RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,442
Posts: 5,507,511
Members: 25,133
Currently online: 476
Newest member: jokerone

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13

Sindicate Lager To Debut In The US Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film.

View Poll Results: How do you rate Pacific Rim?
A+ 31 24.80%
A 35 28.00%
A- 15 12.00%
B+ 25 20.00%
B 7 5.60%
B- 2 1.60%
C+ 2 1.60%
C 1 0.80%
C- 1 0.80%
D+ 1 0.80%
D 1 0.80%
D- 3 2.40%
F+ 0 0%
F 1 0.80%
F- 0 0%
Voters: 125. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 16 2013, 01:24 AM   #106
davejames
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Sac, Ca
Re: Pacific Rim - Grading and Discussion

Noname Given wrote: View Post
Well, remember; the reason given in the film was that the Kaiju were destroying the Jaegers faster than they could be built. That said; after they had an incident where a Kaiju breached a wall like it was nothing (and was defeated by the one (and only) Jaeger Mk V; you would have thought someone, somewhere would say:

"Hey, maybe we SHOULD start funding the program again? It may be a loosing battle, but it still works better than these walls."
Yeah if they want to build a wall, fine. But it's kinda strange that they'd decide to give up on the Jaeger program as well, considering it was the most effective defense they had.
davejames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2013, 01:41 AM   #107
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Pacific Rim - Grading and Discussion

^But didn't he just say that the Jaegers were losing their effectiveness as a defense? That all but four had been destroyed? That doesn't exactly strike me as a rousing success story.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 11/16/14 including annotations for "The Caress of a Butterfly's Wing" and overview for DTI: The Collectors

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2013, 02:31 AM   #108
Corran Horn
Vice Admiral
 
Corran Horn's Avatar
 
Location: I-L
Re: Pacific Rim - Grading and Discussion

Christopher wrote: View Post
^But didn't he just say that the Jaegers were losing their effectiveness as a defense? That all but four had been destroyed? That doesn't exactly strike me as a rousing success story.
More were getting destroyed--it's implied due to the recklessness of their pilot teams. Also, as time goes on the kaiju are getting harder to take down for other spoiler-ish reasons.
__________________
"I don't drink, I don't smoke, I don't do drugs. I play video games, which I think is a far superior addiction to any of those other ones. "
Corran Horn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2013, 05:53 AM   #109
RAMA
Vice Admiral
 
RAMA's Avatar
 
Location: NJ, USA
Re: Pacific Rim - Grading and Discussion

Noname Given wrote: View Post
RAMA wrote: View Post
Government boondoggles like the wall would fill up more than several times the running time of the movie. That's not hard to belive... If you go by the logic of the movie, the Jaeger program was a failure too... Once there were hundreds, only four were left... They were no longer effective as the aliens adapted their monsters. It's likely only a new Jaeger program with improved systems would have worked.
ell, remember; the reason given in the film was that the Kaiju were destroying the Jaegers faster than they could be built. That said; after they had an incident where a Kaiju breached a wall like it was nothing (and was defeated by the one (and only) Jaeger Mk V; you would have thought someone, somewhere would say:

"Hey, maybe we SHOULD start funding the program again? It may be a loosing battle, but it still works better than these walls."

(But again, applying any logic to this film really ruins the fun of stuff like: "Where the hell's my shoe??!!")

[And I'm said to see the film underperforming in the U.S. -- although indications show it opened very strong overseas and should really be a hit in japan as this is the kind of film (with these level of digital effects) they would love to make, but just don't have the budget resources as spending that much locally would net zero profit for them.]


The Jaeger were losing because they didn't realize the fired citing intelligence was learning and adapting their creations. It may well have seemed a wall would work till a kaiju-robot proved otherwise. Then a new program could begin where the Jaeger designers might make them bigger and more adaptable, or with weapons with more ammo, as the misses and cannons seemed effective.
__________________
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. Carl Sagan
RAMA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2013, 08:26 AM   #110
mr.peany
Fleet Captain
 
mr.peany's Avatar
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to mr.peany
Re: Pacific Rim - Grading and Discussion

So just saw it. I loved it. A visual spectacle and one I was totally immersed in from beginning to end. Stunning is a word that came to mind. The story, although simple, was effective enough to get the job done.

