RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,067
Posts: 5,432,162
Members: 24,926
Currently online: 547
Newest member: wod_freak

TrekToday headlines

The Red Shirt Diaries #8
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

IDW Publishing January Comics
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

Retro Review: Chrysalis
By: Michelle on Oct 18

The Next Generation Season Seven Blu-ray Details
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

CBS Launches Streaming Service
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Yelchin In New Indie Thriller
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Saldana In The Book of Life
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Cracked’s New Sci-Fi Satire
By: T'Bonz on Oct 16

Beltran Introduces Shakespeare To Theater Group
By: T'Bonz on Oct 16

Burton To Be Honored at Facets Boo! Bash
By: T'Bonz on Oct 16


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 10 2013, 05:25 PM   #1906
Franklin
Rear Admiral
 
Location: In the bleachers
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

Any series of only 79 shows that ran the gambit of quality from strong dramatic episodes like "Balance of Terror", "Journey to Babel", and "The Immunity Syndrome" to fun stories like "The Trouble with Tribbles", "A Piece of the Action", and "I Mudd", to pure schlock like "Spock's Brain", "For the World is Hollow, and I Have Touched the Sky", and "And the Children Shall Lead" is going to attract a variety of fans for a variety of reasons.

Does "The Squire of Gothos" feel more like "Star Trek" than "The Doomsday Machine"? How does one know?

What about "The Gamesters of Triskelion" compared to "Shore Leave"?

What about TMP compared to TVH?

Where the hell is the TOS archetype so many seem to use as the measure of something's "Trekness?" (Ususally to say why something isn't Trek.)
__________________
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. -- Mark Twain
Franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 05:35 PM   #1907
beamMe
Fleet Captain
 
beamMe's Avatar
 
Location: Europa
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

johnjm22 wrote: View Post
If you adjust all the older TNG & TOS movies for inflation, this is where STID stands domestically right now:

The Motion Picture...............260M
Star Trek 2009....................257M (140M Budget)
The Voyage Home................235M
The Wrath Of Khan..............216M
Into Darkness...................200M (190M Budget)
The Search For Spock..........180M
First Contact......................166M
Generations........................142M
The Undiscovered Country....141M
Insurrection.......................118M
The Final Frontier................104M
Nemesis.............................59M


Factoring in world wide numbers, and the film's budget, it doesn't look like STID is going to be any more profitable than ST2009 (maybe slightly less).

I think that's a bit of a disappointment for Paramount.

Hopefully they'll cut the budget for the next film which will force the writers to focus more on story and less on FX/action. Sometimes limitations are the best thing for creativity.
So, after four weeks STID is already only 9 million shy of ST's total worldwide lifetime gross.
It already made 50 million more in non US-markets after those four weeks than ST made in its entire run.

ST went on to make another 50 million after four weeks in distribution in the US.

Yeah, STID surely is a "disappointment".
beamMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 05:45 PM   #1908
CrazyHorse89
Lieutenant
 
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

Reading this thread has made me realise just how American-centric some people are.
CrazyHorse89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 05:51 PM   #1909
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

CrazyHorse89 wrote: View Post
Reading this thread has made me realise just how American-centric some people are.
Usually Americans.
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 05:53 PM   #1910
Phily B
Fleet Captain
 
Phily B's Avatar
 
Location: United Kingdom
View Phily B's Twitter Profile
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

Franklin wrote: View Post
Any series of only 79 shows that ran the gambit of quality from strong dramatic episodes like "Balance of Terror", "Journey to Babel", and "The Immunity Syndrome" to fun stories like "The Trouble with Tribbles", "A Piece of the Action", and "I Mudd", to pure schlock like "Spock's Brain", "For the World is Hollow, and I Have Touched the Sky", and "And the Children Shall Lead" is going to attract a variety of fans for a variety of reasons.

Does "The Squire of Gothos" feel more like "Star Trek" than "The Doomsday Machine"? How does one know?

What about "The Gamesters of Triskelion" compared to "Shore Leave"?

What about TMP compared to TVH?

Where the hell is the TOS archetype so many seem to use as the measure of something's "Trekness?" (Ususally to say why something isn't Trek.)
I feel like people saying "it's not Star Trek" have an idealised version, instead of an actual version that the rest of us watched.
Phily B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 05:55 PM   #1911
Flake
Commodore
 
Location: Manchester, UK
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

johnjm22 wrote: View Post
Hopefully they'll cut the budget for the next film which will force the writers to focus more on story and less on FX/action. Sometimes limitations are the best thing for creativity.
The action and destruction in this movie helped it to do much better overseas. I think the action will be the same in the next one as it was in STID, perhaps more. I thought the action was fine in this movie as it was not gratuitous, it simply helped to move on the story.
Flake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 05:59 PM   #1912
johnjm22
Lieutenant
 
Location: California
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

beamMe wrote: View Post
So, after four weeks STID is already only 9 million shy of ST's total worldwide lifetime gross.
It already made 50 million more in non US-markets after those four weeks than ST made in its entire run.

