RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,797
Posts: 5,471,325
Members: 25,037
Currently online: 526
Newest member: Skelch

TrekToday headlines

Shatner Book Kickstarter
By: T'Bonz on Nov 20

Trek Original Series Slippers
By: T'Bonz on Nov 19

Hemsworth Is Sexiest Man Alive
By: T'Bonz on Nov 19

Trek Business Card Cases
By: T'Bonz on Nov 17

February IDW Publishing Trek Comics
By: T'Bonz on Nov 17

Retro Review: The Siege of AR-558
By: Michelle on Nov 15

Trevco Full Bleed Uniform T-Shirts
By: T'Bonz on Nov 14

Wheaton Buys Wesley Crusher Hoodie
By: T'Bonz on Nov 14

People’s Choice Award Nominations
By: T'Bonz on Nov 14

Quinto: Not Internally Homophobic
By: T'Bonz on Nov 14


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 21 2013, 03:16 PM   #1
Charles Phipps
Commander
 
Charles Phipps's Avatar
 
It's weird, I have only one complaint about ST (2009)...

I just did a review here: http://unitedfederationofcharles.blo...09-review.html

My problem isn't Kirk, Spock, the plot, or anything. It was, overall, very much a great ball of fun wrapped in chocolate with huge amounts of fanservice to the series (in its myriad incarnations). Except, one part really rubbed me the wrong way. The scene where Kirk offers Nero and his crew mercy only for Spock to ask him what the hell he was doing.

Yes, it was funny. Yes, by any cultural standard which believes in the death penalty, Nero deserved to die.

But that seemed needlessly antagonistic to Trek's philosophy of peace and understanding. It seemed deliberately there to make fun of Roddenberry's attitude towards space combat and battle.
__________________
Check out the United Federation of Charles:
http://unitedfederationofcharles.blogspot.com/
Charles Phipps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21 2013, 03:19 PM   #2
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: It's weird, I have only one complaint about ST (2009)...

If Nero refuses, do you really have any other choice? Can you afford for him to survive falling through another black hole? Kirk did what had to be done.

I can't stand the Academy portion of the film, personally.
__________________
"If I hadn't tried, the cost would have been my soul." - Admiral James T. Kirk, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 21 2013, 03:24 PM   #3
Tosk
Rear Admiral
 
Tosk's Avatar
 
Location: On the run.
Re: It's weird, I have only one complaint about ST (2009)...

BillJ wrote: View Post
Can you afford for him to survive falling through another black hole?
How would that happen? This black hole opened right in the middle of the Narada. If they did somehow survive it, I guess we'd find out where all the Vulcans went.
Tosk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21 2013, 03:26 PM   #4
Charles Phipps
Commander
 
Charles Phipps's Avatar
 
Re: It's weird, I have only one complaint about ST (2009)...

BillJ wrote: View Post
If Nero refuses, do you really have any other choice? Can you afford for him to survive falling through another black hole? Kirk did what had to be done.

I can't stand the Academy portion of the film, personally.
I don't mind them firing afterward, it was more the way the offer was derided by the movie. As if capturing Nero and his crew was an inherently bad thing.

I was okay with the Academy stuff, personally, as I think it illustrated Kirk's Devil May Care attitude had some depth to it. He's not just a complete ass, he also has a "never say die" will that makes him a good captain.

Then again, I think Kirk 'cheating' was kind of ridiculous. It was really-really obvious he did.
__________________
Check out the United Federation of Charles:
http://unitedfederationofcharles.blogspot.com/
Charles Phipps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21 2013, 03:26 PM   #5
Shazam!
Rear Admiral
 
Shazam!'s Avatar
 
Re: It's weird, I have only one complaint about ST (2009)...

The red matter was on destruction mode at that point. Send back in time mode had been disabled.
Shazam! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21 2013, 03:29 PM   #6
NotLKH
Lieutenant
 
NotLKH's Avatar
 
Re: It's weird, I have only one complaint about ST (2009)...