Pros: CGI was out of this world.
The creature design was amazing.
Despite the run of the mill plot it created characters that I genuinely cared for.
The action was involving and to me, easy enough to follow.

Cons: The accents. Boy, wtf?? Those aussie accents were atrocities. Surely, they could have found 2 actual Australians to be cast in those roles. Everyone in our theatre either groaned or laughed when they spoke.
The 2 scientists. Quite possibly the most pain inducing characters I've had to endure in any movie. Ever. Worse than Jar Jar. I had to close my eyes and block my ears whenever they appeared. Makes me wonder how no one picked up on this before the movie was released.
Charlie Hunnam's body. I don't have it.

A solid B+. Points deducted for the accents and the scientists.
__________________
Marge: "Oh no, how will the kids get home?"
Homer : "I dunno, internet?"
^Problem solving, Homer Simpson style.
http://unoland.myminicity.com/
mr.peany is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2013, 01:41 PM   #111
The Baby Stig
Rear Admiral
 
The Baby Stig's Avatar
 
Location: Dunsfold Aerodrome, Surrey
Re: Pacific Rim - Grading and Discussion

mr.peany wrote: View Post
So just saw it. I loved it. A visual spectacle and one I was totally immersed in from beginning to end. Stunning is a word that came to mind. The story, although simple, was effective enough to get the job done.

Pros: CGI was out of this world.
The creature design was amazing.
Despite the run of the mill plot it created characters that I genuinely cared for.
The action was involving and to me, easy enough to follow.

Cons: The accents. Boy, wtf?? Those aussie accents were atrocities. Surely, they could have found 2 actual Australians to be cast in those roles. Everyone in our theatre either groaned or laughed when they spoke.
The 2 scientists. Quite possibly the most pain inducing characters I've had to endure in any movie. Ever. Worse than Jar Jar. I had to close my eyes and block my ears whenever they appeared. Makes me wonder how no one picked up on this before the movie was released.
Charlie Hunnam's body. I don't have it.

A solid B+. Points deducted for the accents and the scientists.
I thought the two scientists were just the right kind of comic relief. Burn Gorman, in particular, was hilarious. I enjoyed this movie completely: it had jaw-dropping robot-on-monster action that I could actually see, enough meat behind the Miko-Ralleigh relationship to be believable and a world that felt real enough to forgive the ridiculous conceit of 100-foot mechas.

I came for the action, but the story and people inhabiting this movie weren't half bad. I'll definitely find this movie again for a re-watch when it's out on video.
__________________
Some say that his arrival was foretold by a Check Engine light shining over Bethlehem and that he was born in a manger on Christmas Day.

All we know is, he's The Baby Stig.
The Baby Stig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2013, 01:43 PM   #112
Seventh White Boomer
Rear Admiral
 
Seventh White Boomer's Avatar
 
Location: Jono
Re: Pacific Rim - Grading and Discussion

Saw it tonight, a solid B+.

Biggest complaint was the Australian characters. The son wasn't too bad, but the dad was hard to understand at times. Find it hard to understand how they couldn't get at least one Australian for the roles (particularly the son), we seem to have half our acting community over there.

Quite cliched, but that didn't matter so much because it was a lot of awesome. A bit disappointed in the Chinese and Russian Jaeger. They were sold as pretty great but they went down like punks. Also in the montages would have loved to see more Jaegers.

I didn't mind the scientists. Use to seeing the guy from Torchwood in that kind of role, but Charlie Day did seem a bit too manic, but they did make me laugh.

The wall seemed like an insane idea. I guess it makes sense since they believed the monsters were just mindless creatures and if they came up against the wall and it didn't immediately fall (I think it took an hour for the one to get into Sydney...though if I remember correctly the wall was right next to the Opera house, which doesn't make sense geographically) they would lose interest and just go play in the ocean.

All in all, enjoyed the film.

Last edited by Seventh White Boomer; July 16 2013 at 01:55 PM.
Seventh White Boomer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2013, 01:50 PM   #113
KGator
Lieutenant Commander
 
KGator's Avatar
 
Location: Mentally? . . . that's debatable.
Re: Pacific Rim - Grading and Discussion

Jono wrote: View Post
I didn't mind the scientists. Use to seeing the guy from Torchwood in that kind of role, but Charlie Day did seem a bit too manic, but they did make me laugh.

