RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,588
Posts: 5,515,357
Members: 25,158
Currently online: 554
Newest member: Giarc1982

TrekToday headlines

Two New Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Dec 26

Captain Kirk’s Boldest Missions
By: T'Bonz on Dec 25

Trek Paper Clips
By: T'Bonz on Dec 24

Sargent Passes
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

QMx Trek Insignia Badges
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

And The New Director Of Star Trek 3 Is…
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

TV Alert: Pine On Tonight Show
By: T'Bonz on Dec 22

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Enterprise

Enterprise The final frontier has a new beginning in this forum!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old June 9 2013, 03:12 AM   #46
teacake
Fleet Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Google's ass cave full of the lush, lush asses they have stolen.
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness - SPOILERS!!!

The only ENT reference I saw was the model.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline  
Old June 9 2013, 03:38 AM   #47
ralfy
Lieutenant
 
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness - SPOILERS!!!

Dukhat wrote: View Post

Seriously dude, you're really on the edge of trolling now with all this shit. Either give your own reasons why you dislike the film (in the appropriate section for that), or cease this incessant posting of links nobody gives a crap about.
A troll is someone who contributes nothing to a discussion, which is what you are doing right now.

I was asked to explain what the flaws are in the movie, and I did. That's it.

Finally, the reason why I am doing that here is because this spread discusses the movie and contains spoilers, which is exactly what is contained in the links. You cannot discuss the plot holes in this movie without spoilers.

Now, if you think a new thread should be created for this, then make that request to the mod. Whatever you do, stop trolling.
ralfy is offline  
Old June 9 2013, 03:42 AM   #48
ralfy
Lieutenant
 
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness - SPOILERS!!!

HopefulRomantic wrote: View Post
No more posts without substantive original content; the idea is to discuss, not simply post links without comment.
I don't understand why "original content" is necessary, as several viewers already see the same flaws in the movie.


Also, your posts belong in the Trek XI+ forum, not here. Thanks.
Thank you for mentioning that. It's just that this thread is found in the "Star Trek TV Series" section. Should it be moved to Trek XI+?
ralfy is offline  
Old June 9 2013, 03:43 AM   #49
ralfy
Lieutenant
 
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness - SPOILERS!!!

Captain59 wrote: View Post
What a load of crap. The second I read a swear word I clicked off the page. If you can't make an argument without using foul language, you have no argument...you're just trying to shock people. The movie is awesome. People know it. Deal with it.

Now can we get back to my OP? After a bunch of people have seen it multiple times, there are no other ENT references?
I cannot do anything about the foul language, but you are free to look at the other links. They refer to the same errors found in the spoiler FAQ and more.
ralfy is offline  
Old June 9 2013, 08:31 AM   #50
HolidayRomantic
Phloxist moderator
 
HolidayRomantic's Avatar
 
Location: HopefulRomantic is feeding the cats again
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness - SPOILERS!!!

ralfy wrote: View Post
Whatever you do, stop trolling.
Accusations of trolling are regarded as trolling. I advise you-- and everyone else-- to refrain from such accusations in future. Further name-calling will result in a warning. This is your last caution on the subject.

If you see a problem, hit the notify button.

ralfy wrote: View Post
HopefulRomantic wrote: View Post
Also, your posts belong in the Trek XI+ forum, not here. Thanks.
Thank you for mentioning that. It's just that this thread is found in the "Star Trek TV Series" section. Should it be moved to Trek XI+?
The thread belongs here, but you should move to the Trek XI+ forum unless you have something to contribute regarding references to the series Enterprise in the movie. That is the topic of this thread.

Also, ralfy, posting more than twice in a row is considered spamming. Reposting already posted material, or a bunch of links, without substantive comment is considered spamming. Please review the FAQ and adhere to the rules from now on.

Back on topic, please.
__________________
"It's late, I'm tired, and there's so much left to do." ~Ernst Stavro Blofeld, Diamonds Are Forever
HolidayRomantic is offline  
Old June 9 2013, 02:38 PM   #51
Therin of Andor
Admiral
 
Therin of Andor's Avatar
 
Location: New Therin Park, Andor (via Australia)
View Therin of Andor's Twitter Profile
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness - SPOILERS!!!

