a car and my fence). Thankfully I still had an old, trusty tube set. Also luckily, I never got rid of my Trek DVDs after I got the Blu-Rays because standard def fills the screen.

As for which versions to choose, I'd go for the original effects if you're used to them after all this time. If you're anything like me, you'll find the new effects interesting and enjoyable (some even help the stories), but you'll prefer what you always had. If all you can swing is one, get the one you KNOW you'll enjoy.
__________________
"Tranya is people!"
ssosmcin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 23 2013, 02:52 PM   #49
LOKAI of CHERON
Commodore
 
LOKAI of CHERON's Avatar
 
Location: Post-apocalyptic ruins of my once mighty Homeworld.
Re: Original or remastered effects?

ssosmcin wrote: View Post
Just a note: if you don't have a high definition TV, don't bother with Blu-Ray. This is especially true if you want to watch Star Trek or other "full screen" TV series. The picture will not fill the screen and be quite smaller, because the format is made to fit the 16:9 widescreen aspect ratio. Widescreen movies will always have the black bars and the top and bottom, which probably won't be an issue, but Star Trek is in 4:3 and it will have the black bars on the top and bottom as well as the side. It's in the same space as a widescreen movie, but inhabits only the center of the screen.
Rectify this by accessing your players set-up menu and changing the output settings to "4:3" TV and "480/576i" appropriate to your region.
__________________
YOU MONOTONE HUMANS ARE ALL ALIKE... FIRST YOU CONDEMN, THEN ATTACK.
LOKAI of CHERON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 23 2013, 03:34 PM   #50
Grant
Fleet Captain
 
Grant's Avatar
 
Re: Original or remastered effects?

LOKAI of CHERON wrote: View Post
ssosmcin wrote: View Post
Just a note: if you don't have a high definition TV, don't bother with Blu-Ray. This is especially true if you want to watch Star Trek or other "full screen" TV series. The picture will not fill the screen and be quite smaller, because the format is made to fit the 16:9 widescreen aspect ratio. Widescreen movies will always have the black bars and the top and bottom, which probably won't be an issue, but Star Trek is in 4:3 and it will have the black bars on the top and bottom as well as the side. It's in the same space as a widescreen movie, but inhabits only the center of the screen.
Rectify this by accessing your players set-up menu and changing the output settings to "4:3" TV and "480/576i" appropriate to your region.
Yep, every Blu-ray player I've seen has this ability. My kids have had a Blu-ray player hooked to an old CRT TV for a couple of years and have not had that problem.
Grant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 23 2013, 04:00 PM   #51
Lance
Fleet Captain
 
Lance's Avatar
 
Location: The Enterprise's Restroom
Re: Original or remastered effects?

DeepSpaceWine wrote: View Post
The remastered effects seem to be tastefully done. What I mean is they don't try to really deviate from that original broadcast, trying to keep in spirit of the limitations, trying to just show a better effect, not trying to make something wildly new (though we got more variation for the planets, like Mudd's spectacular planet). We don't get whole battles made up from nothing basically.
Agreed, and I think this is the strength of the remastered effects. They're very sympathetic to the originals for the most part. There's one sequence where the planet killer attacks the Enterprise in "The Doomsday Machine" where the ship basically has the physics of a physical model, ie it tilts as though it's an actual optical effect. Don't know why that particular shot sticks in mind but I liked it when I saw it, made me feel like the SFX guys were well aware of how important it was not to fiddle about with them too much.

Having said that, there are some moments where I definitely prefered the tactile feel of the original model work, like the sky shots of the Enterprise in "Tomorrow is Yesterday". And while it's kinda cool to actually see Klingon ships in "Errand of Mercy", it does feel like history has been meddled with a bit, given we all know the Klingon ship didn't really debut on screen till season three.

On the whole though I like both sets of effects, but have no hesitation in giving the remastered versions the tick of approval.
Lance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 23 2013, 05:09 PM   #52
Melakon
Vice Admiral
 
Melakon's Avatar
 
Location: Unmarked grave, Ekos
Re: Original or remastered effects?

Buying an HD tv and buying a Blu-Ray player just so I can start buying Blu-Ray disks isn't a luxury I can afford anymore, and could take months or even next year before I'd have enough money. Due to my dabbling with 3d, I am interested in seeing how effects were changed. But CGI doesn't thrill me as much as it probably should, simply because I've worked with 3d and know how some of the effects could have been accomplished. Two things I've never quite learned to do though, are particle effect explosions and transporter effects in 3d. And I never seem to have my ships moving fast enough in battle scenes. My capital ships come out okay, but my fighters always look like they're going twenty miles an hour, even with moving starfields.
__________________
Curly: Moe, Larry, the cheese! Moe, Larry, the cheese! (Horses Collars, 1935)
Melakon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 23 2013, 05:28 PM   #53
Hober Mallow
Commodore
 
Location: The planet Terminus, site of the Encyclopedia Foundation on the periphery of the galaxy
Re: Original or remastered effects?

CommishSleer wrote: View Post
The best thing about the remastering IMO was getting rid of the spots and film blemishes. That makes getting any remastered version worthwhile
Exactly. The crystal clear transfer was for me the only selling point, and I wasn't disappointed.

The new FX I can take or leave, but I'm mostly irked by the changes made before the last remaster that have been retained and which are ever present no matter which version you watch, like the addition of the starship rumble sound.
__________________
"Beep... beep!" --Captain Pike
Hober Mallow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 23 2013, 05:29 PM   #54
trevanian
Rear Admiral
 
trevanian's Avatar
 
Re: Original or remastered effects?

