RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,346
Posts: 5,354,197
Members: 24,620
Currently online: 542
Newest member: StarTrekSteve

TrekToday headlines

Sci-Fried To Release New Album
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Star Trek/Planet of the Apes Crossover
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Star Trek into Darkness Soundtrack
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Horse 1, Shatner 0
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Drexler TV Alert
By: T'Bonz on Jul 26

Retro Review: His Way
By: Michelle on Jul 26

MicroWarriors Releases Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Ships Of The Line Design Contest
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Next Weekend: Shore Leave 36!
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

True Trek History To Be Penned
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

View Poll Results: Grade the movie...
A+ 143 19.32%
A 160 21.62%
A- 99 13.38%
B+ 82 11.08%
B 58 7.84%
B- 27 3.65%
C+ 40 5.41%
C 38 5.14%
C- 24 3.24%
D+ 11 1.49%
D 13 1.76%
D- 10 1.35%
F 35 4.73%
Voters: 740. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 12 2013, 04:43 PM   #4186
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Great post, Ovation.
__________________
"I had no idea you were so... formidable. " - Anan 7 to James T. Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2013, 05:00 PM   #4187
Shazam!
Rear Admiral
 
Shazam!'s Avatar
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

BillJ wrote: View Post
But why do people condemn one version of Trek for doing something that another version they liked did?
My favourite movie and my least favourite movie both have actors in. I guess it's hypocritical to favour one over the other.
Shazam! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2013, 05:13 PM   #4188
Ovation
Vice Admiral
 
Location: La Belle Province or The Green Mountain State (depends on the day of the week)
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Shazam! wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
But why do people condemn one version of Trek for doing something that another version they liked did?
My favourite movie and my least favourite movie both have actors in. I guess it's hypocritical to favour one over the other.
No. But you are making a specious argument.
Ovation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2013, 05:15 PM   #4189
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Shazam! wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
But why do people condemn one version of Trek for doing something that another version they liked did?
My favourite movie and my least favourite movie both have actors in. I guess it's hypocritical to favour one over the other.
The sad thing is, you likely believe that is what everyone is talking about.
__________________
"I had no idea you were so... formidable. " - Anan 7 to James T. Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2013, 05:15 PM   #4190
Shazam!
Rear Admiral
 
Shazam!'s Avatar
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Ovation: Nit-picking stuff such as warp speed/travel time in Abrams' Trek but giving TOS a pass is symptomatic of wider concerns that are far too nebulous to provide any real basis for argument. It's widely accepted that "I didn't like it, erm, because" just doesn't hold water so it's easy to nit-pick specific items that may not hold up in isolation due to movies being more than the sum of their parts.
Shazam! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2013, 05:19 PM   #4191
Shazam!
Rear Admiral
 
Shazam!'s Avatar
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

BillJ wrote: View Post
Shazam! wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
But why do people condemn one version of Trek for doing something that another version they liked did?
My favourite movie and my least favourite movie both have actors in. I guess it's hypocritical to favour one over the other.
The sad thing is, you likely believe that is what everyone is talking about.
You're right. I'm most likely an idiot.
Shazam! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2013, 05:22 PM   #4192
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

If the poster holds previous Trek films up as something that nuTrek should aspire to, then criticism of the current movies for "flaws" that are evident in the old movies is irrelevant.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2013, 05:26 PM   #4193
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Shazam! wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
Shazam! wrote: View Post

My favourite movie and my least favourite movie both have actors in. I guess it's hypocritical to favour one over the other.
The sad thing is, you likely believe that is what everyone is talking about.
You're right. I'm most likely an idiot.
Nope. But when you dig in on a certain position, it becomes harder and harder to dig out. Trust me I use to be a master at digging the hole so deep that no argument, no matter how rational, could drill its way though my thick skull.

I can understand the argument that the story doesn't work, the actors don't fit the part, dislike the set designs, dislike the spaceship designs, dislike lens-flares...

But when we're nitpicking things that have happened in pretty much every incarnation of Trek, I think perspective has been lost. We're down to some posters complaining about Spock running because it looks awkward. Nimoy looked awkward when he ran and I've never seen a single person lodge that as a complaint against TOS.
__________________
"I had no idea you were so... formidable. " - Anan 7 to James T. Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2013, 05:37 PM   #4194
Ovation
Vice Admiral
 
Location: La Belle Province or The Green Mountain State (depends on the day of the week)
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Not to mention that Quinto and Cumberbatch both resemble track runners a lot more than most actors I've seen in similar situations (all out run).
Ovation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2013, 06:42 PM   #4195
johnjm22
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Location: California
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

I think the Red Letter Media review of STID sums up my feelings about the movie pretty well.

Don't know if it's been brought up already, but here it is: http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-th...into-darkness/ (45 Minutes long)
johnjm22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2013, 06:44 PM   #4196
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

johnjm22 wrote: View Post
I think the Red Letter Media review of STID sums up my feelings about the movie pretty well.

Don't know if it's been brought up already, but here it is: http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-th...into-darkness/ (45 Minutes long)
I'm not watching a forty-five minute review of a two-hour movie.
__________________
"I had no idea you were so... formidable. " - Anan 7 to James T. Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2013, 07:03 PM   #4197
CorporalCaptain
Vice Admiral
 
CorporalCaptain's Avatar
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

It's been posted on the board somewhere, already.
__________________
John
CorporalCaptain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2013, 07:13 PM   #4198
johnjm22
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Location: California
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

BillJ wrote: View Post
johnjm22 wrote: View Post
I think the Red Letter Media review of STID sums up my feelings about the movie pretty well.

Don't know if it's been brought up already, but here it is: http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-th...into-darkness/ (45 Minutes long)
I'm not watching a forty-five minute review of a two-hour movie.
It's more of a discussion.
johnjm22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2013, 07:15 PM   #4199
M'Sharak
Definitely Herbert. Maybe.
 
M'Sharak's Avatar
 
Location: Terra Inlandia
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

johnjm22 wrote: View Post
I think the Red Letter Media review of STID sums up my feelings about the movie pretty well.

Don't know if it's been brought up already, but here it is: http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-th...into-darkness/ (45 Minutes long)
There is, in fact, a whole thread covering that (as Shazam! could no doubt have told you.) But rather than simply posting a link to a lengthy review with which some may not be familiar and saying "There - that's what I think," why not describe your feelings about the movie in your own words?
__________________
Dinosaurs are just really, really big chickens.
M'Sharak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2013, 07:40 PM   #4200
Shazam!
Rear Admiral
 
Shazam!'s Avatar
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

BillJ wrote: View Post
But when we're nitpicking things that have happened in pretty much every incarnation of Trek, I think perspective has been lost
But we can't qualify every complaint. Unless we literally start accepting "because!" as a reasonable argument there will always be holes and / or elements or hypocrisy in anyone's opinions.

We're down to some posters complaining about Spock running because it looks awkward. Nimoy looked awkward when he ran and I've never seen a single person lodge that as a complaint against TOS.
Probably because they like TOS / Nimoy more - why would anyone moan about the thing they like? I just read criticism such as that as "and here's another thing..." type of a minor nitpick that of course doesn't hold up to scrutiny but is indicative of the poster's feelings of the movie as a whole.
Shazam! is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
benedict cumberbatch, grading & discussion, jj abrams

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.