RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,443
Posts: 5,507,611
Members: 25,133
Currently online: 446
Newest member: jokerone

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13

Sindicate Lager To Debut In The US Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 27 2013, 04:01 AM   #1201
TREK_GOD_1
Fleet Captain
 
TREK_GOD_1's Avatar
 
Location: Escaped from Delta Vega
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

Out Of My Vulcan Mind wrote: View Post
Fast & Furious 6 is doing great numbers. From Deadline:

Universalís Fast & Furious 6 opened day and date with the U.S. and Canada in 59 international territories and is breaking records. The studio says it opened #1 in every territory and is dominating the box office with 65% market share. Fridayís international gross is $36M at 8,583 dates for an early total of $90M. This is Universalís highest grossing Friday of all time and will be Universalís biggest overseas weekend by a large margin. The international total will be $169M though Sunday. Combined with the North American estimates of $96.2M, the three-day weekend worldwide total will be $265.2M.
At its base, a car race/crime film has more instant appeal than nu Trek.

Damn, that speaks volumes.
__________________
"...to be like God, you have the power to make the world anything you want it to be."
TREK_GOD_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 27 2013, 04:04 AM   #1202
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

TREK_GOD_1 wrote: View Post
At its base, a car race/crime film has more instant appeal than nu Trek.

Damn, that speaks volumes.
Nearly everyone owns a car. Not everyone owns a spaceship.
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 27 2013, 04:18 AM   #1203
Out Of My Vulcan Mind
Vice Admiral
 
Out Of My Vulcan Mind's Avatar
 
Location: Wherever you go, there you are.
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

TREK_GOD_1 wrote: View Post
At its base, a car race/crime film has more instant appeal than nu Trek.
They'll make similar amounts domestically, unless Fast & Furious 6 is significantly leggier than prior sequels in the franchise. It's in foreign markets that F&F 6 will make far more.
__________________
"I'll see you in another life, brother."
Out Of My Vulcan Mind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 27 2013, 04:20 AM   #1204
sj4iy
Commander
 
sj4iy's Avatar
 
Location: US
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

Out Of My Vulcan Mind wrote: View Post
TREK_GOD_1 wrote: View Post
At its base, a car race/crime film has more instant appeal than nu Trek.
They'll make similar amounts domestically, unless Fast & Furious 6 is significantly leggier than prior sequels in the franchise. It's in foreign markets that F&F 6 will make far more.
I don't get it, myself, but hey- whatever floats people's boats.
sj4iy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 27 2013, 04:25 AM   #1205
RollTide1017
Ensign
 
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

Flake wrote: View Post
I agree, they will keep the 3D

I just wonder if they film with a 3D camera like Avatar etc because that might save them some $? instead of converting 2d to 3d.
Shooting in 3D is actually more expensive then converting in post. Some of the reason are because the 3D cameras and lenses are more expensive to run, maintain and setup. It also takes more time to plan, prep and then execute a scene in 3D. There is also more to double check after each shot, to makes sure everything looks right which could lead to even more takes per scene if things go wrong. Basically, shooting in 3D is more time consuming which adds up to more dollars on a movie set.

It also adds more work and time for the special effects teams during post production, which again adds up to more money. It's just quicker and doesn't require as many extra steps to post convert a movie to 3D, which adds up to savings in a movie budget. This is why 3D converted movies are more common the ones shot in 3D.

The first thing to do to save money is to cut out the shooting in IMAX. STID used IMAX film cameras which are bigger, louder and eat through film like crazy. The film itself is a whole lot more expensive as well. Other reasons are very similar to shooting in 3D, prep time and execution time go up with IMAX cameras. Retakes just pile on the cost. Also, because IMAX cameras are so loud, it could cause more ADR to have to be done during post. Because of the higher resolution, special effects work takes longer to create and render. The whole IMAX process is very expensive and would be the first thing to go if I was trying to cut nuTrek 3's budget.

