RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,451
Posts: 5,508,263
Members: 25,132
Currently online: 528
Newest member: Commander Balok

TrekToday headlines

TV Alert: Pine On Tonight Show
By: T'Bonz on Dec 22

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 28 2013, 10:00 AM   #121
F. King Daniel
Admiral
 
F. King Daniel's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: Why did they bother...

TREK_GOD_1 wrote: View Post
King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
Kirk and Spock are bigger than William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy.
Apprently not, as the nuCast are not cultural icons--just actors in a new version no more authentic than the numerous ST fan films.
I think "cultural icons" is pushing it a degree or 50,000.
And this Star Trek is Star Trek. It's as authentic Trek as The Dark Knight Rises is Batman or Skyfall is Bond or Game of Shadows is Sherlock Holmes.
Plus, who gives a shit about Captain Nobody of the USS Generic Starship?
If Paramount/Roddenberry shared that belief, The Next Generation and its sequel series would not exist. Yes, the NG ship is another Enterprise, but Picard, et al, were new to audiences.
Yes, and we saw that with TNG, DS9, VOY and ENT, with diminishing returns each and every time.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
F. King Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2013, 10:18 AM   #122
SantaSpock
Fleet Captain
 
SantaSpock's Avatar
 
Location: CommishSleer
View SantaSpock's Twitter Profile
Re: Why did they bother...

CorporalClegg wrote: View Post
Ryan8bit wrote: View Post
Uh, are you serious? I mean, I can think of several shows that lampoon the specific performances (not just the characters) of old cast members. I haven't seen much of any of that yet for the new cast, but maybe that will come in time?
Because they're familiar, not because they're iconic.

You know how many screen actors have reached iconic status? None.

One could maybe make an argument for Charlie Chaplin, John Wayne, Humphrey Bogart. But that's if you limit the definition of "iconic" to its idiomatic use. And even still, with all three it's their professional personas that would be iconic, not the actors.

In any case, a person could easily count the number of figures from contemporary pop culture who've reached iconic status on one hand. And, like I said, that's if you leave out the religious component.

People use the word way too liberally around here. I know it's Dennis's pet peeve.
Because I'm old I'm going to bore you with a story.

About 20 years ago (or more) I bought a friend of mine a TOS cast t-shirt because he loved TNG. Loving my gift he took it away on a holiday to climb the Himalayas where he would be camping and staying in huts without running water and electricity.
He came back and he told me that he was amazed how many people recognised the people on the shirt. In places without TV or movie theatres where they didn't speak English, people would come up to him and say 'Kirk', 'Spock'.
So you claim they're not icons but a lot of people around the world recognise them.
SantaSpock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2013, 10:38 AM   #123
F. King Daniel
Admiral
 
F. King Daniel's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: Why did they bother...

But would they only recognize Nimoy, or would anyone in the distinctive pointed ears, bowl cut and uniform garner the same recognition? Just like a guy with a blue suit, red cape and \S/ on their chest is Superman?
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
F. King Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2013, 10:38 AM   #124
Halmirdax
Lieutenant Commander
 
Halmirdax's Avatar
 
Location: Studio
Re: Why did they bother...

We know and love the characters, not just the actors. The actors have been immense in taking up these roles and making them memorable yet again. It is very refreshing.
I'm grateful for the old and the new but a new Star Trek film wouldn't have been the same without those particular characters. - Pretty much reiterating what lots of other people have said but adding that I agree.
Halmirdax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2013, 11:19 AM   #125
SantaSpock
Fleet Captain
 
SantaSpock's Avatar
 
Location: CommishSleer
View SantaSpock's Twitter Profile
Re: Why did they bother...

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
But would they only recognize Nimoy, or would anyone in the distinctive pointed ears, bowl cut and uniform garner the same recognition? Just like a guy with a blue suit, red cape and \S/ on their chest is Superman?
Its the Spock that was created after 79 episodes of TOS and maybe TAS and maybe some movies. At that stage it was Nimoy Spock.
SantaSpock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2013, 01:27 PM   #126
OpenMaw
Commander
 
OpenMaw's Avatar
 
Location: Everett, Washington
Re: Why did they bother...

BillJ wrote: View Post
So I'm not sure why it's important that we see that golden moment they become friends in these movies.
Well, origin story, ya know. Seeing the origin of one of science fiction's best friendships. It's one of the elements of Harve Bennett's story I rather liked. In that, in very simple terms, it basically goes Kirk helps Spock, Spock helps Kirk, then they help each other in the end. They're not really ever at odds, but they're depicted as unlikely friends because of their different backgrounds.