ST went on to make another 50 million after four weeks in distribution in the US.

Yeah, STID surely is a "disappointment".
Yes, it's a financial disappointment for Paramount. You're looking at revenues, not profits.

It's not going to be anymore profitable then the last Trek film.

I think Paramount was hoping to turn Star Trek into one of those big time summer mega hits. That's why they spent nearly 200M on it's production.

That's the kind of budget that gets spent on movies like Iron Man, Transformers ect. But STID isn't going to be anywhere near as profitable as those types films.
johnjm22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 06:04 PM   #1913
CrazyHorse89
Lieutenant
 
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

JarodRussell wrote: View Post
CrazyHorse89 wrote: View Post
Reading this thread has made me realise just how American-centric some people are.
Usually Americans.
You know, it's quite funny. Some people are so intent on seeing this movie labelled as a 'dissapointment', so eager to kill the JJ-verse dead, that they will claim that lower than expected box-office figures in the domestic market are the big story here. But if you're standing on the other side of the Pacific or the Atlantic, it's pretty clear that this isn't the big story at all. For that, you have to look at the film's global baseline.

That's what I was getting at.
CrazyHorse89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 06:06 PM   #1914
thumbtack
Commodore
 
Location: Ankh-Morpork
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

CrazyHorse89 wrote: View Post
Reading this thread has made me realise just how American-centric some people are.

It's not that so much as trying to keep your attention away from the foreign grosses.
__________________
"What went wrong!? All my sockpuppets loved this movie!" - Kevin Smith
thumbtack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 06:07 PM   #1915
beamMe
Fleet Captain
 
beamMe's Avatar
 
Location: Europa
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

johnjm22 wrote: View Post
beamMe wrote: View Post
So, after four weeks STID is already only 9 million shy of ST's total worldwide lifetime gross.
It already made 50 million more in non US-markets after those four weeks than ST made in its entire run.

ST went on to make another 50 million after four weeks in distribution in the US.

Yeah, STID surely is a "disappointment".
Yes, it's a financial disappointment for Paramount.
No.
beamMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 06:08 PM   #1916
johnjm22
Lieutenant
 
Location: California
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

CrazyHorse89 wrote: View Post
JarodRussell wrote: View Post
CrazyHorse89 wrote: View Post
Reading this thread has made me realise just how American-centric some people are.
Usually Americans.
You know, it's quite funny. Some people are so intent on seeing this movie labelled as a 'dissapointment', so eager to kill the JJ-verse dead, that they will claim that lower than expected box-office figures in the domestic market are the big story here. But if you're standing on the other side of the Pacific or the Atlantic, it's pretty clear that this isn't the big story at all. For that, you have to look at the film's global baseline.

That's what I was getting at.
Are you referring to my post?

Did you read all of it? I was factoring in the world wide box office numbers.

It's not pulling in the type of money worldwide that you want from a film with a 200M budget and a summer time release. I think Paramount was hoping for more.
johnjm22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 06:09 PM   #1917
LOKAI of CHERON
Commodore
 
LOKAI of CHERON's Avatar
 
Location: Post-apocalyptic ruins of my once mighty Homeworld.
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

There will be a third Bad Robot Trek - the haters will simply have to deal with it.
__________________
YOU MONOTONE HUMANS ARE ALL ALIKE... FIRST YOU CONDEMN, THEN ATTACK.
LOKAI of CHERON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 06:14 PM   #1918
CrazyHorse89
Lieutenant
 
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

johnjm22 wrote: View Post
CrazyHorse89 wrote: View Post
JarodRussell wrote: View Post
Usually Americans.
You know, it's quite funny. Some people are so intent on seeing this movie labelled as a 'dissapointment', so eager to kill the JJ-verse dead, that they will claim that lower than expected box-office figures in the domestic market are the big story here. But if you're standing on the other side of the Pacific or the Atlantic, it's pretty clear that this isn't the big story at all. For that, you have to look at the film's global baseline.

That's what I was getting at.
Are you referring to my post?

Did you read all of it? I was factoring in the world wide box office numbers.

It's not pulling in the type of money worldwide that you want from a film with a 200M budget and a summer time release. I think Paramount was hoping for more.
I wasn't referring to any post in particular. I've read nearly two hundred pages of this stuff so everything has blurred into two or three meta-narratives.

This film has cracked the overseas market in a way that no previous Star Trek film, including ST09, ever has. What's more, it's shown strong legs in important markets like China.
CrazyHorse89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 06:20 PM   #1919
beamMe
Fleet Captain
 
beamMe's Avatar
 
Location: Europa
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

LOKAI of CHERON wrote: View Post
There will be a third Bad Robot Trek - the haters will simply have to deal with it.
This.
beamMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 06:22 PM   #1920
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

Yep. Paramount is disappointed with the domestic gross but happy that their strategy for building Trek up in the international market is working so well.

The bottom line is this: another Trek movie in three years, written and produced by Bad Robot in the successful style of their last two Trek movies. Will the budget come down a bit? Maybe so.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.