RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,602
Posts: 5,424,854
Members: 24,810
Currently online: 336
Newest member: David Ellerman

TrekToday headlines

September Loot Crate Features Trek Surprise
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

USS Enterprise Miniature Out For Refit
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Star Trek/Planet of the Apes Comic Crossover
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Trek 3 Shooting Next Spring?
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Star Trek: Alien Domain Game Announced
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Red Shirt Diaries Episode Three
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Made Out Of Mudd Photonovel
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Takei Has Growth Removed
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Retro Review: Tears of the Prophets
By: Michelle on Sep 12

New Wizkids Attack Wing Ships
By: T'Bonz on Sep 12


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old June 25 2013, 10:47 PM   #646
Crazy Eddie
Rear Admiral
 
Crazy Eddie's Avatar
 
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness & The Bechdel Test

M'Sharak wrote: View Post
Silversmok3 wrote: View Post
The "Bechdel" test is pointless.
Not so. It has a point. What it was never intended to be was a catch-all litmus test.

Indeed, the comic which marks the first appearance of what would become known as the Bechdel Test didn't call it a test at all. It was simply "The Rule" - essentially a thought exercise which functioned as a kind of sorting process.
And constitutes a bit of deadpan humor: if you actually adhere to the Bechdel Rule, it means you've seen maybe six movies in the past twenty years, and most of them weren't all that good.
__________________
The Complete Illustrated Guide to Starfleet - Online Now!
Crazy Eddie is offline  
Old June 25 2013, 10:51 PM   #647
Clancy_s
Lieutenant Commander
 
Clancy_s's Avatar
 
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness & The Bechdel Test

CorporalCaptain wrote: View Post
She obviously finds him attractive too, or else she wouldn't have changed in front of him so overtly in the first place. She's interested, but she wants a relationship with a grown-up.
Getting changed behind him without warning in the midst of a professional discussion IMO is not the action of an adult (nor even an adolescent, but cultures vary), which is the reason I find it intrusively silly - it's a very bad fit with Carol's personality elsewhere in the film.

It doesn't tell me much about Kirk I didn't already know - he's attracted to women and he likes to look at the person he's talking to, which is a common human trait...
Clancy_s is offline  
Old June 25 2013, 11:10 PM   #648
CorporalCaptain
Admiral
 
CorporalCaptain's Avatar
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness & The Bechdel Test

Clancy_s wrote: View Post
CorporalCaptain wrote: View Post
She obviously finds him attractive too, or else she wouldn't have changed in front of him so overtly in the first place. She's interested, but she wants a relationship with a grown-up.
Getting changed behind him without warning in the midst of a professional discussion IMO is not the action of an adult (nor even an adolescent, but cultures vary), which is the reason I find it intrusively silly - it's a very bad fit with Carol's personality elsewhere in the film.

It doesn't tell me much about Kirk I didn't already know - he's attracted to women and he likes to look at the person he's talking to, which is a common human trait...

You remember that Carol led Kirk into the shuttlecraft for a reason that Kirk didn't understand, right? "Where are we going?" he asked, or something like that. If it was just a professional conversation, they didn't need to be alone like that. She led him in there in order to change in front of him, pretty clearly. If she'd wanted privacy, she could have asked him to wait outside for a moment, or changed ahead of time, or afterwards.
__________________
John
CorporalCaptain is offline  
Old June 25 2013, 11:39 PM   #649
Silversmok3
Commander
 
Silversmok3's Avatar
 
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness & The Bechdel Test

M'Sharak wrote: View Post
Silversmok3 wrote: View Post
The "Bechdel" test is pointless.
Not so. It has a point. What it was never intended to be was a catch-all litmus test.

Indeed, the comic which marks the first appearance of what would become known as the Bechdel Test didn't call it a test at all. It was simply "The Rule" - essentially a thought exercise which functioned as a kind of sorting process.
But we must now ask what the point of this sorting exercise is?

Plenty of weak movies pass ,and many strong movies fail.I'd rather judge the worth of a movie in its entirety instead of an arbitrary scene with two female characters.Its like judging a computer by the color of the keyboard.
__________________
There is a time for everything, and a season for every activity under Heaven:A time to heal, A time to break down, and a time to build up.
-Ecclesiastes 3:3
Silversmok3 is offline  
Old June 26 2013, 12:09 AM   #650
CommishSleer
Fleet Captain
 
CommishSleer's Avatar
 
Location: At the After Party Still...
View CommishSleer's Twitter Profile
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness & The Bechdel Test

The Bechdel test is a good rule of thumb but not perfect.
If you think about it - if in one entire movie two women don't even have a conversation it sounds pretty bad.

