RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 135,755
Posts: 5,216,258
Members: 24,216
Currently online: 864
Newest member: kasmuruis

TrekToday headlines

Q Meets NuTrek Crew
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

Pine In Talks For Drama
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

New X-Men: Days of Future Past Trailer
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Nimoy to Receive Award
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Star Trek Special: Flesh and Stone Comic
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

These Are The Voyages TOS Season Two Book Review
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

Kirk’s Well Wishes To Kirk
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Quinto In New Starz Series
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Star Trek: Horizon Film
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14

Star Trek: Fleet Captains Game Expansion
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies I-X

Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 16 2013, 12:21 AM   #76
Dukhat
Commodore
 
Dukhat's Avatar
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: If VI had featured Saavik instead of Valeris as the traitor

Timo wrote: View Post
Chekov's motivation...? Why, the Klingons killed his brother!
No they didn't. Chekov was an only child.

SJK91 wrote: View Post
Regardless, even if Curtis did play a Vulcan like she 'should have,' it certainly was not effective for the film.
Count me as one of the ones who prefer Curtis over Alley.
__________________
“Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.”
– Benjamin Franklin
Dukhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 19 2013, 04:14 PM   #77
CaptainBearclaw
Lieutenant Commander
 
CaptainBearclaw's Avatar
 
Location: not valid
Re: If VI had featured Saavik instead of Valeris as the traitor

I could take either one of them. They both did a pretty good job. Of course I don't know why they had to out-continuity her in TVH, since she's been shown in the comic series' as being a great character. In DC's run she practically became part of the crew's family!

In regards to her being the traitor, I don't like Valeris. She's too one note, and almost sassily unemotional, if that even makes sense. I even think certain scenes would be better with Saavik in place of Valeris, like the scene in Spock's quarters. Just saying, if she had been the traitor, with proper reasoning, it could've been one hell of a twist.
CaptainBearclaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20 2013, 02:04 AM   #78
Kevman7987
Commander
 
Kevman7987's Avatar
 
Location: Erie, PA, USA
View Kevman7987's Twitter Profile
Re: If VI had featured Saavik instead of Valeris as the traitor

1. I prefer Robin Curtis over Kirstie Alley.

2. Saavik would have made for a better conspirator plot-wise. That would have pulled the rug out from under long time Trek fans & the characters (Spock especially).
__________________
"Don't do it, Meat!"
"Don't do it, Cheese!"
Kevman7987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20 2013, 02:05 AM   #79
marksound
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Planet Carcazed
Re: If VI had featured Saavik instead of Valeris as the traitor

Would people have liked Valeris more if she'd showed some cleavage?
marksound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20 2013, 02:08 AM   #80
CaptainBearclaw
Lieutenant Commander
 
CaptainBearclaw's Avatar
 
Location: not valid
Re: If VI had featured Saavik instead of Valeris as the traitor

Um... we'll put that as a maybe.
CaptainBearclaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20 2013, 02:59 PM   #81
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: If VI had featured Saavik instead of Valeris as the traitor

No they didn't. Chekov was an only child.
Says Sulu, and Sulu only. Why should we trust his word over the word of the man himself?

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20 2013, 03:44 PM   #82
Melakon
Rear Admiral
 
Melakon's Avatar
 
Location: Unmarked grave, Ekos
Re: If VI had featured Saavik instead of Valeris as the traitor

Either Kirk or McCoy should have been familiar enough with details of Chekov's family relationships to know whether there was a brother, rather than taking Sulu's word for it. Both of them must have reviewed his personal and/or medical files. Accepting Sulu's word as authority seems questionable, as this is the guy who thought himself one of the Three Musketeers, and went loopy over Landru.
__________________
Curly: Moe, Larry, the cheese! Moe, Larry, the cheese! (Horses Collars, 1935)
Melakon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20 2013, 05:19 PM   #83
Allyn Gibson
Vice Admiral
 
Allyn Gibson's Avatar
 
Location: South Pennsyltucky
View Allyn Gibson's Twitter Profile Send a message via AIM to Allyn Gibson Send a message via Yahoo to Allyn Gibson
Re: If VI had featured Saavik instead of Valeris as the traitor

CaptainBearclaw wrote: View Post
Of course I don't know why they had to out-continuity her in TVH, since she's been shown in the comic series' as being a great character. In DC's run she practically became part of the crew's family!
Perhaps Nimoy and/or Bennett didn't enjoy the experience of working with her and/or her performance in Star Trek III. They couldn't not bring her back in Star Trek IV given where the film starts and where we last saw the crew, but that also doesn't mean they had to give her a meaningful role. In that case, they gave her the bare minimum to explain where she's gone, and that's that.

The other possibility. Nick Meyer wrote the San Francisco half of the script. He didn't want to work with Curtis years later on Star Trek VI; perhaps that went back years earlier and he had no interest in writing for Curtis' Saavik on Star Trek IV. If that's so, then Meyer's half of the script didn't use her, so Bennett had to write Saavik out to explain why she's not there in the middle half of the film.

Or, they simply couldn't come up with anything for the character to do in Star Trek IV, so it was easier to write the character out for the film than have the character hang around like a useless fifth wheel.
__________________
"When David Marcus cited the great thinkers of history -- "Newton, Einstein, Surak" -- Newt Gingrich did not make his list." -- 24 January 2012

allyngibson.net
Allyn Gibson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 20 2013, 05:38 PM   #84
Therin of Andor
Admiral
 
Therin of Andor's Avatar
 
Location: New Therin Park, Andor (via Australia)
View Therin of Andor's Twitter Profile
Re: If VI had featured Saavik instead of Valeris as the traitor

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
Hence The Pandora Principle giving Saavik a backstory where she was sole survivor of a failed colony, and wasn't rescued until she was almost ten. Her control is dodgy in STII because it's not something she was taught from birth.
The backstory is from the ST II and ST III novelizations. "The Pandora Principle" simply expanded on Vonda McIntyre's work.

Allyn Gibson wrote: View Post
Or, they simply couldn't come up with anything for the character to do in Star Trek IV, so it was easier to write the character out for the film than have the character hang around like a useless fifth wheel.
In a "Starlog" interview, Bennett once said that Saavik in San Francisco was yet another Vulcan who'd have to cover her ears to go out in public. It kinda thinned out the joke. The other option was to leave her looking after the Bounty, and she was still contributing nothing.
__________________
Thiptho lapth! Ian (Entire post is personal opinion)
The Andor Files @ http://andorfiles.blogspot.com/
http://therinofandor.blogspot.com/
Therin of Andor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
kisrtie alley, robin curtis, saavik, star trek vi, the undiscovered country, valeris

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.