RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,449
Posts: 5,508,070
Members: 25,131
Currently online: 518
Newest member: xunixan

TrekToday headlines

TV Alert: Pine On Tonight Show
By: T'Bonz on Dec 22

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Fandom > Fan Productions

Fan Productions Creating our own Trek canon!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 31 2013, 09:21 AM   #121
DarKush
Rear Admiral
 
Re: Star Trek Continues "Pilgrim of Eternity"

Barbreader wrote: View Post
I enjoyed the episode. I can't see why anyone would fear that Phase II, JJ, and Continues would produce 'too much' and we'd get sick of it. Most TV shows produce over 20 episodes a year. I don't know how many Continues will produce, but I'm betting it will be less than 4. Phase II always wants to produce more, but they seem to produce one a year. JJ produces one every 4 years. Plenty of time for writers to come up with something new and original... if they are so inclined.
I don't get why anyone would say or feel that way either. I mean, it's not like they have to watch any of these fan productions. I was happy that the cast and crew took so much effort with Continues to evoke the feel and spirit of the original series. The same can be said for New Voyages/Phase II and some of the other shows. Heck even when the production values aren't there the love of Trek is and that counts to me.

Despite the great cast, FX, and spectacle of Into Darkness, seeing Continues was a welcome respite.
DarKush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31 2013, 10:56 AM   #122
beamMe
Fleet Captain
 
beamMe's Avatar
 
Location: Europa
Re: TOS continues...

Warped9 wrote: View Post
they have the potential for a great deal of creative freedom.
No, these fan productions always lack creative freedom. They all limit themselves and will never be anything more than examples in nostalgia.
beamMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31 2013, 11:26 AM   #123
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: TOS continues...

beamMe wrote: View Post
Warped9 wrote: View Post
they have the potential for a great deal of creative freedom.
No, these fan productions always lack creative freedom. They all limit themselves and will never be anything more than examples in nostalgia.
Wrong. Just because so far they've opted not to go beyond what they've been doing doesn't mean they can't. Yes, they might limit themselves, but the opportunity is still there. One day we might get something different. Unlike a licenced novel there is no censor telling them they can't do a particular kind of story.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 31 2013, 12:13 PM   #124
beamMe
Fleet Captain
 
beamMe's Avatar
 
Location: Europa
Re: TOS continues...

Warped9 wrote: View Post
beamMe wrote: View Post
Warped9 wrote: View Post
they have the potential for a great deal of creative freedom.
No, these fan productions always lack creative freedom. They all limit themselves and will never be anything more than examples in nostalgia.
Wrong. Just because so far they've opted not to go beyond what they've been doing doesn't mean they can't. Yes, they might limit themselves, but the opportunity is still there. One day we might get something different. Unlike a licenced novel there is no censor telling them they can't do a particular kind of story.
A good story is one thing.
But presenting it in the guise of the design aesthetic of TOS is already stifling any creative freedom.
beamMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31 2013, 12:46 PM   #125
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: TOS continues...

beamMe wrote: View Post
Warped9 wrote: View Post
beamMe wrote: View Post

No, these fan productions always lack creative freedom. They all limit themselves and will never be anything more than examples in nostalgia.
Wrong. Just because so far they've opted not to go beyond what they've been doing doesn't mean they can't. Yes, they might limit themselves, but the opportunity is still there. One day we might get something different. Unlike a licenced novel there is no censor telling them they can't do a particular kind of story.
A good story is one thing.
But presenting it in the guise of the design aesthetic of TOS is already stifling any creative freedom.
No. In what way could the aesthetic possibly be limiting? There's nothing preventing them from doing something allegorical in the best tradition of TOS, TNG or science fiction in general.

The aesthetic isn't a limitation. The only real limitation is of a self-imposed nature or lack of creative vision. Just because Trek novelists or fan film creators haven't yet done something does not automatically mean it cannot be done.

I haven't yet seen TheNewVoyages version of "Blood And Fire," but I have read David Gerrold's original novel. I don't know how closely they stuck to the original story, but the book touches on openly gay characters and their acceptance within greater society. That story wouldn't have been aired in the '60s, but it could have done in the late '80s or '90s. TNG fudged it. But no reason that story couldn't be done by a fanfilm now. STC's "Pilgrim Of Eternity" is a story of individual redemption. So right there you're right on the doorstep of doing even bolder allegorical stories.

Star Trek didn't limit itself simply to straight-up adventure stories---if it had it probably wouldn't have had the staying power it's enjoyed all these years. And there's no reason fanfilms cannot emulate that approach. It's really a matter of will and ambition.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?

Last edited by Warped9; May 31 2013 at 06:19 PM.
Warped9 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 31 2013, 12:55 PM   #126
plynch
Commodore
 
plynch's Avatar
 
Location: Outer Graceland
View plynch's Twitter Profile
Re: TOS continues...