Though i'd still consider it "wrong" honestly. Simply because I always felt the start of Kirk and Spock's friendship was best established as a course both characters would follow in WNMHGB, and done rather well there too.
__________________
"Paradise protests too much." SFDebris
OpenMaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2013, 02:36 PM   #127
TREK_GOD_1
Fleet Captain
 
TREK_GOD_1's Avatar
 
Location: Escaped from Delta Vega
Re: Why did they bother...

CommishSleer wrote: View Post

Because I'm old I'm going to bore you with a story.

About 20 years ago (or more) I bought a friend of mine a TOS cast t-shirt because he loved TNG. Loving my gift he took it away on a holiday to climb the Himalayas where he would be camping and staying in huts without running water and electricity.
He came back and he told me that he was amazed how many people recognised the people on the shirt. In places without TV or movie theatres where they didn't speak English, people would come up to him and say 'Kirk', 'Spock'.
So you claim they're not icons but a lot of people around the world recognise them.
Actually, it is a common story. In my travels, the image of Shatner as Kirk / Nimoy as Spock were and remain instantly familiar--unlike the majority of random actors who are in and out of a role (even if successful), with limited effects & for some reason, the personalities and/or vibe of the performers were not so locked into the characters as in the TOS case.

The only other rare cases I can think of where the actor so defines a role that all others to follow never matched the effect/association: Karloff as Frankenstein or Garland as The Wizard of Oz's Dorothy or Lugosi as Dracula. Rare and historic company, as all have had others take on the characters on film and TV (some famous, such as Lee's Dracula), but blink, and you missed most who followed.

That is the measure of the iconoc character tied to and eqully iconic performer: anyone else in the role would not be at the right place/right time of their lives to influence/define a character in a way which touched people (from various walks of life) so much, that it had been impossible to replace or match the performer/character association.
__________________
"...to be like God, you have the power to make the world anything you want it to be."
TREK_GOD_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2013, 02:45 PM   #128
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: Why did they bother...

Mickey Mouse is more widely known in the world than anything associated with Star Trek, and he doesn't look or sound much like "Steamboat Willie." For that matter, the same is true of Superman - also better known than Kirk or Spock.

If one must use the silly "icon" word, outside a certain local cultural set it's probably the iconography associated with the characters that's recognized, rather than the faces of the actors - Spock's ears, Superman's costume and "S" shield, the Enterprise (which is essentially identical in Abrams's films to every other version).
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2013, 03:41 PM   #129
Alex1939
Captain
 
Alex1939's Avatar
 
Re: Why did they bother...

Captain Nebula wrote: View Post
Why did they bother with the original Trek crew in these new movies?
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

That is the answer.


Although I've accepted what JJ Abrams trek is which is a rip-off or homage depending on your point of view to one of the most iconic tv/movie franchises of all time. That's why you have to have Khan in a story even though the villain could've not been Khan and this story would've been fine.

But in all honesty, I've enjoyed what JJ has done even if I am just a sucker for the fanboy winks like section 31 and Praxis.

I would like to see him try to do something truly original with this cast. Not recycle old trek villains and the "Earth will be exploded!" or "Big bad ship that is bigger and badder than Enterprise" cliches. JJ is definitely a good director and makes very pretty visual movies. Dialogue/story could use improvement.

But I'm really just bitching, because overall I enjoyed both movies.

And hey, I'm interested to see JJ's take on the Borg. I hope they are menacing like Best of Both Worlds and not like ST:Voyager.



It would be interesting to see a total re-boot with similar concepts (warp/transporters) and races (klingons/vulcans) but totally different characters/motivations/world building.
Alex1939 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2013, 04:27 PM   #130
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Why did they bother...

CommishSleer wrote: View Post
King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
But would they only recognize Nimoy, or would anyone in the distinctive pointed ears, bowl cut and uniform garner the same recognition? Just like a guy with a blue suit, red cape and \S/ on their chest is Superman?
Its the Spock that was created after 79 episodes of TOS and maybe TAS and maybe some movies. At that stage it was Nimoy Spock.
Well, this is often a generational thing. As I've mentioned before, I was appalled to discover, decades ago, that my youngest brother thought that Roger Moore was the "real" James Bond. I was horrified at first (everybody knew that Connery was the one true Bond), but then I realized it made perfect sense from his perspective. My brother, who was seventeen years younger than me, had grown up on Moore just like I had grown up on Connery.

Trust me on this, ten years from now there will be an entire generation for whom Pine and Quinto are the "real" Kirk and Spock. That's just the way it works.

Heck, not long ago, people were horrified at idea of Universal remaking the "classic" Brendan Fraser version of THE MUMMY, which was, of course, at least the third remake of the 1932 Karloff version.
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2013, 04:30 PM   #131
TREK_GOD_1
Fleet Captain
 
TREK_GOD_1's Avatar
 
Location: Escaped from Delta Vega
Re: Why did they bother...

