RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,267
Posts: 5,349,632
Members: 24,609
Currently online: 556
Newest member: robyn

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: His Way
By: Michelle on Jul 26

MicroWarriors Releases Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Ships Of The Line Design Contest
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Next Weekend: Shore Leave 36!
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

True Trek History To Be Penned
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Insight Editions Announces Three Trek Books For 2015
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

To Be Takei Review by Spencer Blohm
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Mulgrew: Playing Red
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Hallmark 2015 Trek Ornaments
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Funko Mini Spock
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Voyager

Voyager There's coffee in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 20 2013, 09:42 PM   #1
QuarkforNagus
Lieutenant
 
QuarkforNagus's Avatar
 
Nothing Human/Moral Perspectives on Exobiology

As Crell's real-life Mengele-like practices are exposed, there's a big hubbub on the ship. Many are outraged at the prospect of using this hologram or any of his medical assistance to heal B'Elanna, herself included, and protest in the hopes of preventing it. They maintain that by using Crell's findings, they are tacitly condoning his research practice.

What are your thoughts? If you were in B'Elanna's position, would you have a problem being treated by Crell? Would it make a difference whether or not the Crell hologram itself performed the procedure or if someone else performed it using his research findings and medical techniques?

Would you make the same call if you were the Captain?

And do you think it was right for the Doctor to have completely deleted Moset's program from the computer? Was there any ethical value in deleting a holographic representation of this character?
QuarkforNagus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 20 2013, 09:55 PM   #2
Mr. Laser Beam
Fleet Admiral
 
Mr. Laser Beam's Avatar
 
Location: The visitor's bullpen
View Mr. Laser Beam's Twitter Profile
Re: Nothing Human/Moral Perspectives on Exobiology

My thoughts are these:

- Whatever Crell Moset did, has already been done. No amount of moral grandstanding can undo it. The knowledge he gained IS OUT THERE. It can't be undone.

- Therefore, I can see no reason why the results of his actions should not be used. Letting B'Elanna die would not bring back any of those who died because of Moset.

- And it would not 'condone' his research practices - not only was the real Moset nowhere near the ship (so it's not like he would find out and thus be inspired to do it all over again), but also: None of Moset's data and research practices were actually used on B'Elanna! She didn't benefit from anything Moset did during the occupation. Moset was used as a fellow doctor in this episode, but nothing he did to any innocent victims was used in helping B'Elanna.

- Indeed, it might be a worse crime to NOT use the data - because then all those people died for nothing.

- So the hologram looked like Moset. Not a big deal. The hologram was not the REAL Moset. The hologram could have been made to look like anyone or anything. (Thus when the program was deleted, obviously it's not a big deal, because the Moset hologram was not a sentient lifeform like the EMH is)
__________________
In labor news: Longshoremen walked off the piers today. Rescue operations are continuing.

Last edited by Mr. Laser Beam; June 20 2013 at 10:06 PM.
Mr. Laser Beam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 20 2013, 10:15 PM   #3
QuarkforNagus
Lieutenant
 
QuarkforNagus's Avatar
 
Re: Nothing Human/Moral Perspectives on Exobiology

I didn't get the big deal, either. It didn't make sense to me that B'Elanna would be so upset about being treated. If she is so preoccupied by the past moral habits of her medical practitioners and their techniques, then it seems like she should refuse ALL medical treatment.

I just didn't understand the Captain's decision. B'Elanna made it clear she did not want to be treated by Crell or benefit from any of his discoveries. I don't think Janeway had the right to refuse that request, even if it was made simply as a result of B'Elanna's racism towards Cardassians.
QuarkforNagus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 20 2013, 10:17 PM   #4
Mr. Laser Beam
Fleet Admiral
 
Mr. Laser Beam's Avatar
 
Location: The visitor's bullpen
View Mr. Laser Beam's Twitter Profile
Re: Nothing Human/Moral Perspectives on Exobiology

^ Janeway is the captain. That alone gives her pretty much the absolute right to order anyone under her command to do this, because if B'Elanna dies, Voyager loses its chief engineer.
__________________
In labor news: Longshoremen walked off the piers today. Rescue operations are continuing.
Mr. Laser Beam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 20 2013, 10:22 PM   #5
QuarkforNagus
Lieutenant
 