But I like watching sci-fi and for good or bad that mostly seems to have male dominated casts. I'm sure rom-coms easily pass the Bechdel test but I don't watch them.
I think in STID you had about 10 named men (if Keenser is male) and two named women so its pretty hard to get the woman-woman conversation in just as we didn't have a Scotty -Sulu, Adm Marcus- Chekov, Uhura-Pike, McCoy-Chekov, etc dialog
CommishSleer is offline  
Old June 26 2013, 10:47 PM   #651
Clancy_s
Lieutenant Commander
 
Clancy_s's Avatar
 
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness & The Bechdel Test

CorporalCaptain wrote: View Post
You remember that Carol led Kirk into the shuttlecraft for a reason that Kirk didn't understand, right? "Where are we going?" he asked, or something like that. If it was just a professional conversation, they didn't need to be alone like that. She led him in there in order to change in front of him, pretty clearly. If she'd wanted privacy, she could have asked him to wait outside for a moment, or changed ahead of time, or afterwards.
On reflection timing aside this idea is weirdly attractive - although it still doesn't seem like a likely way of going after an adult ongoing relationship to me, but that could be cultural skew on my part (Australian, female).

It'd work if she saw Kirk as a floozie and was after a quick bonk, no strings attached but given their situation it was an incredibly inappropriate time to be going after him - IMO you'd have to posit Carol has the same emotional age as Kirk...

I doubt the writers thought about that much, IMO they just took a lazy approach to getting Carol out of her clothes, YMMV
Clancy_s is offline  
Old June 27 2013, 06:16 AM   #652
teacake
Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Militant Janeway True Path Devotees Compound. With Sehlats.
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness & The Bechdel Test

I saw STID for a 7nth time yesterday and noticed there was a woman at the meeting that Kirk interrupted. I thought it was the dark haired woman with the Vulcan hair cut we saw in the detonated meeting but didn't that woman get shot in the leg? Because this woman was walking just fine when Marcus shooed them all away. There is a slight possibility she was just walking in the background though as I didn't actually see her at the table, but saw her leave.

Not that one is all that much better than none.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline  
Old June 27 2013, 06:49 AM   #653
Clancy_s
Lieutenant Commander
 
Clancy_s's Avatar
 
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness & The Bechdel Test

teacake wrote: View Post
I saw STID for a 7nth time yesterday and noticed there was a woman at the meeting that Kirk interrupted. I thought it was the dark haired woman with the Vulcan hair cut we saw in the detonated meeting but didn't that woman get shot in the leg? Because this woman was walking just fine when Marcus shooed them all away. There is a slight possibility she was just walking in the background though as I didn't actually see her at the table, but saw her leave.

Not that one is all that much better than none.
iirc the woman who was shot in the leg had long hair in a bun so the other one could have been at the meeting. 1 is better than 0 - infinitely so if you're a mathematician.
Clancy_s is offline  
Old June 27 2013, 07:54 AM   #654
teacake
Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Militant Janeway True Path Devotees Compound. With Sehlats.
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness & The Bechdel Test

JJ should still have looked at that scene and thought hmmm... something is missing.

I'm remembering the bun now.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline  
Old June 28 2013, 03:17 AM   #655
KittyDuran
Lieutenant Commander
 
KittyDuran's Avatar
 
Location: Hungry (like the wolf)
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness & The Bechdel Test

teacake wrote: View Post
I saw STID for a 7nth time yesterday and noticed there was a woman at the meeting that Kirk interrupted. I thought it was the dark haired woman with the Vulcan hair cut we saw in the detonated meeting but didn't that woman get shot in the leg? Because this woman was walking just fine when Marcus shooed them all away. There is a slight possibility she was just walking in the background though as I didn't actually see her at the table, but saw her leave.

Not that one is all that much better than none.
Before the firing, when Pike is saying to Marcus that Kirk is adjusting to his new role as First Officer - there is a dark-haired woman in the background with a "bob" or "page-boy" cut to Pike's right She is out of focused but IIRC the haircut exposed her ears (or at least one ear). Could she be the one in the interrupted meeting?
KittyDuran is offline  
Old June 29 2013, 01:42 AM   #656
Maurice
Vice Admiral
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness & The Bechdel Test

As I've said before, Bechdel aside the problem I have with many films is the the female characters are rarely acting out of personal agency...that is, what they WANT is typically tied to a man (relationship issue, daddy issue, etc.) and that women are often portrayed as using sex to get what they want, which is the whole Vamp stereotype that goes back a century. Where's the woman who gives up a relationship for a career? Where're the "no beach to walk on" female characters?
__________________
* * *
"If you wanted to get a good meeting... just go in and
say 'darker, grittier, sexier' and whatever."
—Glen Larson, 2010
Maurice is offline  
Old June 29 2013, 01:57 AM   #657
Ovation
Vice Admiral
 
Location: La Belle Province or The Green Mountain State (depends on the day of the week)
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness & The Bechdel Test

Maurice wrote: View Post
As I've said before, Bechdel aside the problem I have with many films is the the female characters are rarely acting out of personal agency...that is, what they WANT is typically tied to a man (relationship issue, daddy issue, etc.) and that women are often portrayed as using sex to get what they want, which is the whole Vamp stereotype that goes back a century. Where's the woman who gives up a relationship for a career? Where're the "no beach to walk on" female characters?
The vacillation between "traditional" and "progressive" ideals (in the US anyway) seems to be in sync (not perfectly, but broadly) with the general public's degree of anxiety in uncertain economic times. The late 50s to late 60s was a time of economic prosperity in the US and it was a period of transition away from "traditional" towards "progressive" ideas. Cultural time lag being what it is, that transition peaked in the 1970s (think of Mary Tyler Moore, Norma Rae, Faye Dunaway's character in Network, Maude) across a broad swath of the pop culture landscape. Not perfect by any means, but a major change from Father Knows Best-type perspectives.