What was the part that rubbed you the wrong way?

> Kirk offering Nero and his crew mercy ?
> Spock asking him what the hell he was doing?

or just including both in the movie, because it seemed needlessly antagonistic to Trek's philosophy of peace and understanding, that it seemed deliberately there to make fun of Roddenberry's attitude ?

Are you also saying that Nero should not have been afforded the chance to surrender, that he should have been blindly pulverized to a bloody pulp?

{edit: lots of discussions occured while I was on a conferance call. oh,well}
NotLKH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21 2013, 03:29 PM   #7
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: It's weird, I have only one complaint about ST (2009)...

Charles Phipps wrote: View Post

I don't mind them firing afterward, it was more the way the offer was derided by the movie. As if capturing Nero and his crew was an inherently bad thing.
I don't know how I'd react if someone who murdered one of my parents and my planet refused an offered act of mercy?

It might be right along the lines of how Spock felt.
__________________
"If I hadn't tried, the cost would have been my soul." - Admiral James T. Kirk, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 21 2013, 03:32 PM   #8
Ovation
Vice Admiral
 
Location: La Belle Province or The Green Mountain State (depends on the day of the week)
Re: It's weird, I have only one complaint about ST (2009)...

I thought it showed just how far (temporarily) Spock had "gone human", in the face of his massive losses. It was also a cathartic end that the general audience expected. Not a moment in the finest Trek tradition perhaps, but a reminder that these characters have a lot of personal growth ahead of them before the mature into the TOS characters. If they were supposed to be the same age as in TOS, I would have been a bit bothered.
Ovation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21 2013, 03:35 PM   #9
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: It's weird, I have only one complaint about ST (2009)...

Doesn't hurt to make fun of GR's ideology sometimes.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21 2013, 03:38 PM   #10
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: It's weird, I have only one complaint about ST (2009)...

NotLKH wrote: View Post
...because it seemed needlessly antagonistic to Trek's philosophy of peace and understanding, that it seemed deliberately there to make fun of Roddenberry's attitude ?
Might want to go back and re-watch The Original Series since that is what these films are based on.
__________________
"If I hadn't tried, the cost would have been my soul." - Admiral James T. Kirk, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 21 2013, 03:43 PM   #11
Sindatur
Vice Admiral
 
Sindatur's Avatar
 
Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: It's weird, I have only one complaint about ST (2009)...

I opened this thread, fully expecting the First post was simply going to add "That it was made"

As has been stated, Spock was in a severe Emotional state after having lost his mother and his planet to this scum, and they are all indeed a decade younger than their Prime Universe counterparts were when they started their tours together on the Enterprise. So, I'm not bothered at all about the way it played out
__________________
One Day I hope to be the Man my Cat thinks I am

Where are we going? And why are we in this Handbasket?
Sindatur is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 21 2013, 03:47 PM   #12
NotLKH
Lieutenant
 
NotLKH's Avatar
 
Re: It's weird, I have only one complaint about ST (2009)...

BillJ wrote: View Post
NotLKH wrote: View Post
...because it seemed needlessly antagonistic to Trek's philosophy of peace and understanding, that it seemed deliberately there to make fun of Roddenberry's attitude ?
Might want to go back and re-watch The Original Series since that is what these films are based on.
Why should I, since I was just restating what the OP said in a question format?
NotLKH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21 2013, 04:06 PM   #13
Locutus of Bored
Full Metal Bat'leth
 
Locutus of Bored's Avatar
 
Location: Huntington Beach, California
Re: It's weird, I have only one complaint about ST (2009)...

Charles Phipps wrote: View Post
I just did a review here: http://unitedfederationofcharles.blo...09-review.html

My problem isn't Kirk, Spock, the plot, or anything. It was, overall, very much a great ball of fun wrapped in chocolate with huge amounts of fanservice to the series (in its myriad incarnations). Except, one part really rubbed me the wrong way. The scene where Kirk offers Nero and his crew mercy only for Spock to ask him what the hell he was doing.