Melakon wrote: View Post
. My capital ships come out okay, but my fighters always look like they're going twenty miles an hour, even with moving starfields.
Have you considered adding some aberrant motion to the ships? When a fastmoving car swerves a little, there's some back&forth fishtailing, and likewise if you're doing course corrections and such, you'd have the space equivalent.

Having the camera struggle to keep the ship framed (a la THE RIGHT STUFF, which is a good example of selling speed with rubber bands & tape) also might give the speed illusion a bit more oomph.
trevanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 23 2013, 05:34 PM   #55
Hober Mallow
Commodore
 
Location: The planet Terminus, site of the Encyclopedia Foundation on the periphery of the galaxy
Re: Original or remastered effects?

CaptainDave1701 wrote: View Post
When doing searches online so that I may determine as to how I am going to paint the model I am finding many pictures from the remastered episode to include the DS9 episode but original stills are few and far between. This gives me cause for concern as I would wonder if what was originally done in the 60's in reference to effects could soon be forgotten.
How would it be forgotten when it's right there in the episode? When you want to play an episode from the bluray you have to specify whether you want the original FX or the newer FX. The old FX haven't gone anywhere.
__________________
"Beep... beep!" --Captain Pike
Hober Mallow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 23 2013, 05:55 PM   #56
Melakon
Vice Admiral
 
Melakon's Avatar
 
Location: Unmarked grave, Ekos
Re: Original or remastered effects?

trevanian wrote: View Post
Melakon wrote: View Post
. My capital ships come out okay, but my fighters always look like they're going twenty miles an hour, even with moving starfields.
Have you considered adding some aberrant motion to the ships? When a fastmoving car swerves a little, there's some back&forth fishtailing, and likewise if you're doing course corrections and such, you'd have the space equivalent.

Having the camera struggle to keep the ship framed (a la THE RIGHT STUFF, which is a good example of selling speed with rubber bands & tape) also might give the speed illusion a bit more oomph.
Yes, I usually have my tiny ships like shuttles and fighters doing some slight side-to-side or up-down rocking motion, and motion blur going on. Where I've not been able to get it right is if they're attacking a capital ship. I never get them moving fast enough to look like high speed craft when the target is in frame. Instead they look like they're out for a leisurely Sunday drive and take a few potshots as they slowly go by. Maybe I'm just staging everything too close together when trying to get the angles I want. I usually render in short 5 or 10 second clips and assemble from there.
__________________
Curly: Moe, Larry, the cheese! Moe, Larry, the cheese! (Horses Collars, 1935)
Melakon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 23 2013, 09:17 PM   #57
ssosmcin
Rear Admiral
 
ssosmcin's Avatar
 
Location: ssosmcin
Re: Original or remastered effects?

Grant wrote: View Post
LOKAI of CHERON wrote: View Post
Rectify this by accessing your players set-up menu and changing the output settings to "4:3" TV and "480/576i" appropriate to your region.
Yep, every Blu-ray player I've seen has this ability. My kids have had a Blu-ray player hooked to an old CRT TV for a couple of years and have not had that problem.

Really?!! No shiznit? Holy crap, I feel pretty tech stupid and this is the first freaking thing I'm gonna do when I get home tonight!

Wow, thanks and sorry for the mis-info.

And thanks for sparing me a huge pair of cuz I should have thought of this....
__________________
"Tranya is people!"
ssosmcin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 23 2013, 10:25 PM   #58
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Original or remastered effects?

ssosmcin wrote: View Post

And thanks for sparing me a huge pair of cuz I should have thought of this....
When I got my first 16:9 TV I spent two weeks watching 16:9 TV shows (like Enterprise) with black bars on the top and bottom because I didn't realized I needed to change the player settings. So you're not alone.
__________________
"I had no idea you were so... formidable. " - Anan 7 to James T. Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 23 2013, 10:42 PM   #59
CaptPapa
Commander
 
Location: I really do not know . . .
Re: Original or remastered effects?

Melakon wrote: View Post
My financial situation won't change unless I start playing Lotto. I'm disabled, can't work anymore. There is enough money coming in once a month for rent and food and small expenses, but anything nearing or over $100 I have to budget several months in advance. I can play DVD's on my computer, but not Blu-Ray. And I didn't even start buying DVD until 3 or 4 years ago. Twenty-five years ago I was earning about 3 times what I get now in disability. So money is tight. Life was much better when I could just stop by the video store and order the entire 10-lot set of TOS videotapes that had just been released without checking the bank balance.
I would recommend Netflix. I don't know where you are, or if Netflix is available everywhere, but if it's an option, I think it's a great deal. I pay $7.99 a month and can stream all the Star Trek I can take - including TOS remastered. I turned off my $80 a month Direct TV almost two years ago now and don't miss it a bit.
I own one blu-ray DVD player, still have VCRs hooked up and nary a flat screen in sight. My house is still filled with picture tube TVs and I'm cool with that too.
__________________
ME, what did I do?
CaptPapa is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 23 2013, 11:04 PM   #60
Melakon
Vice Admiral
 
Melakon's Avatar
 
Location: Unmarked grave, Ekos
Re: Original or remastered effects?

I know about Netflix, but I'm the type of film buff who prefers having a physical library of tapes, disks, or whatever. As I understand pay-for-stream services like Netflix and Hulu+, and perhaps even what Amazon's doing, you're only buying a one time watch of that episode. Maybe Amazon is allowing downloads, but I don't think so. THe other problem I have with considering such services is my internet connection is not reliable. Recently my service was out for over a month, and didn't get repaired until the 10th. Since then, I have not gone 24 hours without the line dropping out several times a day, sometimes for over an hour. Suppose you lose connection in the middle of a streamed program you've already paid for?
__________________
Curly: Moe, Larry, the cheese! Moe, Larry, the cheese! (Horses Collars, 1935)
Melakon is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.