NotLKH wrote: View Post
I've gone to showings of really old 3D movies in the early 80's, and had trouble with getting the 3D glasses over my prescription glasses.
In the 80s, 3D glasses were usually made of cardboard. I've never had a problem putting these, nor modern plastic 3D glasses, over my prescription frames but...

http://www.tr3ndy3d.com/clip-on-3d-glasses

Why not invest in these?
__________________
Thiptho lapth! Ian (Entire post is personal opinion)
The Andor Files @ http://andorfiles.blogspot.com/
http://therinofandor.blogspot.com/
Therin of Andor is offline  
Old June 12 2013, 08:38 PM   #52
Ovation
Vice Admiral
 
Location: La Belle Province or The Green Mountain State (depends on the day of the week)
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness - SPOILERS!!!

I've not noticed any other reference to Enterprise than the model in my two viewings of the latest movie. I found the two references (one in each movie) nicely handled and subtle and didn't really expect any more than that (nor do I think there should be too many--not because I don't like the series but because I prefer subtle when it comes to callbacks to other series. I wouldn't want a TNG film, for example, to have too many TOS references either).
Ovation is offline  
Old June 13 2013, 11:32 AM   #53
F. King Daniel
Admiral
 
F. King Daniel's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness - SPOILERS!!!

The ENT Augments trilogy works as perfectly as a prequel to Into Darkness as it does "Space Seed" and Wrath of Khan. I love how new Treks can make us look back at older episodes or movies slightly differently. ID sheds new light on Henry Archer's death:

SOONG: They're the future. They're stronger, smarter, free from sickness, with life spans twice as long as our own. You, more than anyone, should appreciate what this means.

ARCHER: Why me?

SOONG: Your father suffered from Clarke's Disease. His final years were marked with extreme pain.

ARCHER: My father has nothing to do with this.

SOONG: He didn't need to suffer. Genetic engineering could've cured him. Those who want to suppress my Augments are the same ones who condemned your father to death.

(from "Borderland" http://www.chakoteya.net/enterprise/80.htm)


...all it would have taken to save Henry Archer was an injection of whatever's in Khan's blood, as we saw with Lucille Harewood at the start of Into Darkness and at the end with Kirk - technology which has been outlawed on Earth since 1996.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
F. King Daniel is offline  
Old June 13 2013, 11:19 PM   #54
teacake
Fleet Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Google's ass cave full of the lush, lush asses they have stolen.
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness - SPOILERS!!!

I don't get why the super blood isn't already in use.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline  
Old June 14 2013, 02:10 AM   #55
Shaka Zulu
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Bulawayo Military Krral
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness - SPOILERS!!!

Enterprise is Great wrote: View Post
I saw STiD in 3D IMAX and the glasses they gave me fit comfortably over my own. The last time i saw a 3D movie was Avatar and the 3D glasses were so uncomfortable.
The movie was better in IMAX 3D, IMHO.

teacake wrote: View Post
I don't get why the super blood isn't already in use.
It will be, don't you worry about that-most likely synthesized by McCoy and a certain doctor into a cure-all drug similar to cordrazine. The Federation would be stupid for letting a drug derived from blood like that go to waste, just because of the people that precipitated the tragedy in the movie.

Last edited by Shaka Zulu; June 14 2013 at 02:24 AM.
Shaka Zulu is offline  
Old June 14 2013, 03:33 AM   #56
teacake
Fleet Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Google's ass cave full of the lush, lush asses they have stolen.
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness - SPOILERS!!!

It should have already been in use since the Eugenically enhanced were adults in the 90's. They didn't create themselves, there would be samples and research that should have pointed mankind in the direction of superblood long before Khan had to stick his arm out of the brig. Khan obviously knew his blood was super.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline  
Old June 14 2013, 07:43 AM   #57
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness - SPOILERS!!!

I really didn't like the concept at all that "superblood" is the hand waving anti-death serum.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline  
Old June 14 2013, 08:17 AM   #58
teacake
Fleet Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Google's ass cave full of the lush, lush asses they have stolen.
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness - SPOILERS!!!

That's right, it's stupid and there should be a horrible side effect that Kirk suffers from in the next movie that ensures no one tries it again.

OH I so wish that McCoy had gotten the super part out of the tribble and there was some hilarious tribble related side effect..
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline  
Old June 14 2013, 01:30 PM   #59
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness - SPOILERS!!!

Like Kirk's hair falls out and turns into a tribble? That'd be an amusing spoof on the Shatner hairpiece.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline  
Old June 14 2013, 01:52 PM   #60
teacake
Fleet Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Google's ass cave full of the lush, lush asses they have stolen.
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness - SPOILERS!!!

Actually I was thinking of Too Many Pinkie Pies meets James T. Kirk..

More is better, right?
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.