There are composers who compose new pieces in the styles of previous eras. Plenty of jazz groups (mine) play in by-gone styles (mainstream ca. 1955). I write new songs in the style of "standards" (like Gershwin, Ellington, etc.).

This production, yes, is like a KISS cover band . . . that writes new songs in the manner of KISS! And if you like classic KISS, that's a good thing.

I'd rather watch something in TOS style that has a new story than something in the JJ style that re-enacts scenes from a famous, much-more-emotionally-involving predecessor.

YMMV. Peace be with you.
__________________
Author of Live Like Louis! Inspirational Stories from the Life of Louis Armstrong, http://livelikelouis.com
plynch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31 2013, 01:21 PM   #127
marksound
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Planet Carcazed
Re: TOS continues...

A few thoughts ...

Pacing was good. Some fan productions drag, but this one seemed like it moved right along.

I thought the Uhura singing scene was a bit silly. Painful, almost. I skipped over it.

I think if they'd ...
... but that's a production decision. Could have gone either way.

I initially had a problem with some of the casting, but as I got into the story it was less of an issue.

I thought Chris Doohan had a lot more lines than his dad might have had if they'd made this episode 45 years ago. Some of his lines would have gone to Spock or McCoy. Maybe they're just showing him off. Not a problem, just something I noticed.

The effects, as far as I'm concerned, are spot on. The Enterprise looks exactly like I expected it to look. They did a pretty good job duplicating the old stock footage.

The opening credits look good. Familiar, but not a carbon copy of the original.

Not sure why they needed a "counselor," unless it's just something they thought might be cool to try. No big deal, really. I think the crying was a little over the top for a trained officer. Again, not really a big deal.

Overall, I think they've hit the ground running. Some things could be tighter, but as they go on they'll work it out. I had my doubts going in, but I was pleasantly surprised.
marksound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31 2013, 02:02 PM   #128
beamMe
Fleet Captain
 
beamMe's Avatar
 
Location: Europa
Re: TOS continues...

Warped9 wrote: View Post
The aesthetic isn't a limitation.
It very much is, if you stick to portraying a futuristic world in the terms of 1960s TV-making.

plynch wrote: View Post
There are composers who compose new pieces in the styles of previous eras. Plenty of jazz groups (mine) play in by-gone styles (mainstream ca. 1955). I write new songs in the style of "standards" (like Gershwin, Ellington, etc.).

This production, yes, is like a KISS cover band . . . that writes new songs in the manner of KISS! And if you like classic KISS, that's a good thing.
The difference here being, of course, that Star Trek isn't and never was a period piece about a specific by-gone time. It's a sci-fi show that tries to show a future world.
To ignore shifting and changing design aesthetics when portraying futurity today isn't creative. It's simply sticking to what you know and refusing to accept change.

This production is good, and I like it. But it is not a sci-fi show that takes today into account to portray tomorrow. It's a nostalgic masturbation fantasy for us fans, a period-piece about how a particular creative team saw the future in the 1960s (and even they moved on and adjusted their creative futuristic vision by the time TMP and, later, TNG came around).
beamMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31 2013, 02:29 PM   #129
Pingfah
Admiral
 
Pingfah's Avatar
 
Location: Keeping an eye on TBBS
Re: Star Trek Continues "Pilgrim of Eternity"

Many heartfelt congratulations to all involved with this project. I watched it last night and really enjoyed it.

It felt very authentic to me, as a somewhat casual fan of TOS. The cameos were great fun, and great to see Jamie Bamber being such a good sport, but the show would still have been great without them as it was really strong.

Disbelief was successfully suspended for 95% of the proceedings.
__________________
So it goes.
Pingfah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31 2013, 02:51 PM   #130
mos6507
Captain
 
mos6507's Avatar
 
Re: TOS continues...

Noname Given wrote: View Post
Kirk does have conferences and does ask for opinions, BUT in the end, he usually makes his own decisions.
There are a couple TOS episodes that come to mind that are mostly tension over "what should we do?". Savage Curtain spends a lot of runtime with Kirk deciding whether to trust the simulated Lincoln. And the episode this most resembles, Where No Man Has Gone Before, is almost all hand-wringing on how to handle Gary Mitchell.

It's true that TNG took this much farther, though.
__________________
Fem Trekz on Facebook
mos6507 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31 2013, 05:20 PM   #131
Opus
Commodore
 
Opus's Avatar
 
Location: Bloom County
Re: Star Trek Continues "Pilgrim of Eternity"

Wonderfully shot and acted. Kudos to Michael Forest for reprising his role as Apollo, and Chris Doohan for 'stealing the show' as Scotty.