All in all, enjoyed the film.
Agreed on the scientists, they did seem out of place but did add some humor to the film.
KGator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2013, 02:27 PM   #114
Agent Richard07
Retired
 
Re: Pacific Rim - Grading and Discussion

^ Anime usually has comic relief like that, so their inclusion was a must.

Shaka Zulu wrote: View Post
People say they want intelligent and good sci-fi films, and yet, instead of supporting them, they support shit like Grown Ups 2?
Looks like most people just want to have a good time and laugh. If you think about it, Grown Ups 2 did well for the same reason Pacific Rim is popular here.
Agent Richard07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2013, 04:57 PM   #115
davejames
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Sac, Ca
Re: Pacific Rim - Grading and Discussion

Yeah I wasn't really crazy about the scientists either. I realize they were supposed to be the "wacky, eccentric scientists" you often see in anime, but I'm not sure that really translated well here.
davejames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2013, 05:21 PM   #116
Goji
Rear Admiral
 
Re: Pacific Rim - Grading and Discussion

I liked the crazy scientists subplot and didn't see anything uniquely "anime" about it. They were pretty standard comedic relief that worked well enough, though I liked Charlie Day's scenes with Ron Perlman better than with the other scientist.

Charlie Day's character reminded me a lot of Harper from Andromeda, obscure and entirely unrelated though that is.
Goji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2013, 07:02 PM   #117
TremblingBluStar
Vice Admiral
 
TremblingBluStar's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Dodge, IA
Re: Pacific Rim - Grading and Discussion

mr.peany wrote: View Post
Cons: The accents. Boy, wtf?? Those aussie accents were atrocities. Surely, they could have found 2 actual Australians to be cast in those roles.
I'm not sure about the actors playing Australians, but many of the actors in the film were British. Idris Elba's accent seemed to bounce between American and British. I had no idea what country his character was supposed to be from.
The 2 scientists. Quite possibly the most pain inducing characters I've had to endure in any movie. Ever. Worse than Jar Jar.
Surely you exaggerate. No character is worse than Jar Jar.
TremblingBluStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2013, 08:16 PM   #118
mr.peany
Fleet Captain
 
mr.peany's Avatar
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to mr.peany
Re: Pacific Rim - Grading and Discussion

TremblingBluStar wrote: View Post
mr.peany wrote: View Post
Cons: The accents. Boy, wtf?? Those aussie accents were atrocities. Surely, they could have found 2 actual Australians to be cast in those roles.
I'm not sure about the actors playing Australians, but many of the actors in the film were British. Idris Elba's accent seemed to bounce between American and British. I had no idea what country his character was supposed to be from.
The 2 scientists. Quite possibly the most pain inducing characters I've had to endure in any movie. Ever. Worse than Jar Jar.
Surely you exaggerate. No character is worse than Jar Jar.
Oh how I wish. I'm seeing it again later today, perhaps a second viewing may change my mind. Or further cement it.

Another like I had was the subtle humour. Worked very well. And the score I thought was fairly decent. Hopefully this makes enough to warrant a sequel. Would love to return to this world that Del Toro has helped create.
__________________
Marge: "Oh no, how will the kids get home?"
Homer : "I dunno, internet?"
^Problem solving, Homer Simpson style.
http://unoland.myminicity.com/
mr.peany is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2013, 09:44 PM   #119
Aldo
Admiral
 
Aldo's Avatar
 
Location: Somewhere Out there beneath the pale moonlight.
Re: Pacific Rim - Grading and Discussion

The whole bit with Newt (Charlie Day's character) melding with the monster will be a major plot point if Del Toro makes a sequel. So he is a pretty important character.
__________________
Don't believe everything I say.
Aldo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2013, 09:52 PM   #120
mr.peany
Fleet Captain
 
mr.peany's Avatar
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to mr.peany
Re: Pacific Rim - Grading and Discussion

^ Awww crap.

Hopefully they'll make him less....manic.
__________________
Marge: "Oh no, how will the kids get home?"
Homer : "I dunno, internet?"
^Problem solving, Homer Simpson style.
http://unoland.myminicity.com/
mr.peany is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.