This is just a guess on my part but, I bet the IMAX box office gross doesn't even cover the cost of the IMAX shoot.
RollTide1017 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 27 2013, 04:58 AM   #1206
The Transformed Man
Commander
 
The Transformed Man's Avatar
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
View The Transformed Man's Twitter Profile
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

TREK_GOD_1 wrote: View Post
Out Of My Vulcan Mind wrote: View Post
Fast & Furious 6 is doing great numbers. From Deadline:

Universalís Fast & Furious 6 opened day and date with the U.S. and Canada in 59 international territories and is breaking records. The studio says it opened #1 in every territory and is dominating the box office with 65% market share. Fridayís international gross is $36M at 8,583 dates for an early total of $90M. This is Universalís highest grossing Friday of all time and will be Universalís biggest overseas weekend by a large margin. The international total will be $169M though Sunday. Combined with the North American estimates of $96.2M, the three-day weekend worldwide total will be $265.2M.
At its base, a car race/crime film has more instant appeal than Trek in general.

Damn, that speaks volumes.
Corrected that for you. No Trek film is EVER going to reach mass market appeal like films such as Fast & Furious, Transformers, Star Wars, Avengers or the like.


Yancy
__________________
I have no... precious time at all to spend... nor service to do, till you...
The Transformed Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 27 2013, 05:19 AM   #1207
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

The Transformed Man wrote: View Post
No Trek film is EVER going to reach mass market appeal like films such as Fast & Furious, Transformers, Star Wars, Avengers or the like.
Not that there is anything wrong with that.

Trek doesn't need to be a mega hit in order to be a success and get sequels.
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 27 2013, 05:35 AM   #1208
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

Flake wrote: View Post
ATM I think $230m North America and $200m Overseas for $430m total. The budget will definitely be cut down for the next one.
"Definitely" doesn't belong anywhere in that sentence - everything in it is pure speculation.

As long as we're playing though, I'll speculate that there will definitely be a third big budget Star Trek film produced for Paramount by Bad Robot and it will be released in 2016.

But then, who knows - I was wrong all year about the "Khan" thing...

TREK_GOD_1 wrote: View Post
At its base, a car race/crime film has more instant appeal than nu Trek.
Why would anyone expect anything different?

BTW, that might just as well read "Trek" as "nu Trek" - if something has more box office appeal than nuTrek, it automatically leaves oldTrek in the dust.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 27 2013, 07:11 AM   #1209
Roald
Commander
 
Location: Schiedam, the Netherlands
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

I really hope Paramount will analyse the possible reasons for the disappointing gross. Sure, it will make money, but I do think Paramount was really hoping for a hit on par with the Iron Mans, the Pirates, the Harry Potters...

The main problem I think, is that ST just doesn't have "The Name"... When people hear there's a new Iron Man playing, they go: 'Cool, I'll go and see that!'... Star Trek doesn't have "The Name" like that... I thought it did after 2009, but then Paramount waiting 4 (!) years to ride on that, and I think that's one of the main reasons for the "failure" of making something REALLY big...

Another problem is the whole "who's the villain?" marketing... Looking back, I think it really didn't work... When the 'bigger audience' got wind of the fact that a villain from the 'old ST lore' was involved, I think it pushed people away instead of creating a sincere interest. I think many people thought: 'Well, I don't know any old ST villains... I guess you need foreknowledge to really enjoy this film, so I think I'll pass...'

I love the fact that JJ somehow made this films fit into the existing canon, but I think it stands in the way now... I think that true stand alone films that require no knowledge of old Trek would be far more succesful...

Though the truth is, I really don't want that. Again, I love the idea that Trek since 1966 all the way to STID is connected, is part of an established canon... But it does backfire when it comes to attracting large crowds...

I think for the next film, we should really just go to some exotic alien world, where the villain is not this one guy bent on revenge or whatever, but rather an animalistic, creepy alien race or something... I think something like 'Pitch Black meets The Galileo Seven'... I really think it could work...
Roald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 27 2013, 07:57 AM   #1210
indranee
Vice Admiral
 
indranee's Avatar
 
Location: Warrrrrrrrrshington, DC
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

RAMA wrote: View Post
Flake wrote: View Post
ATM I think $230m North America and $200m Overseas for $430m total. The budget will definitely be cut down for the next one. First change I think would be to film with a 3D camera instead of converting from 2D and more sets indoors with greenscreen instead of outdoors.