QuarkforNagus's Avatar
 
Re: Nothing Human/Moral Perspectives on Exobiology

B'Elanna is a sentient life form with the right to determine her own future. The Captain can force her to do her job in some particular way but she does not have the ethical right to force her to continue living or to submit to some form of medical treatment which would save her life, when she has plainly refused.
QuarkforNagus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 20 2013, 10:24 PM   #6
Mr. Laser Beam
Fleet Admiral
 
Mr. Laser Beam's Avatar
 
Location: The visitor's bullpen
View Mr. Laser Beam's Twitter Profile
Re: Nothing Human/Moral Perspectives on Exobiology

^ I disagree. B'Elanna's rights, and any crewmember's rights for that matter, are what the Captain says they are. As long as Janeway committed no crime in this episode - and she didn't - she has the right and the authority to do whatever is necessary. That's part and parcel of military discipline. You don't get to refuse an order just because it's morally inconvenient to do so.
__________________
In labor news: Longshoremen walked off the piers today. Rescue operations are continuing.
Mr. Laser Beam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 20 2013, 10:40 PM   #7
QuarkforNagus
Lieutenant
 
QuarkforNagus's Avatar
 
Re: Nothing Human/Moral Perspectives on Exobiology

The Captain is a military official, not a "god". There are some rights that people take as basic. Rights upon which it is morally improper for human institutional figures to infringe.

If the Captain had decided to discriminate against or repress certain crewmembers on the basis of their religious beliefs, for example, I'm sure we would both agree that this falls outside of the scope of a captain's rights.

Here, B'Elanna has expressed her moral belief and asked that the Captain respect it. Surely, if the captain felt that B'Elanna was "wrong" in her judgment, she had every right to relieve B'Elanna of duty. But to force her to undergo a medical procedure?

It's akin to forcing a member of your crew to undergo an abortion, or ordering them not to. Not your place.
QuarkforNagus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 20 2013, 10:42 PM   #8
QuarkforNagus
Lieutenant
 
QuarkforNagus's Avatar
 
Re: Nothing Human/Moral Perspectives on Exobiology

And let's be real. Seven would make a fine Chief Engineer.
QuarkforNagus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 20 2013, 10:51 PM   #9
Mr. Laser Beam
Fleet Admiral
 
Mr. Laser Beam's Avatar
 
Location: The visitor's bullpen
View Mr. Laser Beam's Twitter Profile
Re: Nothing Human/Moral Perspectives on Exobiology

^ I'm not sure about that. There might be a fair amount of crew on the ship who would object to a Borg chief engineer.

In any case, Janeway is making a decision that affects her ship and everyone on it: the question of who is chief engineer. And like I said, Janeway broke no laws in doing what she did; wouldn't you think somebody would have brought it up if she had no right to order B'Elanna to undergo the procedure?

As much as some might like to think otherwise, Starfleet is a military. (It's not militarISTIC, but it is still a military.) Those in the military don't have the luxury to not follow orders just because of morals; they can resign their commission if they can't handle it, but obviously B'Elanna couldn't do that here.
__________________
In labor news: Longshoremen walked off the piers today. Rescue operations are continuing.
Mr. Laser Beam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 20 2013, 10:54 PM   #10
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: Nothing Human/Moral Perspectives on Exobiology

Well let's face it, by season 5 Janeway already has consistently demonstrated she's willing to play god with the lives of her crew. She was willing to let Neelix live in purgatory on a biobed rather than kill the Viidian who took his lungs. She killed Tuvix against his will to save Tuvok and Neelix pretty much because she liked them more. Declared she was willing to kill them all to keep the Kazon from getting a replicator and so on and so on.

So looking at it from that perspective, her forcing Torres to take a treatment against her will is small change. That doesn't make it any less unethical. Torres has the right to determine her own treatment or lack thereof. Even if it's silly at best to cut off your nose to spite your own face in her shoes as I think it is.

I don't think the Doctor was out of line at all to use Crell's information. Was it terrible what Crell did? Absolutely. But adding one more body to the mass grave isn't going to change what he's already done. In fact I think a sick sadist would think it's utterly hilarious that yet more people would die out of some silly twist of morality rather than live knowing that his knowledge saved them.