Yes, it was funny. Yes, by any cultural standard which believes in the death penalty, Nero deserved to die.

But that seemed needlessly antagonistic to Trek's philosophy of peace and understanding. It seemed deliberately there to make fun of Roddenberry's attitude towards space combat and battle.
Let's unnecessarily Godwin this bad boy.

Instead of hiding out in his bunker and eventually taking his own life, Hitler makes a desperate escape attempt and boards a U-Boat bound for Argentina or somewhere else that might offer refuge.

You're the captain of a British cruiser that sees the fleeing U-Boat and knows Hitler is aboard. If it submerges, it might be destroyed or captured later on by other patrols, but there's also a good chance it could get away, and Hitler can possibly kill more people and spread his evil elsewhere. But you decide to offer terms of surrender first.

Your first officer surprisingly objects to your decision to offer mercy, contrary to his usual logic and code of ethics in such situations. He's Jewish and he recently witnessed the aftermath of the genocide of his people and the death of his mother in a now liberated concentration camp firsthand. Because of this, he's understandably angry and vengeful, but he's also not willing to even allow the remote possibility of a madman like Hitler escaping while you arrange the surrender or escaping from prison later on when you can finish him now, once and for all, and prevent further loss of life or the spread of his hateful rhetoric.

Hitler then gets on the radio, talks some trash, and that coupled with your XO's recommendation makes you say "good enough for me" and you blow the sub to bits.

Now, the XO's situation is roughly analogous to what Spock had just gone through with the destruction of Vulcan and the murder of a huge number of his people. Isn't his reaction completely understandable in that context, his normal feelings about the death penalty and offering terms of surrender notwithstanding? It's not antagonistic to the idea of allowing enemies to surrender in general, it's antagonistic to the idea of allowing this one way over the top evil genocidal bastard to surrender (possibly buying him time to escape through the wormhole).

Spock even states as much when he says "No captain, not this time" in response to Kirk saying that he offered Nero surrender because he thought that's what Spock would want him to do. So, I don't think the message of Nero's destruction was hostile to the idea of offering surrender to enemies in general. It was just terrible extraordinary circumstances for Spock at the time, so his reaction makes sense in that context.
Locutus of Bored is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21 2013, 04:37 PM   #14
CommishSleer
Fleet Captain
 
CommishSleer's Avatar
 
Location: CommishSleer
View CommishSleer's Twitter Profile
Re: It's weird, I have only one complaint about ST (2009)...

Kirk had the responsibility and duty to do whatever was necessary to ensure that Nero did not destroy any more Federation planets.

If Kirk was totally in control of the situation or Nero was totally disarmed then maybe Kirk could afford to be merciful. Nero was insane, he wasn't going to stop.

I don't know why people think it would be OK to save Nero. It was not. It would be irresponsible.
CommishSleer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21 2013, 04:47 PM   #15
Lance
Commodore
 
Lance's Avatar
 
Location: The Enterprise's Restroom
Re: It's weird, I have only one complaint about ST (2009)...

I have to agree with the OP. I loved the movie, there's almost nothing else I'd change about it. But that scene... I think it's very Star Trek for Kirk to at least offer Nero the chance to surrender peacefully. It's something Prime Kirk would have done, and to me it's the moment when NuKirk shows how much he's matured since the beginning of the movie.

But Spock's petulant response, inner turmoil or no inner turmoil, rings untrue to me. It isn't so much that it's "making fun of Roddenberry's philosophy" as it is I'd imagine that Nimoy's Spock (you know, the guy who tried to broker peace with Klingons?) would have been in favor of the proposition. He may not have liked what Nero had done, but he'd put it aside. As Kirk said, that would be the logical thing to do.

Of course, seeing as Nero immediately threw Kirk's offer back in his face, he was asking for an ass-kicking.
Lance is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.