This is the best fan production I've seen thus far. Looked and felt like TOS. Bravo!
__________________
Now that I've seen it, and have also had time to mellow, to really think about it, I now find it absolutely, unbearably repulsive in every way except for some of the acting. - about The Wrath of Khan. Interstat, Issue 62: 1982
Opus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31 2013, 05:52 PM   #132
plynch
Commodore
 
plynch's Avatar
 
Location: Outer Graceland
View plynch's Twitter Profile
Re: TOS continues...

beamMe wrote: View Post
Warped9 wrote: View Post
The aesthetic isn't a limitation.
It very much is, if you stick to portraying a futuristic world in the terms of 1960s TV-making.

plynch wrote: View Post
There are composers who compose new pieces in the styles of previous eras. Plenty of jazz groups (mine) play in by-gone styles (mainstream ca. 1955). I write new songs in the style of "standards" (like Gershwin, Ellington, etc.).

This production, yes, is like a KISS cover band . . . that writes new songs in the manner of KISS! And if you like classic KISS, that's a good thing.
The difference here being, of course, that Star Trek isn't and never was a period piece about a specific by-gone time. It's a sci-fi show that tries to show a future world.
To ignore shifting and changing design aesthetics when portraying futurity today isn't creative. It's simply sticking to what you know and refusing to accept change.

This production is good, and I like it. But it is not a sci-fi show that takes today into account to portray tomorrow. It's a nostalgic masturbation fantasy for us fans, a period-piece about how a particular creative team saw the future in the 1960s (and even they moved on and adjusted their creative futuristic vision by the time TMP and, later, TNG came around).
This made me smile. How the future will really look is nowhere like they thought in 1965 and nowhere near what JJ thought it will, in 2009. You don't watch sci-fi thinking it's really gonna be that way, do you? Maybe when I was 12, reading Ray Bradbury rockets landing on their tails I thought it might really be that way, but now I know it's all just a fun vehicle to tell what-if stories that pertain to humanity in general, or to current issues.

C'mon, a space navy traveling at light speed!? By your logic, JJ shouldn't use such a preposterous concept that actually seemed plausible to WWII vets in the postwar era.

And I think it IS pretty similar to performing in a style considered hip in 1955. Hip now is way different. Yet some of us really like the old aesthetics. I can't wait to watch the whole episode tonight. Been saving it for a Friday on the big screen. Be well.
__________________
Author of Live Like Louis! Inspirational Stories from the Life of Louis Armstrong, http://livelikelouis.com
plynch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31 2013, 05:53 PM   #133
HarryM
Fleet Captain
 
HarryM's Avatar
 
Location: Old Earth
Re: Star Trek Continues "Pilgrim of Eternity"

Outstanding work, really amazing production values. Awesometo see Michael Forrest as Apollo, one of the great tragic figures of TOS, it's nice to imagine him getting a happy ending, canon or not.
HarryM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31 2013, 06:06 PM   #134
Barbreader
Fleet Captain
 
Location: New York, New York
View Barbreader's Twitter Profile
Re: TOS continues...

Concerning objections to making new TOS episodes... this is essentially like 19th century 'steam punk' work. No one thinks 250 years from now technology in outer space will be behind our current communications tech on earth. Health care, likewise, will not go backward. For anyone who does like 'steam punk' but objects to these TOS fan films... there was real sci fi in the 19th century. Shelly's Frankenstein, jumps to mind. Edward Bellamy's 'Looking Backward 2000-1887' started a utopian movement that makes the Trek community look minor by comparison. I would not personally work on fan Trek... I'd rather do sci fi based on current issues in science and society. But I enjoy watching these efforts, and I have created an index (Star Trek Reviewed) to make it easy for everyone who likes them to spend their time watching them, not hunting for them.

Here, ST Continues has reimagined TOS with a less military-style command structure, a more civilian take. I would have preferred if they made it clear that this was Kirk's choice, and he, in the end, had the final say. Consensus may work for China, but I can't imagine it working on an international, interspecies space vessel. Nevertheless, I think it's an interesting addition to the Fan Film universe. It's no harder to believe than some of the other unlikely developments in Gene's universe. "There will be no war, there will be no greed, and all of the children will know how to read." I don't see the 'no greed' thing. ...Unless you eliminate humans.
Barbreader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31 2013, 06:06 PM   #135
Kruezerman
Fleet Captain
 
Kruezerman's Avatar
 
Location: The corner of San Antonio and a bottle of Fireball
Re: TOS continues...

But why is keeping the old aesthetic so important compared to exploring new characters and topics? Fan productions will always focus on the "Star Trek"-ness of Star Trek and not the fun or adventure or stories. I hope one day this will change.
__________________
I'm not saying it's cold, but I just keyed two cars with my nipples.
Kruezerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.