They will also reduce the Overseas marketing budget because I think they went the extra mile overseas but have not got massive gains however perhaps the people they hooked with this movie will stick around for the next one. Overseas might benefit more if the release date is changed to March, April or late July/early August because of less competition.

I think they hoped for an $500-600m with this movie but it hasn't materialised, they do however know roughly what the ceiling is now and can budget appropriately.

A little less time between movies and 50th anniverary hoopla, and we'll hit $500 million plus for the next one. We won't know the final international tally till maybe late September.

RAMA
Also, the constant "dark, dark, DAAAAAARK" hoopla in the promo didn't help. People don't wanna see Star Trek with dark undertones in it during summer blockbuster season.

Thankfully, the movie itself is not JUST "dark". Plenty of humor, bright spots and charm.

Btw, I went to see it with a non-trekkie friend today who's been waiting to see it with me. She was totally unspoiled, kind of a Cumberbatch fan (not the obsessed kind). We went to the Udvar-Hazy IMAX theater. HUMONGOUS crowd. Literally thousands of people. All kinds of people. Little ones (even some babies, ugh, poor things!), big ones, medium ones. A good mix of the genders.

We'd reserved tix earlier so we were able to get into the 4:30 show. The show was sold out (they announced that) and we could literally TASTE the anticipation in the theater. This was my 2nd time (first time on IMAX). I'll be going tomorrow to either a 3D or a 2D with my brother and niece. Brother is an avowed non-Trekkie and niece is a dyed-in-the-wool Trekkie. I'll watch it one more time in 2D and then write a review on the grading thread.

Oh, funny story: On the way out today, I heard (right behind me) someone (I think a dad or an uncle or an older brother) ask a younger dude: So did you like it?

Younger dude: Yeah! It was really good!

Dad: See? Not every good movie has to be Transformers!

indranee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 27 2013, 08:47 AM   #1211
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

Rth's numbers for Sunday

sunday looking like

FF6 26-27.2m,Stid 12.5-13,THO3 12-12.5,Epic 10,IM3 6.4,TGG 4.5
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 27 2013, 09:03 AM   #1212
Roald
Commander
 
Location: Schiedam, the Netherlands
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

indranee wrote: View Post
Also, the constant "dark, dark, DAAAAAARK" hoopla in the promo didn't help. People don't wanna see Star Trek with dark undertones in it during summer blockbuster season.
Very true... The promotional artwork was very populistic, very 'Dark Knight'-like... And WHY..? Did Paramount really think that conveyed the film well..? STID is such a fun, entertaining film, and we have these posters of doom and destruction, as if they're promoting a totally different film... Looking back, I think Into Darkness, -albeit being a very cool one-, is a teribble title for the film... It does not reflect the spirit nor tone of the film, and ends up trying to be too cool, too hip...
Roald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 27 2013, 10:44 AM   #1213
Phily B
Fleet Captain
 
Phily B's Avatar
 
Location: United Kingdom
View Phily B's Twitter Profile
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

I think the movies lack any big name actors too tbh.
Phily B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 27 2013, 11:00 AM   #1214
Roald
Commander
 
Location: Schiedam, the Netherlands
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

Phily B wrote: View Post
I think the movies lack any big name actors too tbh.
It is a factor, yes. There were rumours once that Jack Black might be playing Harry Mudd in the ST sequel, and I thought that would be a very good move... Just like Paramount's idea in the '80's to involve Eddie Murphy in Star Trek IV, I think that would have been brilliant...

Benedict performance is great of course, but who knows; if they had tried to get an 'big name' things would have better commercially...
Roald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 27 2013, 11:51 AM   #1215
throwback
Captain
 
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

One film did reach a general audience. That film was Star Trek IV.

This was the cinematic trailer for Star Trek IV.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfts9WLXINE

This was one of the official three trailers for this film:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAEkuVgt6Aw

The older film set out the film's story in a few sentences, while showing some of the key moments of the film. A general viewer of the new film couldn't tell you what the film was about in a few sentences. It was a sequence of events.
throwback is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.