Admiral Buzzkill wrote: View Post
Mickey Mouse is more widely known in the world than anything associated with Star Trek, and he doesn't look or sound much like "Steamboat Willie." For that matter, the same is true of Superman - also better known than Kirk or Spock.
Poor examples. As cartoon and comic book characters, respectively, Mickey and Superman were subjected to numerous changes in their early years--there was no hardline, established look in the way the right actor immediately shapes a role with traits that are not always born of the screenwriter's pen. The Superman of Action Comics #1 was already altered by the time AC#6 or 7, where the "S" chest emblem took on a new look, alternated outline colors, along with the color of his cape emblem.

The same can be said of the early, radical changes in other comic & cartoon characters such as Batman or Bugs Bunny, where again, no early, hardline look/character was established--with effect--in the way of a live actor not only in voice, but appearance, as in Garland, Shatner and Nimoy.

To cite Karloff again, nevermind other, non-Universal productions hardly remembered, all one has to do is look at the younger Chaney's take in Ghost of Frankenstein, or Lugosi's in Frankenstein Meets The Wolf Man; gone was the established, Karloff heart of unique performance beneath the make-up which (in no minir way) turned the "monster" into a powerful cultural image starting in the film's decade of origin.

The only result of recasting was how often the public complained about the terrible, lumbering performances, still criticized (or disregarded) today.

If one must use the silly "icon" word, outside a certain local cultural set it's probably the iconography associated with the characters that's recognized, rather than the faces of the actors - Spock's ears, Superman's costume and "S" shield, the Enterprise (which is essentially identical in Abrams's films to every other version).
Spock's ears or the Enterprise do not replace the recognition of Shatner as Kirk, or the whole of Nimoy as the character, whether together or in solo images.

It is the actor's lightning-in-a-bottle shaping of a character which makes a cultural icon. They are not pick n'n swap parts like that found in so many reimagining/reboots to follow. The very reason the nuTrek actors--with all the money and marketing in the world--are not in the same position, two movies in.
__________________
"...to be like God, you have the power to make the world anything you want it to be."
TREK_GOD_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2013, 04:43 PM   #132
Belz...
Fleet Captain
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Location: In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
Re: Why did they bother...

Ryan8bit wrote: View Post
- Spock screaming "KHAAAAN" even though Khan wasn't responsible for Kirk's death, and then going on a rampage to hunt him down.
I think Khan is responsible. He's the one who fired on their ships and caused it to shut down, forcing Kirk to sacrifice his life. The Enterprise was already damaged, but it was still operating.
__________________
And that's my opinion.
Belz... is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2013, 06:40 PM   #133
sj4iy
Commander
 
sj4iy's Avatar
 
Location: US
Re: Why did they bother...

Admiral Buzzkill wrote: View Post
Mickey Mouse is more widely known in the world than anything associated with Star Trek, and he doesn't look or sound much like "Steamboat Willie." For that matter, the same is true of Superman - also better known than Kirk or Spock.

If one must use the silly "icon" word, outside a certain local cultural set it's probably the iconography associated with the characters that's recognized, rather than the faces of the actors - Spock's ears, Superman's costume and "S" shield, the Enterprise (which is essentially identical in Abrams's films to every other version).
Elmer Fudd started out as an offensive stereotype of a black man, but very few people even know about that today. Even though that was his "original" form, I don't see anyone arguing that he should be changed back to what he was, because it would not work in today's society (it didn't even work for very long after that cartoon was aired, and has been banned for a long time). Same with Kirk and Spock...their original characters don't fit into today's entertainment, and evolving them was the best thing to do. Example of the original Elmer Fudd.
sj4iy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2013, 06:42 PM   #134
beamMe
Fleet Captain
 
beamMe's Avatar
 
Location: Europa
Re: Why did they bother...

Belz... wrote: View Post
Ryan8bit wrote: View Post
- Spock screaming "KHAAAAN" even though Khan wasn't responsible for Kirk's death, and then going on a rampage to hunt him down.
I think Khan is responsible. He's the one who fired on their ships and caused it to shut down, forcing Kirk to sacrifice his life. The Enterprise was already damaged, but it was still operating.
I wanted to point that out to him.
beamMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2013, 06:47 PM   #135
RoJoHen
Awesome
 
RoJoHen's Avatar
 
Location: QC, IL, USA
Re: Why did they bother...

Besides, "ADMIRAL MARCUUUUUUUUSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!" doesn't have the same ring to it.
__________________
I am the Quintessential Admiral.
RoJoHen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.