Does that mean I think Janeway had the right to basically force Torres to do it? No. Were I captain, I'd have encouraged her to do it, but in the end if she said no, I wouldn't force it. If it was me on the table, I would say use the SS agent's knowledge to save my life. Me dying isn't going to change anything that already happened after all.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 20 2013, 11:00 PM   #11
teya
Vice Admiral
 
teya's Avatar
 
Location: 2 mi S of Capt Braxton's shopping cart
Re: Nothing Human/Moral Perspectives on Exobiology

What always struck me about the episode, is they're making a big deal about this, but no one complains, no one debates, there are no moral dilemmas when they use knowledge Seven got from the Borg.

The whole episode is simply stupid.
__________________
Akoochimoya, my indigenous ass.
teya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 20 2013, 11:02 PM   #12
Mr. Laser Beam
Fleet Admiral
 
Mr. Laser Beam's Avatar
 
Location: The visitor's bullpen
View Mr. Laser Beam's Twitter Profile
Re: Nothing Human/Moral Perspectives on Exobiology

teya wrote: View Post
What always struck me about the episode, is they're making a big deal about this, but no one complains, no one debates, there are no moral dilemmas when they use knowledge Seven got from the Borg.
Excellent point...

Then again, they could argue that the Borg have no choice in what they do - it's in their collective, their programming - so there is no malicious intent like there was with Moset. (I'm not arguing that, but some might.)
__________________
In labor news: Longshoremen walked off the piers today. Rescue operations are continuing.
Mr. Laser Beam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21 2013, 12:15 AM   #13
teacake
Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Militant Janeway True Path Devotees Compound. With Sehlats.
Re: Nothing Human/Moral Perspectives on Exobiology

Facts are neutral. Using evil methods to obtain facts is evil, but doesn't have any effect on the facts themselves.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21 2013, 02:12 PM   #14
JanewayRulz!
Vice Admiral
 
JanewayRulz!'s Avatar
 
Location: North America
Re: Nothing Human/Moral Perspectives on Exobiology

I think this is a fascinating story, despite the plastic bug that was stuck to B'Elanna's chest for much of the ep, and I don't really understand the 2oth and 21st century fans who complain it is unrealistic when these ethical questions come up in our own culture/society.

Here's an article delineating the issue, and showing "modern" examples of the argument from freezing research to the effects of phosphogene on the human lung.


http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/...m/naziexp.html

I understand that people posting might not agree with B'Elanna's interpretation... just as Dr Pozos and Dr Hayward don't agree with it, but to diss the ep because you think the writers made up an illegitimate controversy is mistaken.

This ep has more real life connections to us than "Tuvix" ever could, and Janeway settled this one the same way she settled Tuvix. She said "no" to the blended parasite/B'Elanna being and "yes" to her crewman.

Unlike Tuvix, however, this decision had consequences that reverberated from season 5 until the 3rd ep of season 6.

The "rift" between Janeway and B'Elanna.


JANEWAY: Feeling any better?
TORRES: I'm alive.
JANEWAY: I hope you can understand why I went against your wishes, B'Elanna. Losing you was unacceptable. I know you're angry, but we need to put this behind us. Understood?
TORRES: Is that an order?
JANEWAY: Yes.
TORRES: You can't order someone to get rid of an emotion, Captain.
JANEWAY: And what emotion is that?
TORRES: You had no right to make that decision for me!
JANEWAY: I'm the Captain. You're my crewman. I did what I thought best. I get the feeling there are still a few demons in the air. Let's hope this does the trick, huh?

Sorry Captain, but those demons will take another 15 eps to dispel.
__________________
"But life is a battle: may we all be enabled to fight it well!" Charlotte Bronte
JanewayRulz! is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 21 2013, 04:37 PM   #15
teya
Vice Admiral
 
teya's Avatar
 
Location: 2 mi S of Capt Braxton's shopping cart
Re: Nothing Human/Moral Perspectives on Exobiology

JanewayRulz! wrote: View Post
I understand that people posting might not agree with B'Elanna's interpretation... just as Dr Pozos and Dr Hayward don't agree with it, but to diss the ep because you think the writers made up an illegitimate controversy is mistaken.
I am well aware of the controversy regarding using Nazi medical data--both from a professional and a personal view: what was left of my family in Europe went into concentration camps.

I'm dissing the episode because it directly contradicted how they used what Seven brought from the Borg. If it's immoral to use a hologram of Crell Moset, then it is also immoral to use any knowledge Seven has gained through assimilation.

That issue NEVER came up.
__________________
Akoochimoya, my indigenous ass.
teya is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.