The uncertainty of the 70s bred a step back to tradition which manifested in the 80s in many ways, though never as much as in the 50s/early 60s (two steps forward, one step back, rather than the reverse). Then, with the (in retrospect somewhat shaky) economic confidence of the 80s followed a surge in progressive women characters in pop culture (Murphy Brown, Designing Women, Thelma and Louise--again, hardly perfect, but still busting through against tradition). And so on. The 2000s, thus far, have been a long series of years of uncertainty--first with 9/11, the wars, the economic upheaval--so traditional ideals have made a come-back. By now, though, with half a century of tidal changes, the figurative seashore/landscape is different. Tradition may have its champions (quite loud, in some cases) but progressive ideas are not lying down without resistance.

Moreover, considerable progress has already been made and retained, such that some of the points that seem to be crucial in terms of championing progressive ideals, in relative terms (witness many of the exchanges in this thread), are, in absolute terms, rather small when compared to the mid-20th century. This is not to suggest that "success has been attained, no more need be done" but rather a reminder that, taken in the larger context, some of the points being fought over might not be worth the energy when there are still significant shortcomings in other areas that demand greater attention. Just something to consider.
Ovation is offline  
Old June 29 2013, 02:08 AM   #658
Maurice
Vice Admiral
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness & The Bechdel Test

And while all interesting points, they don't forgive the piss-poor portrayals of women as characters in much of the media so much as rationalize them.
__________________
* * *
"If you wanted to get a good meeting... just go in and
say 'darker, grittier, sexier' and whatever."
—Glen Larson, 2010
Maurice is offline  
Old June 29 2013, 02:31 AM   #659
Ovation
Vice Admiral
 
Location: La Belle Province or The Green Mountain State (depends on the day of the week)
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness & The Bechdel Test

Maurice wrote: View Post
And while all interesting points, they don't forgive the piss-poor portrayals of women as characters in much of the media so much as rationalize them.
I wasn't looking to forgive them. My day job is to offer explanations for why things have occurred they way they did, not advocate or condemn them. In my free time, I offer my own views on such things more directly. I think it is a serious shame that pop culture portrayals of women are less progressive now, in a number of ways, than they were when I was in elementary school in the 1970s--but I also don't like the idea that we, as an audience, are entitled to be satisfied by makers of art and entertainment according to how we think things ought to be. The power of the wallet and the power of persuasive argument are two useful ways to advocate change. But (and I'm not placing you, specifically, in this camp) the tendency to get excessively outraged over rather minor things in an effort to draw attention to a particular "wrong" is often counterproductive. So while making a persuasive case for improving the portrayal of women characters in Trek, for example, is laudable--suggesting misogyny is at work to explain why Uhura's phaser was somewhat ineffectual in the scene where she fires at Khan, on the other hand, is simply absurd and laughable.
Ovation is offline  
Old June 29 2013, 03:54 AM   #660
Therin of Andor
Admiral
 
Therin of Andor's Avatar
 
Location: New Therin Park, Andor (via Australia)
View Therin of Andor's Twitter Profile
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness & The Bechdel Test

Maurice wrote: View Post
And while all interesting points, they don't forgive the piss-poor portrayals of women as characters in much of the media so much as rationalize them.
It's often no-win. Diahann Carroll as TV's "Julia" was lauded as progressive for its time, and yet I've heard people scoff, "Yeah, but she was mostly just 'a mother' and 'a nurse' (caring profession), why not a doctor instead?"

Action figure companies learned long ago that female characters are often the peg-warmers in a wave ("Buffy" action figures a relatively recent exception), so females are often the shortpacks. Or left out completely. Galoob TNG series didn't include Troi or Crusher, only Yar. Playmates' first wave had Troi (initially the shortpack) and Crusher was saved for Wave 2, and was often found on the pegs even a decade later! Pulaski and Yar seemed to have smaller production runs as a result.

Are enough female TV writers writing strong female characters who don't only discuss men in dialogue? (We had Jeri Taylor writing Janeway in VOY.)
__________________
Thiptho lapth! Ian (Entire post is personal opinion)
The Andor Files @ http://andorfiles.blogspot.com/
http://therinofandor.blogspot.com/
Therin of Andor is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.